Minichan

Topic: Syntax: you said you have super secret information about why Matt "had to leave China"

Anonymous A started this discussion 10 years ago #53,295

Please tell us why.

duhdoug joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 11 minutes later[^] [v] #695,275

is he a chinese male ? dunno .. one thing i do know .. chinese buts are cool

duhdoug double-posted this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 13 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #695,276

duhdoug triple-posted this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 14 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #695,277

why, i tell you some why .. there is no why

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 23 minutes later, 38 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #695,284

@695,276 (duhdoug)
She is Japanese.

Syntax joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 9 hours later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #695,378

Yo
There is a growing rater large now email base that connects TC-MC people and at this point its connecting up people that do not even connect up to me after they get on it.

So bottom line is that for some special stuff - It ain't special until its shared and lulz is passed back n forth.

The very first news breakthrough remained a huge surprise to me cause it took much much longer to end up published in part on here for pubic view by all. I am proud of the group that ALL was not shared

Also and it still amazes me. Places like MC TC once had peer to peer PM's - Which can be dangerous - SC had the open PM system turned On

gokunming.com has peer to peer PM system. Free registration and any one from any country is free to use it. One fun thing about GK. FatFuck at least five times registered new monikers because of being made so much fun of and getting NO Respect from the local Expats. A number he met in person that were open about well about - Even on the forum itself.

One thing FatFuck never figured out. People that worked with him or one who made the mistrake of putting work money in his wallet - They used GK daily, and grew to despise him and used peer to peer PM system a bunch.

Anyway remember this

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 4 hours later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #695,407

@previous (Syntax)
Yeah, so why did he have to leave China?

Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 2 hours later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #695,422

@previous (A)
He doesn't know, he wants everyone to think he knows everything.

After all, he is a sooper Spy.

Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 9 minutes later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #695,423

@previous (D)
This. Syntax is full of shit

Metæ joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 10 minutes later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #695,424

@695,407 (A)
Because he realized he needed to apologize to Syntax, so he webt to California but chickened out when Syntax tried to arrange a meeting.

Dr. Whom !7MHPahvoGY joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 47 minutes later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #695,428

@695,378 (Syntax)
Cool story bro.

Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 9 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #695,671

Syntax is a pud who wants everyone to believe he knows everything. He is more than a pud..he is a jew pud!

beckyderp !Hi.HILLARY joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 38 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #695,697

@previous (H)
I hate that word

Syntax replied with this 10 years ago, 4 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #695,747

@695,424 (Metæ)
> Syntax tried to arrange a meeting.

Arrange a meeting with a known Pedophile? And as to apologize? Given I am not a Christian who turns the other cheek, I continue to consider FatFuck a CockRoach. One cannot expect a CockRoach to apologize.

I made it perfectly clear where I wood be in a public place and I gave an exact time. Once years ago on the very same Highway at a Restaurant and FatFucks brain is to fried to remember but bert will. I posted the name of the restaurant address and phone number. Hostess came over and said a Donna from Indiana wants to speak with you.

Took the phone call and agreed to meet her near the airport for a sit down luncheon to resolve what could be resolved. Most was resolved but in the end of course that bitch albeit one lovely bitch later when back home loaded up with Coke again, and I ended up regretting the meet up.

Few years latter met up with Voxeralla the Syops of that set of Forums FatFuck bert and others used daily. The one with the $121,000 net bandwidth yr cost. That was one hell of a fun evening that ended up a Scotch tasting up in San Francisco. 21 of the best Single Malts all in brown paper bags and lessons learned that night. I miss Voxeralla. She mixed pain meds with alcohol one evening and is no longer around to continue to have fun with.

Meet ups from Web. The $121,000 net bandwidth yr cost operation ended up in Fail and later iterations continued on by several owners over time. One run by a lovely gal Sandy who also lived on a beach in the Carolina's - She hosted terrific Bar-B-Q's for ALL of her members. This is the gal bert fell deeply madly in love with. To the point where he was hands off of every other gal on the forums.

He however ended up not getting an invite nor even trying to crash the party. He could have and wood have been welcomed.

Meeting up with a CockRoach? So many wonderful people to meet why on earth wood I want to meet in person who as those many Expats from Kunming said...Well they were so unimpressed they even said what they thought right out in the open on GoKunming. A man so desperate to meet a woman he changed his age by 10 or more years and attempted to lie about everything else. Shows up drunk and talks about needed another teaching job with more hours and he did not even have a clue the person he was meeting with was an Admin at a school he had applied to

So many stories from the Naked City of the Internet

(Edited 1 minute later.)

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 3 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #695,787

@previous (Syntax)
So, why did he have to leave China?

Anonymous H replied with this 10 years ago, 42 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #695,808

@695,747 (Syntax)
You need to STFU. From what I know of you is, you walked out on your wife and basically left her penniless. You mentally ass rape your own child your own flesh and blood. You are no better than fat fuck miller. So why don't you go get on your make believe surf board and get eaten by a shark or just drown.

beckyderp !Hi.HILLARY replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #695,809

@previous (H)
Wow

Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #695,830

@695,808 (H)
Tell him

kook !!kYTRWTZZj joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 11 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #695,834

@695,808 (H)
What in the fuck are you talking about?

Syntax replied with this 10 years ago, 11 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #695,837

@695,808 (H)
> You need to STFU. From what I know of you is, you walked out on your wife and basically left her penniless.

Huston we have a problem with one fantastic solution - Solution? You asked? You asked me to prove you're full of SHIT?

Look B~Low your post. LookC at who replied to your post. Do you have a clue? She has what no one else here has access2. The Gloria Allred FILES are NOT locked up - They are Not and never have been under Court Seal

I have to do this reply super fast n leave a lot out I wood normally put in as do my best to time my beach runs to the Tide tables with a mix of what the weather is going to be - Route change at high tides.

2Day It is mostly cloudy into 45 mins of my run if forecast is accurate re South Direction of my run and its 73 degrees with somewhat high humidity AND Tide is Milli Inches abouve C level - So again a Run South to the Nude Beach at Blacks Beach''

So Full of Shit Anon H

I could if I wanted2 Ask becky to use something U n I do not have re computer tool - LexisNexis. Total Access to Gloria Allred's files. Hummmm just occurred2 me. I have have a cousin who does what becky does for a living and of course has LexisNexis tools. Except our relations ends up with him using my technical services far more than he lets me use his legal services PLUS I have a much more better attorney than he is for stuff I need which is more often than I wish - Real Estate stuff - His old office was walking distance from me - Now cause he is cheep he has moved a few blocks inland.

So ONCE and I do not think becky is aware of this - I needed to see something and to get it from my attorney I wood have had to pay cold hard cash for a file. Thinking Hummmmm becky could get it for me for Free - Except becky and I have always been on dicey terms on MC. So I did what I do and got someone Else (she has great respect4) to ask her for help and well she...Bottom line file is open and has been published on MC many many many times with lulz. Shows total proof of er I have said enough as its best Not to identify the contents of the file.

> you walked out on your wife and basically left her penniless

$$$ are in 1981-2-3-4 $$$$ So Smaller numbers when looked at it all those years Ago - Adjusted for years and $$$$'s in2days numbers - Does Identify me as holding Title as VP of Engineering of a Profitable very Profitable company Does Identify me as Member of Board of Directors n Does Identify me as President of Another Company at the Time.

