Topic: Nexi
Sophie !MLHqI35Srs started this discussion 10 years ago #52,161
You proclaim that the poster of the pimozide study "knows nothing about medical science", yet you had the gumption to proclaim of the entire autistic spectrum a borderline mental retardation universal to it such as to synonymise the two.
I'm not having my condition or my intellectual credentials, provably higher than yours, pissed all over by a fucking autogynephilliac malignerer. I hope you get knifed, or raped by a negroidic AIDS-sufferer, in the near future.
I'm not having my condition or my intellectual credentials, provably higher than yours, pissed all over by a fucking autogynephilliac malignerer. I hope you get knifed, or raped by a negroidic AIDS-sufferer, in the near future.
Mordor joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 4 minutes later[^] [v] #679,133
Only real psychopaths knows that abilities of real psychopaths.
Nexi !jNexusRe/. joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 6 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #679,135
This is pleasant. I love how you felt necessary to actually make a whole thread about this just to announce this to all of minichan. Like I honestly care about what some nut who posts videos about them wanting to kill their therapist on the internet thinks about me.
(Edited 10 seconds later.)
buttons joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 7 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #679,138
wow harsh
Mordor replied with this 10 years ago, 26 seconds later, 8 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #679,140
That is what it all is about in the end .. ME ME ME
Who gives a cracks ass
Who gives a cracks ass
more positive squeegee joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 10 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #679,143
i think you're using the term "intellectul credentils" rahter loosely there, uh, oh yeah, sorry sophie.
that's nice.
that's nice.
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 50 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #679,189
So now Sophie is taking Denmark Guys place of being a whiney little bitch?
Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #679,195
@OP
As a person suffering from Asperger syndrome, Mr. Gillon, you are in no position to question anyone else's intellectual credentials.
As a person suffering from Asperger syndrome, Mr. Gillon, you are in no position to question anyone else's intellectual credentials.
Sophie !MLHqI35Srs (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #679,199
@previous (Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo)
The position that I'm a liar is actually the clue as to what extent my Asperger's syndrome diagnosis is descriptive of anything other than a few disparately coincidental traits, rather than being reflective of a certifiable case of a stereotypical presentation to the syndromic condition proper.
Bona fide, peanut-gallery spergs are too stuck on compulsions to meaningless honesty to knowingly engage in such reputationally-preservative behaviours.
The position that I'm a liar is actually the clue as to what extent my Asperger's syndrome diagnosis is descriptive of anything other than a few disparately coincidental traits, rather than being reflective of a certifiable case of a stereotypical presentation to the syndromic condition proper.
Bona fide, peanut-gallery spergs are too stuck on compulsions to meaningless honesty to knowingly engage in such reputationally-preservative behaviours.
(Edited 46 seconds later.)
offcourse replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #679,202
pay some decent christian dollars now
Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #679,208
@679,199 (Sophie !MLHqI35Srs)
You are a very bad liar, Mr. Gillon. This is because, as a person suffering from Asperger syndrome, you lack the ability to form theory of mind.
You are a very bad liar, Mr. Gillon. This is because, as a person suffering from Asperger syndrome, you lack the ability to form theory of mind.
(Edited 31 seconds later.)
offcourse replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #679,210
my life is all to easy now .. just send them off to the hate market .. cut your leg now
kook !!vzUOyOi/5 joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 30 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #679,212
@679,199 (Sophie !MLHqI35Srs)
That's true though, the very autistic have a hard time being deceptive.
That's true though, the very autistic have a hard time being deceptive.
Sophie !MLHqI35Srs (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #679,219
@679,208 (Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo)
Only in the instances you've caught me out. That would be a marginal fraction, such that your claim is rendered invalid.
@previous (kook !!vzUOyOi/5)
Yes, that would be an issue if I was nearly as autistic as my psychiatrist's predecessors had mistakenly deceived themselves into beleiving.
Only in the instances you've caught me out. That would be a marginal fraction, such that your claim is rendered invalid.
