Topic: Hillary released her tax returns
Metæ started this discussion 10 years ago #54,782
Who has actually read them? I mean, not like read what other people thought about them but like actually read the actual tax forms in their entirety?
I have not read them and don't care to read them. It doesn't matter. If she did something criminal the IRS would prosecute her. The fact that she's not being prosecuted tells me her tax returns must be alright and if they're good enough for the IRS they're good enough for me.
I have not read them and don't care to read them. It doesn't matter. If she did something criminal the IRS would prosecute her. The fact that she's not being prosecuted tells me her tax returns must be alright and if they're good enough for the IRS they're good enough for me.
WSD !m2cp3rR5zw joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 9 minutes later[^] [v] #711,398
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 5 minutes later, 15 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #711,399
Maybe she should do the same with her emails.
Syntax joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 17 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #711,400
https://www.hillaryclinton.com/page/tax-returns/
Damn that web site wanted an email addy and phone number. I gave them a zip code and email addy of a con man in Louisiana and his working phone number.
So OF COURSE I only did a quick skim and let FOX News dig deep deep deep - All they could find was Clinton gave lots of money to charity and paid a very high much to high rate of tax's
Let others do that kind of work for me and YOU2 - The only criminal thing IRS found was laffing at her for paying so much tax when its easy to reduce that number
Damn that web site wanted an email addy and phone number. I gave them a zip code and email addy of a con man in Louisiana and his working phone number.
So OF COURSE I only did a quick skim and let FOX News dig deep deep deep - All they could find was Clinton gave lots of money to charity and paid a very high much to high rate of tax's
Let others do that kind of work for me and YOU2 - The only criminal thing IRS found was laffing at her for paying so much tax when its easy to reduce that number
Metæ (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 19 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #711,401
@711,398 (WSD !m2cp3rR5zw)
I sometimes politicians were just honest about it. If someone just stopped pandering and was all like yeah faggots I'm in it for the money and the power fuck the plebs ?? I'd feel good about it. At least it would be an honest relationship.
I sometimes politicians were just honest about it. If someone just stopped pandering and was all like yeah faggots I'm in it for the money and the power fuck the plebs ?? I'd feel good about it. At least it would be an honest relationship.
Syntax replied with this 10 years ago, 21 seconds later, 19 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #711,402
@711,399 (C)
> Maybe she should do the same with her emails.
What do you think Trump or Bill O'Reilly wood say if asked to release THEIR Personal emails? What wood you say?
> Maybe she should do the same with her emails.
What do you think Trump or Bill O'Reilly wood say if asked to release THEIR Personal emails? What wood you say?
Metæ (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 5 minutes later, 25 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #711,404
@711,400 (Syntax)
> So OF COURSE I only did a quick skim and let FOX News dig deep deep deep
But see this is the problem. You're not reading them. If Hillary didn't release her tax returns you'd be upset but she's opened the kimono and now you can't be bothered to take more than a cursory glance?
You go to Fox (more like FAUX News, amirite? ?) News and have them read it for you.
> So OF COURSE I only did a quick skim and let FOX News dig deep deep deep
But see this is the problem. You're not reading them. If Hillary didn't release her tax returns you'd be upset but she's opened the kimono and now you can't be bothered to take more than a cursory glance?
You go to Fox (more like FAUX News, amirite? ?) News and have them read it for you.
Syntax replied with this 10 years ago, 9 minutes later, 34 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #711,407
@previous (Metæ)
I do watch much more of Fox these days for comedy relief - Mostly at 24 hour fitness
I did get most of my info on her tax returns from CNN but quickly jumped to Fox for their report - It was of course a Yawn
> Fox (more like FAUX News, amirite?
100%
Tonight as recorded on my TVio I skimmed O'Reilly who asked for details on accuracy the history of accuracy of current polls based on prior elections and the commentator he had on gave totally accurate results - Including Bill asking about how they lean and the gal reported that ALL lean Republican and he said WHAT I thought they all leaned Liberal
I suspect after he recorded his show he was pissed off something terrible
I do watch much more of Fox these days for comedy relief - Mostly at 24 hour fitness
I did get most of my info on her tax returns from CNN but quickly jumped to Fox for their report - It was of course a Yawn
> Fox (more like FAUX News, amirite?