Stupid Gloria never was bright nuff to look at the value of my Business Credit card accounts - Damn becky if you have skimmed this you should ask me sometime to detail the many DUMB as Fuck stupid Mistrakes Gloria made. One of which could have had her B4 the bar for Maleficence. So YES U bet I took full advantage of Gloria

That divorce Few here today make anything close to such and it was a multi bedroom multi story house WITH a Guest house n more more including Stocks n additional property and of course by State Law Alimony. 50% split of community property is kinda Calif law

DIG DEEP into files to see the depositions n well sure large amounts of money other than what court could legally deal with wazz well hell I was laundering money for the USA Gov n If I had got stuck with having Gloria Allred try n get her fingers on such wood just have not been fair and US Gov was on my back to keep all that stuff under court seal WHICH was not necessary cause another super law firm as selected by US Gov and paid for by them - They figured out a cool way to keep that shit out of open court - However NOT out of the Depositions becky could skim for lulz

So of course I do not want becky to publish such details - Such is Dox protected by MC rules. Its one reason Y I never post a photo I took or details I do not want re-published - FatFuck published and cried about being DENIED even being allowed to spend one day on a PhD degree after he got that totally useless-worthless MS. His school did NOT want a Pedophile in attendance anymore. Easy way to get him out after the MS was simply to say NO NO No more school for you here.

Becky is getting real rich as smart attorney's do - Hell Gloria Allred not so much so smart n she got REAL RICH - Ex Wife n I did meet Allred when Allred was local chapter head of Mensa. That is how my Ex wife selected her. I am also proud of how I ended up not having to pay ONE DIME as demanded by Allred to add to her wallet from my wallet. She lost so many actions in so many of our many court hearings. I even learned the wonderful value of having to go on business travel to escape Gloria's Parwana claws. Ended up making a ton of money for company that wood not have been other wise made as I had to find a way to justify IRS rules re Business travel for Business deduction - Damn I sure was one Super Smart VP of Engineering - Anon H thanks for the memories as you go out of way to protect your buddy the Pedophile and Con man who steals from Teens a fraction of his age. Stole cold hard cash from people like Reed n WSD and many. Does gofundme to rip off people and gets away with it. Just one ordinary thief with Useless Degree that pays the same as a Burger Flipper at MC'D's


Oh Me wonders becky if your haid ain't split YET reading one word of this - You are probably not even aware of Mead corp. But forget Mead - LexisNexis started out as an Experiment by of all people the Ohio State Bar.

> You mentally.......your own child your own flesh and blood

Aw still Mad as Fuck I did the right thing and let the Other guy believe it was his kid. Has kept a family intact that wood other wise NOT B

You're still mad at me for making fun of you licking shit off a dick. A fact you dare not deny

Anonymous L joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 3 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #695,875

@695,747 (Syntax)


> Once years ago on the very same Highway at a Restaurant and FatFucks brain is to fried to remember but bert will.

right cuz berts brain aint fried!

Anonymous M joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 9 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #695,878

@695,837 (Syntax)
So becky is in your secret spy circle of co-conspirators and using her attorney powers for evil?

I should have guessed as much.

bhutan joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 45 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #695,903

@695,837 (Syntax)
this makes my head hurt

Anonymous O joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #695,908

@previous (bhutan)
You know syntax is all riled up when he posts pages of tl;dr in response

Anonymous P joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 7 hours later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #696,115

Syntax, you have yet to tell us why Matt "had to leave China", which is what you claimed. So, why did he have to leave?

Syntax replied with this 10 years ago, 1 hour later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #696,163

@695,903 (bhutan)
I just re-read it myself and it made my haid hurt. And damn its accurate as all fuck@695,878 (M)
> I cannot blame you for miss~understanding cause the read wood make you haid hurt as well

No I thought about asking becky and then thought of a more better way. I simply dropped a few facts that people demanded proof of. My info came from people that new in person FatFuck but they never showed me any proof. Someone a Mod at another Chan sent me a PM asking how they might get the proof. I simply suggested someone who had that unique tool necessary.

Anyone is free to go to LA Court house and pay to get copy of records that are Pubic records. I remember buying court transcripts and because I needed them expedited, I paid a premium price.

A by the way. If one wants to meet and date gals who work for Court house? Several took pity on my situation LOLOL - Going up against attorney who is always on TV does have value. She did run up attorney fees by dragging me to court for totally bullshit stuff over n over n over again. When I got fed up with it I just hopped on a plane and went on cough cough biz Trips

New Orleans was my most Fav spot for a getaway and then came the day Me worry about IRS audit of company cause when it comes to technology Not so much exists in NO

All these years later Globalstar Corporate does for a tax break - Back then Nothing other than companies in Oil and fishing tek stuff. One thing which was truly unique was an amplifier that did not use solid state parts nor ole tube parts NOR was sensitive to super high heats found deep in sea re Oil well drilling - But everyone who needed such had already bought all they needed

So being perplexed I open up yellow pages of phone book and discover a company WE did no biz with and I call on phone asking to speak to random engineer and switch board gals says come on over and we will arranged a conference room and NO ONE EVER NEVER Visits us for anything.

They on super secrete stuff could not tell me what they were doing. Me just mentions a series of non military Three letter agency letters and locations and Room discovers ME/We were already qualified and working on the same exact stuff they were doing.

Sometimes in biz is just pure blind luck or the need to have a valid excuse. @695,908 (O)

Been out having a NON work day up till one hour ago. Now have work to do n getting ready to make a trip to Harvard Med School Monday afternoon. Tuesday morning I could walk away More broke or not so much so broke and even somewhat The Other... Dicey current crash of Stock Market could pay off in my favor for Tuesdays trip

@previous (P)
> Ask someone with the info via Email. FatFuck goes to Beijing n gets Tuberculous and as he says he almost died. Long term body damage as result. Lots of places in USA does not allow teachers who had TB to teach

“I stopped applying for work since then because recruiting agencies here will not even entertain my application once I inform them about my TB history’, says person, a professional from country outside of USA.’ My own government can not or would not even touch this issue.”


FatFuck ends up having to move out of toxic Beijing and picks of all places another toxic hell hole. Bad air bad water and very disgusting food as sperlled out on gokuming - Food loaded with mystery meat cooked in sewage on purpose. Finding work is easy but FatFuck rote volumes on GK re horrid pay and pay was the same with any degree or no degree. One had to work multiple companies a week just to eak out survival. Power shortages oh the listed number of Power shortages. People take dumps in street. Other Expats said the place stinks just smells so bad

So one could say Y wood anyone stay? If you're not qualified to do any real work you take what you can I suppose.

None of that has much to do with Y he left. He should have but he could not find another country that wanted him. His looking for work posts are still up on net

Had to leave - Ask someone on the growing email list for reason why he LEFT.

(Edited 4 minutes later.)

Anonymous D replied with this 10 years ago, 10 hours later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #696,244

@previous (Syntax)
So once again, why did he leave?

Anonymous M replied with this 10 years ago, 4 hours later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #696,328

@previous (D)
> They on super secrete stuff could not tell me what they were doing. Me just mentions a series of non military Three letter agency letters and locations and Room discovers ME/We were already qualified and working on the same exact stuff they were doing.

It's a secret

Anonymous Q joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 3 hours later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #696,384

@696,244 (D)
He was caught molesting an 8 year old Chinese boy and the parents tried to blackmail him. After handing over everything he had in his wallet at the time, he managed to stall them long enough to grab his passport and flee the country. Didn't even have time to transfer his savings (such as they were) back to the States, he more or less stepped off the plane with nothing but the clothes on his back, praying that Interpol won't report his activities to the FBI.

Anonymous H replied with this 10 years ago, 3 hours later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #696,404

@696,244 (D)

> So once again, why did he leave?

