Topic: Fuckalms - I have a question about some of the things you have been writing about the MC mods on TC.
Anonymous A started this discussion 10 years ago #55,269
When Frank took TC down you came crawling over here and bored everyone with your pictures and stupid shit about silly video games which no middle aged man should be playing. You would also pretend like you hadn't spent years laughing at MC users and mods on Tinychan.
Now that TC is back up however I notice that every single day your board is almost nothing but attacks on the integrity of the Minichan moderators. Posts about the (here I quote) "pedo-enabling policies of MC mods" (that's from today) are becoming commonplace.
Why are you attacking the Minichan moderators like this? That's pretty two-faced you know, after they took you in when Frank made you homeless.
Now that TC is back up however I notice that every single day your board is almost nothing but attacks on the integrity of the Minichan moderators. Posts about the (here I quote) "pedo-enabling policies of MC mods" (that's from today) are becoming commonplace.
Why are you attacking the Minichan moderators like this? That's pretty two-faced you know, after they took you in when Frank made you homeless.
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 10 minutes later[^] [v] #715,541
> being this obsessed
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 13 minutes later, 24 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #715,550
> homeless
you taking this shit too seriously
you taking this shit too seriously
FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 23 minutes later, 47 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #715,556
For a fact-checker, you sure don't know much about TC or MC, or myself, or anything besides the Bible, apparently. Might I suggest doing a search for "FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI"?
(Edited 37 seconds later.)
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 7 minutes later, 55 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #715,559
@previous (FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI)
OP is having a Jesus please save me from hell moment. If only his mother had treated him with kindness instead of hate.
OP is having a Jesus please save me from hell moment. If only his mother had treated him with kindness instead of hate.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 28 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #715,568
@715,556 (FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI)
Quit bullshitting, middle-aged virgin boy. But ok, since you're here, let's test your defense - are you saying now, unequivocaly, that you do not agree with the sentiments posted by Anon A in this thread, that the MC mods are Matt-sucking pedophile-enablers (coming from you that last part is hilarious) -
https://tinychan.org/topic/45500
A simple yes or no, do you distance yourself from the claims in those posts? Answer in your own name, stop with the anon shit.
Quit bullshitting, middle-aged virgin boy. But ok, since you're here, let's test your defense - are you saying now, unequivocaly, that you do not agree with the sentiments posted by Anon A in this thread, that the MC mods are Matt-sucking pedophile-enablers (coming from you that last part is hilarious) -
https://tinychan.org/topic/45500
A simple yes or no, do you distance yourself from the claims in those posts? Answer in your own name, stop with the anon shit.
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 41 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #715,581
You need a new hobby, OP.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #715,582
Anonymous F replied with this 10 years ago, 9 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #715,583
@previous (A)
Okay then, ask a mod to confirm if you're so sure I'm FuckAlms. I give full permission to do this.
Okay then, ask a mod to confirm if you're so sure I'm FuckAlms. I give full permission to do this.
Meowth joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #715,585
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #715,587
Anonymous F replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #715,588
Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #715,590
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #715,591
Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 10 years ago, 19 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #715,592
Anonymous A (OP) triple-posted this 10 years ago, 8 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #715,593
@715,590 (H)
> So, are you the butthurt crybaby mentioned in the topic?
We seem to have skipped 'Anon G' in this thread Fuckalms. Can I ask you again to answer under your own name instead of this raging barrage of anon accounts.
> So, are you the butthurt crybaby mentioned in the topic?
We seem to have skipped 'Anon G' in this thread Fuckalms. Can I ask you again to answer under your own name instead of this raging barrage of anon accounts.
Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #715,594
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #715,595
Anonymous I replied with this 10 years ago, 5 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #715,600
@previous (A)
It looks like time to take a break from the internet again. You seem confused and afraid of anonymity
It looks like time to take a break from the internet again. You seem confused and afraid of anonymity
Anonymous H replied with this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #715,602
@715,592 (A)
Mods may confirm that I'm not Fuckalms.
@715,593 (A)
And, just for the record, I posted the topic on TC calling you a butthurt crybaby.
Mods may confirm that I'm not Fuckalms.
@715,593 (A)
And, just for the record, I posted the topic on TC calling you a butthurt crybaby.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 4 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #715,604
Anonymous I replied with this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #715,605
@715,602 (H)
For a board that has a couple of trannys and sissy boys, being the biggest butthurt crybaby is quite an accomplishment
For a board that has a couple of trannys and sissy boys, being the biggest butthurt crybaby is quite an accomplishment
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #715,606
Anonymous I replied with this 10 years ago, 5 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #715,608
@previous (A)
> You seem confused and afraid of anonymity
Maybe anonymous message board trigger you too much, poor little guy, getting all upset about big meanie poopy pants saying bad words
> You seem confused and afraid of anonymity
Maybe anonymous message board trigger you too much, poor little guy, getting all upset about big meanie poopy pants saying bad words
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 7 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #715,621
roar joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #715,624
why isn't my report being dealt with?
adam djensen double-posted this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #715,626
roar replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #715,632
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #715,635
@715,608 (I)
> Maybe anonymous message board trigger you too much
"People who post anon on these boards aren't worth listening to" - Fuckalms, posting under his own name.
Kinda fucked yourself there, middle-aged virgin boy ;)
> Maybe anonymous message board trigger you too much
"People who post anon on these boards aren't worth listening to" - Fuckalms, posting under his own name.
Kinda fucked yourself there, middle-aged virgin boy ;)
Anonymous H replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #715,637
Anonymous I replied with this 10 years ago, 45 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #715,638
@715,635 (A)
Do you shed tears at the thought that not every anon is the object of your affection though? Do you then make more topics about fuckalms and how mad you are?
Do you shed tears at the thought that not every anon is the object of your affection though? Do you then make more topics about fuckalms and how mad you are?
Anonymous H replied with this 10 years ago, 4 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #715,640
Anonymous K joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 37 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #715,642
Anonymous I replied with this 10 years ago, 5 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #715,643
Anonymous I double-posted this 10 years ago, 22 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #715,644
Anonymous F replied with this 10 years ago, 30 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #715,645
@715,635 (A)
You are a virgin, Dave. Nobody would want to fuck your on account of your excruciating personality.
You are a virgin, Dave. Nobody would want to fuck your on account of your excruciating personality.
