Notice: You have been identified as a bot, so no internal UID will be assigned to you. If you are a real person messing with your useragent, you should change it back to something normal.

Minichan

Topic: Scotland is going to hold a referrendum to secede from the UK.

Anonymous A started this discussion 15 years ago #5,484

link

Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later[^] [v] #95,888

The SNP aren't gonna do shit and will never have the power to remove Scotland from the UK.

Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 3 minutes later, 5 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #95,892

Typical stupid Scots. :')

Ash Ketchup !bbKEtchUp. joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 2 seconds later, 5 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #95,893

I hope they fucking do it as well.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 8 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #95,896

@95,892 (C)
What's stupid about this?

Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 9 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #95,897

Most Scots are against it.

Source: the news.

Anonymous B replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 11 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #95,899

@95,896 (A)

Average SNP supporter: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=scNLfr1EP08

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 12 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #95,900

@previous (B)
Nice ad hominem.

What's stupid about seceding from the UK?

TTEH !IzK9KJ2nYY replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 13 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #95,902

@95,897 (Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx)
In a 2010 survey, 40% supported independence, 40% opposed independence. Src.

Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 14 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #95,904

@95,900 (A)
Two countries merged together are stronger than two separated. A split would accomplish little but appeasing nationalists.

Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx double-posted this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 17 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #95,905

@95,902 (TTEH !IzK9KJ2nYY)
Channel 4 said last night that most were against independence. While this is presumably more recent, I have no idea how they got that number.

Anonymous B replied with this 15 years ago, 58 seconds later, 18 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #95,906

@95,902 (TTEH !IzK9KJ2nYY)

> In a 2010 survey, 40% supported independence, 40% opposed independence. Src.

And what happened to the remaining 20%? They were too high on crack, stealing England's tax for their dole money, having free university places with Wales while middle England has to pay. If Scotland wasn't in the UK it would be bankrupt.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 58 seconds later, 19 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #95,907

@95,904 (Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx)
Strong in what sense? They would still be allies, and just as strong in a military sense.

Scotland is part of the EU, who is becoming more and more like a federation, uniting all of Europe. Scotland, if it seceded, would use the Euro, stay a member of the European institutions, etc.

The UK isn't a relevant way to group those countries any more. Scotland is a different nation than England, it should be a different state as well.

Anonymous B replied with this 15 years ago, 3 minutes later, 22 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #95,910

@previous (A)

> Scotland is a different nation than England, it should be a different state as well.

There is a fucking retard in our midst.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 24 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #95,911

@previous (B)
*facepalm*

nice shit-tier post.

Learn the difference between a nation and state, moron.

(Edited 2 minutes later.)

Ks !KansasxqvM joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 3 minutes later, 28 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #95,913

What would Scotland gain by seceding?

replied with this 15 years ago, 55 seconds later, 29 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #95,914

@previous (Ks !KansasxqvM)
They'd become an International laughing stock... So nothing would be any different. :D

Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 39 seconds later, 29 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #95,915

@95,913 (Ks !KansasxqvM)
Lower tax on Haggis, presumably.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 59 seconds later, 30 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #95,917

@95,913 (Ks !KansasxqvM)
More autonomy. They could make their own decisions instead of having to take orders from England.

Ks !KansasxqvM replied with this 15 years ago, 18 seconds later, 31 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #95,918

@95,915 (G)
Scotland; where eating fat out of a pig's asshole is a national pastime.

(Edited 1 minute later.)

Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 15 years ago, 3 minutes later, 34 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #95,920

@95,917 (A)
In what way do they suffer from having to comply with what parliament decides? They still have free universities while England lost that.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 36 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #95,924

@previous (Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx)
It just doesn't make sense for them to be together in the first place. (like belgium).

Ks !KansasxqvM replied with this 15 years ago, 7 seconds later, 36 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #95,925

@95,920 (Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx)

> They still have free universities while England lost that.

No more free uni? Healthcare is next.

Anonymous C replied with this 15 years ago, 56 seconds later, 37 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #95,926

@previous (Ks !KansasxqvM)
Lolno.

Ks !KansasxqvM replied with this 15 years ago, 44 seconds later, 38 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #95,928

@previous (C)
You would have said that about uni five years ago. ;)

Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 39 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #95,929

@95,924 (A)
Your arguments are pretty vague. So you have any numbers to back up your claims?

