Topic: Dallas shooting "deadliest day for police since 9/11" - current reports say 5 officers died
vriskalon !0D.SXWIdy6 started this discussion 10 years ago #53,688
jesus christ the police are straight up whining that they died in the line of duty now
like in police culture isnt that like, a honor? guess theyre tired of being killed "protecting" citizens lmfao
like in police culture isnt that like, a honor? guess theyre tired of being killed "protecting" citizens lmfao
RWBY Rhubarb? !!iNo3FkiZx joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later[^] [v] #699,483
I hope you are not being serious. And even if not, mocking dead people isn't very cool. Not very cool at all.
vriskalon !0D.SXWIdy6 (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #699,484
a police officer stubs their toe on a coffee table - fox news blames BLM and it's the "deadliest day for police officers since the mass extinction event that killed the dinosaurs"
beckyderp !Hi.HILLARY joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 6 minutes later, 10 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #699,485
Lol vocalon
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 5 minutes later, 15 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #699,488
Yeah cops are whiny for not wanting to be executed while doing their jobs. You're such a piece of shit.
beckyderp !Hi.HILLARY replied with this 10 years ago, 14 minutes later, 30 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #699,489
@previous (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
Are you saying he's wrong, though? I noticed you did not say @OP is wrong.
Are you saying he's wrong, though? I noticed you did not say @OP is wrong.
(Edited 17 seconds later.)
vriskalon !0D.SXWIdy6 (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 19 minutes later, 49 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #699,494
@699,488 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
idk man, thats literally 1/120th of how many people have been killed by police in 2016 alone
its whining, dude
idk man, thats literally 1/120th of how many people have been killed by police in 2016 alone
its whining, dude
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 10 years ago, 5 minutes later, 55 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #699,495
@previous (vriskalon !0D.SXWIdy6)
So because other cops in other cities killed other people, there is nothing wrong with murdering five cops in Texas. Man you have such a fucked up worldview and I am glad almost no one agrees wkth you.
So because other cops in other cities killed other people, there is nothing wrong with murdering five cops in Texas. Man you have such a fucked up worldview and I am glad almost no one agrees wkth you.
RWBY Rhubarb? !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 10 years ago, 17 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #699,498
@699,494 (vriskalon !0D.SXWIdy6)
I think it's a tad disturbing that you seem to be de-humanising police officers here, to the point that you consider them expendable. They are people too, vocalon. They had loved ones and dreams, just like those killed by police. They are not faceless statistics.
Nothing good ever comes from this level of de-humanisation, as history has shown us again and again. I urge you to reconsider your assessment of the situation.
I think it's a tad disturbing that you seem to be de-humanising police officers here, to the point that you consider them expendable. They are people too, vocalon. They had loved ones and dreams, just like those killed by police. They are not faceless statistics.
Nothing good ever comes from this level of de-humanisation, as history has shown us again and again. I urge you to reconsider your assessment of the situation.
vriskalon !0D.SXWIdy6 (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 33 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #699,500
@previous (RWBY Rhubarb? !!iNo3FkiZx)
arent you british? i have no experience with british police so maybe things are different there
the reason for arming police should be to neutralize and disarm immediate threats. thats it.
even now, they carry the tools to do this and are very well-trained in their use.
but they always take the gun out first
once police officers stop routinely murdering people they could have easily taken in non-lethally, sure. i'll have respect for police
arent you british? i have no experience with british police so maybe things are different there
the reason for arming police should be to neutralize and disarm immediate threats. thats it.
even now, they carry the tools to do this and are very well-trained in their use.
but they always take the gun out first
once police officers stop routinely murdering people they could have easily taken in non-lethally, sure. i'll have respect for police
WSD !m2cp3rR5zw joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 36 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #699,509
Good riddance.
henn joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 8 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #699,512
WSD !m2cp3rR5zw replied with this 10 years ago, 4 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #699,513
@699,500 (vriskalon !0D.SXWIdy6)
Fucking this. No need to go BAM BAM BAM BAM BAM when you could just pull out a taser or even bean rounds, or just restrain the fucker.
Fucking this. No need to go BAM BAM BAM BAM BAM when you could just pull out a taser or even bean rounds, or just restrain the fucker.
(Edited 13 seconds later.)
Dr. Whom !7MHPahvoGY joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 19 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #699,516
vriskalon !0D.SXWIdy6 (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #699,517
Dr. Whom !7MHPahvoGY replied with this 10 years ago, 4 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #699,519
kook !!OPZbEQMT1 joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 51 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #699,528
RWBY Rhubarb? !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #699,530
@699,500 (vriskalon !0D.SXWIdy6)
I am English, yes, but that is not relevant to the point I am making. The point I'm making is that there is a very fundamental problem with de-humanising a group like this, to the point that you consider their death negligible. They are not an amorphous group of clones, but individuals. Humans.
You seem to have this empathy towards the victims of police brutality. So, think of it this way- All I'm asking is that you try to avoid the stereotyping, de-humanising viewpoint that those officers who are trigger-happy may have also taken.