Anonymous I replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #715,649
Anonymous H replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #715,650
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #715,655
@715,637 (H)
@715,638 (I)
@715,640 (H)
@715,645 (F)
@715,649 (I)
@previous (H)
@715,621 (A)
> Answer in your own name, stop with the anon shit.
@715,638 (I)
@715,640 (H)
@715,645 (F)
@715,649 (I)
@previous (H)
@715,621 (A)
> Answer in your own name, stop with the anon shit.
Anonymous F replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #715,659
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #715,662
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 7 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #715,670
Please try to play nice! Thanks.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 22 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #715,682
@previous (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
Will do! Sorry for any unpleasantness, I'll do my part to reign it in. I have another question for Fuckalms though, so I'll post it here if you don't mind to save making another thread -
Yo Fuckalms, what do you think about this thread just posted on your board in which the Minichan moderators are called "fake faggots" who protect pedophiles...
https://tinychan.org/topic/45509
Why are you turning your board into that kind of place yet again after all MC did for you when you had noplace else to go?
Will do! Sorry for any unpleasantness, I'll do my part to reign it in. I have another question for Fuckalms though, so I'll post it here if you don't mind to save making another thread -
Yo Fuckalms, what do you think about this thread just posted on your board in which the Minichan moderators are called "fake faggots" who protect pedophiles...
https://tinychan.org/topic/45509
Why are you turning your board into that kind of place yet again after all MC did for you when you had noplace else to go?
悟 replied with this 10 years ago, 57 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #715,685
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 6 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #715,686
悟 replied with this 10 years ago, 40 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #715,688
Anonymous H replied with this 10 years ago, 9 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #715,690
@715,682 (A)
I made that topic too, you whining little fag. Why don't you address your questions to me?
I made that topic too, you whining little fag. Why don't you address your questions to me?
Anonymous B replied with this 10 years ago, 10 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #715,693
Dave's a sad little cunt. Can't get laid so he masturbates to kids all day. Still lives in moms basement, under that single dull lightbulb.
Will he ever get a life?
I doubt it.
Will he ever get a life?
I doubt it.
悟 replied with this 10 years ago, 4 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #715,694
beckyderp !Hi.HILLARY joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 30 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #715,695
dongs
FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI replied with this 10 years ago, 56 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #715,701
loldaveAnonymous F replied with this 10 years ago, 34 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #715,710
Syntax replied with this 10 years ago, 12 hours later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #715,861
So OP says
> "People who post anon on these boards aren't worth listening to"
I think you made your best point and 4got that you in your own words are
> Not worth listening to
> "People who post anon on these boards aren't worth listening to"
I think you made your best point and 4got that you in your own words are
> Not worth listening to
(Edited 24 seconds later.)
Metæ joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 1 hour later, 22 hours after the original post[^] [v] #715,899
I just took a look at TC and I count four Matt threads on the Bumps page. That's nearly 10% threads about Matt. You should delete them.
FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI replied with this 10 years ago, 44 minutes later, 23 hours after the original post[^] [v] #715,920
@previous (Metæ)
Although unnecessarily redundant posts, there's no rule against mocking someone when you can provide evidence that they are unsavory people.
dave spoiler: the key word here is evidence, something which you have never provided in the face of countless requests
Although unnecessarily redundant posts, there's no rule against mocking someone when you can provide evidence that they are unsavory people.
dave spoiler: the key word here is evidence, something which you have never provided in the face of countless requests
Metæ replied with this 10 years ago, 6 minutes later, 23 hours after the original post[^] [v] #715,925
@previous (FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI)
Right, yeah Matt sucks he's a pedo, open leg vulva, etc, etc, etc but I thought you wanted to make a chan free of Matt.
I mean I guess what I've been getting at is the anti-Matt shit is the same shit I've seen for six years now. There's nothing new.
Right, yeah Matt sucks he's a pedo, open leg vulva, etc, etc, etc but I thought you wanted to make a chan free of Matt.
I mean I guess what I've been getting at is the anti-Matt shit is the same shit I've seen for six years now. There's nothing new.
(Edited 54 seconds later.)
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 5 minutes later, 23 hours after the original post[^] [v] #715,931
@715,920 (FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI)
> Although unnecessarily redundant posts, there's no rule against mocking someone when you can provide evidence that they are unsavory people.
>
> dave spoiler: the key word here is evidence, something which you have never provided in the face of countless requests
Does being a racist count as being an "unsavory" person Fuckalms? If so, then why did you allow thread after thread after thread containing nothing but 'jokes' about "niggers"?
> Although unnecessarily redundant posts, there's no rule against mocking someone when you can provide evidence that they are unsavory people.
>
> dave spoiler: the key word here is evidence, something which you have never provided in the face of countless requests
Does being a racist count as being an "unsavory" person Fuckalms? If so, then why did you allow thread after thread after thread containing nothing but 'jokes' about "niggers"?
FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI replied with this 10 years ago, 7 seconds later, 23 hours after the original post[^] [v] #715,932
@715,925 (Metæ)
As long as they keep it in their threads and don't take up a third of the front page with it, it's fine. When every other post is "sup MAtt" "[insert bodily function here]" etc it's problematic.
Personally, I'd prefer if people didn't mention it at all, but I'd rather have a little of that than what you guys have been dealing with for 6 years.
As long as they keep it in their threads and don't take up a third of the front page with it, it's fine. When every other post is "sup MAtt" "[insert bodily function here]" etc it's problematic.
Personally, I'd prefer if people didn't mention it at all, but I'd rather have a little of that than what you guys have been dealing with for 6 years.
(Edited 4 minutes later.)
Metæ replied with this 10 years ago, 5 minutes later, 23 hours after the original post[^] [v] #715,937
@previous (FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI)
But I mean, like, even if Matt's banned what's the point if 10% of the threads are about him six years after he was permabanned?
But I mean, like, even if Matt's banned what's the point if 10% of the threads are about him six years after he was permabanned?
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 23 hours after the original post[^] [v] #715,938
@715,920 (FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI)
Also, as unsavory as Matt is, why do you consider it ok to allow pictures of his relatives to be mocked on your website? Make fun of Matt by all means but aren't you now 'unsavory' by bringing people like his grandmother into it?
Yoo may reply that Matt doesn't care, but isn't the whole point of your argument that you are morally 'better' than him?
Also, as unsavory as Matt is, why do you consider it ok to allow pictures of his relatives to be mocked on your website? Make fun of Matt by all means but aren't you now 'unsavory' by bringing people like his grandmother into it?
