Topic: Common sense gun reforms?
Anonymous A started this discussion 10 years ago #54,266
> We will work tirelessly with responsible gun owners to pass common sense reformsShe keeps referring to "common sense gun reforms" what does she mean by this?
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 4 minutes later[^] [v] #706,538
Fuck. Fine. We should all vote Trump and he'll pass a law so it's mandatory for every American to carry a gun and fire it at least five times a day. Is that what you wanted to hear???
Dr. Whom !7MHPahvoGY joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 6 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #706,539
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 7 minutes later, 14 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #706,541
Dr. Whom !7MHPahvoGY replied with this 10 years ago, 5 minutes later, 19 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #706,542
D-g !jJEom8Ii3E joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 14 minutes later, 33 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #706,545
@706,539 (Dr. Whom !7MHPahvoGY)
What if you think guns are cool, is that a legit reason to have one?
What if you think guns are cool, is that a legit reason to have one?
Metæ joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 35 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #706,546
It's a pretty good linguistic trick and the Republicans should start using it. "No, we don't want to ban abortion we just want some common sense reforms to protect women's safety." I mean how could you be opposed to common sense? You'd be nonsensical by definition. I think Obama was the first to start using it (though I'm sure some anonymous speechwriter toiling away in the white house basement really engineered it) and it's really good rhetoric.
What she means by "common sense gun reforms" is banning guns gradually.
What she means by "common sense gun reforms" is banning guns gradually.
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 38 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #706,547
FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 39 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #706,548
@706,546 (Metæ)
> What she means by "common sense gun reforms" is banning guns gradually.
That's very republican of you.
> What she means by "common sense gun reforms" is banning guns gradually.
That's very republican of you.
Metæ replied with this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 43 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #706,549
@previous (FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI)
Okay, then where does it end? Will there be a point where the Democratic Party says "okay, great, we've controlled guns enough. our work here is done!" I'm just extrapolating a trend.
Okay, then where does it end? Will there be a point where the Democratic Party says "okay, great, we've controlled guns enough. our work here is done!" I'm just extrapolating a trend.
(Edited 11 seconds later.)
kook !!OPZbEQMT1 joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 45 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #706,550
Metæ replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 46 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #706,551
@706,547 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
> Hold dealers and manufacturers fully accountable if they endanger Americans.
This is very common sense. I think if some shitbag drunk drives a Chevy and kills someone, they should be able to sue General Motors and the car dealer.
> Hold dealers and manufacturers fully accountable if they endanger Americans.
This is very common sense. I think if some shitbag drunk drives a Chevy and kills someone, they should be able to sue General Motors and the car dealer.
kook !!OPZbEQMT1 replied with this 10 years ago, 55 seconds later, 47 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #706,552
@706,549 (Metæ)
Well I think that we should find out who commits most of the gun crimes and work from there.
Well I think that we should find out who commits most of the gun crimes and work from there.
FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 48 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #706,553
Anonymous B replied with this 10 years ago, 8 minutes later, 56 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #706,557
@706,550 (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)
I see your obsession with the SJWs has made you unable to detect sarcasm lol. You idiot.
I see your obsession with the SJWs has made you unable to detect sarcasm lol. You idiot.
Metæ replied with this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #706,559
@706,552 (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)
Are you kidding me?! Don't talk to me or my wife's son ever again.
Are you kidding me?! Don't talk to me or my wife's son ever again.
(Edited 38 seconds later.)
kook !!OPZbEQMT1 replied with this 10 years ago, 10 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #706,561
kook !!OPZbEQMT1 double-posted this 10 years ago, 39 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #706,562
Sheila LaBoof joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 48 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #706,563
@OP
> >We will work tirelessly with responsible gun owners to pass common sense reforms
>
> She keeps referring to "common sense gun reforms" what does she mean by this?
Doesn't matter -- there's no remedy
> >We will work tirelessly with responsible gun owners to pass common sense reforms
>
> She keeps referring to "common sense gun reforms" what does she mean by this?
Doesn't matter -- there's no remedy
kook !!OPZbEQMT1 replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #706,564
WSD !m2cp3rR5zw joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 1 hour later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #706,598
Something tells me it doesn't involve 50-state concealed carry.
Anonymous L joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 10 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #706,604
Political grandstanding. No one should be fooled by this sort of empty rhetoric. More lies fed to the Democrats who blindly support her. Maybe she'll start to talk about "change" and closing Guantanamo Bay too.
@706,546 (Metæ)
Agreed
@706,546 (Metæ)
Agreed