Topic: I'm trying to figure out how long Matt is b& in a "thread bump every day" amount.
Anonymous A started this discussion 10 years ago #55,082
I'm going to need a chart, or diagram, or other visual aid to figure this one out.
How many days are there in a day, exactly? If Matt is banned at the start of the first day, and also at the end of the next day that makes the ban length more than a day apart right? So MAtt is, in fact, not banned every day and I believe I have just successfully unbanned Matt. Thanks
How many days are there in a day, exactly? If Matt is banned at the start of the first day, and also at the end of the next day that makes the ban length more than a day apart right? So MAtt is, in fact, not banned every day and I believe I have just successfully unbanned Matt. Thanks
Metæ joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later[^] [v] #713,749
One day of MAtt's ban is = 1/∞
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 3 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #713,752
@previous (Metæ)
That's not a very good pie chart. Please unban Matt if you haven't already by following my logical bump day reasoning
That's not a very good pie chart. Please unban Matt if you haven't already by following my logical bump day reasoning
RWBY Rhubarb? !!iNo3FkiZx joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 5 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #713,754
I think, by this logic, the staff need to ban Matt once every day for the ban to be valid.
And the ban must come at precisely the same time every day, or the whole thing is null and void.
And the ban must come at precisely the same time every day, or the whole thing is null and void.
(Edited 14 seconds later.)
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 7 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #713,755
if you divide the days of ban ban limit 0.999999999999999998
if you divide the number of days of ban by X approaching Infinity, than you have zero days of ban
if you divide the number of days of ban by X approaching Infinity, than you have zero days of ban
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 9 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #713,758
brie !kGoudaMCFA joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 37 seconds later, 9 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #713,759
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 57 seconds later, 10 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #713,760
@713,754 (RWBY Rhubarb? !!iNo3FkiZx)
> I think, by this logic, the staff need to ban Matt once every day for the ban to be valid.
>
> And the ban must come at precisely the same time every day, or the whole thing is null and void.
Why are you so angry at yourself for having fucked up the 'thread bump' thread? Just accept you missed a day, thus wasting hundreds of days of 'work', and move on from it.
Hell, squeegee has accepted it and moved on with a new thread, why are you still finding it so difficult to do the same?
> I think, by this logic, the staff need to ban Matt once every day for the ban to be valid.
>
> And the ban must come at precisely the same time every day, or the whole thing is null and void.
Why are you so angry at yourself for having fucked up the 'thread bump' thread? Just accept you missed a day, thus wasting hundreds of days of 'work', and move on from it.
Hell, squeegee has accepted it and moved on with a new thread, why are you still finding it so difficult to do the same?
Anonymous D replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 13 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #713,762
@previous (F)
> > I think, by this logic, the staff need to ban Matt once every day for the ban to be valid.
> >
> > And the ban must come at precisely the same time every day, or the whole thing is null and void.
>
> Why are you so angry at yourself for having fucked up the 'thread bump' thread? Just accept you missed a day, thus wasting hundreds of days of 'work', and move on from it.
>
> Hell, squeegee has accepted it and moved on with a new thread, why are you still finding it so difficult to do the same?
It is very simple: dont care
> > I think, by this logic, the staff need to ban Matt once every day for the ban to be valid.
> >
> > And the ban must come at precisely the same time every day, or the whole thing is null and void.
>
> Why are you so angry at yourself for having fucked up the 'thread bump' thread? Just accept you missed a day, thus wasting hundreds of days of 'work', and move on from it.
>
> Hell, squeegee has accepted it and moved on with a new thread, why are you still finding it so difficult to do the same?
It is very simple: dont care
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 14 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #713,763
@713,760 (F)
Please post a chart, or diagram, or other visual aid to explain the problem with the days of the thread bump thread. Thanks
Please post a chart, or diagram, or other visual aid to explain the problem with the days of the thread bump thread. Thanks
Anonymous F replied with this 10 years ago, 6 minutes later, 20 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #713,768
@previous (A)
> Please post a chart, or diagram, or other visual aid to explain the problem with the days of the thread bump thread. Thanks
Why have you made a new thread to ask for something which is already being discussed in another thread? Is this your way of trying to get back control of the topic after having made a fool of yourself and hilariously lost it in the other one?
> Please post a chart, or diagram, or other visual aid to explain the problem with the days of the thread bump thread. Thanks
Why have you made a new thread to ask for something which is already being discussed in another thread? Is this your way of trying to get back control of the topic after having made a fool of yourself and hilariously lost it in the other one?
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 5 minutes later, 26 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #713,776
Anonymous F replied with this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 29 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #713,779
@previous (A)
> Because you don't understand what jokes are, or what joking around is.
Why do you think this? And why are you being so defensive?
> Because you don't understand what jokes are, or what joking around is.
Why do you think this? And why are you being so defensive?
RWBY Rhubarb? !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 32 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #713,780
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 33 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #713,782
dont care about this threadAnonymous H joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #713,809
@OPenis just wants to suck Matt's dick, thus making syntax jealous.
FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 1 hour later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #713,824
@713,780 (RWBY Rhubarb? !!iNo3FkiZx)
He doesn't even realize OP is taking the piss at him. He's really stuck in quite a rut.
He doesn't even realize OP is taking the piss at him. He's really stuck in quite a rut.