Topic: Are Hillary voters more brain dead than Trump and Bernie voters?
Anonymous A started this discussion 10 years ago #54,245
Especially after the DNC leaks? I mean she's a crook more than anyone else running.
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 12 minutes later[^] [v] #706,230
DNC leaks?Show me a juicy one and then we can discuss. So far all we have learned is.
DNC wanted Hillary. Bernie was not even a member of the party until the day he decided to run for office. Bernie is a communistic. Why would the DNC want a communistic as their leader?
So far the result of the leaks is a yawn.
The real scandal is about journalism and the weak standards employed to manufacture headlines.
http://www.newsweek.com/hillary-clinton-emailgate-312784
Image is from wikileaks. One of the more exciting leaked personal emails.
D-g !jJEom8Ii3E joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 5 minutes later, 17 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #706,231
@previous (B)
Didn't it reveale that they despised bernie and thought he didn't really believe in God which could be turned against him?
Didn't it reveale that they despised bernie and thought he didn't really believe in God which could be turned against him?
beckyderp !Hi.HILLARY joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 15 minutes later, 33 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #706,232
Hillary voters are best voters thanks
WSD !m2cp3rR5zw joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 37 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #706,233
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 14 minutes later, 51 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #706,236
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU double-posted this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 53 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #706,237
@706,231 (D-g !jJEom8Ii3E)
There was one email where one staffer floated an idea about maybe attacking him on his religion or lack thereof, and nothing came of it. It's definitely bad PR but it's not corruption.
There was one email where one staffer floated an idea about maybe attacking him on his religion or lack thereof, and nothing came of it. It's definitely bad PR but it's not corruption.
beckyderp !Hi.HILLARY replied with this 10 years ago, 5 minutes later, 59 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #706,244
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #706,249
Metæ joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 11 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #706,255
Crooked $hillary amd Tiny Tim Kaine thanks.beckyderp !Hi.HILLARY replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #706,256
Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #706,257
TRUMP 2016
Make America Great Again!
Make America Great Again!
Metæ replied with this 10 years ago, 5 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #706,259
@706,256 (beckyderp !Hi.HILLARY)
You are correct. Texans are still upset because Cruz got stumped but they'll get over it by November and there's zero chance of Texas turning blue. I did vote for Trump in the primary, though.
I'll probably vote Gary Johnson.
You are correct. Texans are still upset because Cruz got stumped but they'll get over it by November and there's zero chance of Texas turning blue. I did vote for Trump in the primary, though.
I'll probably vote Gary Johnson.
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #706,260
Metæ replied with this 10 years ago, 5 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #706,261
Anonymous B replied with this 10 years ago, 4 hours later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #706,301
@706,231 (D-g !jJEom8Ii3E)
> Didn't it reveale that they despised bernie and thought he didn't really believe in God which could be turned against him?
> Didn't it reveale that they despised bernie and thought he didn't really believe in God which could be turned against him?
Jimmy Kimmel asked him the other night [Friday Oct 23, 2015] if he believed in God he didn't treat it as a softball question and simply say "Yes."
We all know what would have happened if he had done the easy thing:
TV Talk Show Host: Do you believe in God?
Typical Politician: Yes, I do.
[Audience applauds, candidate beams]
Which is really cringe-worthy in our country - whose Constitution specifically forbids religious litmus tests for our political leaders, where people of every faith and people of no faith are supposed to be considered equal members of our democratic society.
Here's how it actually went down. Sanders did get get applause, but not by giving the easy answer:
Kimmel: You say you’re culturally Jewish, you don’t feel religious. Do you believe in God, and do you think that’s important to the people of the United States?
Sanders: Well, you know, I am who I am. And what I believe in and what my spirituality is about is that we’re all in this together. That I think it is not a good thing to believe that, as human beings, we can turn our backs on the suffering of other people. [APPLAUSE] And you know, this is not Judaism. This is what Pope Francis is talking about, that we cannot worship just billionaires and the making of more and more money. Life is more than that.
We all know what would have happened if he had done the easy thing:
TV Talk Show Host: Do you believe in God?
Typical Politician: Yes, I do.
[Audience applauds, candidate beams]
Which is really cringe-worthy in our country - whose Constitution specifically forbids religious litmus tests for our political leaders, where people of every faith and people of no faith are supposed to be considered equal members of our democratic society.
Here's how it actually went down. Sanders did get get applause, but not by giving the easy answer:
Kimmel: You say you’re culturally Jewish, you don’t feel religious. Do you believe in God, and do you think that’s important to the people of the United States?