@previous (kook !!vzUOyOi/5)
Yes, that would be an issue if I was nearly as autistic as my psychiatrist's predecessors had mistakenly deceived themselves into beleiving.
Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo replied with this 10 years ago, 10 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #679,223
@previous (Sophie !MLHqI35Srs)
You assume that I tell you every time I notice your attempted deceptions. Your inability to form theory of mind is showing, Mr. Gillon.
You assume that I tell you every time I notice your attempted deceptions. Your inability to form theory of mind is showing, Mr. Gillon.
offcourse replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #679,224
Superior processors are build trough never thinking of nothing. OK
Sophie !MLHqI35Srs (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 28 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #679,225
@679,223 (Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo)
Many of these internalized instances which could be a blatant overestimation of the deceit involved. Tu quoque.
Many of these internalized instances which could be a blatant overestimation of the deceit involved. Tu quoque.
Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo replied with this 10 years ago, 6 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #679,230
@previous (Sophie !MLHqI35Srs)
You always respond with word salad when you know you've been checkmated, Mr. Gillon. This is one such case.
You always respond with word salad when you know you've been checkmated, Mr. Gillon. This is one such case.
offcourse replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #679,231
checkmated. check-mated. mated with check .. who talks like that
Sophie !MLHqI35Srs (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 50 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #679,233
@679,230 (Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo)
An accusation like that just demonstrates that you had failed to apprehend the critique at hand.
An accusation like that just demonstrates that you had failed to apprehend the critique at hand.
Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo replied with this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #679,235
@previous (Sophie !MLHqI35Srs)
There is nothing for the fora to apprehend, Mr. Gillon. What you posted was nothing more than incoherent bluster.
There is nothing for the fora to apprehend, Mr. Gillon. What you posted was nothing more than incoherent bluster.
offcourse replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #679,236
man want to dick female .. where is it to end lulz
Nexi !jNexusRe/. replied with this 10 years ago, 31 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #679,237
@679,199 (Sophie !MLHqI35Srs)
So you literally have aspergers...That is why you got all uppity with me about me saying that guy was an autist!
So you literally have aspergers...That is why you got all uppity with me about me saying that guy was an autist!
Sophie !MLHqI35Srs (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #679,238
@previous (Nexi !jNexusRe/.)
You had conflated borderline retardation with autism. That's insulting to me as an autist with an IQ in the high-110s.
You had conflated borderline retardation with autism. That's insulting to me as an autist with an IQ in the high-110s.
Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #679,239
offcourse replied with this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #679,242
Nexi !jNexusRe/. replied with this 10 years ago, 7 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #679,243
@679,238 (Sophie !MLHqI35Srs)
They are both learning disabilities. I think that is part of your autism, the necessity of using big words that don't exactly fit the conversation in an attempt to make yourself feel superior to those around you when instead you are just a little above average.
High 110's, Oh boy I bet you feel so super special stating your IQ on the internet. That is such a super high IQ I am jelly. IQ is such a silly way of measuring ones intelligence. It is outdated.
They are both learning disabilities. I think that is part of your autism, the necessity of using big words that don't exactly fit the conversation in an attempt to make yourself feel superior to those around you when instead you are just a little above average.
High 110's, Oh boy I bet you feel so super special stating your IQ on the internet. That is such a super high IQ I am jelly. IQ is such a silly way of measuring ones intelligence. It is outdated.
deal replied with this 10 years ago, 4 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #679,246
two good girls taking out the bad one ..Sophie !MLHqI35Srs (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #679,250
@679,243 (Nexi !jNexusRe/.)
There are plenty of neurotypical retards too. The fact you had immediately gone to autism to explain his low-average intelligence behaviour, ubiqutous amongst neurotypical male fetishists of similarly low intelligence, just shows you do not grasp the rudimentary rules of mutual reciprocability in logical operations; that just because there is overlap in something does not imply mutual inclusivity, or conversely, the rarity of something not necessarily implying muual excluisivity.