He will never answer, just spout off a bunch of drivel and lies like he always does.

kook !!OPZbEQMT1 replied with this 10 years ago, 12 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #696,406

@previous (H)
So I know why he probably left, but not why he won't go back. But I don't know if its appropriate to post here.

Anonymous O replied with this 10 years ago, 1 hour later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #696,415

@previous (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)
Hearsay is appropriate and you should post it. Let me guess, it involves syntax and his meddling

Anonymous H replied with this 10 years ago, 12 hours later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #696,496

@696,406 (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)

> So I know why he probably left, but not why he won't go back. But I don't know if its appropriate to post here.

Appropriate to post here?? For Christ's sake if you know, why don't you tell us instead of acting like the old fool Syntax. I highly doubt you know anything unless you believe the diarrhea that flows out of Syntax's toothless mouth.

kook !!OPZbEQMT1 replied with this 10 years ago, 25 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #696,498

@previous (H)
Fuck off. I don't have to tell you anything if you're going to be a fucking dick.

Anonymous R joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 20 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #696,501

Kook looking for some attention

Anonymous S joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 3 hours later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #696,527

@696,498 (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)

I'd like to know please

kook !!OPZbEQMT1 replied with this 10 years ago, 33 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #696,532

@previous (S)
I asked Becky of she thought it was okay to post but she hasn't responded

beckyderp !Hi.HILLARY replied with this 10 years ago, 7 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #696,533

@previous (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)
Oh shit, just replied.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 18 hours later, 4 days after the original post[^] [v] #696,657

Syntax, we are all still waiting for you to tell us why "Matt had to leave China."

Anonymous R replied with this 10 years ago, 6 minutes later, 4 days after the original post[^] [v] #696,661

@previous (A)

> we are all still waiting

I'm not.

Anonymous H replied with this 10 years ago, 7 minutes later, 4 days after the original post[^] [v] #696,665

@previous (R)

> > we are all still waiting
>
> I'm not.

Well I am..but as always Syntax is as full of shit as a Christmas goose and goes silent, and now kook is all butthurt because I said she was acting like Syntax. But in all honestly I really don't believe either one of them knows their ass from a hole in the ground and was just craving them some MC attention.

Anonymous S replied with this 10 years ago, 1 hour later, 4 days after the original post[^] [v] #696,671

@696,533 (beckyderp !Hi.HILLARY)

Did u say yes

Anonymous R replied with this 10 years ago, 22 minutes later, 4 days after the original post[^] [v] #696,674

@696,665 (H)
I agree that kook was just craving some attention. I merely took issue with the OP saying we were all still waiting. Because I'm not. Therefore it's not all of us.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 2 hours later, 4 days after the original post[^] [v] #696,723

Still waiting.

Anonymous Q replied with this 10 years ago, 1 hour later, 4 days after the original post[^] [v] #696,752

@696,665 (H)
@previous (A)

I already told you: he was caught molesting an 8 year old Chinese boy and the parents tried to blackmail him. After handing over everything he had in his wallet at the time, he managed to stall them long enough to grab his passport and flee the country. He's currently lying low in a desperate attempt to avoid prosecution under 18 U.S.C. § 2423C.

Anonymous T joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 2 hours later, 4 days after the original post[^] [v] #696,787

@previous (Q)

> He's currently lying low in a desperate attempt to avoid prosecution under 18 U.S.C. § 2423C.

The someone needs to tell him to get off facebook because he is all over it showing off pictures of his new car and himself. Doesn't look like he is lying low to me.

Anonymous Q replied with this 10 years ago, 6 minutes later, 4 days after the original post[^] [v] #696,789

@previous (T)
Link?

Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 4 days after the original post[^] [v] #696,791

@previous (Q)
Obsession

Anonymous Q replied with this 10 years ago, 32 minutes later, 4 days after the original post[^] [v] #696,811

@696,787 (T)
@previous (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
So, no Facebook page. Thanks.

Anonymous T replied with this 10 years ago, 2 hours later, 5 days after the original post[^] [v] #696,851

@previous (Q)

Just look him up on facebook..*sheesh* are you that fucking retarded?

Anonymous Q replied with this 10 years ago, 19 hours later, 5 days after the original post[^] [v] #697,129

@previous (T)
It's much easier for me if you post the link. However, you won't, because you're lying. Thanks.

Anonymous V joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 19 hours later, 6 days after the original post[^] [v] #697,299

So, tell us Syntax. Still waiting.

Anonymous R replied with this 10 years ago, 45 minutes later, 6 days after the original post[^] [v] #697,304

@previous (V)

> Still waiting.

I'm not

Anonymous Q replied with this 10 years ago, 2 hours later, 6 days after the original post[^] [v] #697,338

@697,299 (V)
Told you twice already: he was caught molesting an 8 year old Chinese boy and the parents tried to blackmail him. After handing over everything he had in his wallet, he managed to stall them long enough to grab his passport and flee the country. The sick fuck is now hiding under a rock hoping to avoid a prison sentence for violating 18 U.S.C. § 2423C.

Anonymous R replied with this 10 years ago, 5 minutes later, 6 days after the original post[^] [v] #697,340

@previous (Q)
Evidence?

Anonymous O replied with this 10 years ago, 28 minutes later, 6 days after the original post[^] [v] #697,358

@696,498 (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)
You could post it though. Matt should be allowed to tell his side of the story too

Anonymous Q replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 6 days after the original post[^] [v] #697,361

@697,340 (R)
Contact Syntax. He has all the documentation.

Anonymous R replied with this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 6 days after the original post[^] [v] #697,363

@previous (Q)
So you have no evidence. Ok, thanks, that'll be all.

William !KieUG1WfLM double-posted this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 6 days after the original post[^] [v] #697,364

@697,361 (Q)

> Contact Syntax. He has all the documentation.

Why don't you have "all the documentation"?

Anonymous Q replied with this 10 years ago, 12 minutes later, 6 days after the original post[^] [v] #697,371

@previous (William !KieUG1WfLM)
Why would I need any?

William !KieUG1WfLM replied with this 10 years ago, 7 minutes later, 6 days after the original post[^] [v] #697,374

@previous (Q)
Because you're making claims about Matt, and when people ask you to prove your claims you tell them to ask someone else for the proof. It suggests you don't have any proof and you're making things up.

Anonymous Q replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 6 days after the original post[^] [v] #697,375

@previous (William !KieUG1WfLM)
I don't need any evidence. He is a known pedophile.

William !KieUG1WfLM replied with this 10 years ago, 5 minutes later, 6 days after the original post[^] [v] #697,377

@previous (Q)

> I don't need any evidence.

Yes you do if you're going to make claims about someone. Saying you "don't need evidence" and that you rely on what is "known" is something stupid people do.

Anyway, I wasn't proposing to have a conversation with you here. I just wanted to establish that you believe things for which you have no evidence and are therefore a moron. I have done that. And now I'm done with you, thanks.

Anonymous Q replied with this 10 years ago, 9 minutes later, 6 days after the original post[^] [v] #697,379

@previous (William !KieUG1WfLM)
So, why aren't you willing to contact Syntax? Are you afraid he can prove Fatfuck is liar, a thief, a child-molester and a pedophile?

Anonymous Q double-posted this 10 years ago, 55 seconds later, 6 days after the original post[^] [v] #697,380

@697,377 (William !KieUG1WfLM)
> Yes you do if you're going to make claims about someone.

This is not a court of law.

