Topic: Documentary about people like Sophie
introman !/3ZwFHfJFI started this discussion 10 years ago #52,175
P and Vitriol have told me that one of their mutual friends helped make a documentary about tranny's in Scotland. I thought they were bluffing, but here it is:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q-EqtMdY_Ys
Would this fora support a BBC documentary about Sophie? I'll have to run it with P and Vitriol as well as NHS Lothian staff, but I think it would be enlightening.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q-EqtMdY_Ys
Would this fora support a BBC documentary about Sophie? I'll have to run it with P and Vitriol as well as NHS Lothian staff, but I think it would be enlightening.
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later[^] [v] #679,412
The one at the very start reminds me of Rika
Adam Djensen joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 4 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #679,415
no one fucking cares
Anonymous B replied with this 10 years ago, 5 minutes later, 9 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #679,421
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 11 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #679,425
@679,415 (Adam Djensen)
OP is from a trolling forum, this is his hobby.
He might think that we are like him.
OP is from a trolling forum, this is his hobby.
He might think that we are like him.
Sophie !MLHqI35Srs joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 49 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #679,435
> YT;DW
> BBC;DW
I hate other trannies. They remind me of what's been taken away from me.
> BBC;DW
I hate other trannies. They remind me of what's been taken away from me.
Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 31 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #679,453
@previous (Sophie !MLHqI35Srs)
When was the last time you attempted to publicly present as female, Mr. Gillon?
When was the last time you attempted to publicly present as female, Mr. Gillon?
(Edited 16 seconds later.)
Sophie !MLHqI35Srs replied with this 10 years ago, 24 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #679,454
Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #679,456
Sophie !MLHqI35Srs replied with this 10 years ago, 6 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #679,457
Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #679,458
Sophie !MLHqI35Srs replied with this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #679,459
@previous (Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo)
You aren't important enough to gratify the request for clarification.
The only way to deal with narcissists like you, Haselgrove, is to be abused back.
You aren't important enough to gratify the request for clarification.
The only way to deal with narcissists like you, Haselgrove, is to be abused back.
Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo replied with this 10 years ago, 6 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #679,460
@previous (Sophie !MLHqI35Srs)
This "Haselgrove" person is a figment of your imagination, Mr, Gillon, and you know it. Why do you feel the need to try to pull the fora into your silly, delusional games? Is it, perhaps, because you feel that this gives you a degree of control over people that you lack in your real life, Mr. Gillon? I think it is.
This "Haselgrove" person is a figment of your imagination, Mr, Gillon, and you know it. Why do you feel the need to try to pull the fora into your silly, delusional games? Is it, perhaps, because you feel that this gives you a degree of control over people that you lack in your real life, Mr. Gillon? I think it is.
Sophie !MLHqI35Srs replied with this 10 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #679,462
@previous (Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo)
I was going to post you a picture of Haselgrove but I CAN'T STAND LOOKING AT THAT PSYCHOPATHIC, POST-OPERATIVE FACIAL-FEMINIZATION-BOTCH-JOB, ARACHNID FACE.
My god, to the depths of the pit of my stomach, he's an allegory to why some trannies just NEVER PASS no matter how much effort they put in.
I was going to post you a picture of Haselgrove but I CAN'T STAND LOOKING AT THAT PSYCHOPATHIC, POST-OPERATIVE FACIAL-FEMINIZATION-BOTCH-JOB, ARACHNID FACE.
My god, to the depths of the pit of my stomach, he's an allegory to why some trannies just NEVER PASS no matter how much effort they put in.
(Edited 1 minute later.)
Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo replied with this 10 years ago, 4 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #679,465
@previous (Sophie !MLHqI35Srs)
Fascinating. Do you feel that incoherent all-caps screaming is an affectation that will make you appear feminine, Mr. Gillon?
Fascinating. Do you feel that incoherent all-caps screaming is an affectation that will make you appear feminine, Mr. Gillon?
Sophie !MLHqI35Srs replied with this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #679,467
@previous (Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo)
Not all use of capitalization is a volume-control; rather, before the association became popular with the internet, it was frequently understood to be used for an emphasis-drawing purpose alone.
