Topic: I am proud to say there is one topic I have never clicked on - Not once
Anonymous A started this discussion 10 years ago #52,416
"What is the most painless way to commit suicide for under 20 bucks?"
Replies 581 Visits 69,454
Replies 581 Visits 69,454
| Poll option | Votes | Percentage | Graph |
|---|---|---|---|
| You are like me - No need to look | 2 | 67% | |
| You are not like me and like to look | 1 | 33% | |
| You aree looking for a way to prevent loss of Virginity | - | 0% | |
| OP is - Write in | - | 0% |
Not Denmark guy !jJEom8Ii3E joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later[^] [v] #684,064
There is no such thing as suicide for 20 dollars because you have to account for the lost income when you are dead
button joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 5 minutes later, 8 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #684,065
@previous (Not Denmark guy !jJEom8Ii3E)
> There is no such thing as suicide for 20 dollars because you have to account for the lost income when you are dead
You are insane
@OP
> "What is the most painless way to commit suicide for under 20 bucks?"
>
> Replies 581 Visits 69,454
Get murdered
> There is no such thing as suicide for 20 dollars because you have to account for the lost income when you are dead
You are insane
@OP
> "What is the most painless way to commit suicide for under 20 bucks?"
>
> Replies 581 Visits 69,454
Get murdered
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 9 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #684,066
@684,064 (Not Denmark guy !jJEom8Ii3E)
No you don't. That kind of accounting is Catholic or Jewish guilt.
No you don't. That kind of accounting is Catholic or Jewish guilt.
Antikhristos !M6R0eWkIpk joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 4 minutes later, 13 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #684,067
@684,064 (Not Denmark guy !jJEom8Ii3E)
Maybe it's just me, but I think your argument would make more sense if you just accounted for funeral/cremation/burial expenses instead of 'lost income' due to death.
Maybe it's just me, but I think your argument would make more sense if you just accounted for funeral/cremation/burial expenses instead of 'lost income' due to death.
Not Denmark guy !jJEom8Ii3E replied with this 10 years ago, 10 seconds later, 13 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #684,068
button replied with this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 17 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #684,070
@684,067 (Antikhristos !M6R0eWkIpk)
he made a thread about it and I expected funeral costs too but Nope
he made a thread about it and I expected funeral costs too but Nope
Not Denmark guy !jJEom8Ii3E replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 19 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #684,073
@684,067 (Antikhristos !M6R0eWkIpk)
It makes perfect sense without it. Your life is a price of suicide and with it, all future income
It makes perfect sense without it. Your life is a price of suicide and with it, all future income
(Edited 1 minute later.)
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 22 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #684,075
@684,064 (Not Denmark guy !jJEom8Ii3E)
How about the accounting for continued costs of pollution of the environment. The cost to remain alive may well exceed, the cost of one less person on earth.
How about the accounting for continued costs of pollution of the environment. The cost to remain alive may well exceed, the cost of one less person on earth.
Not Denmark guy !jJEom8Ii3E replied with this 10 years ago, 4 minutes later, 26 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #684,078
@previous (A)
Maybe it may but if the subject is dead there is no way to tell and as such this is a hypothetical speculation
Maybe it may but if the subject is dead there is no way to tell and as such this is a hypothetical speculation
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 10 minutes later, 36 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #684,080
FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 28 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #684,087
@684,078 (Not Denmark guy !jJEom8Ii3E)
Just bump your thread if you want to continue discussing the issues of "lost income".
@OP
Never clicked it, but I have the number memorized so I can conveniently insert it into any post where someone should kill themselves.
Just bump your thread if you want to continue discussing the issues of "lost income".
@OP
Never clicked it, but I have the number memorized so I can conveniently insert it into any post where someone should kill themselves.
(Edited 14 seconds later.)
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #684,089
@previous (FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI)
> Never clicked it, but I have the number memorized so I can conveniently insert it into any post where someone should kill themselves.
A most excellent idea.
> Never clicked it, but I have the number memorized so I can conveniently insert it into any post where someone should kill themselves.
A most excellent idea.
more positive squeegee joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 11 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #684,090
yeah, we know, OP. the title is a distraction, the thread is actually nothing but gossip about you. lol.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 6 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #684,091
Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 42 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #684,105
?
Nexi !MUSTaNGYGo joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #684,106
It is a weird thread.