Notice: You have been identified as a bot, so no internal UID will be assigned to you. If you are a real person messing with your useragent, you should change it back to something normal.
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 45 seconds later[^][v]#715,826
Its's your're
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 3 minutes after the original post[^][v]#715,829
I'm going to guess it is because you're not naming the owner, so the rule doesn't apply. I'm pleased this convention exists because otherwise you wouldn't be able to differentiate from the contraction of "it is".
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 34 seconds later, 3 minutes after the original post[^][v]#715,830
I think it is.
Sophie !MLHqI35Srs joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 17 seconds later, 4 minutes after the original post[^][v]#715,831
"It is" is already an abbreviation, "it's".
Its' could have been an alternative but it too has a meaning: when the it in question refers to a collective noun or plural noun.
Its, as a plural, is so rare that it can reliably be replaced with a possessive function.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 18 seconds later, 4 minutes after the original post[^][v]#715,832
@715,829 (C) > I'm pleased
Would you say you are chuffed?
Anonymous C replied with this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 7 minutes after the original post[^][v]#715,834
@previous (A)
Pretty much, yes. I have been since this morning.