Not all use of capitalization is a volume-control; rather, before the association became popular with the internet, it was frequently understood to be used for an emphasis-drawing purpose alone.
Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo replied with this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #679,469
@previous (Sophie !MLHqI35Srs)
You were pretending to scream at me in the way you feel that a woman would, Mr. Gillon. How much effort do you put into passing?
You were pretending to scream at me in the way you feel that a woman would, Mr. Gillon. How much effort do you put into passing?
Sophie !MLHqI35Srs replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #679,471
@previous (Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo)
Again, the "affectation" is coming from your projective interpretation rather than my intention, which is entirely inconsistent with the accusation. Hold those until you can prove them more than just initial-principally or axiomatically.
Again, the "affectation" is coming from your projective interpretation rather than my intention, which is entirely inconsistent with the accusation. Hold those until you can prove them more than just initial-principally or axiomatically.
Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #679,472
@previous (Sophie !MLHqI35Srs)
Your intention was to make me think that you are an hysterical woman, Mr. Gillon.
Your intention was to make me think that you are an hysterical woman, Mr. Gillon.
Sophie !MLHqI35Srs replied with this 10 years ago, 5 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #679,476
@previous (Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo)
see @679,471 (Sophie !MLHqI35Srs)
> Again, the "affectation" is coming from your projective interpretation rather than my intention
> Hold those until you can prove them more than just initial-principally or axiomatically.
definition of "axiom"
http://www.dictionary.com/browse/axiom?s=t
> 3. a proposition that is assumed without proof for the sake of studying the consequences that follow from it.
Except that you are not interested in the derivative consequences of causal-effectuality. You're interested only in presuming an a-priori presumption to fit the back-inferrentiality of the inverse, effectively a form of confirmation bias.
see @679,471 (Sophie !MLHqI35Srs)
> Again, the "affectation" is coming from your projective interpretation rather than my intention
> Hold those until you can prove them more than just initial-principally or axiomatically.
definition of "axiom"
http://www.dictionary.com/browse/axiom?s=t
> 3. a proposition that is assumed without proof for the sake of studying the consequences that follow from it.
Except that you are not interested in the derivative consequences of causal-effectuality. You're interested only in presuming an a-priori presumption to fit the back-inferrentiality of the inverse, effectively a form of confirmation bias.
(Edited 1 minute later.)
Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo replied with this 10 years ago, 4 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #679,481
@previous (Sophie !MLHqI35Srs)
My conclusion is based on detailed observation of your behavior on this fora, Mr. Gillon.
My conclusion is based on detailed observation of your behavior on this fora, Mr. Gillon.
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 9 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #679,488
Anyone remember the original Autphag, David?
Sophie !MLHqI35Srs replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #679,489
Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo replied with this 10 years ago, 7 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #679,492
@previous (Sophie !MLHqI35Srs)
None of what has been made? Try to express yourself more clearly, Mr. Gillon.
None of what has been made? Try to express yourself more clearly, Mr. Gillon.
Sophie !MLHqI35Srs replied with this 10 years ago, 48 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #679,494
@previous (Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo)
Subjects are implied when previously stated by the conversant. Try being less autistic again.
Subjects are implied when previously stated by the conversant. Try being less autistic again.
Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo replied with this 10 years ago, 5 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #679,497
@previous (Sophie !MLHqI35Srs)
Are you trying to say that I made no observations of your behavior, Mr. Gillon?
Are you trying to say that I made no observations of your behavior, Mr. Gillon?
Sophie !MLHqI35Srs replied with this 10 years ago, 6 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #679,500
@previous (Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo)
Instead of circuitously phrasing this ramble as a disingenuously presented rhetorical question, how about you juat make an admission of guilt to the following:
> I made no observations of your behaviour.
As suggested in the inadvertant Freudian slip embedded in redundant and insincere qualification.
This is a lot less narcissistically deflective on your end.
Instead of circuitously phrasing this ramble as a disingenuously presented rhetorical question, how about you juat make an admission of guilt to the following:
> I made no observations of your behaviour.
