Topic: Do you really want the nuclear launch codes in the hands of the bipolar witch?
WSD !m2cp3rR5zw started this discussion 10 years ago #52,840
It was bad enough when her husband sent many to die in Iraq and Yugoslavia to topple secular "dictatorships".
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later[^] [v] #690,202
When, praytell, did Bill Clinton send American troops into Iraq?
D-g !jJEom8Ii3E joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 8 minutes later, 10 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #690,204
What do you expect op? The presidency is more like a royal dynasty to these people. First it's the son of a ex-president, now it's the wife of a ex-president.
They don't know it but they are rooting for more of the same, poor fools.
They don't know it but they are rooting for more of the same, poor fools.
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 5 minutes later, 16 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #690,206
@690,202 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
> When, praytell, did Bill Clinton send American troops into Iraq?
Technically he didn't. He merely bombed Iraq in 1998.
> When, praytell, did Bill Clinton send American troops into Iraq?
Technically he didn't. He merely bombed Iraq in 1998.
WSD !m2cp3rR5zw (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 18 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #690,208
@690,204 (D-g !jJEom8Ii3E)
I'd almost rather have Trump at this point. He's a wildcard and sometimes to the left of Hillary.
I'd almost rather have Trump at this point. He's a wildcard and sometimes to the left of Hillary.
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 22 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #690,209
WSD !m2cp3rR5zw (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 20 minutes later, 43 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #690,212
@previous (E)
So what? Finish your sentence instead of being a tumblr retard.
So what? Finish your sentence instead of being a tumblr retard.
(Edited 10 seconds later.)
more positive squeegee joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 43 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #690,213
@previous (WSD !m2cp3rR5zw)
so your argument that hillary shouldn't have nuclear launch codes because she's "bipolar" is fine
but an argument that trump shouldn't because "he'll bomb mexico" is retarded. Oh, okay.
stop being obtuse, you moron. the very first thing you said is wrong, and everything after that has been vague generalities. "he's sometimes left of hillary." oh okay, yeah, that's just super specific, i'ma go vote for him now.
:|
so your argument that hillary shouldn't have nuclear launch codes because she's "bipolar" is fine
but an argument that trump shouldn't because "he'll bomb mexico" is retarded. Oh, okay.
stop being obtuse, you moron. the very first thing you said is wrong, and everything after that has been vague generalities. "he's sometimes left of hillary." oh okay, yeah, that's just super specific, i'ma go vote for him now.
:|
(Edited 2 minutes later.)
WSD !m2cp3rR5zw (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #690,214
@previous (more positive squeegee)
My argument is not that, but that it is retarded to end a sentence with "so" with no punctuation and it's something i've only seen on SJW twitter and tumblr.
My argument is not that, but that it is retarded to end a sentence with "so" with no punctuation and it's something i've only seen on SJW twitter and tumblr.
more positive squeegee replied with this 10 years ago, 24 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #690,230
@previous (WSD !m2cp3rR5zw)
really? that's weird, because leaving people to fill in the rhetorical blanks is something people have been doing forever, so
deal with it. see what i did there? i filled in the blank for you.
really? that's weird, because leaving people to fill in the rhetorical blanks is something people have been doing forever, so
deal with it. see what i did there? i filled in the blank for you.
bhutam joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 13 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #690,241
Syntax joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 49 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #690,253
@690,208 (WSD !m2cp3rR5zw)> I'd almost rather have Trump at this point. He's a wildcard and sometimes to the left of Hillary.
Now wait a minute please.
> It was bad enough when her husband sent many to die in Iraq and Yugoslavia to topple secular "dictatorships".
Trump is on record for supporting Bush's jr, invasion of Iraq.
Trump indicated his support for war in a radio interview with shock jock Howard Stern on Sept. 11, 2002 — a little more than six months before the war started.
Stern asked Trump directly if he supported going to war with Iraq, and Trump hesitantly responded, 'Yeah'
Stern asked Trump directly if he supported going to war with Iraq, and Trump hesitantly responded, 'Yeah'
If you enjoy shock jock Howie with Trump as his guest?
https://soundcloud.com/buzzfeedandrew/trump-on-the-howard-stern-show-on-sept-11-2002
But if you look at 2003, there are articles. If you look in 2004, there are articles.”