William !KieUG1WfLM replied with this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 6 days after the original post[^] [v] #697,384

@697,379 (Q)
Tell you what chief, since this means so much to you, let's do this - YOU contact Syntax now, ask him to give you "all the documentation", and then you post it here. Ok? Because otherwise, you have to understand why your method just isn't how this kind of thing works:


Lawyer: Your Honour, the defendant is a pedophile!

Judge: Can you prove this?

Laywer: It's well-known, Your Honour!

Judge: I need more than that

Lawyer: Well then write to someone and ask them for the proof, Your Honour!

William !KieUG1WfLM double-posted this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 6 days after the original post[^] [v] #697,385

@697,380 (Q)

> >Yes you do if you're going to make claims about someone.
>
> This is not a court of law.

Indeed it's not. But you want people to believe you, and therefore you need to provide evidence. What is it about this concept that you're struggling to understand?

Anonymous Q replied with this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 6 days after the original post[^] [v] #697,388

@previous (William !KieUG1WfLM)
> But you want people to believe you, and therefore you need to provide evidence.

People already know he's a pedophile, and they don't need evidence to confirm it. Thanks.

Anonymous O replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 6 days after the original post[^] [v] #697,389

@previous (Q)
That's not true at all

Anonymous Q replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 6 days after the original post[^] [v] #697,391

@previous (O)
Yes, it is. Thanks, thanks.

squeegee joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 30 seconds later, 6 days after the original post[^] [v] #697,392

@697,384 (William !KieUG1WfLM)
it appears to mean more to you than anyone else. just ask syntax and quit stalling and trying to make everyone else do the leg work we've all already done. if you want the truth get it from syntax like everyone else.

lazy.

Anonymous Q replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 6 days after the original post[^] [v] #697,393

@previous (squeegee)
This.

Anonymous O replied with this 10 years ago, 32 seconds later, 6 days after the original post[^] [v] #697,394

@697,391 (Q)
Matt is not a pedophile and you, in fact, are. People already know this, and evidence is not needed to confirm it. You should stop being a pedophile immediately or kill yourself.

Anonymous O double-posted this 10 years ago, 53 seconds later, 6 days after the original post[^] [v] #697,395

@697,392 (squeegee)
So you have the imaginary evidence and are not going to post it or something?

William !KieUG1WfLM replied with this 10 years ago, 15 seconds later, 6 days after the original post[^] [v] #697,396

@697,392 (squeegee)
@697,384 (William !KieUG1WfLM)

> Tell you what chief, since this means so much to you, let's do this - YOU contact Syntax now, ask him to give you "all the documentation", and then you post it here. Ok? Because otherwise, you have to understand why your method just isn't how this kind of thing works:
>
>
> Lawyer: Your Honour, the defendant is a pedophile!
>
> Judge: Can you prove this?
>
> Laywer: It's well-known, Your Honour!
>
> Judge: I need more than that
>
> Lawyer: Well then write to someone and ask them for the proof, Your Honour!

squeegee replied with this 10 years ago, 54 seconds later, 6 days after the original post[^] [v] #697,397

@697,395 (O)
syntax has it, how many times do we have to say it? it's not like i kept copies. jesus.

Anonymous O replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 6 days after the original post[^] [v] #697,399

@previous (squeegee)
What is the abridged version?

Anonymous Q replied with this 10 years ago, 24 seconds later, 6 days after the original post[^] [v] #697,400

@697,394 (O)
You have no idea who I am. However, Fatfuck's personal information is freely available online, along with transcripts of his attempts to coerce child pornography from a minor and his later attempts to justify this criminal behavior. Thanks, thanks. Thanks.

BTW:
@697,385 (William !KieUG1WfLM)
@697,394 (O)

Samefag. Thanks.

(Edited 50 seconds later.)

squeegee replied with this 10 years ago, 2 seconds later, 6 days after the original post[^] [v] #697,401

@697,396 (William !KieUG1WfLM)
uh... as someone else pointed out this isn't a court of law and we're not trying to build a case.

kook !!OPZbEQMT1 replied with this 10 years ago, 20 seconds later, 6 days after the original post[^] [v] #697,402

@697,358 (O)
Management said that it wasn't appropriate to post

squeegee replied with this 10 years ago, 7 seconds later, 6 days after the original post[^] [v] #697,403

@697,399 (O)
ask fucking syntax

Anonymous O replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 6 days after the original post[^] [v] #697,406

@697,400 (Q)
The edited transcripts? That is a known fraudulent post and has been admitted so many time by triptych herself.

Anonymous Q replied with this 10 years ago, 0 seconds later, 6 days after the original post[^] [v] #697,407

@697,402 (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)
Kook, please confirm: did Matt request "open-leg vulva" photographs from a minor?

Anonymous O replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 6 days after the original post[^] [v] #697,409

@697,403 (squeegee)
He's not here at the moment. I'm asking you

kook !!OPZbEQMT1 replied with this 10 years ago, 16 seconds later, 6 days after the original post[^] [v] #697,410

@697,407 (Q)
Yes

Anonymous Q replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 6 days after the original post[^] [v] #697,411

@697,406 (O)
The transcripts were not edited. Thanks, thanks. Thanks.

Anonymous O replied with this 10 years ago, 32 seconds later, 6 days after the original post[^] [v] #697,412

@697,410 (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)
Did you learn this by reading the edited transcripts posted to the trusted ED page of truth?

squeegee replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 6 days after the original post[^] [v] #697,413

@697,409 (O)
so you're asking people who don't hold the evidence to "prove it" and then point to our inability to produce documents not in our possession as proof that it's false, all the while refusing to ask the one person who holds all the evidence?

yeah, no... stop asking us, and go ask syntax.

his email is something like [email protected] or something

(Edited 1 minute later.)

Anonymous O replied with this 10 years ago, 14 seconds later, 6 days after the original post[^] [v] #697,414

@697,411 (Q)
Trip herself admitted that they are.

kook !!OPZbEQMT1 replied with this 10 years ago, 9 seconds later, 6 days after the original post[^] [v] #697,415

@697,412 (O)
They weren't edited

Anonymous Q replied with this 10 years ago, 52 seconds later, 6 days after the original post[^] [v] #697,416

@697,414 (O)
She did not. You lie.

Anonymous O replied with this 10 years ago, 10 seconds later, 6 days after the original post[^] [v] #697,417

@697,413 (squeegee)
I'm not asking anyone to "prove" anything. I just want you to tell me the short version what was told to you.

kook !!OPZbEQMT1 replied with this 10 years ago, 15 seconds later, 6 days after the original post[^] [v] #697,418

@697,414 (O)
Around that same time he made constant sexual posts about underage Disney stars.

Anonymous Q replied with this 10 years ago, 11 seconds later, 6 days after the original post[^] [v] #697,419

@697,413 (squeegee)
> his email is something like [email protected] or something

LOL

Anonymous O replied with this 10 years ago, 44 seconds later, 6 days after the original post[^] [v] #697,420

@697,415 (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)
@697,416 (Q)
ask her. I'm just telling you what she told me

squeegee replied with this 10 years ago, 39 seconds later, 6 days after the original post[^] [v] #697,421

@697,417 (O)
ok, let me PM the staff and see if it's okay to post.

Anonymous O replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 6 days after the original post[^] [v] #697,422

@697,418 (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)
And about his teenage girl cousin. His artistic works of fiction have you fooled

kook !!OPZbEQMT1 replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 6 days after the original post[^] [v] #697,423

@previous (O)
Fooled into thinking that he's a pedo?

Anonymous Q replied with this 10 years ago, 12 seconds later, 6 days after the original post[^] [v] #697,424

@697,420 (O)
She told you nothing. Again, you lie.

