Topic: CNN Newsflash! Syntax busted for lying! No getting around this one!
Anonymous A started this discussion 10 years ago #54,498
> "guards could not read my Chinese Visa cause they read n spoke the rong brand of Chinese"
Dude, Chinese writing is all the same, no matter the dialect. You have just been BUSTED for lying about your trip.
Dude, Chinese writing is all the same, no matter the dialect. You have just been BUSTED for lying about your trip.
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later[^] [v] #708,659
Syntax has been caught telling a lie about his life on the internet? Surely you jest.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #708,660
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 7 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #708,664
Syntax was actually using his own self-made dialect of Chinese. He created it around the time he was in China to advise Sun Tzu on military tactics.
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 54 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #708,688
Syntax is now torridly Googling Chinese to see if there is, somewhere, somehow, some linguistic loophole that would allow him to try to get out of this lie.
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 11 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #708,696
Syntax actually invented lying around 3200 years ago while advising the poet sin leqi unninni about epic poetry and wall construction.
FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 13 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #708,704
Anonymous B replied with this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #708,705
@previous (FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI)
Really, really wish you'd fuck off back to Tinychan with your stupid pictures.
Really, really wish you'd fuck off back to Tinychan with your stupid pictures.
Anonymous D replied with this 10 years ago, 1 hour later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #708,732
Still waiting, Syntax!
FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI replied with this 10 years ago, 43 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #708,744
Anonymous B replied with this 10 years ago, 25 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #708,748
Catherine !TGirlYJKXM joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #708,750
Anonymous B replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #708,751
FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI replied with this 10 years ago, 9 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #708,752
Anonymous B replied with this 10 years ago, 13 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #708,753
@previous (FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI)
No, it's not about being 'mad' Fuckalms, it's about wanting you to fuck off. You drove your own board into the ground, so that now it's a wasteland where nobody ever posts, so you've come over here to spam your stupid pictures instead of just going away and thinking about why everyone eventually leaves from any board where you are.
No, it's not about being 'mad' Fuckalms, it's about wanting you to fuck off. You drove your own board into the ground, so that now it's a wasteland where nobody ever posts, so you've come over here to spam your stupid pictures instead of just going away and thinking about why everyone eventually leaves from any board where you are.
FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI replied with this 10 years ago, 17 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #708,757
HelterSkelter !8x8z91r9YM joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 5 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #708,759
FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI replied with this 10 years ago, 5 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #708,764
@previous (HelterSkelter !8x8z91r9YM)
Do you know any good chants I can recite in my head to measure out the recommended 2 minutes?
Do you know any good chants I can recite in my head to measure out the recommended 2 minutes?
(Edited 10 seconds later.)
Metæ joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 8 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #708,766
What about simplified vs traditional Chinese characters??
Anti !M6R0eWkIpk replied with this 10 years ago, 6 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #708,770
@708,764 (FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI)
OM JAYANTI MANGALA KAALI
BHADRA KAALI KAPALINI
DURGA KSHAMA SHIVAA DHAATRI
SVAHA SVADHA NAMO-STU-TE
Repeat 7 times or until gums bleed.
OM JAYANTI MANGALA KAALI
BHADRA KAALI KAPALINI
DURGA KSHAMA SHIVAA DHAATRI
SVAHA SVADHA NAMO-STU-TE
Repeat 7 times or until gums bleed.
Anonymous D replied with this 10 years ago, 12 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #708,775
@708,766 (Metæ)
Mainland Chinese uses simplified exclusively, but all mainland Chinese can also read traditional. Thanks.
Mainland Chinese uses simplified exclusively, but all mainland Chinese can also read traditional. Thanks.
Syntax joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 23 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #708,781
Syntax double-posted this 10 years ago, 25 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #708,789
@OP
> > "guards could not read my Chinese Visa cause they read n spoke the rong brand of Chinese"
> Dude, Chinese writing is all the same, no matter the dialect. You have just been BUSTED for lying about your trip.
