Topic: Hypothetically speaking...
Anonymous A started this discussion 15 years ago #528
Imagine some annoying little shit is trolling you to prove how badass he is. In your opinion, is retaliation justified, or does it make you a butthurt faggot?
(Edited 36 seconds later.)
| Poll option | Votes | Percentage | Graph |
|---|---|---|---|
| Retaliation is justified | 9 | 47% | |
| Retaliation = butthurt | 10 | 53% |
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later[^] [v] #10,453
Depends on the situation.
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 3 minutes later, 5 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #10,455
What do you define as "retaliation"?
Bobby2Sox !dinhUJfbqA joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 7 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #10,458
Depends who you are calling an annoying little shit!!
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 45 seconds later, 8 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #10,459
Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 15 years ago, 45 seconds later, 9 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #10,460
@10,458 (Bobby2Sox !dinhUJfbqA)
> Depends who you are calling an annoying little shit!!
How about someone like (for example) Balfomoar on TC?
> Depends who you are calling an annoying little shit!!
How about someone like (for example) Balfomoar on TC?
(Edited 1 minute later.)
Anonymous A (OP) triple-posted this 15 years ago, 29 seconds later, 9 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #10,462
Anonymous B replied with this 15 years ago, 4 minutes later, 14 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #10,466
@previous (A)
It's hard to say. Could you be more specific on the type of situation you are talking about and what you mean by retaliate?
It's hard to say. Could you be more specific on the type of situation you are talking about and what you mean by retaliate?
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 6 minutes later, 20 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #10,474
@previous (B)
Well, just for argument's sake, let's say some shit-head cracks your tripcode, impersonates you on the board, and generally acts like a drooling fucktard. Would you be justified in letting the rest of the board know what a gigantic pedofaggot he is?
Well, just for argument's sake, let's say some shit-head cracks your tripcode, impersonates you on the board, and generally acts like a drooling fucktard. Would you be justified in letting the rest of the board know what a gigantic pedofaggot he is?
Bobby2Sox !dinhUJfbqA replied with this 15 years ago, 29 seconds later, 21 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #10,477
@10,460 (A)Well Bal is an over inflated, highly self opinionated gentleman who appears to think his sermons impress lesser people than himself [which includes everyone ] Truth be told he doesn't have half the influence he thinks he has. If a young lad like myself can see that then I'm sure wiser folk can too. He is at liberty to spout his bile.
The greater pity is that he seems incapable of taking a positive view whatever the subject.
Anonymous B replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 23 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #10,484
@10,474 (A)
I guess that's justifiable as long as you aren't really angry over it. You shouldn't be taking what happens on the chans seriously.
I guess that's justifiable as long as you aren't really angry over it. You shouldn't be taking what happens on the chans seriously.
Anonymous C replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 25 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #10,491
@10,459 (A)
So long as it's not doing something that is going to damage their personal life in any way, sure.
So long as it's not doing something that is going to damage their personal life in any way, sure.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 6 minutes later, 31 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #10,507
@previous (C)
How about hacking someone's email account and sending gay porn to all of his contacts in an attempt to get the victim expelled from university? Does that qualify as damaging someone's personal life?
How about hacking someone's email account and sending gay porn to all of his contacts in an attempt to get the victim expelled from university? Does that qualify as damaging someone's personal life?
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 36 seconds later, 32 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #10,509
The Magogo„¢ !!F0+vKzoih joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 33 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #10,511
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 18 seconds later, 33 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #10,513
Anonymous E replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 35 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #10,518
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 7 minutes later, 42 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #10,541
@previous (E)
Actually, I saw it happen to someone over on Tinychan. Just goes to prove that TC is one of the biggest hives of faggotry in the chanosphere.
Actually, I saw it happen to someone over on Tinychan. Just goes to prove that TC is one of the biggest hives of faggotry in the chanosphere.
(Edited 1 minute later.)
Anonymous B replied with this 15 years ago, 37 seconds later, 43 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #10,542
Anonymous E replied with this 15 years ago, 43 seconds later, 44 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #10,543
@previous (B)
If anybody threatens to drive to another state to settle an Internet argument, they automatically lose the game.
If anybody threatens to drive to another state to settle an Internet argument, they automatically lose the game.
Bobby2Sox !dinhUJfbqA replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 45 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #10,547
Anonymous E replied with this 15 years ago, 24 seconds later, 45 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #10,549
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 47 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #10,553
@10,543 (E)
@10,542 (B)
That wasn't just an internet argument. The hacker violated the law and deliberately attempted to ruin someone else's life, career and future.
@10,542 (B)
That wasn't just an internet argument. The hacker violated the law and deliberately attempted to ruin someone else's life, career and future.
Anonymous E replied with this 15 years ago, 37 seconds later, 47 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #10,554
@previous (A)
Do you have proof of this? You haven't even posted a link to the person claiming to be this supposed super hacker.
Do you have proof of this? You haven't even posted a link to the person claiming to be this supposed super hacker.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 35 seconds later, 48 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #10,555
@10,547 (Bobby2Sox !dinhUJfbqA)
I never post on Tinychan, Bobby. It's one of the shittiest boards on the face of the planet.