Anonymous O replied with this 10 years ago, 8 minutes later, 6 days after the original post[^] [v] #697,428

@previous (Q)
She told everyone that the logs she gave to the person who uploaded them were not what were supplied.

Anonymous Q replied with this 10 years ago, 4 minutes later, 6 days after the original post[^] [v] #697,430

@previous (O)
She uploaded them to GHOUL herself. Again, you lie.

Anonymous O replied with this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 6 days after the original post[^] [v] #697,432

@previous (Q)
That's simply not true. It's ok to believe everything you read on ED though

squeegee replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 6 days after the original post[^] [v] #697,433

staff said to go ask syntax.

Anonymous O replied with this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 6 days after the original post[^] [v] #697,435

@previous (squeegee)
This whole thread is asking syntax though. Make a pastebin post and link it or something

squeegee replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 6 days after the original post[^] [v] #697,436

@previous (O)
that sounds like something someone else should do

Anonymous O replied with this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 6 days after the original post[^] [v] #697,437

@697,423 (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)
kook, will you make a pastebin post with the short version and link to it?

William !KieUG1WfLM replied with this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 6 days after the original post[^] [v] #697,438

@697,401 (squeegee)

> uh... as someone else pointed out this isn't a court of law and we're not trying to build a case.

Good. Well then, as the saying goes, "what can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence". So stop crying because people are dismissing what you're saying.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 26 minutes later, 6 days after the original post[^] [v] #697,443

So, it seems like the original question from this thread has still not been answered, despite a ton of bullshit. Hey Syntax, why did "Matt have to leave China"?

kook !!OPZbEQMT1 replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 6 days after the original post[^] [v] #697,444

@697,437 (O)
Why would I want to do that?

Anonymous O replied with this 10 years ago, 12 minutes later, 6 days after the original post[^] [v] #697,447

@previous (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)
To answer the "why did matt have to leave china" question that you allude to having info about but won't post here.

kook !!OPZbEQMT1 replied with this 10 years ago, 8 minutes later, 6 days after the original post[^] [v] #697,449

@previous (O)
Fine if one mod says its okay. I'll say why right now

Anonymous O replied with this 10 years ago, 15 minutes later, 6 days after the original post[^] [v] #697,454

@previous (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)
Go to pastebin, write it there, post the link. Thanks

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 5 seconds later, 6 days after the original post[^] [v] #697,455

@697,449 (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)
I am interested to know why "Matt had to leave China".

Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 6 days after the original post[^] [v] #697,456

I have it on pretty damn good authority that he did not "have to" leave, but chose to in order to start a new career.

kook !!OPZbEQMT1 replied with this 10 years ago, 27 seconds later, 6 days after the original post[^] [v] #697,457

@697,454 (O)
@697,455 (A)
I just said that I will do it if a mod okays it

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 23 seconds later, 6 days after the original post[^] [v] #697,458

@previous (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)
What if Matt himself OKs it, because he knows Syntax is full of shit?

kook !!OPZbEQMT1 replied with this 10 years ago, 16 minutes later, 6 days after the original post[^] [v] #697,463

@previous (A)
That would be fine as long as a mod confirmed that it was actually Matt

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 10 minutes later, 6 days after the original post[^] [v] #697,464

@previous (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)
What if Matt told you the opposite of what syntax said? Whom would you believe?

kook !!OPZbEQMT1 replied with this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 6 days after the original post[^] [v] #697,465

@previous (A)
It depends on what we are referring to. Because I have seen some real documentation.

Are you Matt?

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 11 minutes later, 6 days after the original post[^] [v] #697,466

@previous (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)
But Syntax said that Matt "had to leave China." What is that is simply not true? Will you still believe Syntax, the grandfather of lies?

kook !!OPZbEQMT1 replied with this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 6 days after the original post[^] [v] #697,467

@previous (A)
Jesus Christ. I said that I know why Matt left China, but not why he isnt going back. Take that as you will, Matt. I'm trying not to be mean

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 6 days after the original post[^] [v] #697,468

@previous (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)
But Syntax said that he "had to" leave China. That is simply not true.

squeegee replied with this 10 years ago, 4 minutes later, 6 days after the original post[^] [v] #697,470

@previous (A)
well, chased out. fucking semantics, man

kook !!OPZbEQMT1 replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 6 days after the original post[^] [v] #697,471

@697,468 (A)
Are you Matt?

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 6 minutes later, 6 days after the original post[^] [v] #697,472

@697,470 (squeegee)
Nope.

@previous (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)
What would it matter? You believe Syntax no matter what.

Anonymous O replied with this 10 years ago, 7 seconds later, 6 days after the original post[^] [v] #697,473

@697,465 (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)
What is the real document you have seen?

kook !!OPZbEQMT1 replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 6 days after the original post[^] [v] #697,474

@697,472 (A)
It matters to me. I'm trying not to say something that people will use to hurt you.

Anonymous O replied with this 10 years ago, 6 minutes later, 6 days after the original post[^] [v] #697,478

@previous (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)
People use lies all the time to hurt others.

squeegee replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 6 days after the original post[^] [v] #697,479

@697,472 (A)
bailed out?
you seem to know an awful lot about this since you're refuting everything. how about you tell us what you know, mr smart pants?

Syntax replied with this 10 years ago, 4 hours later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #697,511

@697,402 (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)

> Management said that it wasn't appropriate to post

I figured they wood do the rite thing and request so many details remain off of MC. This stuff angers the owner r04r something awful. Frankly I agree with her even though I end up helping to cause a feeding frenzy.

20+ years of experience with FatFuck making a 4um all about him. Once upon a tyme back when he could get away with flooding/spamming 4ums chat rooms he flooded it with fecal fetish shit

Its a known fact that if the girl or boy he is trying to fuck with is not covered in rectum output, Fatfuck cannot get sexually excited.

And anyone here that is not aware of how often FatFuck attempted to talk a 15 year old girl and a 14 year old boy into sending him images of their private parts is in2 pure evil denial.

MC has very few real women/girls who use this site and one who is here daily was one that is open about Fatfucks fucking with her when she was only 15.

'''And b4 I forget here is something EVERYONE should pay attention2.

Leo Vargas is up to his same old shit about hanging out where teens hang on the internet including MC and TC and is actively in pursuit. He recently set the bait in his trap and was again successful. Success is defined as in physical meet up and contact in person.'''

'''I am 100% sure of this!!!

(Edited 1 minute later.)

Syntax double-posted this 10 years ago, 23 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #697,513

@697,456 (A)

> I have it on pretty damn good authority that he did not "have to" leave, but chose to in order to start a new career.

Putting all that I have aside for the momento - I have more better things to do than prove that line as full of BS. After all things FatFuck put up directly on net about in pursuit of PhD from a lowcow University. All the text about how much he loved his jobs teaching. At the same time telling a well respected Mod in PM she found desirable to publish in open on MC how much he despised the teaching jobs.

Perhaps Donald Trump has studied FatFucks pathological lies. Odd thing is all those years in pursuit of a PhD in languages and considering how so few end up getting hired for anything other than teaching simple English or French. It was after all a good con job to get student loans he never expected to pay off and run up IRS debt cause he knew he could go on the run.

I think I am ok in the smarts department but even myself got conned by believing FatFuck Sr was actually a real businessman in the oil business. Eleven companies registered as legit corporations.