Sanders: Well, you know, I am who I am. And what I believe in and what my spirituality is about is that we’re all in this together. That I think it is not a good thing to believe that, as human beings, we can turn our backs on the suffering of other people. [APPLAUSE] And you know, this is not Judaism. This is what Pope Francis is talking about, that we cannot worship just billionaires and the making of more and more money. Life is more than that.
Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 3 hours later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #706,368
A secret service guy wrote a book about what Hillary Clinton is really like behind the scenes. She is more unhinged than the Drumpf, but better at acting and being fake. She will say and do anything to gain power, and all the brainwashed plebs will be surprised when everything she promises turns out to be a lie.
The Bandit replied with this 10 years ago, 1 hour later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #706,403
The Bandit double-posted this 10 years ago, 31 seconds later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #706,404
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #706,406
@706,403 (The Bandit)
It's a 1 sentence quote and they still manage to fuck it up. It starts with "Black people". Also Charles Barkley is well known for being a fucking moron who couldn't win a ring.
It's a 1 sentence quote and they still manage to fuck it up. It starts with "Black people". Also Charles Barkley is well known for being a fucking moron who couldn't win a ring.
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU double-posted this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #706,407
@706,368 (I)
The book is a hit piece written by a low ranking member who could not possibly have known anything he claimed to have known.
http://www.politico.com/story/2016/06/hillary-bill-clinton-secret-service-224578
The book is a hit piece written by a low ranking member who could not possibly have known anything he claimed to have known.
http://www.politico.com/story/2016/06/hillary-bill-clinton-secret-service-224578
The Bandit replied with this 10 years ago, 15 minutes later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #706,409
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 10 years ago, 4 minutes later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #706,410
The Bandit replied with this 10 years ago, 30 minutes later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #706,415
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #706,416
The Bandit replied with this 10 years ago, 16 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #706,418
The Bandit double-posted this 10 years ago, 58 seconds later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #706,419
My favorite......Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 10 years ago, 11 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #706,423
Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 4 hours later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #706,443
@706,407 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
"The Clintons always trash the messenger" So if we take what is being said in retaliation to these claims, that absolutely none of it is true and couldn't possibly have happened, then perhaps the truth is somewhere in the middle. Does this man have a motive to lie? Maybe. Do the people claiming that every word is a lie, have a motive to lie? Absolutely.
I think Hillary voters are as retarded as the Bush voters.
"The Clintons always trash the messenger" So if we take what is being said in retaliation to these claims, that absolutely none of it is true and couldn't possibly have happened, then perhaps the truth is somewhere in the middle. Does this man have a motive to lie? Maybe. Do the people claiming that every word is a lie, have a motive to lie? Absolutely.
I think Hillary voters are as retarded as the Bush voters.
beckyderp !Hi.HILLARY replied with this 10 years ago, 6 minutes later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #706,449
Anonymous J replied with this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #706,450
@previous (beckyderp !Hi.HILLARY)
Do you believe that Hillary had a political agenda to discredit the women who accused Bill of sexual misconduct?
Do you believe that Hillary had a political agenda to discredit the women who accused Bill of sexual misconduct?
beckyderp !Hi.HILLARY replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #706,451
Anonymous K joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 37 seconds later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #706,452
@706,450 (J)
> Do you believe that Hillary had a political agenda to discredit the women who accused Bill of sexual misconduct?
The natural reaction of most women is to back up the husband and trash the woman who claims she was in an affair. Its just a normal reflex reaction.
> Do you believe that Hillary had a political agenda to discredit the women who accused Bill of sexual misconduct?
The natural reaction of most women is to back up the husband and trash the woman who claims she was in an affair. Its just a normal reflex reaction.
Syntax joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 10 minutes later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #706,454
Will stick this in here as my parting reply - We Men have a propensity to wander. Its just nature. I have made such mistrakes and one has been very costly over time. So how about some facts
In a 1991 study, sex researcher Shere Hite found that 70 percent of married women have cheated on their partners; a 1993 follow-up study found that 72 percent of married men have as well. According to a 2004 University of Chicago study, 25 percent of married men have had at least one extramarital affair.Feb 8, 2012
https://www.truthaboutdeception.com/cheating-and-infidelity/stats-about-infidelity.html
Facts and Statistics About Infidelity
Given the secretive nature of infidelity, exact figures about cheating and extra-marital affairs are nearly impossible to establish. But listed below are some of the most well-supported facts about cheating. All cited sources can be found on our reference page.