@95,925 (Ks !KansasxqvM)
Nah. The NHS is the government's main concern, it'll survive.

replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 40 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #95,930

@95,928 (Ks !KansasxqvM)
Fees were introduced in 1998, and everyone saw it coming. It was no big surprise. :p

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 4 minutes later, 45 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #95,935

@95,929 (Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx)

> Your arguments are pretty vague. So you have any numbers to back up your claims?
Can't tell if trolling or just stupid... National identity is not a matter of numbers. Nations and states != math.

Can you give me a "number" that says the US and Mexico should be seperated, or a number that shows why France and Germany are two states?

(Edited 57 seconds later.)

Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 47 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #95,940

@95,917 (A)
> More autonomy. They could make their own decisions instead of having to take orders from England.
They don't take orders from England, they take orders from the GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED KINGDOM. As, does England.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 48 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #95,943

@previous (H)
Nations should govern themselves, not by others.

England, Wales, N. Ireland, etc. should not tell Scotland how to do things, and vice versa.

Anonymous H replied with this 15 years ago, 5 minutes later, 54 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #95,948

@previous (A)
w/e

It's worked fine for the past 300 years and I see no reason why it won't work in the future.

Ks !KansasxqvM replied with this 15 years ago, 10 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #95,955

@95,943 (A)
Given the EAU exists it really doesn't make sense and I think anyone would have a hard time justifying why Scotland should be under the control of the UK.

Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 15 years ago, 22 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #95,971

@95,935 (A)
Fine, stay vague. National identity is an intangible concept, that most don't give a shit about, especially with two countries that have grown up together and more or less share their culture.

Provide tangible, real benefits that independence would bring.

(Edited 1 minute later.)

psychopath !PAHVpsycho joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 2 hours later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #96,029

Good.
Scotland is great place that needs to secede the literal tyranny of the UK/England.

Anonymous H replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #96,033

@previous (psychopath !PAHVpsycho)
Fuck off ya bloody wanker

psychopath !PAHVpsycho replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #96,035

@previous (H)
Englanders are the niggers of the British isles.

Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #96,038

@previous (psychopath !PAHVpsycho)
Trolling hard, or hardly trolling?

Anonymous H replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #96,040

@96,035 (psychopath !PAHVpsycho)
Britain would be NOTHING with out England.

Go troll somewhere else, you inbred twat.

psychopath !PAHVpsycho replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #96,041

@96,038 (Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx)
Option III: Honest opinion.
Englanders really suck in general. They give millions of dollars to the wealthiest Englanders just for getting married, all the while 1/5 of their own people can barely make it off the Dole. They bring in immigrants, but expect them to retain their original culture rather than logically abandoning it for the good of the majority.

psychopath !PAHVpsycho double-posted this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #96,043

@96,040 (H)
Britain would be so much better if everyone from England were to leave the isles. Iceland is the best nation in the UK as of now.

Anonymous H replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #96,045

@previous (psychopath !PAHVpsycho)
> Iceland is the best nation in the UK as of now.
niggayoujustwentfullretard.jpeg

psychopath !PAHVpsycho replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #96,048

@previous (H)
Well, they are soon to be. They are basically owned by UK as of now until they pay off their debt to UK.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 52 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #96,085

@previous (psychopath !PAHVpsycho)
http://netrightdaily.com/2011/04/iceland-declares-independence-from-international-banks/

Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 15 years ago, 23 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #96,091

@96,041 (psychopath !PAHVpsycho)
Talking about the Royal Family?

Watch this video

psychopath !PAHVpsycho replied with this 15 years ago, 13 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #96,093

@96,085 (A)
Welp, there goes wasted potential.
@previous (A)
Neat vid.

Nickalollyoff !Aw0s40dyqw joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 11 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #96,097

even if the jock cunts voted to split off, Westminister wouldn't allow it

(Edited 9 seconds later.)

Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 15 years ago, 3 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #96,099

@96,041 (psychopath !PAHVpsycho)
Psychopath: expert society analyst expert.
:

Please familiarise yourself with the rules and markup syntax before posting.