Notice: You have been identified as a bot, so no internal UID will be assigned to you. If you are a real person messing with your useragent, you should change it back to something normal.

Minichan

Topic: What are the consequences for telling lies about myself being a pedophile

Anonymous A started this discussion 10 years ago #55,138

Hi, I have been telling lies about myself being a paedophile out in public and online as a stress reliever due to the mental anguish imposed on me by an organization choosing to believe in other lies about me and even spread them to a network of metrosexuals and women for the last 6 years. But what will be happening since I told these lies about myself near some metrosexuals and women from such organization once they transmit this piece of information back to this organization?


I also told this in the presence of a police officer who may have secretly recorded my statements before asking my personal information like full name, address, D.O.B., etc I now have police officers friending me on Facebook as minors that I friended purely for the friend counts.

I can honestly say that I did not commit any sex-related offences.

Metæ joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 39 seconds later[^] [v] #714,339

Nice try, Kimmo.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 3 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #714,341

This was 6 months ago, and I no longer do do it.

I have already sought some help and no longer tell these lies about myself. I've even made it clear to these officers on Facebook that I am not a paedophile as I have told each of them. This police officer was out in public when he may have secretly recorded me.

Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 5 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #714,344

They can not press other child sex offences against me.

I don't think it's fair why police should press child-sex offences against my name purely for me saying these lies about myself. That's not fair.

Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 7 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #714,346

Looks like madabouteverything2Dave and his "anti-pedo research" has gone too far again. Collecting cp for "evidence against pedos" is still his justification

Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 6 minutes later, 14 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #714,350

@OP
Assuming this is a genuine post and not just another Poe:
Confessing to an a hypothetical crime is not enough to get you convicted. They (ie the authorities) have to produce concrete, unambiguous proof that you've actually committed an offense. That would require victim statements, forensic evidence and eyewitness testimony.

On the other hand, claiming to be a sex offender is still a mind-bogglingly stupid idea, as it would ruin both your personal reputation and your employment prospects. The internet is full of obsessive crazies who would gleefully track down your dox and plaster them it all over the web, irregardless of your actual guilt or innocence.

(Edited 2 minutes later.)

WSD !m2cp3rR5zw joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 7 minutes later, 21 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #714,352

Hi denmark guy!

ぶたん joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 2 hours later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #714,393

lmao

ぶたん double-posted this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #714,395

@714,344 (A)

> They can not press other child sex offences against me.
>
> against my name purely for me saying these lies about myself. That's not fair.

> not fair that people believed me when i admitted to being a pedophile
l o l

Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 13 hours later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #714,545

@714,352 (WSD !m2cp3rR5zw)

> Hi denmark guy!

Immigrant !jJEom8Ii3E joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 1 hour later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #714,557

@714,352 (WSD !m2cp3rR5zw)
@previous (G)

Name's IMMIGRANT now. Thanks.

Anonymous G replied with this 10 years ago, 19 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #714,852

@previous (Immigrant !jJEom8Ii3E)
Either way, you're still a pedophile. Everything you talk about has to do with children.

You are a sick bastard and should be shot.

Immigrant !jJEom8Ii3E replied with this 10 years ago, 47 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #714,853

@previous (G)

Yeah, I know your retarded but try being less lame.

Anonymous G replied with this 10 years ago, 2 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #714,873

@previous (Immigrant !jJEom8Ii3E)
Is that the only comeback a pedo has, accusing someone of being lame?

Immigrant !jJEom8Ii3E replied with this 10 years ago, 14 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #714,874

@previous (G)

See like right there, you think i need a comeback as if you can't see how lame that comment is.

Anonymous G replied with this 10 years ago, 9 hours later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #715,060

@previous (Immigrant !jJEom8Ii3E)
I can see how lame your comment is.

Being a pedophile has clouded your judgement, please kys.
:

Please familiarise yourself with the rules and markup syntax before posting.