Then FatFuck Sr gets busted by the Feds and ends up convicted of Fraud by US Attorney. On his way to slammer for years n years they find a technical glitch and he is rescheduled for a new trial

Then almost out of money in trying to keep his asshole free from other inmate invasions he really runs out of money and has to skip rent on his corporate office - Seeing the for rent sigh on net I said hummmmm how spacious is that operation. My garage is larger then that old corporate office LOLOLOL - And in the 754 sq feet it had a kitchen and a Bed and bedroom furniture

Figures that FatFuck Jr is living the dream with first running a con on teens then gofundme to steal more money and unable to find work other than flipping McD burgers he runs off to China to get hole in Lung and other quality shit only a crap hole country can provide. Tries to convince people here that the local food is quality. He ends up in fights with other Expats that tell him the food is toxic and generally not fit for animals. China does have areas with quality air and food and places to live but it sure ain't Beijing or Kunming

Photo is near Kunming but a full 8 hour drive to get away from Toxicity.

Anonymous O replied with this 10 years ago, 38 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #697,520

@697,511 (Syntax)
Your beans spill sucks old man
@previous (Syntax)
Is that a picture of stalker village merely a 15 minute drive from Kunming?

None of this has anything to do with having to leave China

Anonymous Q replied with this 10 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #697,522

@previous (O)
He had to leave China because he was caught molesting a child. It's unfortunate he wasn't detained at Changshui International, but he can always be charged under 18 U.S.C. § 2423C when the FBI catches up with him.

Anonymous O replied with this 10 years ago, 41 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #697,525

@previous (Q)
Shit tier trolling lies as usual

beckyderp !Hi.HILLARY replied with this 10 years ago, 5 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #697,526

@697,449 (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)
You're welcome to say it, no one is going to delete it or ban you or anything. It's just I do think it's a bit mean/inappropriate, that's what I thought you were asking me before.

Anonymous Q replied with this 10 years ago, 35 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #697,534

@697,525 (O)

https://minichan.org/topic/45908

Every word true. Thanks, thanks. Thanks.

Anonymous O replied with this 10 years ago, 2 hours later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #697,543

@previous (Q)
> I saw a transcript of the online conversation, posted by the girl he requested the images from. The incident was confirmed by a number of people who were online with them, and the 41 year old White Male initially admitted that he'd made the request, claiming he thought she was 18 despite the transcript showing that she told him her true age beforehand. He then reversed his position, making several contradictory statements, then launched into a vendetta which continues to this day. I've witnessed this sexual harassment for several years and have no doubt that his stalking is motivated by pure spite over being outed as a pedophile.

> Regarding his tax liens, the information is publicly available and he admitted to one of our users that he could face serious charges from the IRS if he ever returns to the US. On the subject of his double-dealing and dishonesty, he has a crowd sourcing account which he used to finance a non existent literary project; basically he stole several thousand dollars from good faith contributors. Residing in Asia, he believes himself beyond the reach of American law and takes great pleasure bragging about the gullibility of his "investors".

> On a personal level, I believe that his posting pictures of his co-worker and claiming he'd gotten her pregnant was an utterly despicable act. You seemed to have dismiss that as a trivial matter, Toni, but I consider it nothing less than victimization, in the sense that he knew the woman, and understood the kind of damage he could have done to her reputation and relationships. Quite literally, she could have lost her job over that, and might conceivably have been ostracized from her general community.

> All of these events have taken place over a span of five years, though he's apparently been running scams of this kind for well over a decade. Granted, I know nothing about psychology, Toni, but at the very least, his track record suggests he has no moral compass to speak of.


You are totally not obsessed bud. None of these allegations are true. Bitter people spread lies about others on the internet and easily fooled halfwits subscribe to the syntax newsletter about Matt.

William !KieUG1WfLM replied with this 10 years ago, 9 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #697,547

@697,511 (Syntax)

> > Management said that it wasn't appropriate to post
>
> I figured they wood do the rite thing and request so many details remain off of MC. This stuff angers the owner r04r something awful. Frankly I agree with her even though I end up helping to cause a feeding frenzy.
>
> 20+ years of experience with FatFuck making a 4um all about him. Once upon a tyme back when he could get away with flooding/spamming 4ums chat rooms he flooded it with fecal fetish shit
>
> Its a known fact that if the girl or boy he is trying to fuck with is not covered in rectum output, Fatfuck cannot get sexually excited.
>
> And anyone here that is not aware of how often FatFuck attempted to talk a 15 year old girl and a 14 year old boy into sending him images of their private parts is in2 pure evil denial.
>
> MC has very few real women/girls who use this site and one who is here daily was one that is open about Fatfucks fucking with her when she was only 15.
>
> '''And b4 I forget here is something EVERYONE should pay attention2.
>
> Leo Vargas is up to his same old shit about hanging out where teens hang on the internet including MC and TC and is actively in pursuit. He recently set the bait in his trap and was again successful. Success is defined as in physical meet up and contact in person.'''
>
> '''I am 100% sure of this!!!

Nothing you have written here is evidence of anything. Merely saying, over and over again, "I am 100% sure" is irrelevant. A fundamentalist Christian is "100% sure" of what he believes, but it doesn't make it so.

I say again, what can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence.

kook !!OPZbEQMT1 replied with this 10 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #697,557

@697,526 (beckyderp !Hi.HILLARY)
It is mean. I'm torn

Anonymous X joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 36 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #697,566

@previous (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)
Don't show any weakness. The neighborhood pit will smell it from a mile away. Just post it, if you want to remain the alpha on your block.

Anonymous Z-1 joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 27 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #697,569

@697,557 (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)
I truthfully don't care what you post, but watching you spin everyone up is annoying. Either post it or don't.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 18 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #697,574

@697,513 (Syntax)
He paid off his student loans 100%.

kook !!OPZbEQMT1 replied with this 10 years ago, 47 seconds later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #697,576

Matt's mother died

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 10 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #697,578

@previous (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)
So what you are saying is that Syntax scours the obituaries for a small town that he has nothing to do with, in the hopes of finding information about Matt? Still think he's not a stalker?

beckyderp !Hi.HILLARY replied with this 10 years ago, 12 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #697,579

@previous (A)
If it's true, I'm genuinely sorry. I hope you're holding up OK.

Anonymous R replied with this 10 years ago, 22 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #697,584

@697,576 (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)

> Matt's mother died

If this is true then Matt, if you're there, really sorry for you man. Best wishes to you, stay strong.

Anonymous X replied with this 10 years ago, 8 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #697,588

@697,576 (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)
Oh...

kook !!OPZbEQMT1 replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #697,591

@697,578 (A)
I'm sorry. I shouldnt have said anything

Anonymous V replied with this 10 years ago, 26 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #697,595

Thank you everybody.

kook !!OPZbEQMT1 replied with this 10 years ago, 6 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #697,598

@previous (V)
for what?

William !KieUG1WfLM replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #697,599

@previous (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)
Presumably for the sympathy and well wishes.

Anonymous V replied with this 10 years ago, 20 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #697,603

This proves that Syntax is a stalker.

Anonymous R replied with this 10 years ago, 49 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #697,610

@previous (V)

> This proves that Syntax is a stalker.

That has never been in doubt.

bhutan replied with this 10 years ago, 8 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #697,613

@697,603 (V)

> This proves that Syntax is a stalker.

Yeah this, again, just makes syntax look like a piece of shit

Anonymous X replied with this 10 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #697,621

@697,591 (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)
You have nothing to apologize for. Matt started this thread, he knew were it would lead. In fact Matt, just recently, started other threads baiting syntax and hoping it would end like this, where syntax looks worse than him, for a change.

squeegee replied with this 10 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #697,665

@697,576 (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)
oh. well, this could've been handled differently. just saying that he's here for a personal family matter would've been enough to stop the trolling.
specifics weren't necessary, but neither was withholding and letting the rumor mill work it's magic.

sorry about your loss, indy, i hope your family is doing well.

