Topic: FAO: Meta
TTEH !PUPenis69. started this discussion 10 years ago #53,667
Thoughts?Metæ joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later[^] [v] #699,232
Have the people voluntarily entered into an agreement to be tied to trolley tracks?
TTEH !PUPenis69. (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 17 minutes later, 20 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #699,233
Metæ replied with this 10 years ago, 3 hours later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #699,255
@previous (TTEH !PUPenis69.)
In that case their NAP has been violated and it's moral to save them. Unless they're commies.
In that case their NAP has been violated and it's moral to save them. Unless they're commies.
TTEH !PUPenis69. (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 4 hours later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #699,319
@previous (Metæ)
So it's OK to violate the NAP in diverting the trolley through someone's private property, in order to save those folks on the tracks, yes?
So it's OK to violate the NAP in diverting the trolley through someone's private property, in order to save those folks on the tracks, yes?
Metæ replied with this 10 years ago, 4 hours later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #699,338
@previous (TTEH !PUPenis69.)
Yes but only if the trolley owner violated those folks NAP first. This is the same reason why shooting a burglar doesn't violate the NAP.
Yes but only if the trolley owner violated those folks NAP first. This is the same reason why shooting a burglar doesn't violate the NAP.
TTEH !PUPenis69. (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 1 hour later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #699,355
@previous (Metæ)
What if the trolley owner is entirely unaware of the situation, the result of a mysterious malicious third party's intervention?
What if the trolley owner is entirely unaware of the situation, the result of a mysterious malicious third party's intervention?
Metæ replied with this 10 years ago, 16 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #699,567
henn joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 20 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #699,574
Unsavory
Metæ replied with this 10 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #699,579
henn replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #699,581
Metæ replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #699,584
henn replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #699,585
Metæ replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #699,586
henn replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #699,587
henn double-posted this 10 years ago, 30 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #699,588
Metæ replied with this 10 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #699,589
@699,587 (henn)
You really should start. You have a disturbing fixation on the word "savory" and an unhealthy obsession with my body.
@previous (henn)
I shower twice daily with Dial™ soap.
You really should start. You have a disturbing fixation on the word "savory" and an unhealthy obsession with my body.
@previous (henn)
I shower twice daily with Dial™ soap.