Topic: A sagacious Goddess

Anonymous A started this discussion 10 years ago #53,633

Spectate, admire.

Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 38 seconds later[^] [v] #698,946

Whom am I seeing here, Minichan?

(Edited 3 minutes later.)

Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 3 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #698,947

@previous (B)
Whom*

Anonymous B replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 4 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #698,949

@previous (C)
Thanks.

kook !!OPZbEQMT1 joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 2 hours later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #698,985

@698,946 (B)
It's Sophia

bhutto joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 4 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #698,990

Did u blur all your pimples together is that what's going on here

Sophie !MLHqI35Srs (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 4 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #698,996

@698,985 (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)
Hi kookiekins x x x

adam djensen joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #698,997

@previous (Sophie !MLHqI35Srs)
Is this how women type?? ??

Sophie !MLHqI35Srs (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #699,000

@previous (adam djensen)
This is how somebody highly familiar with someone else types, rather

adam djensen replied with this 10 years ago, 57 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #699,003

@previous (Sophie !MLHqI35Srs)
O

kook !!OPZbEQMT1 replied with this 10 years ago, 12 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #699,004

You look great!

bhutto replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #699,006

@699,000 (Sophie !MLHqI35Srs)
Lol ok

Sophie !MLHqI35Srs (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #699,007

@previous (bhutto)
kys

@699,004 (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)
@699,004 (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)
Fankyoo

kook !!OPZbEQMT1 replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #699,008

@previous (Sophie !MLHqI35Srs)
I can see that you're starting to take care of yourself. What has caused this change?

Sophie !MLHqI35Srs (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #699,009

@previous (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)
I wish I could unblock you on Skype to tell you but that would depend on whether you had removed me from it thereafter or not. I'm not speaking about private affairs here.

kook !!OPZbEQMT1 replied with this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #699,010

@previous (Sophie !MLHqI35Srs)
Kk I don't even have Skype on my phone anymore bit give me some time to make some extra space and I'll let you know.

bhutto replied with this 10 years ago, 20 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #699,011

@699,008 (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)

> I can see that you're starting to take care of yourself. What has caused this change?

Photoshopping your skin to look clean isn't self care

kook !!OPZbEQMT1 replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #699,012

@previous (bhutto)
I don't think that's what's going on here

Sophie !MLHqI35Srs (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 34 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #699,013

@699,011 (bhutto)
My skin is this clean, I just went overboard on my phone's blurring feature to make unfine features, like the actual slight-masculinity of my face in real life, less salient.

The slight pocks you might be referring to at the bottom are actually RAZOR BURN for continuously using a 5-blade in all directions without consideration of force used, which you can get away with free of nicks and cuts unlike a <3-blade.

(Edited 5 minutes later.)

bhutto replied with this 10 years ago, 10 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #699,016

@previous (Sophie !MLHqI35Srs)
I kinda just noticed that chunks of your glasses had disappeared

Sophie !MLHqI35Srs (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 6 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #699,021

@previous (bhutto)
My glasses have a light-silver frame which is highly reflective and my skin, too, was reflective since I've used various products on it; consequently, that disappearance is actually just a coincidence of colour hues, nothing more; it's definitely still there when I look closely enough.

bhutto replied with this 10 years ago, 59 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #699,023

@previous (Sophie !MLHqI35Srs)
Oh, okay

adam djensen replied with this 10 years ago, 5 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #699,027

@699,012 (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)
Well that picture has been altered either by a shit camera trying to make its picture look better or by op

adam djensen double-posted this 10 years ago, 34 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #699,028

Also you should get new glasses op

kook !!OPZbEQMT1 replied with this 10 years ago, 4 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #699,030

@699,027 (adam djensen)
Its just a soft lense. Every tranny uses it.

bhutto replied with this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #699,031

@previous (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)
See @699,013 (Sophie !MLHqI35Srs)

> I just went overboard on my phone's blurring feature

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 16 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #699,035

@previous (bhutto)
@699,030 (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)
It is a filter, for both of your reference; there was no selectivity over the face or any particular feature, but it was useful in accentuating soft features.

Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 54 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #699,043

hey sexy mama....hows about you spend a night with a real southern man..

you can forget your troubles here in knoxville....you're prettier than the local girls..

kook !!OPZbEQMT1 replied with this 10 years ago, 5 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #699,045

@699,035 (A)
I see no problem with it

adam djensen replied with this 10 years ago, 16 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #699,047

@699,030 (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)
That's not what a soft lens looks like

kook !!OPZbEQMT1 replied with this 10 years ago, 29 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #699,048

@previous (adam djensen)
It seems as though it produces the same effect, so I don't care.