Topic: Is Syntax a stalker?
Anonymous A started this discussion 10 years ago #53,515
Well?
| Poll option | Votes | Percentage | Graph |
|---|---|---|---|
| Yes. | 13 | 100% | |
| No. It is perfectly normal to scour the newspapers of towns across the country. | - | 0% |
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 5 minutes later[^] [v] #697,805
Hey Matt.
I voted yes.
I voted yes.
kook !!OPZbEQMT1 joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 24 seconds later, 6 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #697,806
I think he just googled a name
Anonymous B replied with this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 9 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #697,807
@previous (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)
Kook you look like just as much of a shitty person in this whole debacle. Make yourself scarce.
Kook you look like just as much of a shitty person in this whole debacle. Make yourself scarce.
kook !!OPZbEQMT1 replied with this 10 years ago, 4 minutes later, 14 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #697,808
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 16 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #697,809
@697,806 (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)
Why are you defending him? What kind of normal person scours the obituaries of towns that "just happen" to be where the object of online stalking is from?
Why are you defending him? What kind of normal person scours the obituaries of towns that "just happen" to be where the object of online stalking is from?
kook !!OPZbEQMT1 replied with this 10 years ago, 9 minutes later, 26 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #697,810
@previous (A)
But thats not what happened. he googled a name. The feud is strange and should end. But he didnt have to scour obits to find this info.
But thats not what happened. he googled a name. The feud is strange and should end. But he didnt have to scour obits to find this info.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 8 minutes later, 34 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #697,811
@previous (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)
Why would anyone "google a name" randomly of someone's family member? That is called "stalking".
Why would anyone "google a name" randomly of someone's family member? That is called "stalking".
Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 10 years ago, 40 seconds later, 35 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #697,812
@697,810 (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)
Do you "google names" of people from the internet? Is that normal behavior?
Do you "google names" of people from the internet? Is that normal behavior?
kook !!OPZbEQMT1 replied with this 10 years ago, 4 minutes later, 40 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #697,814
@697,811 (A)
@previous (A)
I've googled the names of people who have put crazy videos on the internet
@previous (A)
I've googled the names of people who have put crazy videos on the internet
bhutan joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 38 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #697,816
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 6 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #697,818
@697,814 (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)
Do you Google their family members, desperately hoping for some tidbit of information that you can email to everyone you know on some obscure forum, claiming to have top secret super secret spy information?
Do you Google their family members, desperately hoping for some tidbit of information that you can email to everyone you know on some obscure forum, claiming to have top secret super secret spy information?
kook !!OPZbEQMT1 replied with this 10 years ago, 44 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #697,819
kook !!OPZbEQMT1 double-posted this 10 years ago, 18 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #697,820
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 16 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #697,821
kook !!OPZbEQMT1 replied with this 10 years ago, 12 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #697,822
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 7 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #697,823
kook !!OPZbEQMT1 replied with this 10 years ago, 9 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #697,825
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 33 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #697,828
@previous (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)
> But I dont really believe in online stalking
What euphemism do you use to describe the practice of delving into all the personal details of someone's life that are available online? fixated? How does that differ?
> But I dont really believe in online stalking
What euphemism do you use to describe the practice of delving into all the personal details of someone's life that are available online? fixated? How does that differ?
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 17 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #697,831
@697,809 (A)
@697,816 (bhutan)
@previous (E)
Exposing a known pedophile to public scorn and ridicule does not qualify as stalking. Thanks, thanks. Thanks.
@697,816 (bhutan)
@previous (E)
Exposing a known pedophile to public scorn and ridicule does not qualify as stalking. Thanks, thanks. Thanks.
kook !!OPZbEQMT1 replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #697,833
bhutan replied with this 10 years ago, 9 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #697,836
@697,831 (F)
He never really exposed anything tho
He's just been following him around the Internet for decades calling him a pedophile
He never really exposed anything tho
He's just been following him around the Internet for decades calling him a pedophile
Anonymous E replied with this 10 years ago, 23 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #697,843
@697,831 (F)
@697,833 (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)
> It isnt stalking to collect public information
okay... LOL'd have fun being "obsessed" and totally not stalking anyone.
@697,833 (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)
> It isnt stalking to collect public information
okay... LOL'd have fun being "obsessed" and totally not stalking anyone.
