Topic: I feel cruel pointing this out, but...the guy who's been bumping the thread every day for a year...
Anonymous A started this discussion 10 years ago #54,952
...was over half an hour late today in bumping it. He has just done it, but it was over a day since the last bump. I assume he was hoping nobody noticed. But yes, more than 24 hours had passed between bumps, hence, he (or she, but likely he I feel) failed in his mission to bump the thread every day.
I'm afraid that now he needs to start all over again, because otherwise there's no sense in continuing until the end of the year, it's meaningless now.
I'm afraid that now he needs to start all over again, because otherwise there's no sense in continuing until the end of the year, it's meaningless now.
RWBY Rhubarb? !!iNo3FkiZx joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later[^] [v] #712,996
The challenge was "once a day", not "every day at exactly the same time". Thanks.fagdeath joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 52 seconds later, 3 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #712,997
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 5 minutes later, 8 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #712,998
@712,996 (RWBY Rhubarb? !!iNo3FkiZx)
> The challenge was "once a day", not "every day at exactly the same time". Thanks.
Re-read what you just wrote, then consider what "more than 24 hours between bumps" implies, and then get back to me if you're still confused.
> The challenge was "once a day", not "every day at exactly the same time". Thanks.
Re-read what you just wrote, then consider what "more than 24 hours between bumps" implies, and then get back to me if you're still confused.
RWBY Rhubarb? !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 10 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #712,999
brie !kGoudaMCFA joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 13 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #713,001
RWBY Rhubarb? !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 16 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #713,002
@previous (brie !kGoudaMCFA)I did. I was worried I was going to fall asleep early, so I bumped it in the evening.
Of course, I then couldn't drop off, so I spent a few hours watching Criminal Minds and playing Metal Gear Solid V anyway.
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 4 minutes later, 20 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #713,004
@OP
Agreed, it's a fail thread
Agreed, it's a fail thread
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 26 seconds later, 21 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #713,005
@713,001 (brie !kGoudaMCFA)
> It makes sense to me.
>
> Maybe KL posted earlier than usual on that day.
Let me walk you through this: there are 24 hours in a day. Therefore, no matter what time post A is made, if more than 24 hours elapse after it, then post B will have been made more than 1 day later. Would you like me to illustrate this for you with a diagram?
> It makes sense to me.
>
> Maybe KL posted earlier than usual on that day.
Let me walk you through this: there are 24 hours in a day. Therefore, no matter what time post A is made, if more than 24 hours elapse after it, then post B will have been made more than 1 day later. Would you like me to illustrate this for you with a diagram?
squeegee joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 25 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #713,006
it's actually a lot harder than it looks
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 7 minutes later, 32 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #713,007
@previous (squeegee)
> it's actually a lot harder than it looks
I'm not blaming you for having failed in your stated objective. I'm merely pointing out that you did fail. Now there is no point in your continuing that thread, because even the very title has been invalidated. You need to start all over again.
> it's actually a lot harder than it looks
I'm not blaming you for having failed in your stated objective. I'm merely pointing out that you did fail. Now there is no point in your continuing that thread, because even the very title has been invalidated. You need to start all over again.
brie !kGoudaMCFA replied with this 10 years ago, 17 minutes later, 49 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #713,011
@713,005 (A)
If Post A is made at the start of the day (midnight) then the 24 hours would put you at the start of the next day giving you plenty of time to make that days post.
But please, show me your diagram.
If Post A is made at the start of the day (midnight) then the 24 hours would put you at the start of the next day giving you plenty of time to make that days post.
But please, show me your diagram.
Anonymous E replied with this 10 years ago, 5 minutes later, 55 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #713,013
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 36 seconds later, 55 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #713,014
@713,011 (brie !kGoudaMCFA)
> If Post A is made at the start of the day (midnight) then the 24 hours would put you at the start of the next day
Yes, it would. I'm proud of you brie, I mean that, you're doing great. Now let's take it a step further: what would it mean if (think about this bit carefully) Post B were made more than 24 hours later? Hmmm? How many days would those posts then straddle?
Work that one out and then let us know your findings. If you're still struggling then...
> But please, show me your diagram.
...I will.
> If Post A is made at the start of the day (midnight) then the 24 hours would put you at the start of the next day
Yes, it would. I'm proud of you brie, I mean that, you're doing great. Now let's take it a step further: what would it mean if (think about this bit carefully) Post B were made more than 24 hours later? Hmmm? How many days would those posts then straddle?
Work that one out and then let us know your findings. If you're still struggling then...
> But please, show me your diagram.
...I will.
(Edited 42 seconds later.)
brie !kGoudaMCFA replied with this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 59 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #713,018
Anonymous E replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #713,019
brie !kGoudaMCFA replied with this 10 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #713,020
Syntax joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #713,021
KL is ok in my book
That said I have never not once or ever will click on that thread unless by accident. So far accident free but I fully support him doing it
That said I have never not once or ever will click on that thread unless by accident. So far accident free but I fully support him doing it
squeegee joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 6 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #713,023
Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 6 hours later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #713,081
@OP
PLEASE EDUCATE YOURSELF ABOUT FOUR-CORNERED ROTATING DAYS ON A FOUR-CORNERED EARTH BEFORE YOU POST HERE.
PLEASE EDUCATE YOURSELF ABOUT FOUR-CORNERED ROTATING DAYS ON A FOUR-CORNERED EARTH BEFORE YOU POST HERE.
RWBY Rhubarb? !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 10 years ago, 8 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #713,082
Anonymous I replied with this 10 years ago, 14 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #713,083
> this guy gets itAnonymous J joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 27 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #713,087
FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 27 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #713,090
@previous (J)
Nice madpost.
@OP
By your logic, if he were required to bump within less than 24 hours of the previous post, if he were to post 1 hour before the 24 hour mark, he would, in fact, make 381 posts within a year. (This) year is 366 days. You are, in fact, for culinary porpoises, classified as a retarded fish.
Nice madpost.
@OP
By your logic, if he were required to bump within less than 24 hours of the previous post, if he were to post 1 hour before the 24 hour mark, he would, in fact, make 381 posts within a year. (This) year is 366 days. You are, in fact, for culinary porpoises, classified as a retarded fish.
(Edited 5 minutes later.)
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 3 hours later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #713,094
@previous (FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI)
You're struggling with this too, huh? *sigh* Very well, I suppose a teacher is only as good as his slowest student, so here we go again:
Statement: "I am going to bump this thread every day..."
Situation: More than 24 hours elapse without the thread being bumped.
Conclusion: A day has passed without the thread being bumped.
Mull it over Fuckalms, give the idea some time to sink in. Focus hard.
My advice to squeegee is that next time he phrases it as "I am going to bump this thread every day of the week in some time zone or other", then he may icnrease his chances.
You're struggling with this too, huh? *sigh* Very well, I suppose a teacher is only as good as his slowest student, so here we go again:
Statement: "I am going to bump this thread every day..."
Situation: More than 24 hours elapse without the thread being bumped.
Conclusion: A day has passed without the thread being bumped.
Mull it over Fuckalms, give the idea some time to sink in. Focus hard.
My advice to squeegee is that next time he phrases it as "I am going to bump this thread every day of the week in some time zone or other", then he may icnrease his chances.
Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #713,095
@713,090 (FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI)
> By your logic...
And incidentally it's not a case of being 'by my logic', it's by the wording of his very own thread title. If he wanted 'every day' to incorporate the 47 hours and 59 minutes from (for example) midnight on Monday to 23:59 on Tuesday, then he should have stated that. But to suggest that such a time span can be called "a day" is absurd and, simply, wrong.
> By your logic...
And incidentally it's not a case of being 'by my logic', it's by the wording of his very own thread title. If he wanted 'every day' to incorporate the 47 hours and 59 minutes from (for example) midnight on Monday to 23:59 on Tuesday, then he should have stated that. But to suggest that such a time span can be called "a day" is absurd and, simply, wrong.
RWBY Rhubarb? !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 10 years ago, 59 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #713,101
FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI replied with this 10 years ago, 4 hours later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #713,132
@713,094 (A)It's worded perfectly fine. You're just autistic as fuck.
@previous (RWBY Rhubarb? !!iNo3FkiZx)
Indeed.
Anonymous L joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 2 hours later, 20 hours after the original post[^] [v] #713,141
Anonymous M joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 5 minutes later, 20 hours after the original post[^] [v] #713,142
In which timezones have ey qualified for the daily posting achievement?
chili dog !!81dzJNNYL joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 58 minutes later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #713,146
@713,095 (A)
You can't call from 1 PM Monday to 1 PM Tuesday a day, that would be completely arbitrary and defeat the purpose of the calendar day
You can't call from 1 PM Monday to 1 PM Tuesday a day, that would be completely arbitrary and defeat the purpose of the calendar day
ぶたん joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #713,150
@713,095 (A)
> > By your logic...
>
> And incidentally it's not a case of being 'by my logic', it's by the wording of his very own thread title. If he wanted 'every day' to incorporate the 47 hours and 59 minutes from (for example) midnight on Monday to 23:59 on Tuesday, then he should have stated that. But to suggest that such a time span can be called "a day" is absurd and, simply, wrong.
assuming someome means calendar days when they say they are going to do something daily isnt absurd or wrong. u being weird
> > By your logic...
>
> And incidentally it's not a case of being 'by my logic', it's by the wording of his very own thread title. If he wanted 'every day' to incorporate the 47 hours and 59 minutes from (for example) midnight on Monday to 23:59 on Tuesday, then he should have stated that. But to suggest that such a time span can be called "a day" is absurd and, simply, wrong.
assuming someome means calendar days when they say they are going to do something daily isnt absurd or wrong. u being weird
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 31 minutes later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #713,161
@previous (ぶたん)
> > > By your logic...
> >
> > And incidentally it's not a case of being 'by my logic', it's by the wording of his very own thread title. If he wanted 'every day' to incorporate the 47 hours and 59 minutes from (for example) midnight on Monday to 23:59 on Tuesday, then he should have stated that. But to suggest that such a time span can be called "a day" is absurd and, simply, wrong.
>
> assuming someome means calendar days when they say they are going to do something daily isnt absurd or wrong. u being weird
Really? So newspapers like 'The Daily Mail' could be released at 02:00 on a Tuesday and then again at 23:30 that same Tuesday? u being retarded
> > > By your logic...
> >
> > And incidentally it's not a case of being 'by my logic', it's by the wording of his very own thread title. If he wanted 'every day' to incorporate the 47 hours and 59 minutes from (for example) midnight on Monday to 23:59 on Tuesday, then he should have stated that. But to suggest that such a time span can be called "a day" is absurd and, simply, wrong.
>
> assuming someome means calendar days when they say they are going to do something daily isnt absurd or wrong. u being weird
Really? So newspapers like 'The Daily Mail' could be released at 02:00 on a Tuesday and then again at 23:30 that same Tuesday? u being retarded
Anonymous L replied with this 10 years ago, 17 minutes later, 22 hours after the original post[^] [v] #713,163
@previous (A)
Lol that is a matter of convenience for the reader it makes no financial sense to have a nighttime version
Oh fun fact newspapers have a morning edition and an evening edition
Lol that is a matter of convenience for the reader it makes no financial sense to have a nighttime version
Oh fun fact newspapers have a morning edition and an evening edition
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 22 hours after the original post[^] [v] #713,164
@previous (L)
Then why is it not called 'The Twice Daily Mail'? Daily means once per day. Why are you struggling with this?
Then why is it not called 'The Twice Daily Mail'? Daily means once per day. Why are you struggling with this?
Anonymous L replied with this 10 years ago, 41 minutes later, 22 hours after the original post[^] [v] #713,170
@previous (A)
dai·ly
ˈdālē/
adjective
adjective: daily
1.
done, produced, or occurring every day or every weekday.
"a daily newspaper"
synonyms: everyday, day-to-day, quotidian, diurnal, circadian
"a daily event"
relating to the period of a single day.
"boats can be rented for a daily rate"
adverb
adverb: daily
1.
every day.
"the museum is open daily"
synonyms: every day, once a day, day after day, diurnally
"the museum is open daily"
No requirement of the word "once" or even "and once only"
dai·ly
ˈdālē/
adjective
adjective: daily
1.
done, produced, or occurring every day or every weekday.
"a daily newspaper"
synonyms: everyday, day-to-day, quotidian, diurnal, circadian
"a daily event"
relating to the period of a single day.
"boats can be rented for a daily rate"
adverb
adverb: daily
1.
every day.
"the museum is open daily"
synonyms: every day, once a day, day after day, diurnally
"the museum is open daily"
No requirement of the word "once" or even "and once only"
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 8 minutes later, 22 hours after the original post[^] [v] #713,174
Anonymous J replied with this 10 years ago, 12 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #713,301
@previous (A)
Post more pictionary defintions of words when making your point.
Include a pie chart of days.
Post more pictionary defintions of words when making your point.
Include a pie chart of days.
Anonymous J double-posted this 10 years ago, 7 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #713,302
@713,101 (RWBY Rhubarb? !!iNo3FkiZx)
@713,132 (FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI)
Keep your picture spam to it's containment thread, which is just that one spam filled thread and not this thread discussing it. Thanks
@713,132 (FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI)
Keep your picture spam to it's containment thread, which is just that one spam filled thread and not this thread discussing it. Thanks
FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI replied with this 10 years ago, 7 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #713,336
beckyderp !Hi.HILLARY joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 15 hours later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #713,468
i disagree with op
posting once each calendar day is enough regardless of the time that elapses between posts
thanks
posting once each calendar day is enough regardless of the time that elapses between posts
thanks
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 2 hours later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #713,505
@previous (beckyderp !Hi.HILLARY)
> i disagree with op
> posting once each calendar day is enough regardless of the time that elapses between posts
> thanks
You can "disagree with op" all you like, provided the next time a doctor tells you to "take 1 pill daily" you stand by your idea and leave it 47 hours and 59 minutes between doses. Then if you're lucky enough to be brought out of your subsequent coma we'll continue the discussion.
