Topic: TinyChan is back up.
Frederick Chilton started this discussion 10 years ago #52,715
I shall touch my genitals now.Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 42 minutes later[^] [v] #688,657
You're very late to the party. Been up over one week now.
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 1 hour later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #688,686
Make this topic again.
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 44 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #688,698
It isn't though, when I type in www.tinychan.org it doesn't go anywhere.
FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 30 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #688,708
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 44 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #688,717
@688,698 (D)
Be right with you.
@previous (FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI)
Now really Ms. FuckAlms. Exactly how is Anon D going to find their way? For all you know Anon D and you could end up hitched.
@688,698 (D)
https://tinychan.org
Make sure you type in https. http: will get you nowhere.
Be right with you.
@previous (FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI)
Now really Ms. FuckAlms. Exactly how is Anon D going to find their way? For all you know Anon D and you could end up hitched.
@688,698 (D)
https://tinychan.org
Make sure you type in https. http: will get you nowhere.
(Edited 1 minute later.)
Anonymous D replied with this 10 years ago, 7 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #688,723
@previous (F)
> Make sure you type in https. http: will get you nowhere.
What a waste of time, why the fuck don't they just use www?
> Make sure you type in https. http: will get you nowhere.
What a waste of time, why the fuck don't they just use www?
Anonymous D double-posted this 10 years ago, 34 seconds later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #688,724
Syntax replied with this 10 years ago, 30 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #688,736
@previous (D)
http://uhurunetwork.com/do-we-need-www-anymore/
This is not in my area of expertise. By observation when every worthwhile web site switched to the secure https: Because I use multiple types of browsers for some work I am doing, I notice old bookmarks with the www or http, do not end up working. Text from link and r04r is probably an expert at this sorta thing - does show you the trouble servers and I am betting Cisco etc routers go through on the re-directs.
From this persons experience - Used to be easy to type in www - The trade off now is - Its in theory just as easy to type IN ONLY the name of the site
minichan.org and away you go. Alas the downside of that is - with the old www even if you typed in www.minichan.net and that is of course wrong, it gives you a search engine answer for various .org .edu etc etc when they are available and you can then get to the one you want.
Now you type in minichan.net you will go nowhere or arrive via your ISP at their server - often loaded with ads your adblocker is not designed to kill.
www Forget about it. Its almost as old as I am.
http://uhurunetwork.com/do-we-need-www-anymore/
This is not in my area of expertise. By observation when every worthwhile web site switched to the secure https: Because I use multiple types of browsers for some work I am doing, I notice old bookmarks with the www or http, do not end up working. Text from link and r04r is probably an expert at this sorta thing - does show you the trouble servers and I am betting Cisco etc routers go through on the re-directs.
From this persons experience - Used to be easy to type in www - The trade off now is - Its in theory just as easy to type IN ONLY the name of the site
minichan.org and away you go. Alas the downside of that is - with the old www even if you typed in www.minichan.net and that is of course wrong, it gives you a search engine answer for various .org .edu etc etc when they are available and you can then get to the one you want.
Now you type in minichan.net you will go nowhere or arrive via your ISP at their server - often loaded with ads your adblocker is not designed to kill.
www Forget about it. Its almost as old as I am.
Anonymous D replied with this 10 years ago, 13 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #688,738
@previous (Syntax)
I'm not interested in knowing all the technical shit, all I know is that as a consumer, typing www is far easier and faster than typing https;'/!? or whatever the fuck it is. That latter is a bad business model.
I'm not interested in knowing all the technical shit, all I know is that as a consumer, typing www is far easier and faster than typing https;'/!? or whatever the fuck it is. That latter is a bad business model.
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 25 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #688,745
Syntax replied with this 10 years ago, 28 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #688,752
@688,738 (D)
@previous (G)
> I just put in tinychan.org and it takes me right there.
Exactly
> typing https;'/!? or whatever the fuck it is. That latter is a bad business model.
That wood be true except see Anon G reply
tinychan.org is easy enough Other then some people may try tinychan.net and discover its not valid and then try .org. Nor am I trying to tell you that you are wrong about www
Alas that is now kaput for most sites now and you have to move on to what the webmaster gurus have handed you. I call it a compromise as I see it.
Perhaps one day for HTML.6.0 They will add a re-direct so if you do .net you end up with suggestion pages of valid .xyz with text enough to let you chose what you want? Again more for DasSheeple or r04r to explain the gain or loss if HTML 6.0 when finished happens. Again I am taking stabs at stuff I have no business taking stabs at
@previous (G)
> I just put in tinychan.org and it takes me right there.
Exactly
> typing https;'/!? or whatever the fuck it is. That latter is a bad business model.
That wood be true except see Anon G reply
tinychan.org is easy enough Other then some people may try tinychan.net and discover its not valid and then try .org. Nor am I trying to tell you that you are wrong about www
Alas that is now kaput for most sites now and you have to move on to what the webmaster gurus have handed you. I call it a compromise as I see it.
Perhaps one day for HTML.6.0 They will add a re-direct so if you do .net you end up with suggestion pages of valid .xyz with text enough to let you chose what you want? Again more for DasSheeple or r04r to explain the gain or loss if HTML 6.0 when finished happens. Again I am taking stabs at stuff I have no business taking stabs at
adam djensen joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 2 hours later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #688,778
bhutan joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #688,779
FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI replied with this 10 years ago, 2 days later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #689,557
Dr. Whom !7MHPahvoGY joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 21 hours later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #689,779
Real Fake Dokter !rozLf8bqm. joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 8 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #689,781
Dr. Whom !7MHPahvoGY replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #689,782
Stikel Burns joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 4 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #689,785
Frederick Chilton (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 2 weeks later, 2 weeks after the original post[^] [v] #694,409
This thread has lulz.Negi Springfield !aeNZeP7XP2 joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 11 hours later, 2 weeks after the original post[^] [v] #694,467
Frederick Chilton (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 1 day later, 2 weeks after the original post[^] [v] #694,922
Tell me more about your dick-envy of the Negro race and how it angers you to have a micro-penis.