A lot of the terms I do use are terminologically specific to subject matter that I am covering. If anything it is a contextual strictness, rather than the socially inappropros per se, distinguishable by manner of my autism.
There are plenty of neurotypical retards too. The fact you had immediately gone to autism to explain his low-average intelligence behaviour, ubiqutous amongst neurotypical male fetishists of similarly low intelligence, just shows you do not grasp the rudimentary rules of mutual reciprocability in logical operations; that just because there is overlap in something does not imply mutual inclusivity, or conversely, the rarity of something not necessarily implying muual excluisivity.
A lot of the terms I do use are terminologically specific to subject matter that I am covering. If anything it is a contextual strictness, rather than the socially inappropros per se, distinguishable by manner of my autism.
Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 6 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #679,254
@previous (Sophie !MLHqI35Srs)
You are just as screwy with English as Syntax is. I skip-skim 70+ % of what you write on MC.
You are just as screwy with English as Syntax is. I skip-skim 70+ % of what you write on MC.
Sophie !MLHqI35Srs (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 58 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #679,255
@previous (J)
Darest you conflate Syntax's illiteracy with my hyperliteracy shows demonstrably your own lexical deficiency.
Darest you conflate Syntax's illiteracy with my hyperliteracy shows demonstrably your own lexical deficiency.
Offourse replied with this 10 years ago, 4 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #679,258
Offcourse no one can relax, read proze, and study websters dictionary
Syntax joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #679,259
@679,255 (Sophie !MLHqI35Srs)You twice failed a simple literacy test.
Nor will I ever let you forget it.
Nexi !jNexusRe/. replied with this 10 years ago, 14 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #679,270
@679,250 (Sophie !MLHqI35Srs)
I love how you call me a male fetishist when that is exactly what you are. You just keep projecting your own insecurities onto me and hope that it sticks. He might not be autistic, but I know my therapist wouldn't allow want an autist to transition unless she was absolutely sure. Most aspies have obsessive preocupations (like you) Many therapists are like this. Don't believe me? Here. https://transresearch.info/2014/08/01/gender-dysphoria-in-aspergers-syndrome-a-caution-review/
You are nuttier that a fruitcake, you use word salad on a board that does not require you using half of these words and yet you continually do so. You're whole shtick is you want people to think you are smarter than them and you aren't, you are so preoccupied with using your thesaurus to make your comeback sound "educated". It is as laughable as it is sad. I feel bad for you, I do. This just sets off your autism.
I love how you call me a male fetishist when that is exactly what you are. You just keep projecting your own insecurities onto me and hope that it sticks. He might not be autistic, but I know my therapist wouldn't allow want an autist to transition unless she was absolutely sure. Most aspies have obsessive preocupations (like you) Many therapists are like this. Don't believe me? Here. https://transresearch.info/2014/08/01/gender-dysphoria-in-aspergers-syndrome-a-caution-review/
You are nuttier that a fruitcake, you use word salad on a board that does not require you using half of these words and yet you continually do so. You're whole shtick is you want people to think you are smarter than them and you aren't, you are so preoccupied with using your thesaurus to make your comeback sound "educated". It is as laughable as it is sad. I feel bad for you, I do. This just sets off your autism.
Sophie !MLHqI35Srs (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 4 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #679,271
@previous (Nexi !jNexusRe/.)
Wow, that study was already refuted by me:
Original source: https://mongaran.wordpress.com/2016/05/04/2hu-eublog-has-been-hiatusd-by-my-friend-also-refutation-of-cunster/
You can thank me later.
Wow, that study was already refuted by me:
They did it. It took 257 pages, and I can’t say I’m surprised because this huckster-faggot indeed is a B’nai B’rit, and it’s a popular position there, what I’m surprised about is that it took this long for them to invoke it: the putative mutual exclusivity of Asperger’s and gender dysphoria/transsexualism.