Yoo may reply that Matt doesn't care, but isn't the whole point of your argument that you are morally 'better' than him?
FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI replied with this 10 years ago, 12 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #715,940
@715,937 (Metæ)
Cross-pollination. As long as he's still relevant somewhere in our corner of the internet, it'll continue to pop up on TC as secondhand news. I can't from a point of authority tell people not to talk about him without achieving the opposite effect. The declaration has to come from the collective community to have any long-term success.
Cross-pollination. As long as he's still relevant somewhere in our corner of the internet, it'll continue to pop up on TC as secondhand news. I can't from a point of authority tell people not to talk about him without achieving the opposite effect. The declaration has to come from the collective community to have any long-term success.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 2 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #716,005
What a surprise. This is why you're not respected as a mod, Fuckalms. When questioned, you avoid it and deflect onto a different theme.
I'll ask you again - is being racist and shitposting over and over again about "niggers" 'unsavory' to you, Fuckalms?
And is posting offensive pictures of somebody's dead grandmother 'unsavory' to you? Even your buddy Kook objects to that, and yet you keep on allowing it and supporting it.
You condemn Matt for being a morally-bankrupt piece of shit, and yet look at yourself you hypocritical little cunt.
I'll ask you again - is being racist and shitposting over and over again about "niggers" 'unsavory' to you, Fuckalms?
And is posting offensive pictures of somebody's dead grandmother 'unsavory' to you? Even your buddy Kook objects to that, and yet you keep on allowing it and supporting it.
You condemn Matt for being a morally-bankrupt piece of shit, and yet look at yourself you hypocritical little cunt.
Anonymous I replied with this 10 years ago, 5 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #716,007
@715,940 (FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI)
Some people just like to be upset. It's funny watching the impotent arm flailing butthurt
Some people just like to be upset. It's funny watching the impotent arm flailing butthurt
kook !!OPZbEQMT1 joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 14 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #716,013
Anonymous I replied with this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #716,015
kook !!OPZbEQMT1 replied with this 10 years ago, 33 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #716,016
Anonymous I replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #716,017
@previous (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)
It's likely he commissions them. I wonder what the going rate for a dead family member in a sexual pose is
It's likely he commissions them. I wonder what the going rate for a dead family member in a sexual pose is
Anonymous P joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 23 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #716,029
Leave FuckAlms alone you little bitch cunt nigger. You bet I'm defending HER character
Anonymous H replied with this 10 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #716,046
@716,005 (A)
STFU. Matt's a fucking pedophile who was caught requesting child porn from a minor. He's a fucking sex criminal. He deserves everything he gets.
STFU. Matt's a fucking pedophile who was caught requesting child porn from a minor. He's a fucking sex criminal. He deserves everything he gets.
FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI replied with this 10 years ago, 26 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #716,052
@716,005 (A)
Sorry, I was busy having a genuine dialog with someone who isn't a flailing asshat.
You see, Tinychania isn't a nanny state. People aren't told what to think and say. As long as they aren't causing problems for the site or violating international law, they are allowed to express their opinions and ideas as they wish, and if another user has an objection, they have tools at their disposal to hide offending content, or they may choose to take up debate with the offending poster and try to change their mind.
I would also like to remind you that this is just the internet, and you should take your own advice and not take everything so seriously. It's bad for your health.
Sorry, I was busy having a genuine dialog with someone who isn't a flailing asshat.
You see, Tinychania isn't a nanny state. People aren't told what to think and say. As long as they aren't causing problems for the site or violating international law, they are allowed to express their opinions and ideas as they wish, and if another user has an objection, they have tools at their disposal to hide offending content, or they may choose to take up debate with the offending poster and try to change their mind.
I would also like to remind you that this is just the internet, and you should take your own advice and not take everything so seriously. It's bad for your health.
Anonymous P replied with this 10 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #716,071
Anonymous Q joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 11 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #716,076
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 12 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #716,232
@716,052 (FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI)
> You see, Tinychania isn't a nanny state. People aren't told what to think and say. As long as they aren't causing problems for the site or violating international law, they are allowed to express their opinions and ideas as they wish
Yet again you've re-written your OWN argument.
You say Matt is banned because he is an "unsavory" character. You said nothing about "international law" (as if by the way some fucking retard like you has even the first clue what that is), you said he is banned because what he posts is, to you, "unsavory". Yes? We clear up to this point?
Ok. So then AGAIN I ask - posting about wanting "niggers" to die is not an aspect of an "unsavory character" to you? That's fine to you, people should just ignore it if they can't handle 'free speech'? (this from the guy who bans absolutely everyone who laughs at him)
Look, clearly you're just going to keep on dodging the question. Whatever. The fact is this - if it's something YOU personally agree with (racism, pedophilia) you have no problem with it, it's all about free speech blah blah blah, but if it's something you DON'T agree with (laughing at you) it gets banned for being'unsavory'.
After all, you banned me for laughing at Louie the Racist. Did I violate 'international laws' then, Fuckalms? Where was your love of "free speech and if people don't like it they can block" bullshit then?
You're a fucking hypocrite, and don't think that just because one or two TC anons defend you on here it doesn't mean that most people don't think you're a little racist pedophile piece of shit.
> You see, Tinychania isn't a nanny state. People aren't told what to think and say. As long as they aren't causing problems for the site or violating international law, they are allowed to express their opinions and ideas as they wish
Yet again you've re-written your OWN argument.
You say Matt is banned because he is an "unsavory" character. You said nothing about "international law" (as if by the way some fucking retard like you has even the first clue what that is), you said he is banned because what he posts is, to you, "unsavory". Yes? We clear up to this point?
Ok. So then AGAIN I ask - posting about wanting "niggers" to die is not an aspect of an "unsavory character" to you? That's fine to you, people should just ignore it if they can't handle 'free speech'? (this from the guy who bans absolutely everyone who laughs at him)
Look, clearly you're just going to keep on dodging the question. Whatever. The fact is this - if it's something YOU personally agree with (racism, pedophilia) you have no problem with it, it's all about free speech blah blah blah, but if it's something you DON'T agree with (laughing at you) it gets banned for being'unsavory'.
After all, you banned me for laughing at Louie the Racist. Did I violate 'international laws' then, Fuckalms? Where was your love of "free speech and if people don't like it they can block" bullshit then?
