Anonymous B replied with this 10 years ago, 27 seconds later, 6 minutes after the original post[^][v]#708,912
@708,907 (A)
I feel like the conservative propaganda machine you're pointing us at wants to blow the whole story open with their particular brand of spin.
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 7 minutes after the original post[^][v]#708,913
> Breitbart
Please find a credible source. A police report or local news or something like that would do.
Breitbart is literal trash not fit to wipe one's arse with.
Anonymous C replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 10 minutes after the original post[^][v]#708,915
@previous (D)
Do you need a fox news link to the story?
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 59 seconds later, 11 minutes after the original post[^][v]#708,916
> > Breitbart > Please find a credible source. A police report or local news or something like that would do. > > Breitbart is literal trash not fit to wipe one's arse with.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 45 seconds later, 12 minutes after the original post[^][v]#708,917
> I feel like the conservative propaganda machine you're pointing us at wants to blow the whole story open with their particular brand of spin.
I feel like the Cultural Marxist propaganda machine you're defending at wants to hide the whole story with their particular brand of spin.
@708,913 (D) > Please find a credible source. A police report or local news or something like that would do. > > Breitbart is literal trash not fit to wipe one's arse with.
Wikileaks proved that all the mainstream media in the USA is controlled by the Democratic Party and still you stick your head in the sand.
Yeah, you're not doing a good job proving you aren't just feeding us conservative propaganda links... Try harder. (Hint: stormfront.com is not going to work)
Anonymous D replied with this 10 years ago, 6 seconds later, 21 minutes after the original post[^][v]#708,923
@708,917 (A)
Never mind, OP isn't capable of carrying a conversation outside of the far-right echo chamber.
Please wait for kook and Denmark guy to join the thread. They are the type of posters you're looking for.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 23 minutes after the original post[^][v]#708,924
Anonymous H replied with this 10 years ago, 6 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^][v]#708,943
@previous (D)
Are you suggesting her own father lied about seeing the video?
Anonymous D replied with this 10 years ago, 7 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^][v]#708,944
@previous (H)
Hmm. Didn't check the Snopes link, huh. Okay, I'll make it easy for you. Very easy:
> We contacted county prosecutor Grant Loebs to obtain first-hand information about the rumors. He confirmed to us that an incident did take place at the Fawnbrook Apartment complex in Twin Falls, Idaho, on 2 June 2016 involving a five-year-old girl, a seven-year-old boy, a ten-year-old boy, and a 14-year-old boy. Loebs said that the three boys were of Middle Eastern descent, but they were not Syrian and he had no information indicating they were refugees.
D-g !jJEom8Ii3E joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 4 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^][v]#708,945
"but their refugee status wasn’t immediately clear to the police chief."
Anyway that prosecutor seems to be all over the place, says it wasn't gang rape, says the 14 year old was just recording and then also mentions sex cases between minors is not uncommon? Whaa!?
Anonymous D replied with this 10 years ago, 5 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^][v]#708,954
@previous (D-g !jJEom8Ii3E)
Nevermind, don't worry about it. I'm not confident that you will be able to understand this properly so you can believe what you'd like. The same for kook.
D-g !jJEom8Ii3E replied with this 10 years ago, 4 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^][v]#708,957
No, I understand that there are bad types of anti refuge people. But if you want to counter it the government shouldn't throw oil on the fire by acting like there aren't bad people among the refugees and there is no cause for concern.
kook !!OPZbEQMT1 replied with this 10 years ago, 17 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^][v]#708,959
I like how people mock Denmark guy while they themselves can't be bothered to do just a bit of extra reading.
魔 joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 1 hour later, 6 hours after the original post[^][v]#708,965
that's a lil graphic
kook !!OPZbEQMT1 replied with this 10 years ago, 13 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^][v]#708,976
And anon D goes silent. Typical.
Anonymous D replied with this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^][v]#708,978
@previous (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)
There is no point in discussing this issue with people who can't understand it properly. It's as much a courtesy to you as it is to me.