Their mutual exclusivity of course inheres to the idea of the aetiology of Asperger’s as being an extreme masculine neurological form. It has been observed intellectually, at least, for some while, though I’ve my questions as to the nocebic nature of the diagnosis’ impartment of stereotype-threats, such that it degrades the Aspie into a stereotypically neurotic, intellectually overcompensating mess, in lieu of the now-perceived talentlessness of his condition in other domains.
It has not seen itself as observed neuro-infrastructurally at the level of biological micro-anatomy except in Asperger women compared to controls (to which end, the measures looked at in MRIs were neurological laterality and white-matter connectivity). To me, this inheres to the idea that an Aspie male-to-female gender dysphoriac is entirely plausible, if, despite their seeming neurological masculinity, this cornucopia of women are nevertheless content to exist, by and large, as they are.
“Exaggerated masculinity” does not inhere to the idea, necessarily, that such individuals are exhibiting masculine behaviours because it is that to which they identify, and indeed, such questions are never asked on the a priori presumption that, in the event of an answer of conformity to characteristic stereotype being in the negative and that they are unhappy with acting stereotypically to their condition’s bounds but feel a pressure to do so nevertheless, this must take in itself pathological form.
In fact, if people were thinking realistically within the context of gender incongruity, these are classic overcompensatory behaviours, probably being engaged in far more than would be expected were we more candid and less evasive about the question of opening up inquiry to the phenomenon.
In the 2 case studies Cunster specifically cited, there wasn’t really an indication that these individuals were gender dysphoric at all, but it could be that the degree of discouragement took a more devious level of deliberate negligence, clandestine colleagiate-rousing, and group-consensus intimidatory brow-beating as a consequence thereof, than the case study is even suggesting. And in any case, these 2 case studies plus the 10-or-so others available on the site are far from reflective of medical practice, in which there would be a definite incentive to under-report it given endemic preconceptions to the two conditions’ relatability.
The owner of the blog transresearch, had the poster Cuntster bothered plugging in a more thorough-going rigour in their efforts, seems to openly question the premise that autism and gender dysphoria are mutually exclusive, and attacks the presumption of the pathological nature of the latter in context of the former in several of the other case studies they have linked. Often it was case of not enough of the correct questions being asked on part of the practitioner or the right parameters being considered by the researcher. In other cases, it was clear they were deliberately conflating the nature of transgenderism and a “paraphillic obsession” in a specially pleading case whereby expression of gender dysphoric sentiments may only ever be trivialized as such in autism.
In all, the blog owner actually seems solicitious enough to the idea that there is a deliberate suppression of investigation on MtF transgenders on the spectrum since it fails to adhere to what, in recent years, autism has been reduced to as a proximial conduit of: badly hypothesized gender theorism, a hypothesis which doesn’t translate to results except in a minority (and seemingly exclusively born-women) on the spectrum.
Their mutual exclusivity of course inheres to the idea of the aetiology of Asperger’s as being an extreme masculine neurological form. It has been observed intellectually, at least, for some while, though I’ve my questions as to the nocebic nature of the diagnosis’ impartment of stereotype-threats, such that it degrades the Aspie into a stereotypically neurotic, intellectually overcompensating mess, in lieu of the now-perceived talentlessness of his condition in other domains.
It has not seen itself as observed neuro-infrastructurally at the level of biological micro-anatomy except in Asperger women compared to controls (to which end, the measures looked at in MRIs were neurological laterality and white-matter connectivity). To me, this inheres to the idea that an Aspie male-to-female gender dysphoriac is entirely plausible, if, despite their seeming neurological masculinity, this cornucopia of women are nevertheless content to exist, by and large, as they are.
“Exaggerated masculinity” does not inhere to the idea, necessarily, that such individuals are exhibiting masculine behaviours because it is that to which they identify, and indeed, such questions are never asked on the a priori presumption that, in the event of an answer of conformity to characteristic stereotype being in the negative and that they are unhappy with acting stereotypically to their condition’s bounds but feel a pressure to do so nevertheless, this must take in itself pathological form.