As suggested in the inadvertant Freudian slip embedded in redundant and insincere qualification.
This is a lot less narcissistically deflective on your end.
(Edited 47 seconds later.)
Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo replied with this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #679,505
@previous (Sophie !MLHqI35Srs)
It looks like you're trying to say that in all the time I have been reading and responding to your posts, you feel that I have not made a single observation of your behavior. Is this correct, Mr. Gillon?
It looks like you're trying to say that in all the time I have been reading and responding to your posts, you feel that I have not made a single observation of your behavior. Is this correct, Mr. Gillon?
Sophie !MLHqI35Srs replied with this 10 years ago, 50 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #679,508
Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #679,509
@previous (Sophie !MLHqI35Srs)
I don't think you understand how ridiculous you sound, Mr. Gillon. This doesn't surprise me, however, since it's a fact that lack of self awareness is a symptom of Asperger syndrome.
I don't think you understand how ridiculous you sound, Mr. Gillon. This doesn't surprise me, however, since it's a fact that lack of self awareness is a symptom of Asperger syndrome.
Sophie !MLHqI35Srs replied with this 10 years ago, 51 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #679,510
Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #679,512
@previous (Sophie !MLHqI35Srs)
Babbling in a foreign language makes you look pretentious, not intelligent, Mr. Gillon.
Babbling in a foreign language makes you look pretentious, not intelligent, Mr. Gillon.
Sophie !MLHqI35Srs replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #679,514
@previous (Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo)
Most of the fallacy-forms however, are either in a presently alive Romance language or a dead Latinate one. It's not really a matter of pretension so much as it is the reality of logical-formality classificaton, unfortunately (and I say this because I'd rather have not learned terms outwith my language at all).
Most of the fallacy-forms however, are either in a presently alive Romance language or a dead Latinate one. It's not really a matter of pretension so much as it is the reality of logical-formality classificaton, unfortunately (and I say this because I'd rather have not learned terms outwith my language at all).
Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #679,519
Catherine !TGirlYJKXM joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 26 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #679,544
I'll support it as long as it's not transphobic and only uses actual scientific knowledge known of gender dysphoria.
Sophie !MLHqI35Srs replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #679,546
@previous (Catherine !TGirlYJKXM)
"Scientific knowledge". HAH. The entire corpus is full of debauched faggots trying to specially excuse the autogynephillic fetishization of neurotypicals themselves whilst hypocritically pathologizing autists for perceptions of the same, along with the usual unverifiable claims of hormonal aetiology despite an over-representation of putatively extreme male-brained autists in the condition.
IT'S WHAT WE CALL IN THE SCIENTIFIC COMMUNITY, HORSE. SHIT.
"Scientific knowledge". HAH. The entire corpus is full of debauched faggots trying to specially excuse the autogynephillic fetishization of neurotypicals themselves whilst hypocritically pathologizing autists for perceptions of the same, along with the usual unverifiable claims of hormonal aetiology despite an over-representation of putatively extreme male-brained autists in the condition.
IT'S WHAT WE CALL IN THE SCIENTIFIC COMMUNITY, HORSE. SHIT.
Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo replied with this 10 years ago, 26 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #679,548
@679,544 (Catherine !TGirlYJKXM)
Mr. Gillon is simply a deeply closeted crossdresser. He does not experience gender dysphoria.
Mr. Gillon is simply a deeply closeted crossdresser. He does not experience gender dysphoria.
Sophie !MLHqI35Srs replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #679,551
@previous (Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo)
Incorrect. You cannot make constructively unverifiable claims to my experience when you're not entitled to speak on behalf of those experiences of mine which are impossible for you to personally sustain.
Incorrect. You cannot make constructively unverifiable claims to my experience when you're not entitled to speak on behalf of those experiences of mine which are impossible for you to personally sustain.
Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo replied with this 10 years ago, 35 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #679,553
@679,546 (Sophie !MLHqI35Srs)
You are a member of the scientific community, Mr. Gillon? This is news to me! What contributions have you made in your field? Would you care to share your PhD dissertation with the fora? Please link us to the papers you have published in respected journals.