OP
You don't no shit about Chinese language. Nice try but next time b4 you make such a claim you should research the subject you No nada about or otherwise someone such as ME will come along and call you just one more Donald Trump con artist faker and liar
Now I of course No nada about Chinese language WELL That was true b4 your topic - Now with a pile of quick tabs on the subject and examples on how many Chinese don't have a clue either EXCEPT just enough do in Mandarin so they can make subtitles for foreign movies and get people to pay ALAS that often fails cause
> The Chinese had no uniform phonetic transcription system until the mid-20th century,
> Cantonese is unique among non-Mandarin regional languages in having a written colloquial standard, used in Hong Kong and overseas, with a large number of unofficial characters for words particular to this dialect.
> with a large number of unofficial characters for words particular to this dialect.
> The simplified forms have also been criticized for being inconsistent.
> Inconsistencies create problems between Mandarin, Cantonese, Fuzhounese, because they transfer to the same characters.
> Transference, in which a character, often with a simple, concrete meaning takes on an extended, more abstract meaning, depending on the dialect
OP you remind me of FatFuck who pretends to no shit about food but proved he does no what shit tastes like because he had no choice but to eat the crap that was served.
You do a topic that is loaded with proof you No Shit about the Chinese language - I suggest you spend some time with On over at TC and discuss with him - Ask him what happens if a fly spec hits a Chinese character and changes the meaning from I want to make love to a real girl instead of palm of hand and fly spec changes it to I want to make garbage out of my palm
I only used two tabs of 5 and there are some fun examples of how hard this Chicken Scrapings of ritting becomes
> > "guards could not read my Chinese Visa cause they read n spoke the rong brand of Chinese"
> Dude, Chinese writing is all the same, no matter the dialect. You have just been BUSTED for lying about your trip.
OP
You don't no shit about Chinese language. Nice try but next time b4 you make such a claim you should research the subject you No nada about or otherwise someone such as ME will come along and call you just one more Donald Trump con artist faker and liar
Now I of course No nada about Chinese language WELL That was true b4 your topic - Now with a pile of quick tabs on the subject and examples on how many Chinese don't have a clue either EXCEPT just enough do in Mandarin so they can make subtitles for foreign movies and get people to pay ALAS that often fails cause
> The Chinese had no uniform phonetic transcription system until the mid-20th century,
> Cantonese is unique among non-Mandarin regional languages in having a written colloquial standard, used in Hong Kong and overseas, with a large number of unofficial characters for words particular to this dialect.
> with a large number of unofficial characters for words particular to this dialect.
In the 20th century, written Chinese divided into two canonical forms, called simplified Chinese and traditional Chinese. Simplified Chinese was developed in mainland China in order to make the characters faster to write (especially as some characters had as many as a few dozen strokes) and easier to memorize. The People's Republic of China claims that both goals have been achieved, but some external observers disagree. Little systematic study has been conducted on how simplified Chinese has affected the way Chinese people become literate; the only studies conducted before it was standardized in mainland China seem to have been statistical ones regarding how many strokes were saved on average in samples of running text.
> The simplified forms have also been criticized for being inconsistent.
> Inconsistencies create problems between Mandarin, Cantonese, Fuzhounese, because they transfer to the same characters.
> Transference, in which a character, often with a simple, concrete meaning takes on an extended, more abstract meaning, depending on the dialect
OP you remind me of FatFuck who pretends to no shit about food but proved he does no what shit tastes like because he had no choice but to eat the crap that was served.
You do a topic that is loaded with proof you No Shit about the Chinese language - I suggest you spend some time with On over at TC and discuss with him - Ask him what happens if a fly spec hits a Chinese character and changes the meaning from I want to make love to a real girl instead of palm of hand and fly spec changes it to I want to make garbage out of my palm
I only used two tabs of 5 and there are some fun examples of how hard this Chicken Scrapings of ritting becomes
Anonymous D replied with this 10 years ago, 7 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #708,791
@previous (Syntax)
Hey Syntax: All Chinese people write the same! LOL all mainlanders can also read traditional! It is all the same! LMAO idiot!