In fact, if people were thinking realistically within the context of gender incongruity, these are classic overcompensatory behaviours, probably being engaged in far more than would be expected were we more candid and less evasive about the question of opening up inquiry to the phenomenon.
In the 2 case studies Cunster specifically cited, there wasn’t really an indication that these individuals were gender dysphoric at all, but it could be that the degree of discouragement took a more devious level of deliberate negligence, clandestine colleagiate-rousing, and group-consensus intimidatory brow-beating as a consequence thereof, than the case study is even suggesting. And in any case, these 2 case studies plus the 10-or-so others available on the site are far from reflective of medical practice, in which there would be a definite incentive to under-report it given endemic preconceptions to the two conditions’ relatability.
The owner of the blog transresearch, had the poster Cuntster bothered plugging in a more thorough-going rigour in their efforts, seems to openly question the premise that autism and gender dysphoria are mutually exclusive, and attacks the presumption of the pathological nature of the latter in context of the former in several of the other case studies they have linked. Often it was case of not enough of the correct questions being asked on part of the practitioner or the right parameters being considered by the researcher. In other cases, it was clear they were deliberately conflating the nature of transgenderism and a “paraphillic obsession” in a specially pleading case whereby expression of gender dysphoric sentiments may only ever be trivialized as such in autism.
In all, the blog owner actually seems solicitious enough to the idea that there is a deliberate suppression of investigation on MtF transgenders on the spectrum since it fails to adhere to what, in recent years, autism has been reduced to as a proximial conduit of: badly hypothesized gender theorism, a hypothesis which doesn’t translate to results except in a minority (and seemingly exclusively born-women) on the spectrum.
Original source: https://mongaran.wordpress.com/2016/05/04/2hu-eublog-has-been-hiatusd-by-my-friend-also-refutation-of-cunster/
You can thank me later.
anonymous R replied with this 10 years ago, 50 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #679,272
@679,259 (Syntax)
> You twice failed a simple literacy test.
> Nor will I ever let you forget it.
just do as i say, or perhaps as you say
> You twice failed a simple literacy test.
> Nor will I ever let you forget it.
just do as i say, or perhaps as you say
Anonymous J replied with this 10 years ago, 35 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #679,273
@679,270 (Nexi !jNexusRe/.)
Ooooops This reply is from Syntax
Dang Autfag wants to be a chick with or without a dick just like you.
> You are nuttier that a fruitcake
Yes how true YET that fits you as well. Autfag just has more bats in his belfry.
Ooooops This reply is from Syntax
Dang Autfag wants to be a chick with or without a dick just like you.
> You are nuttier that a fruitcake
Yes how true YET that fits you as well. Autfag just has more bats in his belfry.
(Edited 4 minutes later.)
Syntax double-posted this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #679,274
@679,272 (anonymous R)
> just do as i say, or perhaps as you say
I am referring to his attempt to use Benadryl to join Allah and the 72 virgins. He looked up on the web the amount necessary and of course with his very low IQ failed to understand simple English and a list of numbers.
So sure everyone makes mistrakes Alas he tried a 2nd time months later making the same basic mistrake. Just about any 12 year old with a computer could have figured it out
> just do as i say, or perhaps as you say
I am referring to his attempt to use Benadryl to join Allah and the 72 virgins. He looked up on the web the amount necessary and of course with his very low IQ failed to understand simple English and a list of numbers.
So sure everyone makes mistrakes Alas he tried a 2nd time months later making the same basic mistrake. Just about any 12 year old with a computer could have figured it out
Nexi !jNexusRe/. replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #679,275
@679,271 (Sophie !MLHqI35Srs)
Refuted by you?? Who do you think you are? A fucking professional? You are some asshole on the internet, nobody is ever going to give a flying fuck about this. You aren't a doctor, you aren't a professional, you aren't a therapist. You literally resort to ad-hominem in the first sentence of your "argument".
Refuted by you?? Who do you think you are? A fucking professional? You are some asshole on the internet, nobody is ever going to give a flying fuck about this. You aren't a doctor, you aren't a professional, you aren't a therapist. You literally resort to ad-hominem in the first sentence of your "argument".