You are a member of the scientific community, Mr. Gillon? This is news to me! What contributions have you made in your field? Would you care to share your PhD dissertation with the fora? Please link us to the papers you have published in respected journals.
(Edited 5 minutes later.)
Sophie !MLHqI35Srs replied with this 10 years ago, 31 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #679,555
@previous (Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo)
> Tu quoque and more projection.
Ever heard of meta-science?
> Tu quoque and more projection.
Ever heard of meta-science?
Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo replied with this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #679,562
@679,551 (Sophie !MLHqI35Srs)
You cannot claim to suffer from gender dysphoria whilst showing no signs that you do, and all possible signs that you do not, and then expect the fora to believe you, Mr. Gillon.
@previous (Sophie !MLHqI35Srs)
No, Mr. Gillon, and since it's something you made up yourself, I doubt that anyone in the scientific community has heard of it either.
You cannot claim to suffer from gender dysphoria whilst showing no signs that you do, and all possible signs that you do not, and then expect the fora to believe you, Mr. Gillon.
@previous (Sophie !MLHqI35Srs)
No, Mr. Gillon, and since it's something you made up yourself, I doubt that anyone in the scientific community has heard of it either.
kook !!vzUOyOi/5 joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 2 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #679,563
Sophie !MLHqI35Srs replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #679,568
@679,562 (Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo)
> whilst showing no signs that you do
Becuase you're not in a position, as a random, retarded namefag on a board where I'm an incorpereal face, to observe such a thing, and as such, this is unverifiable.
> and all possible signs that you do not
Because you hyperbolically speculate these possibilities to be so?
> whilst showing no signs that you do
Becuase you're not in a position, as a random, retarded namefag on a board where I'm an incorpereal face, to observe such a thing, and as such, this is unverifiable.
> and all possible signs that you do not
Because you hyperbolically speculate these possibilities to be so?
Adam Djensen replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #679,571
Sophie !MLHqI35Srs replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #679,574
@previous (Adam Djensen)
Because SCIENTIFIC KNOWLEDGE apparently says the deliberate antagonism of Catherine is a sincere statement of its attempt to poorly conceal under the pretense of a legitimate debate rabblerousing by the instilment of resentment over its reportedly superior transgender status.
Because SCIENTIFIC KNOWLEDGE apparently says the deliberate antagonism of Catherine is a sincere statement of its attempt to poorly conceal under the pretense of a legitimate debate rabblerousing by the instilment of resentment over its reportedly superior transgender status.
(Edited 16 seconds later.)
Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo replied with this 10 years ago, 13 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #679,576
@679,568 (Sophie !MLHqI35Srs)
I have watched your videos, Mr. Gillon, and observed your behavior on multiple forae and social media sites. You are a cisgender male crossdresser, Mr. Gillon, and I don't understand why you're so desperate to deny this. It's certainly your least shameful fetish.
I have watched your videos, Mr. Gillon, and observed your behavior on multiple forae and social media sites. You are a cisgender male crossdresser, Mr. Gillon, and I don't understand why you're so desperate to deny this. It's certainly your least shameful fetish.
Sophie !MLHqI35Srs replied with this 10 years ago, 42 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #679,577
@previous (Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo)
Yes, 1-minute snippets of my life tells you everything you need to know.
Yes, 1-minute snippets of my life tells you everything you need to know.
Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo replied with this 10 years ago, 31 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #679,578
more positive squeegee joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 30 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #679,579
Dr. Haselgrove !MLHqI35Srs replied with this 10 years ago, 23 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #679,580
@679,578 (Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo)
> taking sarcasm unironically
I hearby diagnose you with autism. Good day, Matt Miller.
> taking sarcasm unironically
I hearby diagnose you with autism. Good day, Matt Miller.
kook !!vzUOyOi/5 replied with this 10 years ago, 16 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #679,581
@679,571 (Adam Djensen)
Because it's fun and Catherine acts antagonistically towards me and Sophie, anonymously and under the big daddy Derek handle.
Because it's fun and Catherine acts antagonistically towards me and Sophie, anonymously and under the big daddy Derek handle.
Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo replied with this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #679,583
@679,580 (Dr. Haselgrove !MLHqI35Srs)
Whom is "Matt Miller", Mr. Gillon? Another of your imaginary foes?
Whom is "Matt Miller", Mr. Gillon? Another of your imaginary foes?
Dr. Haselgrove !MLHqI35Srs replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #679,584
kook !!vzUOyOi/5 replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #679,585
Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo replied with this 10 years ago, 28 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #679,586
@679,584 (Dr. Haselgrove !MLHqI35Srs)
I Googled "Matt Miller", and it looks like he's a fictional character in the "Saints Row" series of computer games. Are you trying to pretend that your real life is a computer game, Mr. Gillon?
I Googled "Matt Miller", and it looks like he's a fictional character in the "Saints Row" series of computer games. Are you trying to pretend that your real life is a computer game, Mr. Gillon?
Dr. Haselgrove !MLHqI35Srs replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #679,587
@previous (Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo)
Good day, Matt "Caveatipse" "Paedophillic Fan-fiction of Emma Watson Author" Miller.
Good day, Matt "Caveatipse" "Paedophillic Fan-fiction of Emma Watson Author" Miller.
Catherine !TGirlYJKXM replied with this 10 years ago, 27 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #679,588
@679,585 (kook !!vzUOyOi/5)
I think this BDD could be the former Tinychan user known as "The Doctor".
I think this BDD could be the former Tinychan user known as "The Doctor".
Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #679,590
@679,587 (Dr. Haselgrove !MLHqI35Srs)
This is fascinating, Mr. Gillon. Your behavior is remarkably similar to that of Christine Chandler, when she retreated into a fantasy world of computer characters and imagined foes. Is "Matt Miller" to "Haselgrove" as Sonichu is to Mary Lee Walsh?
This is fascinating, Mr. Gillon. Your behavior is remarkably similar to that of Christine Chandler, when she retreated into a fantasy world of computer characters and imagined foes. Is "Matt Miller" to "Haselgrove" as Sonichu is to Mary Lee Walsh?
kook !!vzUOyOi/5 replied with this 10 years ago, 7 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #679,593
Catherine !TGirlYJKXM replied with this 10 years ago, 4 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #679,597
@previous (kook !!vzUOyOi/5)
No, this one isn't me, plus you can tell by the way his posts are structured.
No, this one isn't me, plus you can tell by the way his posts are structured.
Dr. Haselgrove !MLHqI35Srs replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #679,598
@previous (Catherine !TGirlYJKXM)
@679,593 (kook !!vzUOyOi/5)
In Catherine's defense, although BDD is not that bright either, he seems to be a lot more 'with it'; slick if unintelligent.
@679,593 (kook !!vzUOyOi/5)
In Catherine's defense, although BDD is not that bright either, he seems to be a lot more 'with it'; slick if unintelligent.
Anonymous K joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 2 hours later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #679,660
@679,435 (Sophie !MLHqI35Srs)> >YT;DW
> >BBC;DW
>
> I hate other trannies. They remind me of what's been taken away from me.
button joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 36 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #679,697
@679,546 (Sophie !MLHqI35Srs)
> "Scientific knowledge". HAH. The entire corpus is full of debauched faggots trying to specially excuse the autogynephillic fetishization of neurotypicals themselves whilst hypocritically pathologizing autists for perceptions of the same, along with the usual unverifiable claims of hormonal aetiology despite an over-representation of putatively extreme male-brained autists in the condition.
>
> IT'S WHAT WE CALL IN THE SCIENTIFIC COMMUNITY, HORSE. SHIT.
lol you sound so angry and jealous all the time
> "Scientific knowledge". HAH. The entire corpus is full of debauched faggots trying to specially excuse the autogynephillic fetishization of neurotypicals themselves whilst hypocritically pathologizing autists for perceptions of the same, along with the usual unverifiable claims of hormonal aetiology despite an over-representation of putatively extreme male-brained autists in the condition.
>
> IT'S WHAT WE CALL IN THE SCIENTIFIC COMMUNITY, HORSE. SHIT.
lol you sound so angry and jealous all the time