I am English, yes, but that is not relevant to the point I am making. The point I'm making is that there is a very fundamental problem with de-humanising a group like this, to the point that you consider their death negligible. They are not an amorphous group of clones, but individuals. Humans.
You seem to have this empathy towards the victims of police brutality. So, think of it this way- All I'm asking is that you try to avoid the stereotyping, de-humanising viewpoint that those officers who are trigger-happy may have also taken.
Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 9 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #699,532
Do you think that decades of blatantly murdering innocent people, had the slightest thing to do with this tragedy?
Dr. Whom !7MHPahvoGY replied with this 10 years ago, 54 seconds later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #699,533
@699,528 (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)What does that have to do with Vocalon's childish obsession with cartoons?
kook !!OPZbEQMT1 replied with this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #699,534
kook !!OPZbEQMT1 double-posted this 10 years ago, 52 seconds later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #699,535
@699,533 (Dr. Whom !7MHPahvoGY)
> What does that have to do with Vocalon's childish obsession with cartoons?
I guess it just shows another aspect of his childish worldview
> What does that have to do with Vocalon's childish obsession with cartoons?
I guess it just shows another aspect of his childish worldview
kook !!OPZbEQMT1 triple-posted this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #699,536
Why is it more tragic when people are killed while committing a crime than when people are killed while working?
kook !!OPZbEQMT1 quadruple-posted this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #699,537
Two civilians were killed as well. You'd better find out their level of pigmentation before you get upset.
squeegee joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 35 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #699,540
kook !!OPZbEQMT1 replied with this 10 years ago, 9 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #699,543
@previous (squeegee)
This shit pisses me off. The criminals and miscreants that I know, hate cops. But they also don't use them! None of them will call 911 for any reason ever, because they are insular and handle things amongst themselves
But these soft as sponge cake liberals will dial 911 at the drop of a hat. They are the same people who hate the US and capitalism, but are also okay with taking government hand outs. It makes me sick.
This shit pisses me off. The criminals and miscreants that I know, hate cops. But they also don't use them! None of them will call 911 for any reason ever, because they are insular and handle things amongst themselves
But these soft as sponge cake liberals will dial 911 at the drop of a hat. They are the same people who hate the US and capitalism, but are also okay with taking government hand outs. It makes me sick.
Metæ joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 17 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #699,550
@previous (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)
> They are the same people who hate the US and capitalism
And then tweet about it on their iPhones. They don't seem interested in moving to Venezuela for some reason.
> They are the same people who hate the US and capitalism
And then tweet about it on their iPhones. They don't seem interested in moving to Venezuela for some reason.
vriskalon !0D.SXWIdy6 (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 51 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #699,552
Anonymous L joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 19 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #699,557
@699,533 (Dr. Whom !7MHPahvoGY)
> What does that have to do with Vocalon's childish obsession with cartoons?
Aren't you the most notorious pedophile in chan history? And you're denigrating Vocalon's obsession with childish things?
> What does that have to do with Vocalon's childish obsession with cartoons?
Aren't you the most notorious pedophile in chan history? And you're denigrating Vocalon's obsession with childish things?
kook !!OPZbEQMT1 replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #699,558
kook !!OPZbEQMT1 double-posted this 10 years ago, 36 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #699,559
vriskalon !0D.SXWIdy6 (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 13 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #699,562
@699,558 (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)
kook i didnt even remember not getting hired by the salvation army
you have a problem
kook i didnt even remember not getting hired by the salvation army
you have a problem
kook !!OPZbEQMT1 replied with this 10 years ago, 4 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #699,565
@previous (vriskalon !0D.SXWIdy6)
I remember because you claimed that it was because you were a tranny, even though you didn't yet go out and as a woman.
I remember because you claimed that it was because you were a tranny, even though you didn't yet go out and as a woman.
Metæ replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #699,566
@699,558 (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)
The Salvation Army is Christian, imperialist and colonialist. They (seriously) have operations in 127 countries.
I don't blame Vocalon for being a conscientious objector and not enlisting.
The Salvation Army is Christian, imperialist and colonialist. They (seriously) have operations in 127 countries.
I don't blame Vocalon for being a conscientious objector and not enlisting.
kook !!OPZbEQMT1 replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #699,568
@previous (Metæ)
They hire homeless ex cons and drug addicts, but they wouldn't hire him.
I blame a militaristic police force.
They hire homeless ex cons and drug addicts, but they wouldn't hire him.