Sophie !MLHqI35Srs (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 18 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #679,276
@679,274 (Syntax)
Absorption, expedition of saving, etc., are all factors affecting the success of a suicidal endeavour far outwith the locus of control of the atemptee. Stop being an obtuse, empathy-devoid codger.
Absorption, expedition of saving, etc., are all factors affecting the success of a suicidal endeavour far outwith the locus of control of the atemptee. Stop being an obtuse, empathy-devoid codger.
Nexi !jNexusRe/. replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #679,277
Sophie !MLHqI35Srs (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #679,278
@679,275 (Nexi !jNexusRe/.)
You use these terms, "doctor", "therapist", "professional", in a threatening manner as if we are to be threatened by the prima facie presumpion of such a legitimacy's infallibility. It's a cheap attempt at using an authoritarian talisman that I'm not buying, because they frankly contradict with my logic, deepest of convictions, and feelings on the matter, and inform the natural arsenal of argumentative rhetoric at my employ, with which I use to refute this arbitrarily brandished heavyweight of deliberate negligence -- in this case, conspired against two Aspies who would naturally be more intimidatable and discouragable by manner of their social isolaion.
The problem is, these two do not represent all Aspie gender dysphoriacs, and had probably been of a mental state too intellectually marginal for the solidifcation of conviction.
You use these terms, "doctor", "therapist", "professional", in a threatening manner as if we are to be threatened by the prima facie presumpion of such a legitimacy's infallibility. It's a cheap attempt at using an authoritarian talisman that I'm not buying, because they frankly contradict with my logic, deepest of convictions, and feelings on the matter, and inform the natural arsenal of argumentative rhetoric at my employ, with which I use to refute this arbitrarily brandished heavyweight of deliberate negligence -- in this case, conspired against two Aspies who would naturally be more intimidatable and discouragable by manner of their social isolaion.
The problem is, these two do not represent all Aspie gender dysphoriacs, and had probably been of a mental state too intellectually marginal for the solidifcation of conviction.
anonymous R replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #679,279
Beeeautiful prize which i can not utter .. could you give a discourse on "or not" sensitivity ? What the layman considers "dancing" ?@679,271 (Sophie !MLHqI35Srs)
Nexi !jNexusRe/. replied with this 10 years ago, 44 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #679,280
@679,276 (Sophie !MLHqI35Srs)
Look sophie. Lets have a truce. We are both trans and we both need to stop fighting each other. We need to support each other on this board because we are both being attacked. If you are done hurling shit like two grown gorillas I am too.
We need to defend each other from all of the other assholes who are attacking us. We both have our issues but neither of us should be subject to being called freaks or non worse "males". I want to bury the hatchet.
Look sophie. Lets have a truce. We are both trans and we both need to stop fighting each other. We need to support each other on this board because we are both being attacked. If you are done hurling shit like two grown gorillas I am too.
We need to defend each other from all of the other assholes who are attacking us. We both have our issues but neither of us should be subject to being called freaks or non worse "males". I want to bury the hatchet.
Nexi !jNexusRe/. double-posted this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #679,281
@679,278 (Sophie !MLHqI35Srs)
I am telling you, they went to school for years to learn this stuff, they aren't doing anything out of spite for you or anyone. They just want to help.
I am telling you, they went to school for years to learn this stuff, they aren't doing anything out of spite for you or anyone. They just want to help.
Syntax replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #679,283
RobbiesGold replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #679,284
diagnosed: unequivocally religious ... no more diagnose required .. you type it
Sophie !MLHqI35Srs (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 19 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #679,287
@679,280 (Nexi !jNexusRe/.)
Ultimately, mistake my arguing as little more: I argue because it benefits me. I've more to use against my therapist the more often I'm opposed. You at least attempt, I suppose, to do it semi-legitimately (on the basis you do feel yourself to be engaging in concerns legitimate to yourself), whilst others are basically hurling hurtfully demeaning epiphets in the hope they can wear me down. It hasn't worked yet because I'm made of more solid stuff, irrespective of what my psychiatrist wishes to make of my putative "emotional instability". I've nothing against your transgenderism.