Hey Syntax: All Chinese people write the same! LOL all mainlanders can also read traditional! It is all the same! LMAO idiot!
Metæ replied with this 10 years ago, 10 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #708,792
@previous (D)
But I thought Hong Kong and PRChina used different systems (traditional and simplified).
I dunno man, a lot of people can't read or write in cursive anymore. It's not even being taught in schools these days. You could say "all English speaking people write the same!" but If write a letter in cursive with a fountain pen, like half the population will be unable to read it.
But I thought Hong Kong and PRChina used different systems (traditional and simplified).
I dunno man, a lot of people can't read or write in cursive anymore. It's not even being taught in schools these days. You could say "all English speaking people write the same!" but If write a letter in cursive with a fountain pen, like half the population will be unable to read it.
Syntax replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #708,793
Damn so much more about language that looks like Hen scratching's
Because the majority of modern Chinese words contain more than one character, there are at least two measuring sticks for Chinese literacy: the number of characters known, and the number of words known. John DeFrancis, in the introduction to his Advanced Chinese Reader, estimates that a typical Chinese college graduate recognizes 4,000 to 5,000 characters, and 40,000 to 60,000 words.
Jerry Norman, in Chinese, places the number of characters somewhat lower, at 3,000 to 4,000. These counts are complicated by the tangled development of Chinese characters. In many cases, a single character came to be written in multiple ways.
> The entire Chinese character corpus since antiquity comprises well over 20,000 characters, of which only roughly 10,000 are now commonly in use. However Chinese characters should not be confused with Chinese words. Because most Chinese words are made up of two or more characters,
"there are many times more Chinese words than there are characters."
> Many modern forms of the Chinese languages have their own distinct writing system using Chinese characters that contain colloquial variants. These typically are used as sound characters to help determine the pronunciation of the sentence within that language:
Shocking that OP had no clue (nor wood I) That Ritten Cantonese differs from Mandarin
U must be FatFucks understudy and should consider doing food reviews that are total BS cept was a good con to crowdfund the suckers which he larned from con man daddy
Added to make one anon happy about adding Fatfuck shit into a reply
Because the majority of modern Chinese words contain more than one character, there are at least two measuring sticks for Chinese literacy: the number of characters known, and the number of words known. John DeFrancis, in the introduction to his Advanced Chinese Reader, estimates that a typical Chinese college graduate recognizes 4,000 to 5,000 characters, and 40,000 to 60,000 words.
Jerry Norman, in Chinese, places the number of characters somewhat lower, at 3,000 to 4,000. These counts are complicated by the tangled development of Chinese characters. In many cases, a single character came to be written in multiple ways.
> The entire Chinese character corpus since antiquity comprises well over 20,000 characters, of which only roughly 10,000 are now commonly in use. However Chinese characters should not be confused with Chinese words. Because most Chinese words are made up of two or more characters,
"there are many times more Chinese words than there are characters."
> Many modern forms of the Chinese languages have their own distinct writing system using Chinese characters that contain colloquial variants. These typically are used as sound characters to help determine the pronunciation of the sentence within that language:
Written Cantonese is the written form of Cantonese, the most complete written form of Chinese after that for Mandarin Chinese. Written Chinese was originally developed for Classical Chinese, and was the main literary language of China until the 19th century. Written vernacular Chinese first appeared in the 17th century and a written form of Mandarin became standard throughout China in the early 20th century. While texts written in this system can in principle be read word for word in other Chinese varieties'
, this sounds unnatural because of differences in idiom, grammar, and usage. Modern Cantonese speakers have therefore developed their own written script, sometimes creating new characters for words that either do not exist or have been lost in standard Chinese.