> i disagree with op
> posting once each calendar day is enough regardless of the time that elapses between posts
> thanks
You can "disagree with op" all you like, provided the next time a doctor tells you to "take 1 pill daily" you stand by your idea and leave it 47 hours and 59 minutes between doses. Then if you're lucky enough to be brought out of your subsequent coma we'll continue the discussion.
beckyderp !Hi.HILLARY replied with this 10 years ago, 13 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #713,507
@previous (A)
if it's that important to be taken at a certain time, the prescription will specify the time of day
if it's that important to be taken at a certain time, the prescription will specify the time of day
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 7 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #713,511
@previous (beckyderp !Hi.HILLARY)
> if it's that important to be taken at a certain time, the prescription will specify the time of day
Exactly. And further to this, if it's important to be taken at a certain time, the word used will not be "daily", which was the word used in the bump thread's title.
Thank you for succinctly proving my own point.
> if it's that important to be taken at a certain time, the prescription will specify the time of day
Exactly. And further to this, if it's important to be taken at a certain time, the word used will not be "daily", which was the word used in the bump thread's title.
Thank you for succinctly proving my own point.
chili dog !!81dzJNNYL replied with this 10 years ago, 34 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #713,521
@previous (A)
That doesn't prove your point at all, it proves that daily doesn't mean the same time of day
That doesn't prove your point at all, it proves that daily doesn't mean the same time of day
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 7 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #713,524
@previous (chili dog !!81dzJNNYL)
It proves that 'daily' is the adjectival or adverbial form of 'day', which is a 24-hour period.
It proves that 'daily' is the adjectival or adverbial form of 'day', which is a 24-hour period.
adam djensen joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 49 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #713,536
autism
Anonymous J replied with this 10 years ago, 12 hours later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #713,719
@713,014 (A)
You claimed you were going to show a diagram, until you do your opinion on the matter is null and void. You need to make a pie chart clearly explaining days and acceptable posting frequency otherwise all your feeble madposting counts for nothing as you have convinced no one.
You claimed you were going to show a diagram, until you do your opinion on the matter is null and void. You need to make a pie chart clearly explaining days and acceptable posting frequency otherwise all your feeble madposting counts for nothing as you have convinced no one.
RWBY Rhubarb? !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 10 years ago, 6 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #713,720
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 20 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #713,726
@713,719 (J)
> You need to make a pie chart clearly explaining days
You actually need this? Maybe just go listen to Rebecca Black's "Friday", she'll walk you through how days work. Lol, retard :)
> You need to make a pie chart clearly explaining days
You actually need this? Maybe just go listen to Rebecca Black's "Friday", she'll walk you through how days work. Lol, retard :)
Anonymous J replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #713,728
@previous (A)
> You claimed you were going to show a diagram, until you do your opinion on the matter is null and void.
> You claimed you were going to show a diagram, until you do your opinion on the matter is null and void.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #713,730
@previous (J)
> >You claimed you were going to show a diagram, until you do your opinion on the matter is null and void.
Where did I claim this?
> >You claimed you were going to show a diagram, until you do your opinion on the matter is null and void.
Where did I claim this?
Anonymous J replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #713,732
@previous (A)
In this post @713,014 (A)
> > But please, show me your diagram.
> ...I will.
So, do it. Anything you have to say is easily disregarded otherwise.
In this post @713,014 (A)
> > But please, show me your diagram.
> ...I will.
So, do it. Anything you have to say is easily disregarded otherwise.
Anonymous R joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 26 seconds later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #713,733
bump
RWBY Rhubarb? !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #713,734
@713,726 (A)
Come on, bud... You've kindly made quite a few posts trying to help us understand this, and a diagram would probably clinch it.
We're not expecting anything complicated. Brie made a very simple diagram over here: @713,020 (brie !kGoudaMCFA) . Something simple like that will be fine.
Come on, bud... You've kindly made quite a few posts trying to help us understand this, and a diagram would probably clinch it.
We're not expecting anything complicated. Brie made a very simple diagram over here: @713,020 (brie !kGoudaMCFA) . Something simple like that will be fine.
(Edited 47 seconds later.)
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 4 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #713,735
@previous (RWBY Rhubarb? !!iNo3FkiZx)
> Come on, bud... You've kindly made quite a few posts trying to help us understand this, and a diagram would probably clinch it.
That much is actually doubtful to be fair (since a purely linguistic explanation of what a "day" is has so far proved confusing to you), but before we start posting diagrams here, I'm still curious to know - when did I claim I would do that? The chap up there seems convinced I said I would, which is relevant only insofar as it demonstrates yet another inablity to understand plain sentences.
> Come on, bud... You've kindly made quite a few posts trying to help us understand this, and a diagram would probably clinch it.
That much is actually doubtful to be fair (since a purely linguistic explanation of what a "day" is has so far proved confusing to you), but before we start posting diagrams here, I'm still curious to know - when did I claim I would do that? The chap up there seems convinced I said I would, which is relevant only insofar as it demonstrates yet another inablity to understand plain sentences.
RWBY Rhubarb? !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #713,738
@previous (A)
I don't mind if you didn't say you would beforehand. I just think that I diagram would really clear things up.
How about it? You've been patient with us so far, so a simple diagram should be a trivial matter.
I don't mind if you didn't say you would beforehand. I just think that I diagram would really clear things up.
How about it? You've been patient with us so far, so a simple diagram should be a trivial matter.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 18 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #713,742
@previous (RWBY Rhubarb? !!iNo3FkiZx)
> I just think that I diagram would really clear things up.
What on earth are you trying to express here?
Seriously, why do you find language so troublesome? Take more time over your words, really think about how they need to be ordered to form coherent sentences, it'll help you understand ideas better.
> I just think that I diagram would really clear things up.
What on earth are you trying to express here?
Seriously, why do you find language so troublesome? Take more time over your words, really think about how they need to be ordered to form coherent sentences, it'll help you understand ideas better.
Anonymous J replied with this 10 years ago, 7 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #713,745
@previous (A)
Saying "I will" implies you will do something. So by saying that people reasonably expect you to not shy away so quickly
Saying "every day" seems to confuse you. Have you considered drawing a picture to explain your warped views?
Saying "I will" implies you will do something. So by saying that people reasonably expect you to not shy away so quickly
Saying "every day" seems to confuse you. Have you considered drawing a picture to explain your warped views?
RWBY Rhubarb? !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 10 years ago, 8 seconds later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #713,746
@713,742 (A)
Indeed. One misplaced letter, and the sentence is completely unintelligible. I cannot blame you for being confused.
Regardless, since a diagram doesn't seem to be forthcoming, it seems that the fora will never understand your intriguing ideas on days. Unfortunate, but that's just how these things go.
Indeed. One misplaced letter, and the sentence is completely unintelligible. I cannot blame you for being confused.
Regardless, since a diagram doesn't seem to be forthcoming, it seems that the fora will never understand your intriguing ideas on days. Unfortunate, but that's just how these things go.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 8 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #713,747
@previous (RWBY Rhubarb? !!iNo3FkiZx)
> Indeed. One misplaced letter, and the sentence is completely unintelligible.
Yes it is. Glad you're learning. Hopefully the day (that's to say, 24-hour period) will come when you'll no longer need to keep asking people to draw pictures for you to help you understand their sentences.
You keep on studying, Champ, you'll get there!
> Indeed. One misplaced letter, and the sentence is completely unintelligible.
Yes it is. Glad you're learning. Hopefully the day (that's to say, 24-hour period) will come when you'll no longer need to keep asking people to draw pictures for you to help you understand their sentences.
You keep on studying, Champ, you'll get there!
Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #713,748
@713,745 (J)
> Saying "I will" implies you will do something.
No it doesn't "imply" it, it directly says it. What is this, day release from the retard clinic?
> Saying "I will" implies you will do something.
No it doesn't "imply" it, it directly says it. What is this, day release from the retard clinic?
Anonymous J replied with this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #713,750
@previous (A)
Well, you aren't readily believable and I was trying to give you the benefit of the doubt.
Well, you aren't readily believable and I was trying to give you the benefit of the doubt.
RWBY Rhubarb? !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #713,751
Honestly, I'm losing track of what a day even is. This topic is messing me up...
Do I have work tomorrow? It's impossible to tell. Work isn't a uniformly daily occurrence, so it's meaningless. Help!
Do I have work tomorrow? It's impossible to tell. Work isn't a uniformly daily occurrence, so it's meaningless. Help!
Anonymous J replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #713,753
@previous (RWBY Rhubarb? !!iNo3FkiZx)
My daily pie chart was upside down and I don't know what day it is either!
My daily pie chart was upside down and I don't know what day it is either!
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #713,756
@previous (J)
> My daily pie chart was upside down and I don't know what day it is either!
That can happen when you require illustrations to understand what a day is.
> My daily pie chart was upside down and I don't know what day it is either!
That can happen when you require illustrations to understand what a day is.
Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 10 years ago, 52 seconds later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #713,757
@713,751 (RWBY Rhubarb? !!iNo3FkiZx)
> Honestly, I'm losing track of what a day even is
It's commendable you once grasped it though. It hasn't been clear from this thread :)
> Honestly, I'm losing track of what a day even is
It's commendable you once grasped it though. It hasn't been clear from this thread :)
Anonymous J replied with this 10 years ago, 4 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #713,761
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 5 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #713,765
@previous (J)
> Please show me what an upside down pie chart looks like, using only your words. Thanks
Did you not just say, literally 5 minutes ago, that you were looking at one? And now you're asking me to walk you through what it looks like?
Seriously, I'm not even joking now, is this genuinely some kind of day release programme from the Institute for the Advanced Study of Barely Functional Retards? Or did you and Rhubarb slug an orderly, bust a window, and escape together?
> Please show me what an upside down pie chart looks like, using only your words. Thanks
Did you not just say, literally 5 minutes ago, that you were looking at one? And now you're asking me to walk you through what it looks like?
Seriously, I'm not even joking now, is this genuinely some kind of day release programme from the Institute for the Advanced Study of Barely Functional Retards? Or did you and Rhubarb slug an orderly, bust a window, and escape together?
Anonymous J replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #713,766
brie !kGoudaMCFA replied with this 10 years ago, 25 seconds later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #713,767
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #713,769
@previous (brie !kGoudaMCFA)
> I am confused how a day release program works exactly and a chart might help.
Then go look for one, sport!
> I am confused how a day release program works exactly and a chart might help.
Then go look for one, sport!
Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 10 years ago, 29 seconds later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #713,770
@713,766 (J)
> What if it's a daily bar graph and not a daily pie chart like I have been claiming?
Then you must be doubly confused!
> What if it's a daily bar graph and not a daily pie chart like I have been claiming?
Then you must be doubly confused!
brie !kGoudaMCFA replied with this 10 years ago, 48 seconds later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #713,771
@713,769 (A)
I don't know how much time I have left! Please post your already prepared chart that you promised me earlier.
I don't know how much time I have left! Please post your already prepared chart that you promised me earlier.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #713,772
@previous (brie !kGoudaMCFA)
> I don't know how much time I have left! Please post your already prepared chart that you promised me earlier.
Where and when did I promise you this?
> I don't know how much time I have left! Please post your already prepared chart that you promised me earlier.
Where and when did I promise you this?
Anonymous J replied with this 10 years ago, 4 seconds later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #713,773
RWBY Rhubarb? !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 10 years ago, 55 seconds later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #713,774
brie !kGoudaMCFA replied with this 10 years ago, 26 seconds later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #713,775
@713,772 (A)
You said you would here --> @713,014 (A)
I think it was three days ago, but I honestly can't tell anymore.
You said you would here --> @713,014 (A)
I think it was three days ago, but I honestly can't tell anymore.
(Edited 33 seconds later.)
Anonymous J replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #713,777
@713,774 (RWBY Rhubarb? !!iNo3FkiZx)
I just turned my pie chart 90 degrees, and it clearly says that it is tomorrow.
I just turned my pie chart 90 degrees, and it clearly says that it is tomorrow.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #713,778
@713,775 (brie !kGoudaMCFA)
Where in that post you've linked are you seeing a promise that I would draw for you a diagram explaining "how a day release program works"?
Where in that post you've linked are you seeing a promise that I would draw for you a diagram explaining "how a day release program works"?
brie !kGoudaMCFA replied with this 10 years ago, 4 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #713,781
FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI replied with this 10 years ago, 2 hours later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #713,817
> effort trollingAnonymous S joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 5 hours later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #713,841
I'm sure everyone in this thread is either retarded or just trolling. But here we go.
Let's say on day one, someone makes a post at 8am.
Then, 24 hours later, we are on day 2, 8am. But if the person were then to make a post at 9am, it would be 25 hours after the previous post. Yet it would still be one post a day.
Yeah? Ok.
Let's say on day one, someone makes a post at 8am.
Then, 24 hours later, we are on day 2, 8am. But if the person were then to make a post at 9am, it would be 25 hours after the previous post. Yet it would still be one post a day.
Yeah? Ok.
RWBY Rhubarb? !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 10 years ago, 10 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #713,843
@previous (S)
Yes, we know that OP is trolling. Some of us are playing along for a giggle, and I assume the rest simply think that OP is an idiot.
@713,817 (FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI)
He reminds me of mountainman's style of trolling. In that he makes an irrational claim, and then unwaveringly disagrees with anyone who questions it.
Although, mountainman was a bit more cheerful.
Yes, we know that OP is trolling. Some of us are playing along for a giggle, and I assume the rest simply think that OP is an idiot.
@713,817 (FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI)
He reminds me of mountainman's style of trolling. In that he makes an irrational claim, and then unwaveringly disagrees with anyone who questions it.
Although, mountainman was a bit more cheerful.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 1 hour later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #713,851
@previous (RWBY Rhubarb? !!iNo3FkiZx)
> an irrational claim
A day being 24 hours is not an "irrational claim", Euclid. You're confusing the terms "irrational claim" and "things even a retarded toddler knows".
> an irrational claim
A day being 24 hours is not an "irrational claim", Euclid. You're confusing the terms "irrational claim" and "things even a retarded toddler knows".
Anonymous E replied with this 10 years ago, 20 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #713,854
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 5 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #713,855
RWBY Rhubarb? !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 10 years ago, 23 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #713,856
Since the OP was, for whatever reason, unable to produce the agreed upon diagram, I have taken the liberty of producing one for him.I hope that it helps to clear things up.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 16 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #713,857
@previous (RWBY Rhubarb? !!iNo3FkiZx)
Fuckin' LOL :)))) Yo, spend more of your Sunday making diagrams dude :))
Incidentally, there's a mistake in your little opus there. It doesn't explain how a day isn't 24 hours.
Back to the drawing board (literally) for you my lad!