You're a fucking hypocrite, and don't think that just because one or two TC anons defend you on here it doesn't mean that most people don't think you're a little racist pedophile piece of shit.
Anonymous R joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 9 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #716,236
@previous (A)
Dave or however you want to be addressed. What is your real point? I think its all about you ending up banned. Do you think all or any of your arguments are going to get FuckAlms to unban you?
Good luck, but honestly I cannot see why she would lift a finger to help you. All she can do at this point is continue to embarrass you. Perhaps you are into some form of BDSM and you want her to continue to slap the shit out of you.?
She is not going to let you back in. Once I helped someone banned from TC. Got them unbanned. I regret that.
Dave or however you want to be addressed. What is your real point? I think its all about you ending up banned. Do you think all or any of your arguments are going to get FuckAlms to unban you?
Good luck, but honestly I cannot see why she would lift a finger to help you. All she can do at this point is continue to embarrass you. Perhaps you are into some form of BDSM and you want her to continue to slap the shit out of you.?
She is not going to let you back in. Once I helped someone banned from TC. Got them unbanned. I regret that.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 42 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #716,267
@previous (R)
> What is your real point?
The 'real point' is exactly as stated. Why does Fuckalms allow endless shitposting by racists and pedophiles on his board ("cuz free speech!"), but anyone who objects to it gets banned?
Simple enough for you?
> What is your real point?
The 'real point' is exactly as stated. Why does Fuckalms allow endless shitposting by racists and pedophiles on his board ("cuz free speech!"), but anyone who objects to it gets banned?
Simple enough for you?
悟 replied with this 10 years ago, 6 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #716,272
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #716,274
@previous (悟)
Don't let it bother you so much is my advice.
To answer your question though, I don't like racist pedophiles, so I don't let Fuckalms pull his little 'wrongly-accused' act. Go ask Frank to send you his messages to Fuckalms and tell me you still think he's some harmless little 27 year old awkward virgin.
Don't let it bother you so much is my advice.
To answer your question though, I don't like racist pedophiles, so I don't let Fuckalms pull his little 'wrongly-accused' act. Go ask Frank to send you his messages to Fuckalms and tell me you still think he's some harmless little 27 year old awkward virgin.
Anonymous F replied with this 10 years ago, 12 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #716,276
@716,272 (悟)
I think it's been going on longer than that. Like two years?
For Dave, this is a hobby. Hassling FuckAlms is what he does in his downtime. It's creepy.
I think it's been going on longer than that. Like two years?
For Dave, this is a hobby. Hassling FuckAlms is what he does in his downtime. It's creepy.
悟 replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #716,279
kook !!OPZbEQMT1 replied with this 10 years ago, 30 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #716,280
Anonymous S joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #716,296
@716,236 (R)
> don't think that just because one or two TC anons defend you on here it doesn't mean that most people don't think you're a little racist pedophile piece of shit.
While I agree that FuckAlms has protected certain posters in the past, I think most TC regulars genuinely like her. There's week old topics on the front page nowadays so I don't think deleting new topics is a priority, even if they're about matt and repetitive.
> don't think that just because one or two TC anons defend you on here it doesn't mean that most people don't think you're a little racist pedophile piece of shit.
While I agree that FuckAlms has protected certain posters in the past, I think most TC regulars genuinely like her. There's week old topics on the front page nowadays so I don't think deleting new topics is a priority, even if they're about matt and repetitive.
FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI replied with this 10 years ago, 55 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #716,302
@716,236 (R)
He has no real point, he's just repeating the same old post in new arrangements.
@716,272 (悟)
2+ years
@716,280 (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)
because he knows nobody would believe him since he was banned for writing pedo stories about me and The Doctor and claiming they were "parodies". apparently in his mind, banning and removing pedophilic content constitutes behavior that is supportive of pedophiles. yet, not banning and removing racist opinions is also considered to be supportive behavior. seems like everything is supportive behavior in his world.
He has no real point, he's just repeating the same old post in new arrangements.
@716,272 (悟)
2+ years
@716,280 (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)
because he knows nobody would believe him since he was banned for writing pedo stories about me and The Doctor and claiming they were "parodies". apparently in his mind, banning and removing pedophilic content constitutes behavior that is supportive of pedophiles. yet, not banning and removing racist opinions is also considered to be supportive behavior. seems like everything is supportive behavior in his world.
Syntax replied with this 10 years ago, 33 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #716,311
@previous (FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI)Ah 1st I need to expose myself as Anon R
I wood have thought my comment about helping to get bert back in, with my pleas via IRC to a compadre of yours wood give me away to OP
OP you need to no I as well was not and is not pleased about the ''Former amount of N Word content but I do notice the new TC has far far less of that now.
Although I cut myself off from the Jewish Religion, I am also not so much a fan of Jew hate -
All that said I fully support USA freedom of expression and of course the limits like yelling fire in a crowded place. So Dave is guilty of pedophilic content. Damn sperl check had me search for Pedophilic and now that is part of my sperl checker. OP the real bottom line ends up me as user of TC for a long time under multiple monikers - 4-5 years ago it was wtf?
Anyway I wood rather see the racist shit rather than have freedom of expression removed and removing pedo shit even in text form is a good thing for the community at large
That is it for me - Work is done done done and I will be out of town tomorrow and hope you dave and all here enjoy all that the rest of 2day and 2morrow will bring ye
ZoooOOOoooOOOOOOOOooooM-------------------------------------------------------------------->
Anonymous T joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 1 hour later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #716,321
@716,302 (FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI)
I remember the screen shots of his posting history lol! Every topic about pedophilia or the doctor or both. Someone shooped Chris Hanson onto it and he has never lived it down. Please post it itt
I remember the screen shots of his posting history lol! Every topic about pedophilia or the doctor or both. Someone shooped Chris Hanson onto it and he has never lived it down. Please post it itt
brie !kGoudaMCFA joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 22 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #716,329
悟 replied with this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #716,332
@716,311 (Syntax)
> Ah 1st I need to expose myself as Anon R
> I wood have thought my comment about helping to get bert back in, with my pleas via IRC to a compadre of yours wood give me away to OP
>
> OP you need to no I as well was not and is not pleased about the ''Former amount of N Word content but I do notice the new TC has far far less of that now.
