Minichan

Topic: Report: Authorities Concealed Stockpiles of Child Pornography at Michael Jackson’s Residence

Syntax started this discussion 10 years ago #53,193

Michael Jackson may have been *(Was) a seriously sick individual.

Authorities discovered stockpiles of child pornography and disgustingly lewd images of animal torture at Michael Jackson’s residence at Neverland Ranch, but didn’t disclose those findings to the general public according to a recently published report. The image pile also includes depictions of S&M, strange collages of children’s faces pasted on adult bodies, and other seriously deranged material alongside graphic DVDs and computer files.


The lurid evidence appears to have been collected during a 2003 raid by police of the Neverland Ranch. Jackson was later acquitted of wrongdoing on 14 counts, just one of several court battles involving allegations of child molestation and other sexual crimes. The stockpile itself, which was complemented by other forms of media like video, was characterized by authorities as useful for ‘lowering the inhibitions’ of child victims.

“The documents exposed Jackson as a manipulative, drug-and-sex-crazed predator who used blood, gore, sexually explicit images of animal sacrifice and perverse adult sex acts to bend children to his will,” Radar’s source explained. “[Jackson] also had disgusting and downright shocking images of child torture, adult and child nudity, female bondage, and sadomasochism.”


“Some of the documents appear to be copies of reports that were authored by Sheriff’s Office personnel as well as evidentiary photographs taken by Sheriff’ Office personnel interspersed with content that appears to be obtained off the internet or through unknown sources. The Sheriff’s Office did not release any of the documents and/or photographs to the media. The Sheriff’s Office released all of its reports and the photographs as part of the required discovery process to the prosecution and the defense.[/border

The documents with a header titled Sheriff’s Department that contain a case number appear to be Sheriff’s Office documents. The photos that are interspersed appear to be some evidentiary photos taken by Sheriff’s investigators and others are clearly obtained from the internet.”

Why these lurid images and documents are only coming to light in 2016, more than 13 years after the raid and subsequent court battles, is anyone’s guess. The discovery coincided with accusations from Gavin Arvizo, 13 years old at the time, who came forward with claims child molestation. Jackson was completely acquitted of those charges by 2005, and died four years later.

bhutan joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 7 minutes later[^] [v] #694,386

Oh fuck off you didn't even post a link
Youre a real scumbag syntax

squeegee joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 20 minutes later, 28 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #694,388

@previous (bhutan)
it's all over everywhere. google michael jackson and click news if you want to be creeped out

kook !!kYTRWTZZj joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 36 seconds later, 28 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #694,389

@694,386 (bhutan)
wtf? He's not the child molester

Syntax (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 29 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #694,391

@694,386 (bhutan)
Usually I do. There is a VERY GOOD Reason Y I did not. I think I can find an acceptable link to same story different source.

Nope sorry I found multiple sources and you can find them. Links in articles I am not about to post here or anywhere. It may be only the gore content but one article leads me to believe it also has examples of illegal content

I do have more so hold on

bhutan joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 31 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #694,392

@694,388 (squeegee)
as far as i can tell the news is all spreading from one shitty source that apparently sourced images from the internet or something
again, like with the stupid 'prince had aids' rumor syntax posted, i will reserve judgment until a reputable source verifies the garbage currently floating around

Syntax (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 33 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #694,393

@694,388 (squeegee)
Yea I have CNN on in background and picked it up there. Then looked for something for kook - That case where he paid off a parent a few million bucks to keep the case quiet and out of court BUTTT

Found these:

Michael Jackson spent $35 million to cover up molestation's of 24 boys:

Michael Jackson spent nearly $35 million in a desperate bid to cover up his crimes after he molested at least 24 boys, according to an explosive report published Saturday.

London’s Sunday People tabloid says it obtained “secret FBI files” full of stomach-churning details about the late King of Pop’s seamy past.

Jackson allegedly was once caught groping a famous child star and watching pornographic films while molesting another boy.

He allegedly fondled a third boy in his private theater as the victim’s clueless mother sat only a few rows away, according to the purported FBI files.

The documents – identified as case numbers CADCE MJ-02463 and CR 01046 — were apparently never turned over to prosecutors in the sensational 2005 trial that cleared Jackson of molestation charges.

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/michael-jackson-spent-35-million-cover-molestations-report-article-1.1386325

Yikes this one says $200 Million
http://www.etonline.com/news/162324_michael_jackson_accused_of_paying_millions_hush_money_to_alleged_molestation_victims/

Metæ joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 36 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #694,394

Idk. I mean, I'm sure Jackson was a pedo but this reminds me of the story last year where an LAPD officer had been sitting on OJ's murder knife for 20-odd years and just now decided to tell the press.

(Edited 20 seconds later.)

Syntax (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 37 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #694,396

@694,392 (bhutan)
http://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-michael-jackson-porn-neverland-20160621-snap-story.html

I heard viewed the story on CNN
Yes looks like the source with same story and at least this one is not loaded with links.

bhutan replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 40 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #694,397

@previous (Syntax)
yeah i read the LA times one already
no real sources there they are just reporting that it is the buzz atm like good clickbait sites do
i was on the LA times once that's how i know they suck

Syntax (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 4 minutes later, 44 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #694,401

@694,394 (Metæ)
Yea that is possible.
This is the one I was looking for from the infamous trial days

http://abcnews.go.com/Entertainment/fbi-releases-documents-michael-jackson-child-molestation-probes/story?id=9402010

Government documents released today show that the FBI assisted Santa Barbara, Calif., officials in their attempt to get cooperation from a person who could have been a key witness in the 2005 case child molestation case against Michael Jackson: the boy who accused the pop star of molesting him in 1993.

No criminal charges were ever filed in the 1993 case. Instead the then 12-year-old boy refused to cooperate with officials and accepted a multi-million dollar settlement from Jackson.

The documents released today under the Freedom of Information Act show that the FBI and Santa Barbara officials met in 2004 with Jackson's 1993 accuser, but were unsuccessful in getting his cooperation.


I have always said Anyone who pays out Millions in Hush money IS GUILT AS CHARGED

bhutan replied with this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 47 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #694,403

@previous (Syntax)
> Millions in Hush money
So like paying your secret daughter's college tuition??

Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 50 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #694,404

So this was eccentric billionaire Kimmo was hoping for...

Syntax (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 51 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #694,405

@694,397 (bhutan)
> i was on the LA times once that's how i know they suck

You now have the one I was looking for The FBI case and the case file in redacted form is available - Kids and parents name redacted address etc

I also worked for LA Times. First job at age 12
Super hard work starting up b4 sunrise damn hard work with many downsides like delivering paper in RAIN Sleet n Snow

However LA times did provide one hell of a lot of free passes for ball games and movies and all kinds of fun things - The fed us and provided transportation

bhutan replied with this 10 years ago, 34 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #694,411

@previous (Syntax)
sleet and snow in LA? what are u on

bhutan double-posted this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #694,412

@694,405 (Syntax)
oh sorry. i forgot you haven't been an adolescent since the last ice age

Anonymous G replied with this 10 years ago, 2 hours later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #694,429

@previous (bhutan)
As a long time resident of the Los Angeles basin I can testify that sleet and snow are something that happens commonly here. You should come here for the winter - there is a tobogganing race through East LA, we hold snowman-making competitions, snowball fights, and there is a reindeer petting zoo! Kids here enjoy snow days off from school, but we more than often worry about getting snowed-in during heavy blizzards.
:

Please familiarise yourself with the rules and markup syntax before posting.