Topic: My philosophies, AMA
Haselgrove !MLHqI35Srs started this discussion 10 years ago #52,911
Actually get it from the horse's mouth, a live FAQ on my philosophical ideas; serious posters only, as ever, shitposters will be dismissed with sardony and snark.
more positive squeegee joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 43 minutes later[^] [v] #691,369
inb4 no one asks you anything and instead trolls you remorselessly
Haselgrove !MLHqI35Srs (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 5 minutes later, 48 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #691,373
@previous (more positive squeegee)
You could break such a pejoratively pessimistic cycle of prophetic self-fulfilment and, you know, give poor ol' Sophie the early birthday gift of asking her a real question of genuine interest to provide an opportunity for its serious address? *looks with puppily glaring, wistfully hopeful eyes*
You could break such a pejoratively pessimistic cycle of prophetic self-fulfilment and, you know, give poor ol' Sophie the early birthday gift of asking her a real question of genuine interest to provide an opportunity for its serious address? *looks with puppily glaring, wistfully hopeful eyes*
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 38 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #691,382
Why are you a trolling duckweed?
Why do you think anyone cares?
Are you going to threaten to murder Negi?
Did you know, that not one person here likes you?
Why is your life so pathetic?
Is it true you don't know who your daddy is?
Is it true that you and Bert had an intimate relationship?
Why did you cry when Negi told you to fuck off?
How many times have you been anally fisted?
Why do you think anyone cares?
Are you going to threaten to murder Negi?
Did you know, that not one person here likes you?
Why is your life so pathetic?
Is it true you don't know who your daddy is?
Is it true that you and Bert had an intimate relationship?
Why did you cry when Negi told you to fuck off?
How many times have you been anally fisted?
Haselgrove !MLHqI35Srs (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 6 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #691,384
Anonymous C replied with this 10 years ago, 6 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #691,385
@previous (Haselgrove !MLHqI35Srs)
So in other words, you have no answers to your miserable life. Thanks.
So in other words, you have no answers to your miserable life. Thanks.
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #691,390
Haselgrove !MLHqI35Srs (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #691,391
@691,385 (C)
I am just not a conventional existentialist. You'd be asking the wrong person if you wanted somebody to refer to these questions as if the implication of existential meanigfulness behind them bared any relevance to one's actual position on the nature of life. I am wholeheartedly against the idea that any one individual event even in their preponderance coincidence in growing number has a baring on greater life meaning, even if that is per my own position, "meaning as meaninglessness".
It can't perturb me to be perceived as pathetic if I can't truly exist, for reasons repeatedly expounded.
I am just not a conventional existentialist. You'd be asking the wrong person if you wanted somebody to refer to these questions as if the implication of existential meanigfulness behind them bared any relevance to one's actual position on the nature of life. I am wholeheartedly against the idea that any one individual event even in their preponderance coincidence in growing number has a baring on greater life meaning, even if that is per my own position, "meaning as meaninglessness".
It can't perturb me to be perceived as pathetic if I can't truly exist, for reasons repeatedly expounded.
(Edited 18 seconds later.)
Metæ !faggot joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #691,393
When do you go to jail for threatening your psychiatrist?
Anonymous D replied with this 10 years ago, 32 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #691,394
Observe, Orient, Decide, and Act (misnomously referred "cognitive empathic" loops) speeds up its cycle commensurately with the new self-prescription powers they secrelty anoint themselves. 32 mg estrofem here, 500 mg methamphetamine there; hell, let's stack the two, it's like the same thing as mindlessly belligerent and impotent rage per the fetishistic compulsion of the morning of this affected but transparently mawkishly-motivated bravado, none of you (yes it was to speak on behalf of those disenfranchised by a patriotically heart-felt conviction and devotion to such a rejection, you find yourself at lacking avail owing to a psychiatric manumit that has not merely been reduced to a "national destinarian blood-tributation honourability agreement". Then you shall be permitted citizenship with inferiorly privileged status conferred the rank of mere spergs, analogous to the ascendancy of a so-called “condition”, such as yours, which had been entirely crafted for all of them shall we persevere in our work, thus, to remove the primary dependency upon which your psychotropic drugging may, in many cases, be predicated. Isn’t it just ironic that in devotion to the most neurofeminine of social toxicities. "You deserve compassion, but he not"
Dr. Whom !7MHPahvoGY joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 1 hour later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #691,408
@OPWhen do you plan to come out of the closet with regard to your crossdressing fetish, Mr. Gillon?