> Although I cut myself off from the Jewish Religion, I am also not so much a fan of Jew hate -
>
> All that said I fully support USA freedom of expression and of course the limits like yelling fire in a crowded place. So Dave is guilty of pedophilic content. Damn sperl check had me search for Pedophilic and now that is part of my sperl checker. OP the real bottom line ends up me as user of TC for a long time under multiple monikers - 4-5 years ago it was wtf?
>
> Anyway I wood rather see the racist shit rather than have freedom of expression removed and removing pedo shit even in text form is a good thing for the community at large
>
> That is it for me - Work is done done done and I will be out of town tomorrow and hope you dave and all here enjoy all that the rest of 2day and 2morrow will bring ye
>
>
> ZoooOOOoooOOOOOOOOooooM-------------------------------------------------------------------->
wow! controversial
> Ah 1st I need to expose myself as Anon R
> I wood have thought my comment about helping to get bert back in, with my pleas via IRC to a compadre of yours wood give me away to OP
>
> OP you need to no I as well was not and is not pleased about the ''Former amount of N Word content but I do notice the new TC has far far less of that now.
> Although I cut myself off from the Jewish Religion, I am also not so much a fan of Jew hate -
>
> All that said I fully support USA freedom of expression and of course the limits like yelling fire in a crowded place. So Dave is guilty of pedophilic content. Damn sperl check had me search for Pedophilic and now that is part of my sperl checker. OP the real bottom line ends up me as user of TC for a long time under multiple monikers - 4-5 years ago it was wtf?
>
> Anyway I wood rather see the racist shit rather than have freedom of expression removed and removing pedo shit even in text form is a good thing for the community at large
>
> That is it for me - Work is done done done and I will be out of town tomorrow and hope you dave and all here enjoy all that the rest of 2day and 2morrow will bring ye
>
>
> ZoooOOOoooOOOOOOOOooooM-------------------------------------------------------------------->
wow! controversial
beckyderp !Hi.HILLARY replied with this 10 years ago, 1 hour later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #716,336
Anonymous H replied with this 10 years ago, 3 hours later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #716,370
@716,274 (A)
You're a fucktard, Dave. Apart from a few posts criticizing Obama, there are literally no racist topics on TC's front page at this time. Your argument is a load of shit.
You're a fucktard, Dave. Apart from a few posts criticizing Obama, there are literally no racist topics on TC's front page at this time. Your argument is a load of shit.
Sheila LaBoof joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 1 hour later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #716,378
PENIS PSENSIS PENIS
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 5 hours later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #716,405
@716,302 (FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI)
> He has no real point, he's just repeating the same old post in new arrangements.
It's a post that would only need to be made once if you would stop dodging it and address the question.
Posting very cruel images of Matt's dead relatives and also posting about how "niggers" should be killed = fine to you. Free speech, 'if you don't like it block it', etc.
Posting literally ONE message laughing at Louie who made those posts = banned by you.
Again, you can get your 2 TC anons to divert the theme all you want Fuckalms, but you're a fucking hypocrite and every board you moderate becomes a fucking wasteland as a result of that.
> He has no real point, he's just repeating the same old post in new arrangements.
It's a post that would only need to be made once if you would stop dodging it and address the question.
Posting very cruel images of Matt's dead relatives and also posting about how "niggers" should be killed = fine to you. Free speech, 'if you don't like it block it', etc.
Posting literally ONE message laughing at Louie who made those posts = banned by you.
Again, you can get your 2 TC anons to divert the theme all you want Fuckalms, but you're a fucking hypocrite and every board you moderate becomes a fucking wasteland as a result of that.
Anonymous T replied with this 10 years ago, 10 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #716,409
@previous (A)I found your profile page that was leaked. It's no wonder you are generally disliked everywhere you post and regularly banned. Maybe you can go follow the doctor around the internet or something
You seem easily obsessed, mostly with pedophilia though
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 30 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #716,412
@previous (T)
> I found your profile page that was leaked.
Nice "I'm not obsessed, honest!" post bud.
As I wrote in the other thread, those threads are not mine, I have never once dropped my uid, and the mods of this site can verify that. Fuckalms has built himself a defense mechanism whereby every person who criticizes him he labels under the same name and attributes every post to that name. He's pretty much admitted to this in the past ("Dave is a general name I use..." etc)
Yet again you divert the question away from him.
> I found your profile page that was leaked.
Nice "I'm not obsessed, honest!" post bud.
As I wrote in the other thread, those threads are not mine, I have never once dropped my uid, and the mods of this site can verify that. Fuckalms has built himself a defense mechanism whereby every person who criticizes him he labels under the same name and attributes every post to that name. He's pretty much admitted to this in the past ("Dave is a general name I use..." etc)
Yet again you divert the question away from him.
Anonymous T replied with this 10 years ago, 9 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #716,413
@previous (A)
Nope. That's you. It's the same tired old story from you all the time. You just can't leave it alone, you can't take a step back and reflect on yourself and what you are doing, and you get really, really butthurt when you bet banned. Like lose your mind obsessed for years over it.
As soon as the doctor started posting here you followed him around like a lost puppy nipping at his heels, then when he left you just turned it towards fuckalms again. You won't give up until you are banned from here too.
Nope. That's you. It's the same tired old story from you all the time. You just can't leave it alone, you can't take a step back and reflect on yourself and what you are doing, and you get really, really butthurt when you bet banned. Like lose your mind obsessed for years over it.
As soon as the doctor started posting here you followed him around like a lost puppy nipping at his heels, then when he left you just turned it towards fuckalms again. You won't give up until you are banned from here too.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 1 hour later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #716,416
悟 replied with this 10 years ago, 5 hours later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #716,482
Anonymous F replied with this 10 years ago, 9 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #716,487
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 2 hours later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #716,513
@716,482 (悟)
> lol i bet your profile on this site is borderline scary. 100% fuckalms posts
The moderators of this site are free to confirm that it isn't.
Yet again I say, I am not this 'Dave' character Fuckalms thinks I am (but again I really don't give two fucks about things like that, he can call me 'Dave' if it turns him on, or makes it easier for him to believe only one person has issues with him). I have never, not once, ever, since I've been on the site, which is an age, dropped my uid. Never. Everything I've ever posted is on my profile. Mods can verify this too.
I am the guy who got banned for taking exception to Louie's racist posts about how subhuman "niggers" are. Louie also loved to post pictures of Matt's family, and his justification would be "Matt doesn't care, he posted his own pictures first". And so...later, Louie posted a picture of his own filthy apartment and I used that chance to laugh at him and his belief that he is somehow a 'higher' breed than anyone else.