It is estimated that roughly 30% to 60% of all married individuals (in the United States) will engage in infidelity at some point during their marriage (see Buss & Shackelford for review of this research). And these numbers are probably on the conservative side, if you consider that close to half of all marriages end in divorce (people are more likely to stray as relationships fall apart; also see, who is likely to cheat).
Research consistently shows that 2% to 3% of all children are the product of infidelity (see Anderson). And most of these children are unknowingly raised by men who are not their biological fathers. DNA testing is finally making it easy for people to check the paternity of their children (see paternity issues).
Infidelity is becoming more common among people under 30. Many experts believe this increase in cheating is due to greater opportunity (time spent away from a spouse), as well as young people developing the habit of having multiple sexual partners before marriage (see young and restless – Wall Street Journal).
There are no definitive signs of cheating. But, in hindsight you will always find them (see signs of infidelity).
Some cultures have adopted extreme measures to combat infidelity: female circumcision, allowing only limited contact between the sexes, and even death as a punishment. Other cultures view infidelity in a more nuanced way, and may not see it as a serious marital problem.
Men are more likely to cheat than women. But as women become more financially independent, they are beginning to act more like men with respect to infidelity (see cheating wife, cheating husband, why men cheat, and why women cheat).
In many cases, infidelity is never discovered (see cheating spouse quiz).
Emotionally, it is possible to have feelings for more than one person at a time. Pragmatically, loving more than one person is difficult to do (see polyamory – Truth, Lies, and Romance Blog).
As more and more women enter the work force, office romances are becoming more common. Spouses often spend more time with coworkers than with each other.
The internet, e-mail, and chat rooms are making it easier for people to engage in infidelity (see online cheating).
The initial decision to be unfaithful is rarely if ever a rational choice; instead, infidelity is usually driven by circumstances and one’s emotions. In fact, most people are surprised by their own behavior at the start of an affair (see decision to cheat).
Emotional infidelity, compared to pure physical infidelity, can inflict as much if not more hurt, pain and suffering. And to make matters worse, most infidelity involves both physical and emotional betrayal (see what counts as cheating).
Unfortunately, many people find a more suitable mate (someone they love more than their spouse) after they are already married.
Biological evidence (i.e., research on biology and reproduction) indicates that long-term monogamy is difficult for humans to achieve—NOT impossible, but difficult (see Barash & Lipton or the myth of monogamy – Salon.com).
Almost everyone admits to having fantasies that involve someone other than a spouse (see our indecent thoughts survey).
Jealousy is such a fundamental, universal emotion because infidelity has been a part of our human nature for a very long time (see Buss).
In a 1991 study, sex researcher Shere Hite found that 70 percent of married women have cheated on their partners; a 1993 follow-up study found that 72 percent of married men have as well. According to a 2004 University of Chicago study, 25 percent of married men have had at least one extramarital affair.Feb 8, 2012
https://www.truthaboutdeception.com/cheating-and-infidelity/stats-about-infidelity.html
Facts and Statistics About Infidelity
Given the secretive nature of infidelity, exact figures about cheating and extra-marital affairs are nearly impossible to establish. But listed below are some of the most well-supported facts about cheating. All cited sources can be found on our reference page.
It is estimated that roughly 30% to 60% of all married individuals (in the United States) will engage in infidelity at some point during their marriage (see Buss & Shackelford for review of this research). And these numbers are probably on the conservative side, if you consider that close to half of all marriages end in divorce (people are more likely to stray as relationships fall apart; also see, who is likely to cheat).
Research consistently shows that 2% to 3% of all children are the product of infidelity (see Anderson). And most of these children are unknowingly raised by men who are not their biological fathers. DNA testing is finally making it easy for people to check the paternity of their children (see paternity issues).
Infidelity is becoming more common among people under 30. Many experts believe this increase in cheating is due to greater opportunity (time spent away from a spouse), as well as young people developing the habit of having multiple sexual partners before marriage (see young and restless – Wall Street Journal).
There are no definitive signs of cheating. But, in hindsight you will always find them (see signs of infidelity).
Some cultures have adopted extreme measures to combat infidelity: female circumcision, allowing only limited contact between the sexes, and even death as a punishment. Other cultures view infidelity in a more nuanced way, and may not see it as a serious marital problem.
Men are more likely to cheat than women. But as women become more financially independent, they are beginning to act more like men with respect to infidelity (see cheating wife, cheating husband, why men cheat, and why women cheat).
In many cases, infidelity is never discovered (see cheating spouse quiz).