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 8 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #697,846
That old bastard has been doing this for 20 fucking years! Besides stalking he has a very unhealthy obsession! And Matt is not the only one he has done this too. This goes very deep.
Anonymous F replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #697,847
Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 5 hours later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #697,901
@697,810 (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)
> But thats not what happened. he googled a name. The feud is strange and should end. But he didnt have to scour obits to find this info.
Yeah, listen up Kook because you need to hear this. You're a nasty piece of work who hides that fact behind all your bullshit stories about dear little old ladies and gentlemen whose pain and suffering you heroically ease. You had absolutely no good reason, or right, to post that information about Matt's mother, and it doesn't matter how many times you now say "Yeah, I feel awful, I regretted it as soon as I posted it". Bullshit. You were given all the time in the world to re-think what you were doing but you still did it, once you'd attracted enough attention to yourself.
And this is a mark of just how fucking sly you are: now you're playing your sanctimonious 'hall monitor of the site' role again, telling people to stop being cruel, to leave Matt alone, to drop the subject, saying the thread ought to be deleted. Trying to make yourself look like the 'kind, sympathetic Kook' again (when can we expect another of your tedious "I'm so drained today, I can't deal with you people, I just helped a dear old dying man" posts?), even though you've shown there's a very nasty, calculating, cruel and just plain fucking sinister side to you.
> But thats not what happened. he googled a name. The feud is strange and should end. But he didnt have to scour obits to find this info.
Yeah, listen up Kook because you need to hear this. You're a nasty piece of work who hides that fact behind all your bullshit stories about dear little old ladies and gentlemen whose pain and suffering you heroically ease. You had absolutely no good reason, or right, to post that information about Matt's mother, and it doesn't matter how many times you now say "Yeah, I feel awful, I regretted it as soon as I posted it". Bullshit. You were given all the time in the world to re-think what you were doing but you still did it, once you'd attracted enough attention to yourself.
And this is a mark of just how fucking sly you are: now you're playing your sanctimonious 'hall monitor of the site' role again, telling people to stop being cruel, to leave Matt alone, to drop the subject, saying the thread ought to be deleted. Trying to make yourself look like the 'kind, sympathetic Kook' again (when can we expect another of your tedious "I'm so drained today, I can't deal with you people, I just helped a dear old dying man" posts?), even though you've shown there's a very nasty, calculating, cruel and just plain fucking sinister side to you.
(Edited 7 minutes later.)
Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 13 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #697,903
i wonder if its just google alerts https://www.google.com/alerts
Syntax joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 1 hour later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #697,921
@697,847 (F)
> Exposing Fatfuck as a pedophile is not stalking. It is a service to humanity.
EXACTLY
Plus FatFuck is totally aware that he was being followed daily for some period of time by FBI and local unmarked cars/police in his old hood while he was in fail pursuit of PhD.
@697,846 (G)
> is not the only one he has done this too.
Name a couple3 Go on. If you mean that Obese slob who attempts to sell comics on the web and goes out daily with greasy KFC stains on his T shirts? The very same guy with the same Exact Scat fetish that FatFuck has - The so called mortal enemy of FatFuck from the very same Scat chat rooms n 4ums. Now allies cause that Obese fool thinks FatFuck will supply him with pedophilia material.
Well of course I never ever stalked that fool but alas when he left his school workstation open after spamming Scat on 4ums I used n this was back when one could type n Echo command in2 URL header and worm ones way in2 what one used to be able to worm in2 AND THE Fool had his passwords all ritten out on corner of screen - Lowcow New Jersey 2 year city college had IT dept - Hey more to this but running shoes ready to put on and
ZoooOOOoooOOOOOOOOooooM-------------------------------------------------------------------->
> Exposing Fatfuck as a pedophile is not stalking. It is a service to humanity.
EXACTLY
Plus FatFuck is totally aware that he was being followed daily for some period of time by FBI and local unmarked cars/police in his old hood while he was in fail pursuit of PhD.
@697,846 (G)
> is not the only one he has done this too.
Name a couple3 Go on. If you mean that Obese slob who attempts to sell comics on the web and goes out daily with greasy KFC stains on his T shirts? The very same guy with the same Exact Scat fetish that FatFuck has - The so called mortal enemy of FatFuck from the very same Scat chat rooms n 4ums. Now allies cause that Obese fool thinks FatFuck will supply him with pedophilia material.