I never post on Tinychan, Bobby. It's one of the shittiest boards on the face of the planet.
totoforhire !!hWKWsQ1mC joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 6 seconds later, 48 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #10,556
Anonymous E replied with this 15 years ago, 50 seconds later, 49 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #10,558
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 50 seconds later, 50 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #10,559
@10,549 (E)
Your comment about traveling to another state suggests that you already know who it happened to.
Your comment about traveling to another state suggests that you already know who it happened to.
(Edited 2 minutes later.)
Anonymous E replied with this 15 years ago, 58 seconds later, 51 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #10,561
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 45 seconds later, 51 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #10,562
Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 15 years ago, 29 seconds later, 52 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #10,563
@10,561 (E)
Are you seriously claiming that you don't know who it happened to?
Are you seriously claiming that you don't know who it happened to?
(Edited 1 minute later.)
totoforhire !!TPesVWBmL replied with this 15 years ago, 19 seconds later, 52 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #10,565
Anonymous E replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 54 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #10,567
Bobby2Sox !dinhUJfbqA replied with this 15 years ago, 28 seconds later, 55 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #10,568
@10,555 (A)
I used to. They Blacklisted me for being verbose. I can't argue with that. But I find here a gentle nudge this way and that keeps me doing the right thing. Such a pity. novice, first time users need a helping hand. Least ways I do.
I used to. They Blacklisted me for being verbose. I can't argue with that. But I find here a gentle nudge this way and that keeps me doing the right thing. Such a pity. novice, first time users need a helping hand. Least ways I do.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 58 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #10,571
@10,567 (E)
> I have no idea.
If you have no idea, why are you passing judgment on something you know nothing about?
> I have no idea.
If you have no idea, why are you passing judgment on something you know nothing about?
Anonymous E replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 59 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #10,573
@previous (A)
I thought this was all hypothetical.
You know, you seem to be quite knowledgable in this "hypothetical" situation. Why don't you explain it to me?
I thought this was all hypothetical.
You know, you seem to be quite knowledgable in this "hypothetical" situation. Why don't you explain it to me?
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #10,582
@10,568 (Bobby2Sox !dinhUJfbqA)
You were new in town, Bobby. If you'd been there long enough, you would've realized that TC is a festering hive of fags, pedos and shit-tier trolls. You're much better off here, trust me.
You were new in town, Bobby. If you'd been there long enough, you would've realized that TC is a festering hive of fags, pedos and shit-tier trolls. You're much better off here, trust me.
totoforhire !!TPesVWBmL replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #10,584
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #10,590
@10,573 (E)
I'd rather not do that, as it concerns a well known user of this board. I'll leave it to him to explain the matter, if he wishes to discuss the subject again.
I will say this, however: he was treated very badly by the scum out at TC, and had every right to be angry. As mentioned above, it went a long way beyond a simple online disagreement.
I'd rather not do that, as it concerns a well known user of this board. I'll leave it to him to explain the matter, if he wishes to discuss the subject again.
I will say this, however: he was treated very badly by the scum out at TC, and had every right to be angry. As mentioned above, it went a long way beyond a simple online disagreement.
sim !SimonKaPg. joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 7 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #10,591
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 40 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #10,593
totoforhire !!TPesVWBmL replied with this 15 years ago, 59 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #10,595
sim !SimonKaPg. replied with this 15 years ago, 17 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #10,597
Bobby2Sox !dinhUJfbqA replied with this 15 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #10,604
@10,591 (sim !SimonKaPg.)Thank You I appreciate your confidence in me. You can really be my friend.
Anonymous E replied with this 15 years ago, 10 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #10,605
@10,590 (A)
That is just too ridiculous to be true. I think you're just trolling this place to stir up even more shit between the two boards.
That is just too ridiculous to be true. I think you're just trolling this place to stir up even more shit between the two boards.
Bobby2Sox !dinhUJfbqA replied with this 15 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #10,613
Good Night everyone. Long gone my bed time. God Bless.B2S
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 50 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #10,614
Anonymous E replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #10,618
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #10,623
Anonymous E replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #10,626
@previous (A)
It seems that you're the annoyed one here. After all, you're asking us if retaliating against somebody who made fun of you on the Internet is justified.
Now, here's the important question: what are you going to do about it?
It seems that you're the annoyed one here. After all, you're asking us if retaliating against somebody who made fun of you on the Internet is justified.
Now, here's the important question: what are you going to do about it?
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #10,629
Anonymous E replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #10,631
@previous (A)
I never asked if you needed to do anything. I asked what you are going to do about it.
I never asked if you needed to do anything. I asked what you are going to do about it.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #10,633
Anonymous E replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #10,636
Anonymous G replied with this 15 years ago, 6 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #10,642
Anonymous E replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #10,645
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 6 hours later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #11,052
All right: as of this post, 62 percent of respondents voted that retaliation is entirely justified against shitty little trollfags and that calling out a fucktard on his incessant faggotry does not equal butthurt. Based on these results, I recommend that:
A) Use of the shitmeme "Lol U Mad" (and all variations thereof) be strictly forbidden under the rules, and
B) Anyone caught posting it be labeled a faggot and buttfucked with the banhammer until the end of time.
THE PEOPLE HAVE SPOKEN.
A) Use of the shitmeme "Lol U Mad" (and all variations thereof) be strictly forbidden under the rules, and
B) Anyone caught posting it be labeled a faggot and buttfucked with the banhammer until the end of time.
THE PEOPLE HAVE SPOKEN.
(Edited 7 minutes later.)
