Topic: It's funny, a decade ago I would have never considered "heterosexual male" an insullt
Haselgrove !MLHqI35Srs started this discussion 10 years ago #52,881
Now it is a sin. That I cast unto the entire "tranny" community of malignerers.
bhutan joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later[^] [v] #690,794
Weren't u like 10 a decade ago? How old are you
Haselgrove !MLHqI35Srs (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #690,795
@previous (bhutan)
25. I was 15, Scotland was, perhaps thankfully, late to the game of LGBT popularization-propagandization. I took the path expected of me and thought little different of it until I was sexually active later.
25. I was 15, Scotland was, perhaps thankfully, late to the game of LGBT popularization-propagandization. I took the path expected of me and thought little different of it until I was sexually active later.
Haselgrove !MLHqI35Srs (OP) double-posted this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 6 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #690,798
And before Nexi goes "hah, you grasped onto an identity", not so fast. Latency will be the inevitable fate of the aberrosexual if it isn't discovered that such a course is indeed possible, let alone acceptable.
(Edited 30 seconds later.)
bhutan replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 7 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #690,800
WSD !m2cp3rR5zw joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 19 seconds later, 8 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #690,801
Haselgrove !MLHqI35Srs (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 54 seconds later, 9 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #690,802
bhutan replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 10 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #690,803
WSD !m2cp3rR5zw replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 12 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #690,805
Nexi !tRAnsGiRLo joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 15 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #690,806
@690,798 (Haselgrove !MLHqI35Srs)
What age were you first sexually active? When was the first time you engaged in relations with a girl? Did you ever feel this way as a child, or was it something that you grew into as an adult?
What age were you first sexually active? When was the first time you engaged in relations with a girl? Did you ever feel this way as a child, or was it something that you grew into as an adult?
Haselgrove !MLHqI35Srs (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 18 minutes later, 34 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #690,813
@previous (Nexi !tRAnsGiRLo)
22, from a relationship I had lasting quite a few years (I was 18 when meeting her through youtube's Aspiesphere). I announced it to few other than my trolling crew on there. I soon came to the realization that I was living through her and was happy to do this to avoid embarrassing fate of transitioning publicly. It became apparent I wasn't truly gynephillic (and this much I always knew to be true but hoped with my blessings that my androphillia was a phase that would go away, to be confined to fantasy and fetishism with a shield of female accomplice in the public world) when I started getting closer to her in physical proximity in our few visits. I nevertheless enjoyed her company and influence upon me (she exposed me to 1st wave feminism which I used to ardently adhere to). Things became sour in 2013 and mostly terminated after disappointing, wretched intercourse. Emma still wants to deny we did, and I, in practice, most of the time deny having had that relationship off the internet. I confided this to a toxic psycho like Haselgrove and was disbelieve, and I'm not even offended (enough to care fully anyway) because Emma was nasty work I too wish to forget and deny.
Reality is though, yeah, she stole my innocence not only with respect to sexuality but also to what I was really after; not in her, but of her.
I did have such notions in childhood, on and off. They weren't really continuous until adolescence when I had my first exposure to (relatively soft core and literary) forced feminization fiction via. Internet. That wasn't't completeely fetishistic but, for obvious reAsons, I had to keep this tendency of mine low key since my sensitivity to the social milieu meant I felt as if I had an image to upkeep (which is where my Asperger moral objections wherein I rationalize such degeneracy, and my more borderline-esque, principally emotional 'socially intuitive'/'attitudinally intuitive' reservations, clash badly even to this day).
It's dilemmas like thAt which make me wish there was an effective Pimozide bullet for me, but nothing has worked eradicate it. I'm not this way because it's easy to say or be or whatever.
