Anonymous A started this discussion 10 years ago#52,649
Rather or not there could be a second civil war spark from a simplistic issue such as public restrooms. Obviously this isn't just some petty argument when you were get down into the deeper purpose of it. There is a minority group saying that restroom laws among other arguments infringe upon their civil rights. I'm sure many citizens in the Southern U.S. and elsewhere thought slavery was a small petty argument and look what happened there.
Many people claim that anti-gun legislature will be the issue that tears the Union apart, but a part me of questions that notion. Because 1) it won't be much of a war if the pro-gun people hold all of their weapon or 2) the anti-gun people find other more horrid means to kill without using firearms. Plus the anti-gun people don't want more violence so they will most likely evade any combat.
However, with the restroom issue heating up, you have one side fighting because of "religious beliefs" and the other fighting for their right to pee in their identified gender's room. Both sides feel like they have worthy causes to fight the other one even if it were to get violent. Will there be a second civil war? Probably not, since we're more civilized now, but it makes me wonder...
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 12 minutes later[^][v]#687,706
> Rather or not
Hi Catherine
Syntax joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 13 minutes after the original post[^][v]#687,707
I have modified my point of view on the restroom debate.
Changed my mind to
.
1:It going to be ok for men and women to share bathrooms and gym showers - If they are over 18 years of age
2: No one under 18 of the other sex should be allowed to share bathrooms - of the opposite sex
Because of gender Confucius: Its probably ok for people of both sexes to share a bathroom IF they have the same sexual gender parts. (even if those parts are man made)
I just cannot phantom a situation where for instance - Children of grammar school age, having girls and boys nakkid in the same open room shower in a gym.
Now sure I must admit in retrospect - Me in boys open showers after a baseball game in 6th grade and a nakkid cute girl wanders in to join us for a wash off - Yea cool BUT
Not cool if some 24 yer old perv dude walks in with camera to take pictures or reaches out to adjust body parts for the shoot.
No time to edit this mess -
Older men should NOT be allowed into a girls restroom unless there is total privacy for /girls/woman inside of any age range
(Edited 1 minute later.)
kook !!2HY00OZrM joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 5 minutes later, 19 minutes after the original post[^][v]#687,708
A lot of the people who question this are not religious
kook !!2HY00OZrM double-posted this 10 years ago, 6 minutes later, 25 minutes after the original post[^][v]#687,710
Op, do you really think that religion is the cause of this?
Syntax replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 28 minutes after the original post[^][v]#687,713
@687,708 (kook !!2HY00OZrM)
Don't no if you were aware - After the election of Obama 1st n 2nd time - Groups of right wing extremists formed via the net to change and do it legalize the split of USA into Red Blue states creating a new safe zone for them just like the South attempted via civil war.
I still stay in touch with one of them for the lulz - I continue to drive them crazy with my somewhat liberal views. You even might have some fun with them towards the end of this election or just after
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 30 minutes after the original post[^][v]#687,714
@687,710 (kook !!2HY00OZrM)
It's a cover for it if anything.
kook !!2HY00OZrM replied with this 10 years ago, 58 seconds later, 31 minutes after the original post[^][v]#687,715
lol that's a odd way to interpret what he said. You see, if the surrounding powers really wanted isis gone, they would have already done it. That's what he said.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 20 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^][v]#687,771
@previous (Denmark guy !jJEom8Ii3E)
If you're going to samefag, don't leave your trip on.
Denmark guy !jJEom8Ii3E replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^][v]#687,772
Oh now I understand why he thought i was samefaging.
I also thought that it wasn't easy and of course it ain't easy. However what has anyone actually done about isis?
Isn't it just airstrikes? Airstrikes while somehow isis gets wealthy even though all their subjects are poor as fuck.
Syria is a cluster fuck when it comes to politics, I think it's because of something more than if or if not the syrian regime remains.
Sheila LaBoof joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^][v]#687,782
doesn't the southern states still have double the toilets and fountains everywhere
RWBY Rhubarb? !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 10 years ago, 6 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^][v]#687,784
@687,778 (Denmark guy !jJEom8Ii3E)
My guess is that western nations aren't doing more because another full-scale invasion would be bad PR. I don't think the public really wants the troops getting bogged down in the Middle East all over again.
> even though all their subjects are poor as fuck.
ISIS does have some economic ventures. I heard they've captured some oil reserves. They also sell women quite often.
(Edited 18 seconds later.)
Denmark guy !jJEom8Ii3E replied with this 10 years ago, 6 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^][v]#687,785
Well then, if they aren't doing more than they can, does it not mean that the death of isis isn't their top priorit. PR is one reason but I doubt it's the only reason.
And yes, the oil reserves, I don't think businesses is booming in Syria, they sell turkey the oil. Don't they?