I blame a militaristic police force.
vriskalon !0D.SXWIdy6 (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 59 seconds later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #699,569
@699,565 (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)
it was also you that brought me up in the minichan tranny thread
smells like obsession
it was also you that brought me up in the minichan tranny thread
smells like obsession
kook !!OPZbEQMT1 replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #699,570
squeegee replied with this 10 years ago, 39 seconds later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #699,571
@699,569 (vriskalon !0D.SXWIdy6)
she's just got a good memory and you like to say ridiculous things.
she's just got a good memory and you like to say ridiculous things.
vriskalon !0D.SXWIdy6 (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 51 seconds later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #699,572
Dr. Whom !7MHPahvoGY replied with this 10 years ago, 16 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #699,575
henn replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #699,576
Dr. Whom !7MHPahvoGY replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #699,577
henn replied with this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #699,580
Metæ replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #699,582
Dr. Whom !7MHPahvoGY replied with this 10 years ago, 15 seconds later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #699,583
Anonymous L replied with this 10 years ago, 1 hour later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #699,599
@699,577 (Dr. Whom !7MHPahvoGY)
> What about my the cartoon?
This sentence makes no sense you dumbfuck.
> What about my the cartoon?
This sentence makes no sense you dumbfuck.
Dr. Whom !7MHPahvoGY replied with this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #699,600
Anonymous L replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #699,601
@previous (Dr. Whom !7MHPahvoGY)
What the fuck are you even talking about retard? It looks like your rage has addled your brain.
What the fuck are you even talking about retard? It looks like your rage has addled your brain.
Dr. Whom !7MHPahvoGY replied with this 10 years ago, 4 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #699,602
Anonymous L replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #699,603
Dr. Whom !7MHPahvoGY replied with this 10 years ago, 21 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #699,611
@previous (L)Are you lashing out because I, as a doctor, am an authority figure? Why do you resent authority so much?
Sheila LaBoof joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #699,613
Anonymous L replied with this 10 years ago, 11 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #699,619
@699,611 (Dr. Whom !7MHPahvoGY)
> Are you lashing out because I, as a doctor, am an authority figure? Why do you resent authority so much?
Likewise.
> Are you lashing out because I, as a doctor, am an authority figure? Why do you resent authority so much?
Likewise.
Anonymous L double-posted this 10 years ago, 35 seconds later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #699,620
@699,613 (Sheila LaBoof)
> it was because you made fun of that guy's typeo
What is a "typeo"? Is it the typo form of 'typo'?
> it was because you made fun of that guy's typeo
What is a "typeo"? Is it the typo form of 'typo'?
Dr. Whom !7MHPahvoGY replied with this 10 years ago, 9 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #699,622
adam djensen joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 5 hours later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #699,708
Anonymous O joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 2 days later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #700,314
@699,543 (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)
@699,550 (Metæ)
> They are the same people who hate the US and capitalism, but are also okay with taking government hand outs. It makes me sick.
HOW DARE DO SERFS REVOLT WHEN ALL THEIR IMPLEMENTS ARE PURCHASED BY THEIR FEUDAL LORD!
@699,550 (Metæ)
> They are the same people who hate the US and capitalism, but are also okay with taking government hand outs. It makes me sick.
HOW DARE DO SERFS REVOLT WHEN ALL THEIR IMPLEMENTS ARE PURCHASED BY THEIR FEUDAL LORD!
kook !!OPZbEQMT1 replied with this 10 years ago, 51 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #700,324
Anonymous O replied with this 10 years ago, 5 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #700,326
@previous (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)
It's a counterexample to the idea that one is a hypocrite for criticizing the society he grows up in while also reaping the benefits of that society.
For example, it's like Stalin saying "How dare the citizens oppose the USSR while we provide them bread and keep the Nazis away!"
It's a counterexample to the idea that one is a hypocrite for criticizing the society he grows up in while also reaping the benefits of that society.
For example, it's like Stalin saying "How dare the citizens oppose the USSR while we provide them bread and keep the Nazis away!"
kook !!OPZbEQMT1 replied with this 10 years ago, 1 hour later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #700,344
@previous (O)
But comparing things that are not slavery to slavery .makes you look like an ass and actually takes away from the impact of actual slavery.
But comparing things that are not slavery to slavery .makes you look like an ass and actually takes away from the impact of actual slavery.
Metæ replied with this 10 years ago, 10 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #700,347
@700,326 (O)
So it's not hypocritical for someone who grew up and reaped the benefits of American Capitalism (Starbucks Stalinists and Twitter Trotskyites) to criticize it?
So it's not hypocritical for someone who grew up and reaped the benefits of American Capitalism (Starbucks Stalinists and Twitter Trotskyites) to criticize it?
Anonymous O replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #700,350
@700,344 (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)
You must have poor reading comprehension. Although an example I used involved serfs, I wasn't comparing anything to serfdom.
As for "actual slavery", the serf was the worst fed and rewarded, but at least he had his place and, unlike slaves, had certain rights in land and property. A lord of the manor could not sell his serfs as a Roman might sell his slaves.
You must have poor reading comprehension. Although an example I used involved serfs, I wasn't comparing anything to serfdom.
As for "actual slavery", the serf was the worst fed and rewarded, but at least he had his place and, unlike slaves, had certain rights in land and property. A lord of the manor could not sell his serfs as a Roman might sell his slaves.