22, from a relationship I had lasting quite a few years (I was 18 when meeting her through youtube's Aspiesphere). I announced it to few other than my trolling crew on there. I soon came to the realization that I was living through her and was happy to do this to avoid embarrassing fate of transitioning publicly. It became apparent I wasn't truly gynephillic (and this much I always knew to be true but hoped with my blessings that my androphillia was a phase that would go away, to be confined to fantasy and fetishism with a shield of female accomplice in the public world) when I started getting closer to her in physical proximity in our few visits. I nevertheless enjoyed her company and influence upon me (she exposed me to 1st wave feminism which I used to ardently adhere to). Things became sour in 2013 and mostly terminated after disappointing, wretched intercourse. Emma still wants to deny we did, and I, in practice, most of the time deny having had that relationship off the internet. I confided this to a toxic psycho like Haselgrove and was disbelieve, and I'm not even offended (enough to care fully anyway) because Emma was nasty work I too wish to forget and deny.
Reality is though, yeah, she stole my innocence not only with respect to sexuality but also to what I was really after; not in her, but of her.
I did have such notions in childhood, on and off. They weren't really continuous until adolescence when I had my first exposure to (relatively soft core and literary) forced feminization fiction via. Internet. That wasn't't completeely fetishistic but, for obvious reAsons, I had to keep this tendency of mine low key since my sensitivity to the social milieu meant I felt as if I had an image to upkeep (which is where my Asperger moral objections wherein I rationalize such degeneracy, and my more borderline-esque, principally emotional 'socially intuitive'/'attitudinally intuitive' reservations, clash badly even to this day).
It's dilemmas like thAt which make me wish there was an effective Pimozide bullet for me, but nothing has worked eradicate it. I'm not this way because it's easy to say or be or whatever.
(Edited 1 minute later.)
Nexi !tRAnsGiRLo replied with this 10 years ago, 21 minutes later, 55 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #690,826
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 58 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #690,827
Haselgrove !MLHqI35Srs (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #690,829
@690,826 (Nexi !tRAnsGiRLo)
I would have thought that the phrase "I hoped it was a phase which would go away" would've given you a solid enough insinuation (namely that it didn't and I'm mad for all things phallic and seminal), along with my disgust to the experience of Emma's anatomy.
I would have thought that the phrase "I hoped it was a phase which would go away" would've given you a solid enough insinuation (namely that it didn't and I'm mad for all things phallic and seminal), along with my disgust to the experience of Emma's anatomy.
Haselgrove !MLHqI35Srs (OP) double-posted this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #690,832
@690,827 (E)
I have very, very, very vague gynephillic tendencies now, which Don't involve direct genital contact and mostly concern indirect femdom ("mommy" role play). It's from this where I surmise my antimatriarchal theorism and was its main inspiration.
I have very, very, very vague gynephillic tendencies now, which Don't involve direct genital contact and mostly concern indirect femdom ("mommy" role play). It's from this where I surmise my antimatriarchal theorism and was its main inspiration.
(Edited 1 minute later.)
Nexi !tRAnsGiRLo replied with this 10 years ago, 23 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #690,836
@690,829 (Haselgrove !MLHqI35Srs)
Insinuation is not a direct question. Now I know for sure. There is nothing wrong with that in all honesty. I know why you give me shit for being attracted to women now.
@690,827 (E)
> autogynephilic
Ray Blanchard is full of shit.
Insinuation is not a direct question. Now I know for sure. There is nothing wrong with that in all honesty. I know why you give me shit for being attracted to women now.
@690,827 (E)
> autogynephilic
Ray Blanchard is full of shit.
Nexi !tRAnsGiRLo double-posted this 10 years ago, 52 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #690,837
@690,832 (Haselgrove !MLHqI35Srs)
So basically you are just attracted to the idea of women, not women themselves?
So basically you are just attracted to the idea of women, not women themselves?
Haselgrove !MLHqI35Srs (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 1 hour later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #690,878
@previous (Nexi !tRAnsGiRLo)
I like limited aspects of their form, but otherwise, it is specifically the intangible, social features of women I am most romantically drawn to on an incidental-at-best basis.
I like limited aspects of their form, but otherwise, it is specifically the intangible, social features of women I am most romantically drawn to on an incidental-at-best basis.