Trump’s comments on Stern are more in line with what he wrote in his 2000 book, The America We Deserve, where he advocated for a “principled and tough” policy toward “outlaw” states like Iraq.
“We still don’t know what Iraq is up to or whether it has the material to build nuclear weapons. I’m no warmonger,” Trump wrote. “But the fact is, if we decide a strike against Iraq is necessary, it is madness not to carry the mission to its conclusion. When we don’t, we have the worst of all worlds: Iraq remains a threat, and now has more incentive than ever to attack us.”
Trump’s comments on Stern are more in line with what he wrote in his 2000 book, The America We Deserve, where he advocated for a “principled and tough” policy toward “outlaw” states like Iraq.
“We still don’t know what Iraq is up to or whether it has the material to build nuclear weapons. I’m no warmonger,” Trump wrote. “But the fact is, if we decide a strike against Iraq is necessary, it is madness not to carry the mission to its conclusion. When we don’t, we have the worst of all worlds: Iraq remains a threat, and now has more incentive than ever to attack us.”
Trump, asked by CNN’s Anderson Cooper at a town hall on Thursday about the Stern interview, said, “I could have said that.”
Tump is also a lot more hawkish about building up or military. I hope you learned in school that our military does not take police or war actions inside the USA.
Why build up or military? Look up Posse Comitatus - Will save you the bother.
"In the United States, a federal statute known as the Posse Comitatus Act forbids the use of the United States Army, and through it, its offspring, the United States Air Force, as a posse comitatus or for law enforcement purposes. A directive from the Secretary of Defense prohibits the use of the United States Navy and United States Marine Corps for law enforcement. No such limitation exists on the United States Coast Guard, which can be used for all law enforcement purposes (for example, Coast Guardsmen were used as temporary Air Marshals for many months after the 9/11 attacks) except when, as during WWII, a part of the Coast Guard is placed under the command of the Navy. This part would then fall under the regulations governing the Navy in this matter, rather than those concerning the Coast Guard. The limitation also does not apply to the National Guard when activated by a state's governor and operating in accordance with Title 32 of the U.S. Code (for example, National Guardsmen were used extensively by state governors during Hurricane Katrina response actions). Conversely, the limitation would apply to the National Guard when activated by the President and operating in accordance with Title 10 of the U.S. Code"
So I think if you want the opposite of what you said. Then vote for Trump. Frankly I have not figured out what he will do with a built up military. He said he want to pull out of NATO. That frees up a huge number of military people and weapons & fighter jets. He says the same about Japan. Let them build their own nukes and take care of their own asses.
WSD !m2cp3rR5zw (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 11 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #690,255
@previous (Syntax)
I'll take the honest man, but since that's not available, I'll take the one who isn't the crook. If that means voting for a nationalist liberal, so be it.
I'll take the honest man, but since that's not available, I'll take the one who isn't the crook. If that means voting for a nationalist liberal, so be it.
Syntax replied with this 10 years ago, 25 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #690,259
@previous (WSD !m2cp3rR5zw)Honest man? Hillary is being investigated - Trump was indited by several states including Texas for Fraud. Texas agreed to drop the Fraud charges when Trump agreed to pull his
his phony University out of the State of Texas. New York has him going to court for Fraud and just 25 miles away Trump and he has joked that after he wins the nomination he has a court date set here in San Diego where he is charged with Fraud.
> .If that means voting for a nationalist liberal, so be it.
I gota hand it to you. You accept the fact Trump is found of KKK and White Race bait groups. Then again you have in past expressed how happy you are to be a racist - At least you see Trump for what he is.
(Edited 56 seconds later.)
Metæ joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 53 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #690,266
@690,202 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
Air Force pilots did fly over Iraq and drop bombs so I think it is, technically, sending American troops into Iraq.
The fact that Operation Desert Fox happened at about the same time as the Lewinsky scandal is a coincidence. Clinton was just defending America because Saddam was making "dubya em dees" and hated our freedom.
Air Force pilots did fly over Iraq and drop bombs so I think it is, technically, sending American troops into Iraq.