@708,965 (魔)
Of course. What OP and the far-right sources want to do is shock you into being scared of refugees. Their aim isn't to give you an accurate picture of events, but a scary one.
beckyderp !Hi.HILLARY joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 8 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^][v]#708,981
"ugh"
kook !!OPZbEQMT1 replied with this 10 years ago, 22 seconds later, 7 hours after the original post[^][v]#708,982
@708,978 (D)
Can't understand how you're a dumb fuck? Yes that does puzzle me.
kook !!OPZbEQMT1 double-posted this 10 years ago, 37 seconds later, 7 hours after the original post[^][v]#708,983
@708,981 (beckyderp !Hi.HILLARY)
No it's okay becky, because they aren't Syrians.
Anonymous D replied with this 10 years ago, 13 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^][v]#708,989
@previous (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)
This is precisely why I'm deciding not to discuss the matter with you. You did not even follow a conversation properly, and leap to wild conclusions about what is being said.
Don't worry. I'm not mad at you. I did not expect you to fully grasp things here.
kook !!OPZbEQMT1 replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^][v]#708,991
@previous (D)
Okay. Enjoy being a child molesting, race traitor
The Gospel II joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 8 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^][v]#708,993
Andrew Breitbart
Andrew Breitbart (1969–2012) was an American right-wing media critic, webmaster and "Internet entrepreneur." He was the founder of the "Big X" sites, currently comprising Big Hollywood, Big Government, Big Journalism and Big Peace. When it came to Hollywood radicals, it took one to know one: He was born to progressive Jewish parents in Brentwood, a suburb of Los Angeles. He joined the conservative cause in reaction to a multi-pronged, liberal media attack on Clarence Thomas during his confirmation hearing. From then on, "outrage was Breitbart’s chosen weapon.
Breitbart said: Pubic hair on a cola can was just a silly joke. Its not important in the scheme of selecting a supreme court judge. If anyone was offended they should have moved on and found another job.
A.B. had a reputation for making up more stories than Aesop, all wrapped up in a burrito of self-aggrandizement and grandiose, incoherent proclamations.
He was particularly fond of using misleading information to denigrate his political opponents. Very shortly after his death (mere hours after the news broke), bizarre conspiracy theories began circulating that Breitbart was murdered after finding "something" on Barack Obama rather than dying of natural causes.
Amazing how a previously right-wing rag which was a notch below WorldNetDaily has become a major news outlet for "socially liberal" Reddit. Breitbart is building an army of unemployed twenty-somethings who will be the future of America. So no, they are not going away soon.
These unemployed twenty-somethings are the basis for Donald Trumps nomination.
(Edited 1 minute later.)
kook !!OPZbEQMT1 replied with this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^][v]#708,994
@previous (The Gospel II)
Where did you find this?
Anonymous N joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^][v]#708,997
In remembrance, Republican presidential candidates Rick Santorum, Mitt Romney and Newt Gingrich praised Breitbart. Santorum called Breitbart's death "a huge loss" that strongly affected him. Gingrich said: Breitbart showed me his micropenis, and I drooled at the opportunity to taste it and compare it to a clitoris & decided someone might have a hidden camera, so I decided otherwise.
The Gospel II replied with this 10 years ago, 27 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^][v]#709,009
@708,994 (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)
Type in to Bing search engine.
"Critique Andrew Breitbart." Read results.
The reply is from two sources and are parsed. One source was used for 95% of the reply you see.
D-g !jJEom8Ii3E replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^][v]#709,011
Anonymous D replied with this 10 years ago, 9 hours later, 3 days after the original post[^][v]#709,831
I see that some of the slower posters have missed the point and haven't properly understood the conversation. As a courtesy, I will clearly spell it out for them:
The point, in the conversation, is that right-wing sources were misrepresenting details of the rape. At no point was the rape's occurrence denied, nor that people of Arabic origin perpetrated it. And, yes, rape is bad.
I hope this has helped you to catch on to what was said. I won't always be around to help you out with these things. You should practice thinking about these things some more.
kook !!OPZbEQMT1 replied with this 10 years ago, 3 hours later, 3 days after the original post[^][v]#709,840