100%
Tonight as recorded on my TVio I skimmed O'Reilly who asked for details on accuracy the history of accuracy of current polls based on prior elections and the commentator he had on gave totally accurate results - Including Bill asking about how they lean and the gal reported that ALL lean Republican and he said WHAT I thought they all leaned Liberal
I suspect after he recorded his show he was pissed off something terrible
Metæ (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 37 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #711,408
@previous (Syntax)
Yes of course if there was anything bad Fox would be all over it. But my point is you want to see her tax returns but you don't want to actually read them.
Yes of course if there was anything bad Fox would be all over it. But my point is you want to see her tax returns but you don't want to actually read them.
Syntax replied with this 10 years ago, 22 minutes later, 59 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #711,412
@previous (Metæ)
I mean like I do work for a living and sure during summer I do try n goof off to add to summer fun. I pay a tax guy to do my returns and sure I look at pages n pages of stuff and then sign
If Trump were to release his returns and that will be a cold day in hell - I wood leave it up to people like Ben Stein to analyze and report and do the work for me
https://m.hrc.onl/secretary/10-documents/01-health-financial-records/Clinton_2015_Form_1040_with_Signature_Page.pdf
Metæ
One year one tax return 40 Pages. Tell ya what I will do for you - I will let U get off on the 40 pages and then you can do all the other years and u tell me what I missed OK
I mean like I do work for a living and sure during summer I do try n goof off to add to summer fun. I pay a tax guy to do my returns and sure I look at pages n pages of stuff and then sign
If Trump were to release his returns and that will be a cold day in hell - I wood leave it up to people like Ben Stein to analyze and report and do the work for me
https://m.hrc.onl/secretary/10-documents/01-health-financial-records/Clinton_2015_Form_1040_with_Signature_Page.pdf
Metæ
One year one tax return 40 Pages. Tell ya what I will do for you - I will let U get off on the 40 pages and then you can do all the other years and u tell me what I missed OK
Anonymous C replied with this 10 years ago, 1 hour later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #711,417
Syntax replied with this 10 years ago, 44 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #711,420
@previous (C)
BullShite
Questions about whether Clinton deleted a number of work-related emails—and if she did, why.
I doubt a single person HERE wants their Personal and Private emails made visible to all
And have you looked at the number of other people who used private email servers? Some FAMOUS Names
BullShite
Questions about whether Clinton deleted a number of work-related emails—and if she did, why.
The State Department has released what is said to represent all of the work-related, or “official,” emails Clinton sent during her tenure as secretary—a number totaling about 30,000. According to Clinton and her campaign, when they were choosing what correspondence to turn over to State for public release, they deleted 31,830 other emails deemed “personal and private.”
I doubt a single person HERE wants their Personal and Private emails made visible to all
And have you looked at the number of other people who used private email servers? Some FAMOUS Names
Metæ (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 1 day later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #711,771
In fact, going back in time bit, who actually read Mitt Romney's or John Kerry's tax returns? Nobody I know did. Did you?
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #711,772
I want Matt to release his tax returns.
Syntax replied with this 10 years ago, 12 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #711,774
@711,771 (Metæ)
I did in fact skim Mitt Romney's return - Fact is I never took a basic accounting course until I found it necessary to do one at UCLA by extension.
Metæ I bet not a single On Air news person read any of the tax returns. That boring stuff is assigned to research staff. You and I have more better things to do like cooking something wonderful or making wine or?
I not going to waste my time reading a tax return -
I did in fact skim Mitt Romney's return - Fact is I never took a basic accounting course until I found it necessary to do one at UCLA by extension.
Metæ I bet not a single On Air news person read any of the tax returns. That boring stuff is assigned to research staff. You and I have more better things to do like cooking something wonderful or making wine or?
I not going to waste my time reading a tax return -