Topic: Are potatoes vegetables?
Anonymous A started this discussion 10 years ago #52,443
Headline.
| Poll option | Votes | Percentage | Graph |
|---|---|---|---|
| Yes, of course. | 7 | 78% | |
| No (I'm an idiot). | 2 | 22% |
lost soul joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 8 minutes later[^] [v] #684,353
It is the best vegetable in the whole world
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 8 minutes later, 16 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #684,354
if youre eating potatoes and think that means you dont have to eat any other vegetables or fruits i genuinely pity you
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 18 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #684,356
Potatoes are fish, not vegetables.
Culinary classification is more relevant to most people's lives than taxonomic classification. Potatoes, therefore, are properly classified as fish.
Culinary classification is more relevant to most people's lives than taxonomic classification. Potatoes, therefore, are properly classified as fish.
lost soul replied with this 10 years ago, 41 seconds later, 19 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #684,358
Anonymous C replied with this 10 years ago, 45 seconds later, 19 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #684,359
lost soul replied with this 10 years ago, 42 seconds later, 20 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #684,360
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 9 seconds later, 20 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #684,361
Anonymous C replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 22 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #684,362
lost soul replied with this 10 years ago, 17 seconds later, 22 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #684,363
lold
Nexi !FMXTRANsAM joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 4 hours later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #684,395
Technically they are roots.
Maddy !kCITGirlXc joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 46 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #684,396
Nexi !FMXTRANsAM replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #684,397
RWBY Rhubarb? !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #684,399
@previous (Nexi !FMXTRANsAM)
So you're saying that technical classification is more relevant to people's lives than botanical classification?
So you're saying that technical classification is more relevant to people's lives than botanical classification?
(Edited 13 seconds later.)
Nexi !FMXTRANsAM replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #684,400
@previous (RWBY Rhubarb? !!iNo3FkiZx)
Well it is a starchy food. It usually replaces bread or pasts in a meal. Even then it is not technically considered a vegetable when considering the 5 food groups due to its high starch content.
Well it is a starchy food. It usually replaces bread or pasts in a meal. Even then it is not technically considered a vegetable when considering the 5 food groups due to its high starch content.
RWBY Rhubarb? !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 10 years ago, 7 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #684,401
@previous (Nexi !FMXTRANsAM)
I see.
So there you have it. Potatoes, therefore, are properly classified as roots.
I see.
So there you have it. Potatoes, therefore, are properly classified as roots.
Maddy !kCITGirlXc replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #684,402
@previous (RWBY Rhubarb? !!iNo3FkiZx)
According to the scientists that classified it, it is a vegetable. According to nutritionists, it is a starchy food.
According to the scientists that classified it, it is a vegetable. According to nutritionists, it is a starchy food.
RWBY Rhubarb? !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 10 years ago, 4 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #684,404
@previous (Maddy !kCITGirlXc)
Ah, I'm just memeing. Notice how I was recycling this post @684,356 (D)
It's an in-joke, started when an anon impersonated Matt and argued that dolphins weren't mammals to make Matt look stupid.
Ah, I'm just memeing. Notice how I was recycling this post @684,356 (D)
It's an in-joke, started when an anon impersonated Matt and argued that dolphins weren't mammals to make Matt look stupid.
Maddy !kCITGirlXc replied with this 10 years ago, 7 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #684,408
@previous (RWBY Rhubarb? !!iNo3FkiZx)
Ah, I see. I was misled, because it wasn't accompanied by a picture of Neon Katt.
Ah, I see. I was misled, because it wasn't accompanied by a picture of Neon Katt.
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 5 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #684,411
@684,404 (RWBY Rhubarb? !!iNo3FkiZx)
Quality memeing. I expected Nexi to fail basic Botany 101. One day he will wake up and decided he feels like he should be called a Vegetable, and in fact he already is one.
Quality memeing. I expected Nexi to fail basic Botany 101. One day he will wake up and decided he feels like he should be called a Vegetable, and in fact he already is one.
RWBY Rhubarb? !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #684,412
Maddy !kCITGirlXc replied with this 10 years ago, 8 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #684,415
RWBY Rhubarb? !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #684,416
Maddy !kCITGirlXc replied with this 10 years ago, 4 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #684,417
@previous (RWBY Rhubarb? !!iNo3FkiZx)
I've watched RWBY before, and paying attention to things you've said previously.
I've watched RWBY before, and paying attention to things you've said previously.