Fuckin' LOL :)))) Yo, spend more of your Sunday making diagrams dude :))
Incidentally, there's a mistake in your little opus there. It doesn't explain how a day isn't 24 hours.
Back to the drawing board (literally) for you my lad!
Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 10 years ago, 1 day later, 4 days after the original post[^] [v] #714,265
28 hours elapsed between the latest bumps. Amusingly, this time straddling 3 (that's 3!) calendar days.
So much epic failure in that thread, squeegee did the right thing in abandonning it, it's hilarious now watching that parsnip guy or whatever keep it going anyway.
So much epic failure in that thread, squeegee did the right thing in abandonning it, it's hilarious now watching that parsnip guy or whatever keep it going anyway.
FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI replied with this 10 years ago, 1 hour later, 5 days after the original post[^] [v] #714,301
One day has passed since this thread was last posted in, and yet OP saw fit to samebump it again without contributing anything of value. I wonder why?Anonymous E replied with this 10 years ago, 34 minutes later, 5 days after the original post[^] [v] #714,322
@previous (FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI)
It's Dave, the perpetually perturbed anon who has happy seizures when his madthreads full of mdposts have 100 replies.
Let's watch and see if another of his life highlights filled with giggle spasms happens itt
It's Dave, the perpetually perturbed anon who has happy seizures when his madthreads full of mdposts have 100 replies.
Let's watch and see if another of his life highlights filled with giggle spasms happens itt
FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI replied with this 10 years ago, 21 minutes later, 5 days after the original post[^] [v] #714,335
@previous (E)Do you think he does some sort of silly dance whenever he achieves 100 posts in his madthreads?
Anonymous E replied with this 10 years ago, 12 minutes later, 5 days after the original post[^] [v] #714,337
@previous (FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI)
It's likely he flaps his arms while squealing with delight, and this is probably as close as he will ever get to dancing. Just another highlight in his "online career" of being professionally upset.
It's likely he flaps his arms while squealing with delight, and this is probably as close as he will ever get to dancing. Just another highlight in his "online career" of being professionally upset.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 17 minutes later, 5 days after the original post[^] [v] #714,345
@714,335 (FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI)
@previous (E)
Conversing with oneself is a sign of dementia, Fuckalms. May I recommend the following Biblical passage to ground you -
"And lo, Moses did part the Panama Canal and summon forth the plague of locusts to feast upon the face of Jazebel". Retard :)
@previous (E)
Conversing with oneself is a sign of dementia, Fuckalms. May I recommend the following Biblical passage to ground you -
"And lo, Moses did part the Panama Canal and summon forth the plague of locusts to feast upon the face of Jazebel". Retard :)
Anonymous E replied with this 10 years ago, 5 minutes later, 5 days after the original post[^] [v] #714,347
@previous (A)
Call everyone samefag! I forgot about that part of your madcycle.
Do you feel the excitement of 100 posts building? Not long now until you can have a madgasm
Call everyone samefag! I forgot about that part of your madcycle.
Do you feel the excitement of 100 posts building? Not long now until you can have a madgasm
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 18 minutes later, 5 days after the original post[^] [v] #714,354
@previous (E)
> Call everyone samefag! I forgot about that part of your madcycle.
Why has this got under your skin so much? In your own words, why are you so "obsessed" with what people write on internet forums, such that you remember every tiny detail? Is this another of your "fact-checking" missions?
> Call everyone samefag! I forgot about that part of your madcycle.
Why has this got under your skin so much? In your own words, why are you so "obsessed" with what people write on internet forums, such that you remember every tiny detail? Is this another of your "fact-checking" missions?
FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI replied with this 10 years ago, 1 hour later, 5 days after the original post[^] [v] #714,370
@714,345 (A)
Ah, you got me. Every anonymous post is me. Even the OP is me. You've uncovered my plot. I thought I'd fuck with everyone by setting a complex stage with multiple samefag accounts defending me over the course of months and fighting off one entirely unlikeable character, that people could rally around in their disdain of, so that maybe MAtt would become irrelevant. But now that MAtt is permabanned, it's all seeming quite pointless and tiresome so I'm retiring the bit. Farewell OP, you've served your purpose well. Aaaand ID card deleted!
Ah, you got me. Every anonymous post is me. Even the OP is me. You've uncovered my plot. I thought I'd fuck with everyone by setting a complex stage with multiple samefag accounts defending me over the course of months and fighting off one entirely unlikeable character, that people could rally around in their disdain of, so that maybe MAtt would become irrelevant. But now that MAtt is permabanned, it's all seeming quite pointless and tiresome so I'm retiring the bit. Farewell OP, you've served your purpose well. Aaaand ID card deleted!
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 8 hours later, 5 days after the original post[^] [v] #714,501
@previous (FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI)
When you shoot for irony, the result has the humor and charm of a Ugandan mass grave. Don't attempt it Fuckalms, it requires both wit and wits, which you lack.
Instead, why don't you tell us all about the time Mary Magdalene led Goliath out of Egypt in an Arc containing 2 of every type of Frankincense. Retard :)
When you shoot for irony, the result has the humor and charm of a Ugandan mass grave. Don't attempt it Fuckalms, it requires both wit and wits, which you lack.
Instead, why don't you tell us all about the time Mary Magdalene led Goliath out of Egypt in an Arc containing 2 of every type of Frankincense. Retard :)
chili dog !!81dzJNNYL replied with this 10 years ago, 1 hour later, 5 days after the original post[^] [v] #714,508
Dave is inspiring me to read the Bible. I feel weird knowing details about early Christianity without knowing anything they believed
RWBY Rhubarb? !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 5 days after the original post[^] [v] #714,509
And the 100th bump goes to... NEON KATT!ぶたん replied with this 10 years ago, 1 hour later, 5 days after the original post[^] [v] #714,517
chili dog !!81dzJNNYL replied with this 10 years ago, 6 minutes later, 5 days after the original post[^] [v] #714,522
悟 replied with this 10 years ago, 5 hours later, 5 days after the original post[^] [v] #714,573
@previous (chili dog !!81dzJNNYL)
i had a religious education so for me it was the opposite. i had a bunch of useless religious knowledge and was taught science and everything all backwards as hell so i had to fill those holes fast when i stopped going
talk about illogical
i had a religious education so for me it was the opposite. i had a bunch of useless religious knowledge and was taught science and everything all backwards as hell so i had to fill those holes fast when i stopped going
talk about illogical
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 1 month later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #727,435
Anonymous E replied with this 10 years ago, 8 hours later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #727,504
RWBY Rhubarb? !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #727,505
@727,435 (A)
I really wish you weren't influenced by my posts. I know you look up to me as a hero, but you shouldn't. I am a loser. When you turn 18, I don't want you to imitate me.
I really wish you weren't influenced by my posts. I know you look up to me as a hero, but you shouldn't. I am a loser. When you turn 18, I don't want you to imitate me.
Faced joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 2 hours later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #727,512
i don't listen to what people say, yet i don't have a plan for it
FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI replied with this 10 years ago, 2 hours later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #727,519
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #727,520
@previous (FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI)
> Update - the number of days OP has obsessed over this is is up to who cares?:
You do apparently. Try to stop letting this get under your skin so much.
> Update - the number of days OP has obsessed over this is is up to who cares?:
You do apparently. Try to stop letting this get under your skin so much.
FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI replied with this 10 years ago, 3 hours later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #727,541
@previous (A)So, in your world:
necrobumping a month old thread that everybody else forgot about, with information that nobody cares about = not mad or obsessed at all
but
asking "who cares?" = frothing at the mouth mad
Ok, got it.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 6 minutes later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #727,543
@previous (FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI)
> information that nobody cares about
Apparently you care. Will you at least try to stop letting yourself get riled up over this.
> information that nobody cares about
Apparently you care. Will you at least try to stop letting yourself get riled up over this.
RWBY Rhubarb? !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #727,544
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 3 days later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #728,115
RWBY Rhubarb? !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #728,117
beckyderp !Hi.HILLARY replied with this 10 years ago, 29 minutes later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #728,120
I have so many problems with OP.
First, the idea of having to bump within a day's time essentially leads to a requirement to bump more frequently than daily, which is antithetical to other OP's stated purpose. Minichan's timing isn't particularly sensitive, so to get within a day, one must plan to be posting at least every 23 hours, 59 minutes, and more realistically, probably every 23 hours, 55 minutes (because what if CloudFlare acts up and it doesn't go through?). Those extra five minutes add up to over thirty hours each year, or a whole extra day. Clearly, that is no longer "daily" posting, but something much more frequent. You are posting "daily" for some other planet entirely.
There are also the practical considerations. Who can post every 23 hours, 55 minutes? What if you are coding, banging a hot chick, or taking a shit at 23 hours, 55 minutes? Obviously, you must plan to post earlier than that sometimes. Let's say one day you post a bit early, say at 18 hours, because you know you will be busy in the lovely woods at 24 hours. Remember that OP's requirement is posting within 24 hours of the last post. You've now moved the whole thing up six hours. What about the next day?
In sum, OP attempts to hold other OP to a standard (s)he never promised. This entire thread is a sham and an embarrassment, and I hope OP apologizes for tarnishing other OP's good name.
thank you
First, the idea of having to bump within a day's time essentially leads to a requirement to bump more frequently than daily, which is antithetical to other OP's stated purpose. Minichan's timing isn't particularly sensitive, so to get within a day, one must plan to be posting at least every 23 hours, 59 minutes, and more realistically, probably every 23 hours, 55 minutes (because what if CloudFlare acts up and it doesn't go through?). Those extra five minutes add up to over thirty hours each year, or a whole extra day. Clearly, that is no longer "daily" posting, but something much more frequent. You are posting "daily" for some other planet entirely.
There are also the practical considerations. Who can post every 23 hours, 55 minutes? What if you are coding, banging a hot chick, or taking a shit at 23 hours, 55 minutes? Obviously, you must plan to post earlier than that sometimes. Let's say one day you post a bit early, say at 18 hours, because you know you will be busy in the lovely woods at 24 hours. Remember that OP's requirement is posting within 24 hours of the last post. You've now moved the whole thing up six hours. What about the next day?
In sum, OP attempts to hold other OP to a standard (s)he never promised. This entire thread is a sham and an embarrassment, and I hope OP apologizes for tarnishing other OP's good name.
thank you
buto replied with this 10 years ago, 14 minutes later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #728,123
beckyderp !Hi.HILLARY replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #728,125
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 29 minutes later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #728,138
@728,120 (beckyderp !Hi.HILLARY)
Rhubarb is not the "OP" of that thread. Squeegee was. That's kind of the entire point. Squeegee fucked up the thread by missing some days, admitted to it, and moved on. This Rhubarb loser then came along days later and picked it up. Hence, the thread has not been bumped every day since its inception. In addition to this, 10 calendar (how many times do I have to repeat that) days have so far been missed by him alone.
Rhubarb is not the "OP" of that thread. Squeegee was. That's kind of the entire point. Squeegee fucked up the thread by missing some days, admitted to it, and moved on. This Rhubarb loser then came along days later and picked it up. Hence, the thread has not been bumped every day since its inception. In addition to this, 10 calendar (how many times do I have to repeat that) days have so far been missed by him alone.
(Edited 29 seconds later.)
Anonymous U joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #728,139
PUshbeckyderp !Hi.HILLARY replied with this 10 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #728,141
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 10 minutes later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #728,144
dpog replied with this 10 years ago, 10 minutes later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #728,146
@previous (A)
> No. Try not to get so upset over these things.
A dog may come out of dark and bite you in the ass.
> No. Try not to get so upset over these things.
A dog may come out of dark and bite you in the ass.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 7 minutes later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #728,148
@previous (dpog)
And if and when that happens I will roll with life's punches, friend. I will roll with those punches.
And if and when that happens I will roll with life's punches, friend. I will roll with those punches.
Anonymous J replied with this 10 years ago, 31 minutes later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #728,151
@previous (A)
What about when fuckalms bans you from tc again? Will you roll with that, or cry about it for five years or so?
What about when fuckalms bans you from tc again? Will you roll with that, or cry about it for five years or so?
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 15 minutes later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #728,154
buto replied with this 10 years ago, 8 minutes later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #728,156
Anonymous J replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #728,157
buto replied with this 10 years ago, 14 minutes later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #728,158
RWBY Rhubarb? !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 10 years ago, 3 hours later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #728,184
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 11 hours later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #728,225
beckyderp !Hi.HILLARY replied with this 10 years ago, 12 minutes later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #728,229
@728,138 (A)
Also no you retard, your specific complaint in your OP here was that more than 24 hours passed between bumps. I am not falling for your revisionist history about "calendar days." Go choke on a dick.
Also no you retard, your specific complaint in your OP here was that more than 24 hours passed between bumps. I am not falling for your revisionist history about "calendar days." Go choke on a dick.
beckyderp !Hi.HILLARY double-posted this 10 years ago, 39 seconds later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #728,231
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 10 years ago, 9 minutes later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #728,234
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 2 days later, 2 months after the original post[^] [v] #728,749
31 hours just missed, and a Roman history lesson to boot! 2 for the price of non(c)e.
https://minichan.org/topic/47201#reply_728750
https://minichan.org/topic/47201#reply_728750
(Edited 6 minutes later.)
RWBY Rhubarb? !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 10 years ago, 21 minutes later, 2 months after the original post[^] [v] #728,754
@previous (A)
I'm not sure that name-dropping a handful of Roman Emperors and one Roman poet is much of a history lesson.
Are you interested in Roman history? I read a book about Roman history, a while ago. I was amazed at how unstable things seemed to get towards the end, it felt like every time I turned the page another Legion guy was trying to usurp the current Emperor.
I'm not sure that name-dropping a handful of Roman Emperors and one Roman poet is much of a history lesson.
Are you interested in Roman history? I read a book about Roman history, a while ago. I was amazed at how unstable things seemed to get towards the end, it felt like every time I turned the page another Legion guy was trying to usurp the current Emperor.
Anonymous W joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 8 minutes later, 2 months after the original post[^] [v] #728,755
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 9 minutes later, 2 months after the original post[^] [v] #728,756
@728,754 (RWBY Rhubarb? !!iNo3FkiZx)
> one Roman poet
There were two in there (Aurelius also wrote poetry). You might want to re-read that 'book about Roman history' of yours. And bump that thread more than 3 times a week.