Anonymous Q replied with this 10 years ago, 10 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #697,666

@697,543 (O)
So, Fatfuck is the victim of some vast online conspiracy spearheaded by Syntax and maintained by an global network of covert informants?

Occam's razor says no.

@697,574 (A)

No, he didn't. Thanks.

Also:

@697,574 (A)
@697,547 (William !KieUG1WfLM)
@697,603 (V)
@697,525 (O)
@697,613 (bhutan)
@697,610 (R)

Samefag. Thanks, thanks. Thanks.

kook !!OPZbEQMT1 replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #697,667

Can we just delete this thread?

Syntax replied with this 10 years ago, 9 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #697,668

So I guess its time I replied. Frankly I am disappointed that becky gave a go ahead. That said its good very good kook limited her information to just One issue.
True death is no laffin matter however, the Death was NOT what all the Big News was or is about.

I suspect there were several behind the scenes helpful hints so that kook could post and come away clean. What I do not get is why a Mod wood allow kook to get bullied when it was just as easy to say - The subject should be off limits.

And as to Stalker? I just rote a reply to a Topic I was not aware of. It details Pedophilia as in ages 8 to 12-13-14- maybe a 15?
But that was not even the reason I looked for an update on FatFuck. He came off of a long term Ban and was banned again and then he said something in a post and asked Mods to verify it was by him.

I read something in2 that post or posts and said hummmm What IF - I were to look at a Family members facebook page. Bang with the I am so sorry. Still nothing unusually there. Someone dies and everyone is sorry. Perhaps NOT everyone because there is a relative who was not so sad. Still no big deal.

Well sure kook will back me up with THERE is So Much MORE to the story but it should NOT be posted in open because it could wood will end up hurting a probably nice person and there is no need for that on MC. When real full names end up as they have on MC TC SC - Real people can get hurt - Jobs can be lost. Visa's can end up being hard to renew. This kinda shit should never happen.

FatFuck set that person up to fail. Its all on him for that shit he pulled If it ends up posted on here or TC

Ya all who bully to force it out are crazy for trying YET a few got your wish re some information now out to all. Alas that person is no longer with us AND another IS!

Leave it alone let it go.

And for FatFuck to beg for more information about the Y Y Y - Even He is unaware of stuff going on behind his back in Kunming. He left behind some very angry gokunming users. He is even mostly aware of who they are. He is still clueless about two of them he met in person and still is unaware of their use of gokunming forums. For someone in that tiny Expat community he truly fucked up with is to be expected.

Green !BEERiVqJJw joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 7 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #697,672

I'm sorry about your mom Matt. You know that I'm here if you ever need someone to talk to.

squeegee replied with this 10 years ago, 14 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #697,674

@697,668 (Syntax)
his mom died, dude. let it go. let him mourn in peace. at this point you're coming across as the bad guy. you should drop it

Anonymous Z-3 joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #697,675

@previous (squeegee)

Syntax replied with this 10 years ago, 5 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #697,679

@697,674 (squeegee)
Since when did I try coming across as anything other than myself?

And again the many emails and people on mail - The issue had Nada to do with anyone's death - Only with those surviving - And its not Lemon's its yellowroses2060 yahoo with the missing @
Me thinks you deserve the missing puzzle piece - Now remaining a virgin does have some value so its ok with me if you pass up the important missing element.

You could also get it from someone you trust in IRC. It is as simple as that.

kook !!OPZbEQMT1 replied with this 10 years ago, 6 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #697,681

@previous (Syntax)
email me plox

Syntax replied with this 10 years ago, 7 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #697,684

@previous (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)
You have mail - very very limited time n must head out - will be back a bit later maybe but its Sat evening sooooon and again one more set of Brext USA 1776 events to celebrate and THEN Jitterbug n dinner n more dancing but on the Latino side

Anonymous R replied with this 10 years ago, 14 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #697,690

@697,679 (Syntax)

> Since when did I try coming across as anything other than myself?
>
> And again the many emails and people on mail - The issue had Nada to do with anyone's death - Only with those surviving - And its not Lemon's its yellowroses2060 yahoo with the missing @
> Me thinks you deserve the missing puzzle piece - Now remaining a virgin does have some value so its ok with me if you pass up the important missing element.
>
> You could also get it from someone you trust in IRC. It is as simple as that.

Why do you write completely normally when somebody pushes back on you, but the rest of the time you use that stupid 'dyslexia' shtick?

Aw hell nah replied with this 10 years ago, 8 seconds later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #697,691

@697,668 (Syntax)
> leave it alone let it go

Do you have any self awareness you dribbling old sack of shit? You've been promoting your email list for weeks on end by alluding to special information that amounted to a clipping from the obituaries of a small newspaper circulated thousands of miles away from you.

Kill yourself.

RWBY Rhubarb? !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #697,692

Ugh. This rivalry and the drama around it is all pretty cringeworthy tbh.

Syntax replied with this 10 years ago, 5 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #697,693

@697,690 (R)
> Why do you write completely normally when somebody pushes back on you, but the rest of the time you use that stupid 'dyslexia' shtick?

I do love to fuck with English as it was the only subject in school I had to really really really WORK HARD on. Everything else came super easy. English is NOT Logical. And my Dyslexcia is very real and costs me money using editors for the proper ritten versions for clients. Clients all are aware of my Dyslexia


@697,691 (Aw hell nah)
> You've been promoting your email list for weeks on

No I HAVE Not. I no for a fact U are not on it nor will ever B

Where is reply from KOOK? I even sent her a new eaddy to make her day/nite

Syntax double-posted this 10 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #697,694

@697,681 (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)
Geeeesh girl - I have places to go and stuff to pick up for party2share

You just replied to the WRONG Email - Perhaps you did not get the regular one yet? Will try that one again - Do not use the new one as its well only one mod can explain it to you and that wood get me in hot water

I was only trying to SHOCK ya with it

Anonymous Z-4 joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #697,695

@OP
@697,665 (squeegee)
@697,674 (squeegee)
@697,672 (Green !BEERiVqJJw)

Let's put all of this into perspective:

A couple of years ago, when I was moderating SC, I suffered a bereavement and was required to return home to fulfill certain legal responsibilities. As a close relative, I was also asked to deliver the eulogy at the funeral service and supervise the wake afterwards. I stayed on in my home country for around ten days, meeting up with various family members, then flew back to Asia to resume work.

Following that, I went through a period of private mourning, during which I was more or less inactive on the boards and the internet in general. Eventually, however, I resumed moderator duties on SC and set about cleaning up the mess that had ensued following my departure. As soon as I reappeared, I received a PM from someone - whom I strongly suspect was Matt - inquiring about my absence. I replied that I had been in my home country dealing with a family crisis. This person then sent me a cruel and rather sneering message, alleging that I'd committed various criminal offenses and had been deported as a result. I'll leave the contents of the PM to your imagination; I'm not inclined to discuss it here and you're all aware of what chan users are capable of.

That was roughly two years ago. My story is very similar to Matt's, with possibly one exception: I've never mentioned my loss until now. I grieved in private and made no attempt to garner sympathy from the general community. Matt, by contrast, has dragged his closest relative into his online war and is now (attempting to) use her memory to his personal advantage. No doubt he's playing the same game in real life.