, this sounds unnatural because of differences in idiom, grammar, and usage. Modern Cantonese speakers have therefore developed their own written script, sometimes creating new characters for words that either do not exist or have been lost in standard Chinese.
Shocking that OP had no clue (nor wood I) That Ritten Cantonese differs from Mandarin
U must be FatFucks understudy and should consider doing food reviews that are total BS cept was a good con to crowdfund the suckers which he larned from con man daddy
Added to make one anon happy about adding Fatfuck shit into a reply
(Edited 8 minutes later.)
FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #708,794
Metæ replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #708,795
@previous (FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI)
Can you ask On how easy it would be for a PRChinese person to read traditional Chinese characters?
Can you ask On how easy it would be for a PRChinese person to read traditional Chinese characters?
Syntax replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #708,796
@708,791 (D)
> Hey Syntax: All Chinese people write the same! LOL all mainlanders can also read traditional! It is all the same! LMAO idiot!
Not according to what I just posted and tell me what are your qualifications? Do you have a phony PhD in Chinese?
Wood you like a reference or DID YOU THINK I wood make this UP?
Reminds me of Indy - He goes to Beijing and becomes expert on getting Tuberculous then goes to another disgusting city to teach a language to Chinese that that almost anyone in US can teach cause its wot we sorta no - Worth a few cents over minimum wage or less but hey that was all he was qualified to do other then Flip Burgers
For sure he no shit about Chinese language cause he left so many posts about how hard it was to learn on the ex pat forum
> Hey Syntax: All Chinese people write the same! LOL all mainlanders can also read traditional! It is all the same! LMAO idiot!
Not according to what I just posted and tell me what are your qualifications? Do you have a phony PhD in Chinese?
Written Cantonese is the written form of Cantonese, the most complete written form of Chinese after that for Mandarin Chinese. Written Chinese was originally developed for Classical Chinese, and was the main literary language of China until the 19th century. Written vernacular Chinese first appeared in the 17th century and a written form of Mandarin became standard throughout China in the early 20th century. While texts written in this system can in principle be read word for word in other Chinese varieties'
, this sounds unnatural because of differences in idiom, grammar, and usage. Modern Cantonese speakers have therefore developed their own written script, sometimes creating new characters for words that either do not exist or have been lost in standard Chinese.
, this sounds unnatural because of differences in idiom, grammar, and usage. Modern Cantonese speakers have therefore developed their own written script, sometimes creating new characters for words that either do not exist or have been lost in standard Chinese.
Wood you like a reference or DID YOU THINK I wood make this UP?
Reminds me of Indy - He goes to Beijing and becomes expert on getting Tuberculous then goes to another disgusting city to teach a language to Chinese that that almost anyone in US can teach cause its wot we sorta no - Worth a few cents over minimum wage or less but hey that was all he was qualified to do other then Flip Burgers
For sure he no shit about Chinese language cause he left so many posts about how hard it was to learn on the ex pat forum
Anonymous D replied with this 10 years ago, 4 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #708,797
@previous (Syntax)
Syntax: there are only two forms of written Chinese: simplified, and traditional. All mainland Chinese can read both. You are full of shit, or, as I might say, full of 屎.
Syntax: there are only two forms of written Chinese: simplified, and traditional. All mainland Chinese can read both. You are full of shit, or, as I might say, full of 屎.
Metæ replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #708,798
@previous (D)
> All Chinese people write the same!
> there are only two forms of written Chinese
Which is it?
> All Chinese people write the same!
> there are only two forms of written Chinese
Which is it?
Anonymous K joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 30 seconds later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #708,799
@708,753 (B)
> No, it's not about being 'mad' Fuckalms, it's about wanting you to fuck off. You drove your own board into the ground, so that now it's a wasteland where nobody ever posts, so you've come over here to spam your stupid pictures instead of just going away and thinking about why everyone eventually leaves from any board where you are.
I like his reaction images. Why don't you just go blind. I guess that cancer will soon remove sight from your eyes.