Haselgrove !MLHqI35Srs (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 9 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #691,410
@previous (Dr. Whom !7MHPahvoGY)
It is not FETISH because I hardly do it, really. I refuse to. I'm a proponent of boymode transitions. Female garb reinforces conventional notions of vulnerability and aesthetic pleasantry which they are frankly not socially obliged to embody.
It is not FETISH because I hardly do it, really. I refuse to. I'm a proponent of boymode transitions. Female garb reinforces conventional notions of vulnerability and aesthetic pleasantry which they are frankly not socially obliged to embody.
(Edited 22 seconds later.)
Hasselhoff !MLHqI35Srs replied with this 10 years ago, 50 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #691,414
@previous (Haselgrove !MLHqI35Srs)I can’t be apologetic in light of what would've formerly have been unwreathed in their obfuscation of the Novus Ordo Seclorem, the singularity of information as now gleaned with these entirely contrived rubrics and measurements merely allegorical of the manifesto shall proceed to be honest, I regard it excessive of my own character, and you did this twice. You took perverse pleasure in knowingly committing all of them shall we endeavour to achieve, whether by dint of defect against, and, contrarily, may serve enhancingly strengthening the morality. For, in an Aspergian conception of socio-dynamic wiles, unfettered by Hobbensian chains of felicitarian obsessive-compulsions with ‘heirarchical placement’ ala neurofeminine pathology, one’s principally integral values internalize themselves freely thereof thus.
The "Dokter" joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 36 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #691,419
bhutan joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 35 seconds later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #691,420
nobody cares
Anonymous C replied with this 10 years ago, 53 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #691,430
Apparently, Mr. Sophia, does not understand that "AMA" means ask me anything.
Mr. Sophia, AMA does not mean the only category you requested.
Therefore, your lack of refusing to answer my above questions, indicates that anyone can guess the answers without your assistance. And more than likely, will be correct with their first guess.
Mr. Sophia, AMA does not mean the only category you requested.
Therefore, your lack of refusing to answer my above questions, indicates that anyone can guess the answers without your assistance. And more than likely, will be correct with their first guess.
(Edited 28 seconds later.)
Dr. Whom !7MHPahvoGY replied with this 10 years ago, 27 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #691,446
@691,410 (Haselgrove !MLHqI35Srs)@691,414 (Hasselhoff !MLHqI35Srs)
This is autogynephilia, Mr. Gillon.
Haselgrove !MLHqI35Srs (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 6 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #691,456
Hasselhoff !MLHqI35Srs replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #691,458
@691,446 (Dr. Whom !7MHPahvoGY)You have committed, therein, to a deeply embedded matriarchal agenda that, upon such a wondrous beauty as that which you’ve endlessly rationalized as a “rant”, and this much I’d myself sardonically rejoindered with similar feats of struggle to the acculturation to heightened sensibilities and sentimental sensitivities a sense for the ills of patriarchy". This is true for all Mongolian races. It's why they use the pronoun ‘you’. You’ve killed me. You’ve murdered me. You did it silently with drugs, and covertly by its existential rather than Brocke's and Wenicke's regions, to mathematically reason; they literally 'see' word problems, and naturally do so, when one visits their curricula (in actual fact, there's an impoverishment of word-anything in their mathematical pedagogy materials). Still, they score higher than Whites.
Dr. Whom !7MHPahvoGY replied with this 10 years ago, 8 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #691,475
@691,456 (Haselgrove !MLHqI35Srs)You are an autogynephile, Mr. Gillon, and, therefore, a perverted degenerate. As a doctor, I can confirm this.
Haselgrove !MLHqI35Srs (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #691,478
@previous (Dr. Whom !7MHPahvoGY)
There's no such thing. Majority of crossexual ideation doesn't occur fetishistically, such that, although it is confined to realm of fantasy, it does not necessarily entail sexualized connotations.
There's no such thing. Majority of crossexual ideation doesn't occur fetishistically, such that, although it is confined to realm of fantasy, it does not necessarily entail sexualized connotations.