Emotionally, it is possible to have feelings for more than one person at a time. Pragmatically, loving more than one person is difficult to do (see polyamory – Truth, Lies, and Romance Blog).
As more and more women enter the work force, office romances are becoming more common. Spouses often spend more time with coworkers than with each other.
The internet, e-mail, and chat rooms are making it easier for people to engage in infidelity (see online cheating).
The initial decision to be unfaithful is rarely if ever a rational choice; instead, infidelity is usually driven by circumstances and one’s emotions. In fact, most people are surprised by their own behavior at the start of an affair (see decision to cheat).
Emotional infidelity, compared to pure physical infidelity, can inflict as much if not more hurt, pain and suffering. And to make matters worse, most infidelity involves both physical and emotional betrayal (see what counts as cheating).
Unfortunately, many people find a more suitable mate (someone they love more than their spouse) after they are already married.
Biological evidence (i.e., research on biology and reproduction) indicates that long-term monogamy is difficult for humans to achieve—NOT impossible, but difficult (see Barash & Lipton or the myth of monogamy – Salon.com).
Almost everyone admits to having fantasies that involve someone other than a spouse (see our indecent thoughts survey).
Jealousy is such a fundamental, universal emotion because infidelity has been a part of our human nature for a very long time (see Buss).
Anonymous H replied with this 10 years ago, 5 hours later, 22 hours after the original post[^] [v] #706,474
adam djensen joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 25 minutes later, 23 hours after the original post[^] [v] #706,476
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 10 years ago, 28 minutes later, 23 hours after the original post[^] [v] #706,480
@706,443 (J)
That is the dumbest thing I've ever read. Thanks for the insightful political commentary.
That is the dumbest thing I've ever read. Thanks for the insightful political commentary.
Anonymous I replied with this 10 years ago, 5 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #706,587
@previous (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
> Someone said bad things about Hillary, hurr that's a lie!
> Hillary says words, durr only the truth!
Brain dead. Thanks
> Someone said bad things about Hillary, hurr that's a lie!
> Hillary says words, durr only the truth!
Brain dead. Thanks
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 10 years ago, 7 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #706,593
@previous (I)
So if I accused you of fucking and eating alive ten goats, and you say you have never done that, the answer is probably you have done it to about five? Some claims are just baseless. Thanks.
So if I accused you of fucking and eating alive ten goats, and you say you have never done that, the answer is probably you have done it to about five? Some claims are just baseless. Thanks.
Anonymous J replied with this 10 years ago, 21 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #706,602
@previous (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
What if a political leader was accused of fucking a dead pig? Would you decry the allegations as baseless?
What if a political leader was accused of fucking a dead pig? Would you decry the allegations as baseless?
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 10 years ago, 8 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #706,606
Anonymous J replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #706,608
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #706,609
@previous (J)
> The opening programme to the series is a political thriller in which Prime Minister Michael Callow (Rory Kinnear) faces a huge and shocking dilemma when Princess Susannah, Duchess of Beaumont (Lydia Wilson), a much-loved member of the Royal Family, is kidnapped. For her safe return, the Prime Minister must have live sexual intercourse with a pig on national television, with a list of technical specifications designed to make it impossible to fake.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_National_Anthem_(Black_Mirror)
> The opening programme to the series is a political thriller in which Prime Minister Michael Callow (Rory Kinnear) faces a huge and shocking dilemma when Princess Susannah, Duchess of Beaumont (Lydia Wilson), a much-loved member of the Royal Family, is kidnapped. For her safe return, the Prime Minister must have live sexual intercourse with a pig on national television, with a list of technical specifications designed to make it impossible to fake.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_National_Anthem_(Black_Mirror)
Killer Lettuce?? !!iNo3FkiZx joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 5 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #706,610
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 10 years ago, 46 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #706,611
@previous (Killer Lettuce?? !!iNo3FkiZx)
Since we invented both England and the television, it only makes sense that we would, yes. Also I saw it on Netflix or something.
Since we invented both England and the television, it only makes sense that we would, yes. Also I saw it on Netflix or something.
Anonymous J replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #706,612
@706,609 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
> a list of technical specifications designed to make it impossible to fake.
I'd like to see that list.
> a list of technical specifications designed to make it impossible to fake.
I'd like to see that list.
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 10 years ago, 28 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #706,613
Anonymous J replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #706,615
Killer Lettuce?? !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 10 years ago, 37 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #706,616
@706,611 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
I respect you for seeking out superior UK television programs, then.
I respect you for seeking out superior UK television programs, then.
Metæ replied with this 10 years ago, 29 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #706,624