> one Roman poet
There were two in there (Aurelius also wrote poetry). You might want to re-read that 'book about Roman history' of yours. And bump that thread more than 3 times a week.
RWBY Rhubarb? !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 months after the original post[^] [v] #728,757
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 4 minutes later, 2 months after the original post[^] [v] #728,759
RWBY Rhubarb? !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 months after the original post[^] [v] #728,762
butan replied with this 10 years ago, 1 hour later, 2 months after the original post[^] [v] #728,777
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 48 minutes later, 2 months after the original post[^] [v] #728,786
@previous (butan)
For having a working knowledge of Marcus Aurelius' letters, dailectis and poetry I "have problems"? How so?
For having a working knowledge of Marcus Aurelius' letters, dailectis and poetry I "have problems"? How so?
FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI replied with this 10 years ago, 8 minutes later, 2 months after the original post[^] [v] #728,790
@previous (A)
Oh, where to start? I suppose this thread is as good a place as any. Please re-read the entire thing, from the standpoint of someone new who had not written half of the content themselves.
Oh, where to start? I suppose this thread is as good a place as any. Please re-read the entire thing, from the standpoint of someone new who had not written half of the content themselves.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 6 minutes later, 2 months after the original post[^] [v] #728,792
@previous (FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI)
> Please re-read the entire thing
Yes indeed, that would be a good place to start LOL.
> Please re-read the entire thing
Yes indeed, that would be a good place to start LOL.
butan replied with this 10 years ago, 1 hour later, 2 months after the original post[^] [v] #728,798
@728,786 (A)
> For having a working knowledge of Marcus Aurelius' letters, dailectis and poetry I "have problems"? How so?
this thread is 2 months old and you are fucking nuts
> For having a working knowledge of Marcus Aurelius' letters, dailectis and poetry I "have problems"? How so?
this thread is 2 months old and you are fucking nuts
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 8 hours later, 2 months after the original post[^] [v] #728,890
beckyderp !Hi.HILLARY replied with this 10 years ago, 1 hour later, 2 months after the original post[^] [v] #728,897
@728,786 (A)
> For having a working knowledge of Marcus Aurelius' letters, dailectis and poetry I "have problems"? How so?
What, praytell, is a "dailectis"?
> For having a working knowledge of Marcus Aurelius' letters, dailectis and poetry I "have problems"? How so?
What, praytell, is a "dailectis"?
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 5 hours later, 2 months after the original post[^] [v] #728,926
Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 10 years ago, 6 hours later, 2 months after the original post[^] [v] #728,987
Lol, from the other thread:
Here's the final definitive proof that the thread has failed - bump number 328 happened on the first day of the 11th month of the thread (post #722,701). That means that 30 or 31 days later will be the 12th month, i.e the completion of a year.
And yet...328 + 30/31 = 358/359.
To put it another way - we are now 362 days from the beginning of that thread, and yet we are only at bump number 355.
So in 3 or 4 days, when the bar says "12 months after the original post" and those 2 sad nonces are still nowhere close to bump 365, I shall bask in the glow of their verified failure.
Here's the final definitive proof that the thread has failed - bump number 328 happened on the first day of the 11th month of the thread (post #722,701). That means that 30 or 31 days later will be the 12th month, i.e the completion of a year.
And yet...328 + 30/31 = 358/359.
To put it another way - we are now 362 days from the beginning of that thread, and yet we are only at bump number 355.
So in 3 or 4 days, when the bar says "12 months after the original post" and those 2 sad nonces are still nowhere close to bump 365, I shall bask in the glow of their verified failure.
Anonymous X joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 51 minutes later, 2 months after the original post[^] [v] #729,002
@previous (A)
You seem to be embarrassingly worked up over that thread. You might want to find a hobby bro.
You seem to be embarrassingly worked up over that thread. You might want to find a hobby bro.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 5 minutes later, 2 months after the original post[^] [v] #729,003
@previous (X)
2 sad nonces obsessively try to bump the same thread every day for an entire year on a backwater chan: good luck fellas!
Someone points out they hilariously failed: you need a hobby bro!
Try harder, nonceboy ;)
2 sad nonces obsessively try to bump the same thread every day for an entire year on a backwater chan: good luck fellas!
Someone points out they hilariously failed: you need a hobby bro!
Try harder, nonceboy ;)
Anonymous W replied with this 10 years ago, 52 minutes later, 2 months after the original post[^] [v] #729,010
FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI replied with this 10 years ago, 1 hour later, 2 months after the original post[^] [v] #729,018
@729,003 (A)
Congratulations on effectively changing the meaning of "nonce" on minichan to what I originally thought it meant, the British equivalent of the meaningless ad hominem "nincompoop".
Also, making the same post in 2 different threads is a sign of autistic meme-forcing.
Congratulations on effectively changing the meaning of "nonce" on minichan to what I originally thought it meant, the British equivalent of the meaningless ad hominem "nincompoop".
Also, making the same post in 2 different threads is a sign of autistic meme-forcing.
(Edited 2 minutes later.)
buto replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 months after the original post[^] [v] #729,020
OP should be on the ICIT rankings
Anonymous I replied with this 10 years ago, 20 minutes later, 2 months after the original post[^] [v] #729,023
RWBY Rhubarb? !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 10 years ago, 3 hours later, 2 months after the original post[^] [v] #729,027
@729,002 (X)
@previous (I)
Yeah. Even knowing he's a troll, he still comes across as being pretty weird.
I'm not sure if it's a Svet type of situation where he's really an okay guy under the troll persona, or if he really is this creepy and obnoxious.
@previous (I)
Yeah. Even knowing he's a troll, he still comes across as being pretty weird.
I'm not sure if it's a Svet type of situation where he's really an okay guy under the troll persona, or if he really is this creepy and obnoxious.
Anonymous J replied with this 10 years ago, 53 minutes later, 2 months after the original post[^] [v] #729,032
@previous (RWBY Rhubarb? !!iNo3FkiZx)He's not trolling. A long time ago OP was defeated in an imaginary internet battle with The Doctor, he has never recovered and remains in a perpetually perturbed state.
This picture still haunts him.
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 10 years ago, 7 hours later, 2 months after the original post[^] [v] #729,043
Stop shitting up my beautiful front page with this petty quibbling over shit no one could possibly care about thanks.
Anonymous W replied with this 10 years ago, 1 hour later, 2 months after the original post[^] [v] #729,048
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 3 hours later, 2 months after the original post[^] [v] #729,164
Ladies and gents: victory -
"As an aside, there have actually been like four days when I forgot to bump and Marcus didn't cover. At this point, it's just for giggles"
From the obsessive weirdo himself (only after I'd posted proof however).
Thus ends it. What began as my mere pointing out to squeegee that he'd missed some days, which he took in perfectly good humor, spiralled into a much more entertaining absolute spazzing out from the TC nonce. Alas, he has now been proven wrong. Yet again. Will that guy ever latch onto a winner in life lol. Arrivederci!
"As an aside, there have actually been like four days when I forgot to bump and Marcus didn't cover. At this point, it's just for giggles"
From the obsessive weirdo himself (only after I'd posted proof however).
Thus ends it. What began as my mere pointing out to squeegee that he'd missed some days, which he took in perfectly good humor, spiralled into a much more entertaining absolute spazzing out from the TC nonce. Alas, he has now been proven wrong. Yet again. Will that guy ever latch onto a winner in life lol. Arrivederci!