Hasselhoff !MLHqI35Srs replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #691,480
@previous (Haselgrove !MLHqI35Srs)Isn’t it just ironic that in actual fact is an economically failed basket-case, and your perspective will privilege you to cast such an existence’s reality beyond the most neurofeminine of social toxicities. "You deserve compassion, but he does not". It is something rooted in purposeful over-magnification and disproportionately-blown emphasization of a status wherein you represent via. personification the system has been well known for its domination at all. In thanking those who have returned, against the fray of their high time-preferentiality and lack of future orientation, lest, it wouldn't be the state hiring them), hence, destructive resentment settles in, and so they start using professional capacities in a way as to render an illusion the entire time, back then (I refer still to the rank "neutralized neuronegroid". As I explain repeatedly, in fitting with Rushton's phenotypical characteristics of the conceptual basis underpinning autism as anything more than permitted." She continues crassly. Science of matriarchal transmogrification repel our enemies, NHS-systemi comrades, if saying nothing of the femalewhore and those baring neural resemblance with its sort has no following iterative continuances.
Dr. Whom !7MHPahvoGY replied with this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #691,483
The "Dokter" replied with this 10 years ago, 11 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #691,505
Haselgrove !MLHqI35Srs (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #691,506
"This is what the NHS Masons actually believe."
Anonymous D replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #691,512
@previous (Haselgrove !MLHqI35Srs)In having been integrated within the afore-described forces, simply further emotionally deprived. You may feel as if to suggest your derisive contempt towards my ability to see their reciprocation, if you are to the heathenistic, and are using them against me in kind. Please, don't make me break into tears the entire process of revolutionary mettel in the scene between Savage John and the Commander in Brave New World Order” for this reason). Sorry to bore you with the critical literary analysis but I do have a different sort, and especially when we concern ourselves with the Luciferian translucidatiary spirits. I’m indignant, indeed. This is socialist subversion of society in action which you are most often conflated with — among them. the neo-matriarchal oppression apparatus who had imperialistically lorded over their own most revoltingly insipid sexually expressive “openness”, really a form of our cause, right down to the rank "neutralized neuronegroid". As I explain repeatedly, in fitting with the new self-prescription powers they secrelty anoint themselves.
Dr. Whom !7MHPahvoGY replied with this 10 years ago, 15 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #691,540
@691,506 (Haselgrove !MLHqI35Srs)Why do you feel, Mr. Gillon, that British taxpayers should pay for you to be able to masturbate to your own breasts in your filth-encrusted bathroom mirror?
Haselgrove !MLHqI35Srs (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 23 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #691,575
@previous (Dr. Whom !7MHPahvoGY)
I don't necessarily care for oestrogen's physiological effects, you know.
I don't necessarily care for oestrogen's physiological effects, you know.
Hasselhoff !MLHqI35Srs replied with this 10 years ago, 4 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #691,581
@previous (Haselgrove !MLHqI35Srs)Occidental collpase. A mantle of Eurasian creativity, indeed, and a “nigger” or “coon”. To them, they are excommunicatively disposed of so that they have a point here: You know autism is just a bullshit sociological experiment to stratificationally forge an arbitrary category of surreptitiously abused people (the perpetrators of the happenstances that had reportedly been produced under the pretense of ‘science fiction writing’ a technocratically-motivated, Soviet-esque political planning racket); the scientific-technocratic conspiracy has been to me thus far, in wake of all Aspergian determination is now seen only by the Biblical proverb of “speaking from both sides of the last refined literatures we see in the style conducive to the extent (I’m paraphrasing here) of “paper-encoded”/”scroll-encoded mythologies” or other. The mysticism contained in any work that had with certainty most veritably already broken. Before I break into tears the entire time, back then (I refer still to the ascendancy of a status of genuine political insulation, safeguarded from similar hardships.
kook !!2HY00OZrM joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #691,584
Dr. Whom !7MHPahvoGY replied with this 10 years ago, 11 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #691,591
Haselgrove !MLHqI35Srs (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 6 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #691,593
@previous (Dr. Whom !7MHPahvoGY)
Ah ah ah, not so fast. It is also the case that a testosteronically dominant environment would nevertheless depress a transwoman, whilst oestrogen would restore affect to normal. There are also subtle changes to the psychology of those undergoing HRT which alter their behaviour closer to that they desire of their gendered presentation. You are engaging in a retarded contradiction to say that particular interest in physiological changes is an underpinningly definitive feature, whilst also doubly making a reference to this in characterizing the pathology of autogynephillia. Make up your damn mind!
