Notice: You have been identified as a bot, so no internal UID will be assigned to you. If you are a real person messing with your useragent, you should change it back to something normal.
Sophie !MLHqI35Srs replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 13 hours after the original post[^][v]#705,917
@previous (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)
I didn't defend child pornography at all but simply expressed concern at the possibility of Deborah possessing thoughts to the effect of sexual attraction towards children, which is not inherently wrong itself unless actionable. I've never had a single thought to this effect so the people accusing me of defending child pornography are fucking retard.
kook !!OPZbEQMT1 replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 13 hours after the original post[^][v]#705,919
@previous (Sophie !MLHqI35Srs)
I know that you're a little bit and not a pedophile. It's all good
Sophie !MLHqI35Srs replied with this 10 years ago, 6 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[^][v]#705,923
@previous (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)
The only emotion I've ever felt around children is one of annoyance. I have wanted my own on and off but if it means chivalry slavery then what's the point?
I do feel some compassion around them (and sometimes if they're particularly obedient, I find that impressive, especially on council estates) but the ubiquitous connotation of the "autistic paedophile" makes it uncomfortable for me to be around them for too long, in case this association has mistakenly made.
(Edited 3 minutes later.)
bhutto replied with this 10 years ago, 1 hour later, 14 hours after the original post[^][v]#705,938
@705,916 (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)
real cp. said jerking to kids is fine in his book
kook !!OPZbEQMT1 replied with this 10 years ago, 7 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^][v]#705,950
@previous (bhutto)
To photos of kids that are portrayed in a sexual manner?
bhutto replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^][v]#705,954
I'm being serious, masturbation about children is okay if you don't hurt anybody nor have a likelihood of hurting anybody. That includes passive harm, child pornography and the like.
-autphag
kook !!OPZbEQMT1 replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 14 hours after the original post[^][v]#705,958
> Lol you read that wrong, I was including in my list of harm, i.e. what is unacceptable, 'tard.
no backpedalling now
think before you post next time scumbag
Pvt. Sophie Antimatriarkaler replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 15 hours after the original post[^][v]#705,969
@previous (bhutto)
Get your reading comprehension up past the 5th grade. Cheers.
bhutto replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 15 hours after the original post[^][v]#705,970
@previous (Pvt. Sophie Antimatriarkaler)
whatever go jerk to kids you creep
Pvt. Sophie Antimatriarkaler replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 15 hours after the original post[^][v]#705,971
@previous (bhutto)
You are the sick, negroidic-IQ psychopath who misread paedophillic intentions into my post in a desperate attempt to grasp straws. Get fucked, nonce.
bhutto replied with this 10 years ago, 30 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[^][v]#705,990
@previous (Pvt. Sophie Antimatriarkaler)
whatever pedo
Sophie !MLHqI35Srs replied with this 10 years ago, 55 seconds later, 15 hours after the original post[^][v]#705,991