Fuckalms' immediately banned me for doing that. While claiming his site stands for 'freedom of speech'. The stupid little cunt himself even went on to say "I don't know who wrote that, anyone who attacks the site I assume is Dave so I ban them".
> lol i bet your profile on this site is borderline scary. 100% fuckalms posts
The moderators of this site are free to confirm that it isn't.
Yet again I say, I am not this 'Dave' character Fuckalms thinks I am (but again I really don't give two fucks about things like that, he can call me 'Dave' if it turns him on, or makes it easier for him to believe only one person has issues with him). I have never, not once, ever, since I've been on the site, which is an age, dropped my uid. Never. Everything I've ever posted is on my profile. Mods can verify this too.
I am the guy who got banned for taking exception to Louie's racist posts about how subhuman "niggers" are. Louie also loved to post pictures of Matt's family, and his justification would be "Matt doesn't care, he posted his own pictures first". And so...later, Louie posted a picture of his own filthy apartment and I used that chance to laugh at him and his belief that he is somehow a 'higher' breed than anyone else.
Fuckalms' immediately banned me for doing that. While claiming his site stands for 'freedom of speech'. The stupid little cunt himself even went on to say "I don't know who wrote that, anyone who attacks the site I assume is Dave so I ban them".
Anonymous S replied with this 10 years ago, 9 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #716,518
@716,302 (FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI)
> writing pedo stories about me and The Doctor and claiming they were "parodies".
I missed those. Can you post a link, or reup if deleted?
> writing pedo stories about me and The Doctor and claiming they were "parodies".
I missed those. Can you post a link, or reup if deleted?
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 12 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #716,525
@previous (S)
> > writing pedo stories about me and The Doctor and claiming they were "parodies".
>
> I missed those. Can you post a link, or reup if deleted?
I'm also interested to verify these, since I have no recollection of ever doing anything like this.
You always demand people post links to claims about you Fuckalms, so now the spotlight is on yourself - post a link please.
> > writing pedo stories about me and The Doctor and claiming they were "parodies".
>
> I missed those. Can you post a link, or reup if deleted?
I'm also interested to verify these, since I have no recollection of ever doing anything like this.
You always demand people post links to claims about you Fuckalms, so now the spotlight is on yourself - post a link please.
悟 replied with this 10 years ago, 11 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #716,528
@716,513 (A)
> > lol i bet your profile on this site is borderline scary. 100% fuckalms posts
>
> The moderators of this site are free to confirm that it isn't.
>
> Yet again I say, I am not this 'Dave' character Fuckalms thinks I am (but again I really don't give two fucks about things like that, he can call me 'Dave' if it turns him on, or makes it easier for him to believe only one person has issues with him). I have never, not once, ever, since I've been on the site, which is an age, dropped my uid. Never. Everything I've ever posted is on my profile. Mods can verify this too.
>
> I am the guy who got banned for taking exception to Louie's racist posts about how subhuman "niggers" are. Louie also loved to post pictures of Matt's family, and his justification would be "Matt doesn't care, he posted his own pictures first". And so...later, Louie posted a picture of his own filthy apartment and I used that chance to laugh at him and his belief that he is somehow a 'higher' breed than anyone else.
>
> Fuckalms' immediately banned me for doing that. While claiming his site stands for 'freedom of speech'. The stupid little cunt himself even went on to say "I don't know who wrote that, anyone who attacks the site I assume is Dave so I ban them".
are the moderators free to confirm that all of your posts are, in fact, about fuckalms?
> > lol i bet your profile on this site is borderline scary. 100% fuckalms posts
>
> The moderators of this site are free to confirm that it isn't.
>
> Yet again I say, I am not this 'Dave' character Fuckalms thinks I am (but again I really don't give two fucks about things like that, he can call me 'Dave' if it turns him on, or makes it easier for him to believe only one person has issues with him). I have never, not once, ever, since I've been on the site, which is an age, dropped my uid. Never. Everything I've ever posted is on my profile. Mods can verify this too.
>
> I am the guy who got banned for taking exception to Louie's racist posts about how subhuman "niggers" are. Louie also loved to post pictures of Matt's family, and his justification would be "Matt doesn't care, he posted his own pictures first". And so...later, Louie posted a picture of his own filthy apartment and I used that chance to laugh at him and his belief that he is somehow a 'higher' breed than anyone else.
>
> Fuckalms' immediately banned me for doing that. While claiming his site stands for 'freedom of speech'. The stupid little cunt himself even went on to say "I don't know who wrote that, anyone who attacks the site I assume is Dave so I ban them".
are the moderators free to confirm that all of your posts are, in fact, about fuckalms?
beckyderp !Hi.HILLARY replied with this 10 years ago, 6 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #716,530
@716,513 (A)
> I have never, not once, ever, since I've been on the site, which is an age, dropped my uid. Never. Everything I've ever posted is on my profile. Mods can verify this too.
We could but we don't care enough
> I have never, not once, ever, since I've been on the site, which is an age, dropped my uid. Never. Everything I've ever posted is on my profile. Mods can verify this too.
We could but we don't care enough
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 4 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #716,533
@previous (beckyderp !Hi.HILLARY)
Fair enough, no problem. But certain sad cases keep demanding profile verification so I'm saying it can be given any time, I personally don't give a fuck.
Fair enough, no problem. But certain sad cases keep demanding profile verification so I'm saying it can be given any time, I personally don't give a fuck.
Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 10 years ago, 25 seconds later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #716,534
@716,528 (悟)
> > > lol i bet your profile on this site is borderline scary. 100% fuckalms posts
> >
> > The moderators of this site are free to confirm that it isn't.
> >
> > Yet again I say, I am not this 'Dave' character Fuckalms thinks I am (but again I really don't give two fucks about things like that, he can call me 'Dave' if it turns him on, or makes it easier for him to believe only one person has issues with him). I have never, not once, ever, since I've been on the site, which is an age, dropped my uid. Never. Everything I've ever posted is on my profile. Mods can verify this too.
> >
> > I am the guy who got banned for taking exception to Louie's racist posts about how subhuman "niggers" are. Louie also loved to post pictures of Matt's family, and his justification would be "Matt doesn't care, he posted his own pictures first". And so...later, Louie posted a picture of his own filthy apartment and I used that chance to laugh at him and his belief that he is somehow a 'higher' breed than anyone else.