Anonymous X replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 months after the original post[^] [v] #729,167
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 7 minutes later, 2 months after the original post[^] [v] #729,180
@previous (X)
> I feel like your're being trolled.
Feel again. I'm playing chess, you are playing checkers. You have been bested by a master tactician.
Trolling, for your future reference, is when you start a thread which gets losers like you to obsess over it, post diagrams illustrating what a day is, post mathematical equations explaining the same, to wade back through the thread checking obscure posts, and all the while a few days before it's due to end I get the moron to admit he fucked up :)
Ah yes, and trolling is also when you get someone to unironically accuse others of obsessive autism...while trying to bump a pointless thread on a backwater chan every day for a year, just for the sake of doing it.
You have yourself a sweet sweet day sir.
> I feel like your're being trolled.
Feel again. I'm playing chess, you are playing checkers. You have been bested by a master tactician.
Trolling, for your future reference, is when you start a thread which gets losers like you to obsess over it, post diagrams illustrating what a day is, post mathematical equations explaining the same, to wade back through the thread checking obscure posts, and all the while a few days before it's due to end I get the moron to admit he fucked up :)
Ah yes, and trolling is also when you get someone to unironically accuse others of obsessive autism...while trying to bump a pointless thread on a backwater chan every day for a year, just for the sake of doing it.
You have yourself a sweet sweet day sir.
Anonymous X replied with this 10 years ago, 13 minutes later, 2 months after the original post[^] [v] #729,199
FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI replied with this 10 years ago, 9 hours later, 2 months after the original post[^] [v] #729,303
@729,180 (A)Remember when you admitted to being a troll and a grand total of zero people were surprised and yet you still continued the same scheme for fuck knows how long? Yeah, you're a real "master troll"*. You're so good you should quit your day job and "go pro"**.
* "severe autist"
** "kill yourself"
Have a nice day, faggot :)
korkor replied with this 10 years ago, 4 hours later, 2 months after the original post[^] [v] #729,309
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 41 minutes later, 2 months after the original post[^] [v] #729,315
@729,303 (FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI)
I seem to have upset you. Perhaps you'd like to continue this discussion once you've cooled off a little?
I seem to have upset you. Perhaps you'd like to continue this discussion once you've cooled off a little?
buto replied with this 10 years ago, 4 hours later, 2 months after the original post[^] [v] #729,332
@729,167 (X)
I feel like op is probably the troll here because his schtick is like almost too pathetic to be real
I feel like op is probably the troll here because his schtick is like almost too pathetic to be real
FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI replied with this 10 years ago, 1 hour later, 2 months after the original post[^] [v] #729,344
@729,315 (A)What discussion are you referring to? This whole thread is just OP (you) being tarred and feathered through text.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 1 hour later, 2 months after the original post[^] [v] #729,356
@previous (FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI)
You still seem flustered. Maybe you'd feel better continuing this discussion when you've cooled off a bit more?
You still seem flustered. Maybe you'd feel better continuing this discussion when you've cooled off a bit more?
Anonymous X replied with this 10 years ago, 46 minutes later, 2 months after the original post[^] [v] #729,370
@729,332 (buto)
> his schtick is like almost too pathetic to be real
Aside from the fact that he just makes up numbers and does bad math, his schtick about spending all this time tracking one thread on a backwater chan makes him seem a little too crazy to be real.
> his schtick is like almost too pathetic to be real
Aside from the fact that he just makes up numbers and does bad math, his schtick about spending all this time tracking one thread on a backwater chan makes him seem a little too crazy to be real.
Anonymous W replied with this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 2 months after the original post[^] [v] #729,371
@729,164 (A)
Remember when you declared victory in your squabble with the doctor? But he just laughed and continued to mock you. Well, nothing has changed from where you stand.
Remember when you declared victory in your squabble with the doctor? But he just laughed and continued to mock you. Well, nothing has changed from where you stand.
Anonymous W double-posted this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 months after the original post[^] [v] #729,372
@729,370 (X)
These are his life achievements though! A victory was declared. Also, trolling was declared. Butthurt is evident
These are his life achievements though! A victory was declared. Also, trolling was declared. Butthurt is evident
RWBY Rhubarb? !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 10 years ago, 8 minutes later, 2 months after the original post[^] [v] #729,373
@729,370 (X)
After all the oddballs that have been through Minichan, I can believe that he really is this nuts tbh.
After all the oddballs that have been through Minichan, I can believe that he really is this nuts tbh.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 5 minutes later, 2 months after the original post[^] [v] #729,375
@729,371 (W)
> Remember when you declared victory in your squabble with the doctor? But he just laughed and continued to mock you. Well, nothing has changed from where you stand.
So this just got a tad weirder. Who exactly is it that you think I am?
> Remember when you declared victory in your squabble with the doctor? But he just laughed and continued to mock you. Well, nothing has changed from where you stand.
So this just got a tad weirder. Who exactly is it that you think I am?
buto replied with this 10 years ago, 1 hour later, 2 months after the original post[^] [v] #729,385
@729,370 (X)
that's pretty much what I said
it's just that his schtick is really a really simple, one note one that would be easy to maintain or emulate
i feel like there's an equal chance of him actually being this insane and stupid and him trolling
that's pretty much what I said
it's just that his schtick is really a really simple, one note one that would be easy to maintain or emulate
i feel like there's an equal chance of him actually being this insane and stupid and him trolling
dw replied with this 10 years ago, 10 hours later, 2 months after the original post[^] [v] #729,486
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 11 hours later, 2 months after the original post[^] [v] #729,564
Ladies and gentlemen, my case - unlike Fuckalms' ever-perturbed mind - is rested:
https://minichan.org/topic/47201#reply_729562
I thank you.
https://minichan.org/topic/47201#reply_729562
I thank you.
Anonymous W replied with this 10 years ago, 2 hours later, 2 months after the original post[^] [v] #729,606
RWBY Rhubarb? !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 10 years ago, 7 minutes later, 2 months after the original post[^] [v] #729,615
@previous (W)
And his bumps obsession. Although, since the bump thread is ending soon, I guess he'll have to find something new.
And his bumps obsession. Although, since the bump thread is ending soon, I guess he'll have to find something new.
Anonymous W replied with this 10 years ago, 7 minutes later, 2 months after the original post[^] [v] #729,622
@previous (RWBY Rhubarb? !!iNo3FkiZx)
He can't let things go. Being unemployed, fat, lonely, and mad about everything leaves him very little in his life.
I like how he claims victory. It's sad, but cute. It's best to let the poor little guy think he's doing something constructive.
He can't let things go. Being unemployed, fat, lonely, and mad about everything leaves him very little in his life.
I like how he claims victory. It's sad, but cute. It's best to let the poor little guy think he's doing something constructive.
FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI replied with this 10 years ago, 2 hours later, 2 months after the original post[^] [v] #729,655
@previous (W)> It's best to let the poor little guy think he's doing something constructive.
But where's the fun in that?
@729,615 (RWBY Rhubarb? !!iNo3FkiZx)
Maybe he'll samefag it for a whole 'nother year just to keep the feeling alive.
Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 2 weeks later, 2 months after the original post[^] [v] #734,451
This threads grate.