Haselgrove !MLHqI35Srs (OP) double-posted this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #690,881
I personally believe AGPs do exist, but they are distinct from TG proper. And yes, it occurs more often in gynephillic transwomen than either biphillic or androphillic transwomen.
(Edited 2 minutes later.)
Nexi !tRAnsGiRLo replied with this 10 years ago, 34 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #690,912
@previous (Haselgrove !MLHqI35Srs)
https://learningtrans.files.wordpress.com/2011/01/serano-agreview-ijt.pdf
http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/00918369.2010.486241
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18299976
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20039113
http://juliaserano.blogspot.com/2015/05/reconceptualizing-autogynephilia-as_26.html
Personally I think he is full of shit. Like really, really full of shit. AGP's would be better assigned as Female/Feminine Embodiment Fantasies or (FEFs) or Male/Masculine Embodiment Fantasies(MEFs). I am not discounting what you say, just what ray blanchard says about AGPs.
https://learningtrans.files.wordpress.com/2011/01/serano-agreview-ijt.pdf
http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/00918369.2010.486241
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18299976
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20039113
http://juliaserano.blogspot.com/2015/05/reconceptualizing-autogynephilia-as_26.html
Personally I think he is full of shit. Like really, really full of shit. AGP's would be better assigned as Female/Feminine Embodiment Fantasies or (FEFs) or Male/Masculine Embodiment Fantasies(MEFs). I am not discounting what you say, just what ray blanchard says about AGPs.
(Edited 1 minute later.)
Haselgrove !MLHqI35Srs (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #690,915
@previous (Nexi !tRAnsGiRLo)
Reading transgender research makes me uncomfortable, I prefer just to reinvent conceptualization on these things based on my own experiences. Thanks for understanding that my position isn't necessarily Blanchard's.
Reading transgender research makes me uncomfortable, I prefer just to reinvent conceptualization on these things based on my own experiences. Thanks for understanding that my position isn't necessarily Blanchard's.
Nexi !tRAnsGiRLo replied with this 10 years ago, 8 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #690,920
@previous (Haselgrove !MLHqI35Srs)
Odd. It gives me a certain satisfaction that others share my experiences and feelings and gives me a certain sense that I am not so alone with how I feel as of late.
Odd. It gives me a certain satisfaction that others share my experiences and feelings and gives me a certain sense that I am not so alone with how I feel as of late.
Haselgrove !MLHqI35Srs (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #690,922
@previous (Nexi !tRAnsGiRLo)
Remember that you are not internationally challenged (I.e. the conflictual contradictions between trannies and perceived mutually exclusive comorbids) like I am, so have less of a stake in being shunned or invalidated experientially for whatever reason, unlike myself.
Remember that you are not internationally challenged (I.e. the conflictual contradictions between trannies and perceived mutually exclusive comorbids) like I am, so have less of a stake in being shunned or invalidated experientially for whatever reason, unlike myself.
(Edited 17 seconds later.)
Nexi !tRAnsGiRLo replied with this 10 years ago, 18 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #690,939
@previous (Haselgrove !MLHqI35Srs)
There will be new research into people who are like you and transgender. You do not fit the stereotypical mold.
There will be new research into people who are like you and transgender. You do not fit the stereotypical mold.
Haselgrove !MLHqI35Srs (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 10 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #690,951
@690,922 (Haselgrove !MLHqI35Srs)
That should say "intersectionally" challenged, not international; fucking Kindle Silk autocorrect.
That should say "intersectionally" challenged, not international; fucking Kindle Silk autocorrect.
Metæ joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 55 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #690,997
@OP
Me neither. "White male" used to be a neutral description but now seems to be quite pejorative. Google search "white male", "black male", "Hispanic male", and "asian male" and see the different results. It's quite interesting!
Me neither. "White male" used to be a neutral description but now seems to be quite pejorative. Google search "white male", "black male", "Hispanic male", and "asian male" and see the different results. It's quite interesting!