> >
> > Fuckalms' immediately banned me for doing that. While claiming his site stands for 'freedom of speech'. The stupid little cunt himself even went on to say "I don't know who wrote that, anyone who attacks the site I assume is Dave so I ban them".
>
> are the moderators free to confirm that all of your posts are, in fact, about fuckalms?
Reading comprehension not your strong point, huh?
> > > lol i bet your profile on this site is borderline scary. 100% fuckalms posts
> >
> > The moderators of this site are free to confirm that it isn't.
> >
> > Yet again I say, I am not this 'Dave' character Fuckalms thinks I am (but again I really don't give two fucks about things like that, he can call me 'Dave' if it turns him on, or makes it easier for him to believe only one person has issues with him). I have never, not once, ever, since I've been on the site, which is an age, dropped my uid. Never. Everything I've ever posted is on my profile. Mods can verify this too.
> >
> > I am the guy who got banned for taking exception to Louie's racist posts about how subhuman "niggers" are. Louie also loved to post pictures of Matt's family, and his justification would be "Matt doesn't care, he posted his own pictures first". And so...later, Louie posted a picture of his own filthy apartment and I used that chance to laugh at him and his belief that he is somehow a 'higher' breed than anyone else.
> >
> > Fuckalms' immediately banned me for doing that. While claiming his site stands for 'freedom of speech'. The stupid little cunt himself even went on to say "I don't know who wrote that, anyone who attacks the site I assume is Dave so I ban them".
>
> are the moderators free to confirm that all of your posts are, in fact, about fuckalms?
Reading comprehension not your strong point, huh?
悟 replied with this 10 years ago, 15 seconds later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #716,535
悟 double-posted this 10 years ago, 45 seconds later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #716,536
@716,534 (A)
> > > > lol i bet your profile on this site is borderline scary. 100% fuckalms posts
> > >
> > > The moderators of this site are free to confirm that it isn't.
> > >
> > > Yet again I say, I am not this 'Dave' character Fuckalms thinks I am (but again I really don't give two fucks about things like that, he can call me 'Dave' if it turns him on, or makes it easier for him to believe only one person has issues with him). I have never, not once, ever, since I've been on the site, which is an age, dropped my uid. Never. Everything I've ever posted is on my profile. Mods can verify this too.
> > >
> > > I am the guy who got banned for taking exception to Louie's racist posts about how subhuman "niggers" are. Louie also loved to post pictures of Matt's family, and his justification would be "Matt doesn't care, he posted his own pictures first". And so...later, Louie posted a picture of his own filthy apartment and I used that chance to laugh at him and his belief that he is somehow a 'higher' breed than anyone else.
> > >
> > > Fuckalms' immediately banned me for doing that. While claiming his site stands for 'freedom of speech'. The stupid little cunt himself even went on to say "I don't know who wrote that, anyone who attacks the site I assume is Dave so I ban them".
> >
> > are the moderators free to confirm that all of your posts are, in fact, about fuckalms?
>
> Reading comprehension not your strong point, huh?
what did you quote it for
> > > > lol i bet your profile on this site is borderline scary. 100% fuckalms posts
> > >
> > > The moderators of this site are free to confirm that it isn't.
> > >
> > > Yet again I say, I am not this 'Dave' character Fuckalms thinks I am (but again I really don't give two fucks about things like that, he can call me 'Dave' if it turns him on, or makes it easier for him to believe only one person has issues with him). I have never, not once, ever, since I've been on the site, which is an age, dropped my uid. Never. Everything I've ever posted is on my profile. Mods can verify this too.
> > >
> > > I am the guy who got banned for taking exception to Louie's racist posts about how subhuman "niggers" are. Louie also loved to post pictures of Matt's family, and his justification would be "Matt doesn't care, he posted his own pictures first". And so...later, Louie posted a picture of his own filthy apartment and I used that chance to laugh at him and his belief that he is somehow a 'higher' breed than anyone else.
> > >
> > > Fuckalms' immediately banned me for doing that. While claiming his site stands for 'freedom of speech'. The stupid little cunt himself even went on to say "I don't know who wrote that, anyone who attacks the site I assume is Dave so I ban them".
> >
> > are the moderators free to confirm that all of your posts are, in fact, about fuckalms?
>
> Reading comprehension not your strong point, huh?
what did you quote it for
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 16 seconds later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #716,537
@716,535 (悟)
> i wasnt demanding anything i dont care either
You sure make a lot of effort over something you claim not to care about.
> i wasnt demanding anything i dont care either
You sure make a lot of effort over something you claim not to care about.
悟 replied with this 10 years ago, 4 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #716,540
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #716,543
悟 replied with this 10 years ago, 36 seconds later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #716,545
Metæ replied with this 10 years ago, 6 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #716,550
悟 replied with this 10 years ago, 55 seconds later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #716,553
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #716,554
Anonymous F replied with this 10 years ago, 6 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #716,557
@716,550 (Metæ)
I'll try to do a TL;DR...
There's this poster who FuckAlms dubbed "Dave from Russia". I think he started off calling the Doctor a pedo, and also latched onto FuckAlms at some point. Probably because FuckAlms told him to shut up, or something.
Dave is distinctive because he's quite intense with his trolling. He went as far to write mini-fanfics about the Doctor and FuckAlms trading child porn, and he's kept up his trolling and ineffective misinformation campaign for years. You can see a sample of his creepy posts here: https://static.minichan.org/img/1473074882401065.png
He does also strenuously deny he's the same guy whenever he shows up, but his text voice and fixation on FuckAlms and The Doctor are unmistakable.
I'll try to do a TL;DR...
There's this poster who FuckAlms dubbed "Dave from Russia". I think he started off calling the Doctor a pedo, and also latched onto FuckAlms at some point. Probably because FuckAlms told him to shut up, or something.
Dave is distinctive because he's quite intense with his trolling. He went as far to write mini-fanfics about the Doctor and FuckAlms trading child porn, and he's kept up his trolling and ineffective misinformation campaign for years. You can see a sample of his creepy posts here: https://static.minichan.org/img/1473074882401065.png
He does also strenuously deny he's the same guy whenever he shows up, but his text voice and fixation on FuckAlms and The Doctor are unmistakable.
(Edited 3 minutes later.)
