Topic: If you judge "Ghostbusters 2016" without even seeing the movie
Anonymous A started this discussion 10 years ago #52,367
...then you're a racist, sexist, misogynistic piece of shit. Fuck off.Nexi !jNexusRe/. joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 5 minutes later[^] [v] #682,993
That is exactly how they wanted you to feel. I can judge from the trailer which means it = shit.
kook !!vzUOyOi/5 joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 5 minutes later, 10 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #682,997
I've been a fan of Kate Mckinnon since she was on The Big Gay Sketch Show, and it still doesnt look good to me.
Sheila LaBoof joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 12 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #682,999
is the movie suitable for parents and kids or does it have cock references or fuck scenes
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 8 minutes later, 20 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #683,002
kook !!vzUOyOi/5 replied with this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 24 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #683,004
@previous (A)
If you saw a book with a title called "Women are holes, and niggers should die. No seriously I hate them" Would you read it?
If you saw a book with a title called "Women are holes, and niggers should die. No seriously I hate them" Would you read it?
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 4 minutes later, 28 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #683,006
adam djensen joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 30 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #683,007
@683,002 (A)
But there already are two trailers out and presuming they have some of the best moments in the movie, it's pretty likely to be shit. Thanks.
But there already are two trailers out and presuming they have some of the best moments in the movie, it's pretty likely to be shit. Thanks.
adam djensen double-posted this 10 years ago, 35 seconds later, 30 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #683,008
kook !!vzUOyOi/5 replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 32 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #683,009
kook !!vzUOyOi/5 double-posted this 10 years ago, 17 seconds later, 33 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #683,010
adam djensen replied with this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 36 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #683,011
kook !!vzUOyOi/5 replied with this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 39 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #683,012
button joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 24 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #683,017
lost soul joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #683,023
@previous (button)
U mean the Women are holes, and niggers should die. No seriously I hate them book?
U mean the Women are holes, and niggers should die. No seriously I hate them book?
button replied with this 10 years ago, 39 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #683,024
Catherine !TGirlYJKXM joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #683,025
I'm looking forward to seeing it.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #683,027
@683,004 (kook !!vzUOyOi/5)
> If you saw a book with a title called "Women are holes, and niggers should die. No seriously I hate them" Would you read it?
No, but I still wouldn't judge it by its cover.
> If you saw a book with a title called "Women are holes, and niggers should die. No seriously I hate them" Would you read it?
No, but I still wouldn't judge it by its cover.
Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 3 hours later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #683,068
All the Ghostbuster movies are shit, this one is too. Thanks.
Catherine !TGirlYJKXM replied with this 10 years ago, 3 hours later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #683,112
Would you judge this book by it's cover?Anonymous J replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #683,115
Maddy !kCITGirlXc joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 52 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #683,130
kook !!vzUOyOi/5 replied with this 10 years ago, 27 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #683,137
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 5 hours later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #683,234
@previous (kook !!vzUOyOi/5)
I only read a small number of authors, including Stephen King and Ray Bradbury. I guess if either of them wrote it, I'd probably pick it up and look through it out of interest.
I only read a small number of authors, including Stephen King and Ray Bradbury. I guess if either of them wrote it, I'd probably pick it up and look through it out of interest.
kook !!vzUOyOi/5 replied with this 10 years ago, 45 minutes later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #683,260
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 5 minutes later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #683,263
@previous (kook !!vzUOyOi/5)
They're my favorites. In the past, I've also read Orwell, Huxley, H.G. Wells and Harper Lee amongst others, but these days, I find King and Bradbury the most entertaining.
They're my favorites. In the past, I've also read Orwell, Huxley, H.G. Wells and Harper Lee amongst others, but these days, I find King and Bradbury the most entertaining.