In short, while I feel sympathy for Matt's family, I feel absolutely none for him. Using his Mother this way is both inexcusable and utterly contemptible - though perfectly in keeping with his track record, considering how often he used his Grandmother's name in precisely the same manner. As pointed out by Anon X, this entire thread was just another bid for attention, an attempt to both provoke and manipulate the community. No doubt he's now resting on his laurels, congratulating himself on a job well done.

Save your sympathy for someone who truly deserves it. We all lose someone at some point in our lives, that's one of the very few things we can be sure of in this world. The way in which we cherish their memory indicates the depth of respect we feel for them.

One more thing, Matt: leave your Mother out of it, you pathetic creep. She deserves better than this, even from you.

(Edited 8 minutes later.)

Anonymous O replied with this 10 years ago, 18 seconds later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #697,696

@697,666 (Q)
Calm down, you can't throw samefag at everyone and hope something sticks when you get flustered.

> So, Fatfuck is the victim of some vast online conspiracy spearheaded by Syntax and maintained by an global network of covert informants?

Yes. Syntax explains it here:
@697,668 (Syntax)

Secret underground sewer oil agents working for him out of Kunming China. This has been his go-to evil plan for a while. The Big News is NOT about a Death it's edited logs from the Yaris forum 2.0

I rate this evil plan 6/10 myles

Anonymous R replied with this 10 years ago, 5 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #697,699

@697,695 (Z-4)

> Matt, by contrast, has dragged his closest relative into his online war and is now (attempting to) use her memory to his personal advantage. No doubt he's playing the same game in real life.

No he hasn't. Matt hasn't said a single word about it, it was Kook who (in my opinion very wrongly) 'broke' this news about Matt's mother here in public. If you're looking to blame anyone, blame Kook for her pathetic "Hey everyone, look at me, I have info, I may post it...I may post it...hey everyone, do you want me to post it?...keep looking at me everyone...ok, so Matt's mother died......oh damn, have I said too much? Mods, come on, delete this thread please, everyone here is being irresponsibly cruel!"

(Edited 2 minutes later.)

Anonymous O replied with this 10 years ago, 8 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #697,701

@previous (R)
Matt pulled the trigger on that.

@697,695 (Z-4)
SC mod that flew back to Asia to resume work? Are you t04str?

kook !!OPZbEQMT1 replied with this 10 years ago, 38 seconds later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #697,702

@697,699 (R)
I seriously felt like it was a mistake right after I posted it

kook !!OPZbEQMT1 double-posted this 10 years ago, 26 seconds later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #697,703

@697,701 (O)
No he isnt t04ster

Aw hell nah replied with this 10 years ago, 3 seconds later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #697,704

@697,693 (Syntax)
Why would I want to be on your cc list you kooky old weirdo?

ZoooooooooOoooooooom

replied with this 10 years ago, 54 seconds later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #697,706

@697,695 (Z-4)
Oh boy it's Rufus2Bobbycomix. Did you don a black opera cape as a sign of mourning?

Anonymous Q replied with this 10 years ago, 28 seconds later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #697,708

@697,695 (Z-4)
> As pointed out by Anon X, this entire thread was just another bid for attention, an attempt to both provoke and manipulate the community.

This.

Anonymous O replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #697,709

@697,703 (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)
It's Leo Vegas isn't it?

Syntax replied with this 10 years ago, 33 seconds later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #697,711

@697,699 (R)
R U having a moment of brain fatigue?

Nothing has changed. Nothing about those on my mail list has said or discussed one word of a death of anyone. Of the many NOT a Single person has brought it up. That wood be disrespectful.

FatFuck from his Challenge to me to prove I had what I said I had, read my coded careful reply in detail and he blew the fuck up and hit Mods screaming and begging for retribution.

A Mod a well respected Mod gave me open and full permission to tell all. I suspect that Mod wood do otherwise with time to cool off- Reason for saying go do it was all about FatFuck pushing buttons and demanding I show proof.

IT Ain't going to happen because a Living breathing person gets hurt and worse much worse. Documents can end up worthless. Jobs can be lost in future. Shit like this and FatFuck is more than aware - Its ends up a mess. Perhaps he wants to fuck someone over besides me? Well I am not about to help him do it.

Ah looks like kook has replied so off to mail and THEN its a Good nite ya all - Shopping to do shower to do and Brexit to attend

Anonymous O replied with this 10 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #697,713

@previous (Syntax)
You could just not do what you are planning if it will cause the mess that you say it will.

kook !!OPZbEQMT1 replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #697,715

@697,709 (O)
lol no

Syntax replied with this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #697,718

@697,713 (O)
Where did I say I was planning on doing anything? Be back in maybe one hour n maybe not

Work is just about done for day/nite and USA Brext for memories of Rockets Red blare n smoke in air

C ya maybe or maybe not

ZoooOOOoooOOOOOOOOooooM-------------------------------------------------------------------->

Anonymous O replied with this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #697,719

@697,715 (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)

> However yes it does please me that someone should help keep track of Pedophiles in the hood. Take the case of Leo Vargas who is again active on Chans! Found a new Chan victim. Of course Jenna perhaps you want your ass raped by Leo?

> Jenna nice try - You may now take that dress and push up bra off with the Kleenex stuffing. So sorry your dick is as small as a clit.

Is the Big News syntax implying to you that Leo is a tranny chaser?

bhutan replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #697,720

@697,695 (Z-4)
I wouldn't be so hard on him. When someone is accusing you of being a pedophile or chased out (and not telling why, leaving people to speculate that Matt could have done something to bring this on himself) of China or forced out because he couldn't manage rent, when it's truly just a personal matter that syntax shouldn't have been goading about to begin with, I can see this as a semi-reasonable reaction. Somebody says they have dirt on you, you know they don't, you tell them to spill it. out of self respect at least
I can see where you're coming from but I really don't feel like Matt tried or even expected his mother to be dragged into this. Kook and syntax knew it wasn't some scandal but they played it up like one anyway. kook shouldn't have posted it. A statement like 'it was personal and nothing sordid or remotely juicy' would have sufficed
Nobody needed to know that matts mom died. syntax kept hinting at and sending emails about it like the evil son of a bitch he is

Anonymous Z-5 joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 12 seconds later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #697,721

tl;dr

squeegee replied with this 10 years ago, 6 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #697,724

@697,679 (Syntax)
when you started trying to convince everyone you're always right 100% of the time. i've been paying attention in these threads. why did you insist that everyone ask you?

Anonymous V replied with this 10 years ago, 8 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #697,728

Hey Syntax, someone I know is going to kill you.

RWBY Rhubarb? !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #697,729

@previous (V)
Literally Kimmo-tier.

Anonymous T replied with this 10 years ago, 42 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #697,739

@697,718 (Syntax)

This is pathetic...you will be 74 years old next month and this is how you get your jollies in life.

bhutan replied with this 10 years ago, 6 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #697,747

@697,728 (V)
Wow wtf

William !KieUG1WfLM replied with this 10 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #697,798

@697,728 (V)

> Hey Syntax, someone I know is going to kill you.

Ok, now things just got interesting again. Tell us more, anon V. Who is going to kill him and how, when and why are they going to do it?

Svet !jzYkdX7lIw replied with this 10 years ago, 22 hours later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #698,103

Sorry about your mother, Matt. Let me know if you need any extra large boxes sent out.

Anonymous O replied with this 10 years ago, 17 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #698,105

@previous (Svet !jzYkdX7lIw)

Syntax replied with this 10 years ago, 42 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #698,115

@697,728 (V)

> Hey Syntax, someone I know is going to kill you.

24 years of death threats.

Anonymous D replied with this 10 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #698,179

@previous (Syntax)
Cool story bro
:

Please familiarise yourself with the rules and markup syntax before posting.