Anonymous S replied with this 10 years ago, 16 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #716,560
悟 replied with this 10 years ago, 47 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #716,566
Anonymous I replied with this 10 years ago, 4 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #716,568
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 20 hours later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #716,843
@716,557 (F)
> I'll try to do a TL;DR...
>
> There's this poster who FuckAlms dubbed "Dave from Russia". I think he started off calling the Doctor a pedo, and also latched onto FuckAlms at some point. Probably because FuckAlms told him to shut up, or something.
>
> Dave is distinctive because he's quite intense with his trolling. He went as far to write mini-fanfics about the Doctor and FuckAlms trading child porn, and he's kept up his trolling and ineffective misinformation campaign for years. You can see a sample of his creepy posts here: https://static.minichan.org/img/1473074882401065.png
>
> He does also strenuously deny he's the same guy whenever he shows up, but his text voice and fixation on FuckAlms and The Doctor are unmistakable.
I love how the first part of this message is written in that detached, laconic I-really-don't-care-about-any-of-this style, but then the main body launches into an obsessively-researched, forensically-detailed and totally confident history of what you imagine has been going on.
As I keep telling you in the other thread - you are obvious at this point. Quite bullshitting yourself, even if nobody else.
> I'll try to do a TL;DR...
>
> There's this poster who FuckAlms dubbed "Dave from Russia". I think he started off calling the Doctor a pedo, and also latched onto FuckAlms at some point. Probably because FuckAlms told him to shut up, or something.
>
> Dave is distinctive because he's quite intense with his trolling. He went as far to write mini-fanfics about the Doctor and FuckAlms trading child porn, and he's kept up his trolling and ineffective misinformation campaign for years. You can see a sample of his creepy posts here: https://static.minichan.org/img/1473074882401065.png
>
> He does also strenuously deny he's the same guy whenever he shows up, but his text voice and fixation on FuckAlms and The Doctor are unmistakable.
I love how the first part of this message is written in that detached, laconic I-really-don't-care-about-any-of-this style, but then the main body launches into an obsessively-researched, forensically-detailed and totally confident history of what you imagine has been going on.
As I keep telling you in the other thread - you are obvious at this point. Quite bullshitting yourself, even if nobody else.
(Edited 25 seconds later.)
Anonymous I replied with this 10 years ago, 56 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #716,858
@previous (A)
Calm down. Maybe take a break from the internet and this imaginary drama you have created for yourself.
Calm down. Maybe take a break from the internet and this imaginary drama you have created for yourself.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 56 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #716,885
@previous (I)
I write a cursory 2 sentence reply to your epic wall of rage text and I'm the one who needs to take a break from the 'drama'? I have you on a string, anything I post you come flying in within minutes to cry about it.
I write a cursory 2 sentence reply to your epic wall of rage text and I'm the one who needs to take a break from the 'drama'? I have you on a string, anything I post you come flying in within minutes to cry about it.
FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI replied with this 10 years ago, 35 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #716,901
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 36 seconds later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #716,904
FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI replied with this 10 years ago, 11 minutes later, 4 days after the original post[^] [v] #716,914
@previous (A)
Surely you're not referring to the post I cited in @716,901 (FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI) because that post is addressed to Anonymous I. Which post were you referring to?
Surely you're not referring to the post I cited in @716,901 (FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI) because that post is addressed to Anonymous I. Which post were you referring to?
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 34 minutes later, 4 days after the original post[^] [v] #716,922
@previous (FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI)
Got under your skin there, huh?
I'm referring to the posts you've written in this thread Fuckalms2AnonIandFandCandEveryoneelsewhohappenstosuityoutoimagineisoneperson.
Stop looking for drama where there is none, try not to obsess over stuff like this. And stop samefagging with your anon posts.
Got under your skin there, huh?
I'm referring to the posts you've written in this thread Fuckalms2AnonIandFandCandEveryoneelsewhohappenstosuityoutoimagineisoneperson.
Stop looking for drama where there is none, try not to obsess over stuff like this. And stop samefagging with your anon posts.
Anonymous W joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 4 days after the original post[^] [v] #716,924
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 21 minutes later, 4 days after the original post[^] [v] #716,932
"Sup OP" incoming in 5...4...3...2...
FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI replied with this 10 years ago, 1 hour later, 4 days after the original post[^] [v] #716,949
@716,922 (A)
> try not to obsess over stuff like this
That's what I've been trying to tell you!
> try not to obsess over stuff like this
That's what I've been trying to tell you!
(Edited 23 seconds later.)
Anonymous I replied with this 10 years ago, 48 minutes later, 4 days after the original post[^] [v] #716,957
@716,922 (A)
You think everyone here is fuckalms because you are an obsessed retard. Go outside and get away from the internet for a while. How long have you been holding this grudge again?
You think everyone here is fuckalms because you are an obsessed retard. Go outside and get away from the internet for a while. How long have you been holding this grudge again?
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 11 hours later, 4 days after the original post[^] [v] #717,066
@previous (I)
> How long have you been holding this grudge again?
> Provides epic wall of text overview of 'drama' in quantum detail
> Asks how long it's been going on
Try harder, Fuckalms. Try harder.
> How long have you been holding this grudge again?
> Provides epic wall of text overview of 'drama' in quantum detail
> Asks how long it's been going on
Try harder, Fuckalms. Try harder.
Anonymous I replied with this 10 years ago, 1 day later, 6 days after the original post[^] [v] #717,801
Ohhh, so Dave is obsessed with getting the last word too?
FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI replied with this 10 years ago, 33 minutes later, 6 days after the original post[^] [v] #717,806
Antikhristos !M6R0eWkIpk joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 8 minutes later, 6 days after the original post[^] [v] #717,807
拝 陌 佰 败 joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 12 minutes later, 6 days after the original post[^] [v] #717,810
@717,066 (A)
This link will resolve all of your problems with FuckAlms.
http://minichan.org/topic/1650
We here are willing to forward the money to you, because we know it is more than your can afford.
This link will resolve all of your problems with FuckAlms.
http://minichan.org/topic/1650
We here are willing to forward the money to you, because we know it is more than your can afford.
Anonymous Z-2 joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 19 minutes later, 6 days after the original post[^] [v] #717,813
A favor por favor
Work does not allow me to click on the abouve link. If OP replied could someone post his reply here.
Thank you in advance and my employer thanks you as well.
Work does not allow me to click on the abouve link. If OP replied could someone post his reply here.
Thank you in advance and my employer thanks you as well.