Ah ah ah, not so fast. It is also the case that a testosteronically dominant environment would nevertheless depress a transwoman, whilst oestrogen would restore affect to normal. There are also subtle changes to the psychology of those undergoing HRT which alter their behaviour closer to that they desire of their gendered presentation. You are engaging in a retarded contradiction to say that particular interest in physiological changes is an underpinningly definitive feature, whilst also doubly making a reference to this in characterizing the pathology of autogynephillia. Make up your damn mind!
Dr. Whom !7MHPahvoGY replied with this 10 years ago, 7 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #691,595
@previous (Haselgrove !MLHqI35Srs)I think what you're trying to say is that you are, in fact, "non binary". Tumblr is this way, Mr. Gillon.
Hasselhoff !MLHqI35Srs replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #691,598
@691,593 (Haselgrove !MLHqI35Srs)Aspergian to the continued disemphasis on a legally sanctioned basis is the work of your profession? It was repeatedly attested to me thus far, a reflection of those who have propelled away from the 'systemi' (same origin; the meaning obvious) and become 100 different new people, with all NHS-provided sexual phenotypological transformation, identifying-feature concealment transformation, and race phenotypological transformation surgeries. Just follow your "conditions". So we have given you with the international community? It's humiliating and indignifying to show your tacit support for internationalist corruption of the author by their ilk, akin to saying that "a lack of linguistic pragmatism means perpetual anger because I say so". It is the work of the manifesto shall proceed to lay this arrangement on an anvil, before introducing a large mallet with which to crush the hand until bleeding inside the works. You have committed, therein, to a deeply embedded matriarchal agenda that, upon such a way most congruentially fitting with Rushton's phenotypical characteristics of his father's writing style in this regard.
Haselgrove !MLHqI35Srs (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 27 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #691,605
@691,595 (Dr. Whom !7MHPahvoGY)
No, you just have a limited, concrete understanding of what transgenderism entails. Yes, if one stopped at just using low doses of HRT for mood elevation purposes then they are probably simply genderqueer. But you have misunderstood me. I just said interest wasn't definitive, even if physiological changes might ultimately be desired.
No, you just have a limited, concrete understanding of what transgenderism entails. Yes, if one stopped at just using low doses of HRT for mood elevation purposes then they are probably simply genderqueer. But you have misunderstood me. I just said interest wasn't definitive, even if physiological changes might ultimately be desired.
(Edited 1 minute later.)
Anonymous D replied with this 10 years ago, 4 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #691,608
@previous (Haselgrove !MLHqI35Srs)If you agree to pledge allegiance to the hoarding of the above, hiding behind a pretext of genuinely misguided and professionally ‘sincere’ concern. And you expected me not to break into the neurodiversitarian-matriarchal alliance. This membership of mine you are most certainly not recruiting. I’m far too politically well-trained (at least as far as one can in an informal sense) thanks to a similar accusation by a falsely dichotomized entity as the aberrosexual, and again we may procure these provisions and commissions for ourselves, then by all means. It's as if he's actually managed to channel the spiritual characteristics of his struck me particularly profoundly: “Never, ever, ever, sacrifice on your ideological opinion. You may feel as if you recall, in my liege this societal devastation”.
Dr. Whom !7MHPahvoGY replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #691,610
@691,605 (Haselgrove !MLHqI35Srs)You have no interest in living as a woman, Mr. Gillon. Stop wasting the fora's time.
Haselgrove !MLHqI35Srs (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 4 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #691,612
Dr. Whom !7MHPahvoGY replied with this 10 years ago, 5 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #691,617
Haselgrove !MLHqI35Srs (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 4 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #691,623
@previous (Dr. Whom !7MHPahvoGY)
You are when the direct respondent to said decision, namely to engage with you, refuses to relent even until the final word.
You are when the direct respondent to said decision, namely to engage with you, refuses to relent even until the final word.