The fact that Operation Desert Fox happened at about the same time as the Lewinsky scandal is a coincidence. Clinton was just defending America because Saddam was making "dubya em dees" and hated our freedom.
(Edited 3 minutes later.)
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #690,267
Metæ replied with this 10 years ago, 5 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #690,268
@previous (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
If I said "Obama sent troops in to kill Bin Laden" would you be all like "well they were actually they were Navy SEALs and they arrived by helicopter so it wasn't troops at all!"
> her husband sent many to die in Iraq and Yugoslavia to topple secular "dictatorships".
Also Clinton's actions DID kill Iraqis (why do they hate us?). "Sent many to die" doesn't just mean Americans. There are, like, other people in the world.
If I said "Obama sent troops in to kill Bin Laden" would you be all like "well they were actually they were Navy SEALs and they arrived by helicopter so it wasn't troops at all!"
> her husband sent many to die in Iraq and Yugoslavia to topple secular "dictatorships".
Also Clinton's actions DID kill Iraqis (why do they hate us?). "Sent many to die" doesn't just mean Americans. There are, like, other people in the world.
Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #690,270
adam djensen joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 16 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #690,273
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #690,274
@690,268 (Metæ)
Well seeing as the seals that took out Obama were actually physically present on the soil of Pakistan I would be fine with my saying that, though it would be more accurate to say "special forces" or something to that extent.
In order for "sent many to die" to be true , he would have to have
1. Sent many
2. Many of those sent died.
Iraqis dying as a result of our actions would be described as "sent many to kill". He chose the exact opposite word. It would be like if I jumped in the pool and said "I jumped in to make myself dry." when I meant "wet". Why are you even defending a low effort wally shitpost anyway?
Well seeing as the seals that took out Obama were actually physically present on the soil of Pakistan I would be fine with my saying that, though it would be more accurate to say "special forces" or something to that extent.
In order for "sent many to die" to be true , he would have to have
1. Sent many
2. Many of those sent died.
Iraqis dying as a result of our actions would be described as "sent many to kill". He chose the exact opposite word. It would be like if I jumped in the pool and said "I jumped in to make myself dry." when I meant "wet". Why are you even defending a low effort wally shitpost anyway?
(Edited 39 seconds later.)
Metæ replied with this 10 years ago, 9 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #690,275
@690,270 (J)
No one likes you. Thanks.
@previous (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
> Why are you even defending a low effort wally shitpost anyway?
Because Walter doesn't get enough love on this fora.
No one likes you. Thanks.
@previous (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
> Why are you even defending a low effort wally shitpost anyway?
Because Walter doesn't get enough love on this fora.
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 10 years ago, 4 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #690,278
Metæ replied with this 10 years ago, 25 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #690,279
> Why build up or military? Look up Posse Comitatus - Will save you the bother.@690,253 (Syntax)
Clinton, Bush, and Obama found a neat end-run: just turn the police into the army!
(Edited 27 seconds later.)
Nexi !tRAnsGiRLo joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #690,280
Syntax replied with this 10 years ago, 52 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #690,296
@690,279 (Metæ)> Clinton, Bush, and Obama found a neat end-run: just turn the police into the army!
Forget how old you are - Memories of Kent State and the Chicago Dem 1968 Convention Riots.
I think Cops have always had a heavy hand. Reminds me - I years ago dated blonde LAPD Homicide detective - Damn out of curiosity I just looked to see what she is up to - I am shocked to discover her partner another Gal Homicide detective was and still is married to one of the most famous judges on LA courts and known world wide and I had no clue until now. Weird how the internet can find stuff for real that leaves me asking how come I had no clue
This I can only explain in back channels -
adam djensen replied with this 10 years ago, 5 hours later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #690,345
Nexi !tRAnsGiRLo replied with this 10 years ago, 15 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #690,470
Anonymous M joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 6 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #690,473
Nexi !tRAnsGiRLo replied with this 10 years ago, 12 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #690,475
@previous (M)
> Saying I am whiny when I defend myself.
Keep talking, anonymous poster. At least I don't hide.
> Saying I am whiny when I defend myself.
Keep talking, anonymous poster. At least I don't hide.