Well of course I never ever stalked that fool but alas when he left his school workstation open after spamming Scat on 4ums I used n this was back when one could type n Echo command in2 URL header and worm ones way in2 what one used to be able to worm in2 AND THE Fool had his passwords all ritten out on corner of screen - Lowcow New Jersey 2 year city college had IT dept - Hey more to this but running shoes ready to put on and
ZoooOOOoooOOOOOOOOooooM-------------------------------------------------------------------->
Dr. Whom !7MHPahvoGY joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #697,922
Syntax joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 29 minutes later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #697,927
kook !!OPZbEQMT1 replied with this 10 years ago, 3 hours later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #697,935
Syntax replied with this 10 years ago, 34 minutes later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #697,942
@697,927 (Syntax)@previous (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)
You got bullied into doing what you did. Rare I see anyone bullying you so whats up with that. becky's line about it was ok re rules? Not based on a unwritten rule r04r put up not that long ago.
Anonymous M joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #697,944
Anonymous H replied with this 10 years ago, 1 hour later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #697,983
@697,935 (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)
> I've literally never made an I'm so drained post
But you have made a "Hey everyone, Matt's mother is dead" post, you fucking cruel bitch.
> I've literally never made an I'm so drained post
But you have made a "Hey everyone, Matt's mother is dead" post, you fucking cruel bitch.
kook !!OPZbEQMT1 replied with this 10 years ago, 29 minutes later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #697,991
Anonymous H replied with this 10 years ago, 9 minutes later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #697,993
@previous (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)
> Whats done is done
As simple as that for you, huh? "What's done is done, now everyone drop it and let me go back to sanctimoniously lecturing you all on how to behave to each other".
Reflect on what you did, Kook. How cruel and unnecessary it was. Think about what you did says about you as a person. When even the mods of this site - certainly no friends of Matt Miller - are telling you it's not a good idea to post what you did, but still you pester them until finally they leave it to your own conscience and you still go right ahead and do it...who other than you would do something like that?
So don't now think you can just hope it all goes away and that you can go back to being your usual holier-than-thou self on here.
> Whats done is done
As simple as that for you, huh? "What's done is done, now everyone drop it and let me go back to sanctimoniously lecturing you all on how to behave to each other".
Reflect on what you did, Kook. How cruel and unnecessary it was. Think about what you did says about you as a person. When even the mods of this site - certainly no friends of Matt Miller - are telling you it's not a good idea to post what you did, but still you pester them until finally they leave it to your own conscience and you still go right ahead and do it...who other than you would do something like that?
So don't now think you can just hope it all goes away and that you can go back to being your usual holier-than-thou self on here.
kook !!OPZbEQMT1 replied with this 10 years ago, 9 minutes later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #697,996
Green !BEERiVqJJw joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 5 minutes later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #697,998
Anonymous H replied with this 10 years ago, 8 minutes later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #698,000
@697,996 (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)
> I'm not expecting anything to go away
No, least of all you, apparently.
> I'm not expecting anything to go away
No, least of all you, apparently.
kook !!OPZbEQMT1 replied with this 10 years ago, 10 minutes later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #698,005
Anonymous H replied with this 10 years ago, 4 minutes later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #698,008
@previous (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)
I didn't expect you to. Why would you fuck off when you can stay and continue to be a total cunt while pretending to be a sensitive person.
I didn't expect you to. Why would you fuck off when you can stay and continue to be a total cunt while pretending to be a sensitive person.
kook !!OPZbEQMT1 replied with this 10 years ago, 5 minutes later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #698,010
Green !BEERiVqJJw replied with this 10 years ago, 11 minutes later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #698,016
Dr. Whom !7MHPahvoGY replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #698,017
Anonymous F replied with this 10 years ago, 53 minutes later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #698,050
Syntax replied with this 10 years ago, 2 hours later, 22 hours after the original post[^] [v] #698,119
@previous (F)
> Fatfuck plays the victim card yet again.
Exactly + He has followed in his dads tracks and learned how to con young teens our of their money.
Also asking young girls and boys for genital photos on chans while living in the USA. One wonders what the statue of limitations is?
> Fatfuck plays the victim card yet again.
Exactly + He has followed in his dads tracks and learned how to con young teens our of their money.
Also asking young girls and boys for genital photos on chans while living in the USA. One wonders what the statue of limitations is?