> No, it's not about being 'mad' Fuckalms, it's about wanting you to fuck off. You drove your own board into the ground, so that now it's a wasteland where nobody ever posts, so you've come over here to spam your stupid pictures instead of just going away and thinking about why everyone eventually leaves from any board where you are.
I like his reaction images. Why don't you just go blind. I guess that cancer will soon remove sight from your eyes.
Anonymous D replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #708,801
@708,798 (Metæ)
Mainland Chinese use simplified for writing. Overseas Chinese, for the most part, use traditional. BOTH CAN READ BOTH.
Mainland Chinese use simplified for writing. Overseas Chinese, for the most part, use traditional. BOTH CAN READ BOTH.
Anonymous L joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 5 seconds later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #708,802
Syntax. Pull your head out of your asshole.
Metæ replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #708,804
@708,801 (D)
I understand both can read both, but which is it:
> All Chinese people write the same!
> there are only two forms of written Chinese
It can't be both.
I understand both can read both, but which is it:
> All Chinese people write the same!
> there are only two forms of written Chinese
It can't be both.
Anonymous D replied with this 10 years ago, 4 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #708,806
@previous (Metæ)
Those two statements are not mutually exclusive. All Chinese people on earth can read both.
Those two statements are not mutually exclusive. All Chinese people on earth can read both.
Syntax replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #708,809
@708,798 (Metæ)
According to Wiki and its a lot to read there are more than Two Well hell far more that Two because the original characters took so long to write each one they had to make it more simple
Also I found a reference to a huge number of people that cannot read the characters because they lack the education2 Yet are hired for Gov jobs
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Written_Cantonese
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Written_Chinese#Literacy
https://www.quora.com/How-do-people-in-mainland-China-feel-when-they-read-traditional-Chinese-Do-they-feel-no-difficulty-to-understand-or-have-some-trouble
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chinese_language
http://pages.ucsd.edu/~dkjordan/chin/SimplifiedCharacters.html
http://pinyin.info/news/2011/simplified-chinese-characters-being-purged-from-taiwan-government-sites/
http://www.economist.com/blogs/prospero/2016/07/language
According to Wiki and its a lot to read there are more than Two Well hell far more that Two because the original characters took so long to write each one they had to make it more simple
Also I found a reference to a huge number of people that cannot read the characters because they lack the education2 Yet are hired for Gov jobs
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Written_Cantonese
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Written_Chinese#Literacy
https://www.quora.com/How-do-people-in-mainland-China-feel-when-they-read-traditional-Chinese-Do-they-feel-no-difficulty-to-understand-or-have-some-trouble
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chinese_language
http://pages.ucsd.edu/~dkjordan/chin/SimplifiedCharacters.html
http://pinyin.info/news/2011/simplified-chinese-characters-being-purged-from-taiwan-government-sites/
http://www.economist.com/blogs/prospero/2016/07/language
Syntax double-posted this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #708,810
@708,806 (D)
> Those two statements are not mutually exclusive. All Chinese people on earth can read both.
How much money are you willing to bet on this? Do you have a copy of a fake PhD to show us LOL
> Those two statements are not mutually exclusive. All Chinese people on earth can read both.
How much money are you willing to bet on this? Do you have a copy of a fake PhD to show us LOL
Syntax triple-posted this 10 years ago, 5 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #708,812
@708,804 (Metæ)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Written_Chinese#Literacy
Simplified Chinese is standard in the People's Republic of China, Singapore, and Malaysia. Traditional Chinese is retained in Hong Kong, Taiwan, Macau and overseas Chinese communities (except Singapore and Malaysia)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Written_Chinese#Literacy
Syntax is wrong again joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 11 hours later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #708,946
Boy syntax, you're really trying hard to weasel your way out of this one.
Give it up you creepy old stalker, you're done, your lie has caught up with you.
Give it up you creepy old stalker, you're done, your lie has caught up with you.