I do wonder why, outside of the obvious systemic difference (in America, even autists are taken more considerately and seriously), they treat individuals like you, on the seemingly arbitrary basis of reported 'sanity' on your end, less belligerently, as if I can somehow be regarded more unstable merely by virtue of my difference in presentability and natural approach, as if my style of being must indict a core rottenness.
I will always view that to be a case of special pleading on the part of individuals like you, not due to ill-will, but on the extremely aggreiving presumption that I must've been acting on bad faith at all times with respect to this, when I wasn't. It feels like nothing short of betrayal, and none of this is necessarily your fault, but a cynicism of the system that seems to view people like yourself more expendient than folk like myself.
It'll be a long and tiring, though nevertheless, worthwhile, life of ponderance and philosophization on this one. That is my overarching obsession and joy in life, over and above my gender dysphoric characteristics.
Ultimately, mistake my arguing as little more: I argue because it benefits me. I've more to use against my therapist the more often I'm opposed. You at least attempt, I suppose, to do it semi-legitimately (on the basis you do feel yourself to be engaging in concerns legitimate to yourself), whilst others are basically hurling hurtfully demeaning epiphets in the hope they can wear me down. It hasn't worked yet because I'm made of more solid stuff, irrespective of what my psychiatrist wishes to make of my putative "emotional instability". I've nothing against your transgenderism.
I do wonder why, outside of the obvious systemic difference (in America, even autists are taken more considerately and seriously), they treat individuals like you, on the seemingly arbitrary basis of reported 'sanity' on your end, less belligerently, as if I can somehow be regarded more unstable merely by virtue of my difference in presentability and natural approach, as if my style of being must indict a core rottenness.
I will always view that to be a case of special pleading on the part of individuals like you, not due to ill-will, but on the extremely aggreiving presumption that I must've been acting on bad faith at all times with respect to this, when I wasn't. It feels like nothing short of betrayal, and none of this is necessarily your fault, but a cynicism of the system that seems to view people like yourself more expendient than folk like myself.
It'll be a long and tiring, though nevertheless, worthwhile, life of ponderance and philosophization on this one. That is my overarching obsession and joy in life, over and above my gender dysphoric characteristics.
(Edited 1 minute later.)
RobbiesHater replied with this 10 years ago, 7 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #679,289
@679,284 (RobbiesGold)
> diagnosed: unequivocally religious ... no more diagnose required .. you type it
What .. you are not religious. I AAAM religious ... FUCK YOU
> diagnosed: unequivocally religious ... no more diagnose required .. you type it
What .. you are not religious. I AAAM religious ... FUCK YOU
Anonymous I replied with this 10 years ago, 4 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #679,290
@previous (RobbiesHater)
Religion. Children are fed pablum. Religion is pablum for the masses. Religion is a form of gurel.
Fairy tales can come true they can happen to you. Just remember they are Fairy Tales.
Religion. Children are fed pablum. Religion is pablum for the masses. Religion is a form of gurel.
Fairy tales can come true they can happen to you. Just remember they are Fairy Tales.
RobbiesHater replied with this 10 years ago, 6 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #679,291
@previous (I)
> Religion. Children are fed pablum. Religion is pablum for the masses. Religion is a form of gurel.
> Fairy tales can come true they can happen to you. Just remember they are Fairy Tales.
Pet Shop Boy's: It's a sin
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tffTrA1dbag
> Religion. Children are fed pablum. Religion is pablum for the masses. Religion is a form of gurel.
> Fairy tales can come true they can happen to you. Just remember they are Fairy Tales.
Pet Shop Boy's: It's a sin
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tffTrA1dbag
Mordor double-posted this 10 years ago, 12 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #679,302
May i not have opinions even if they are not poetically put ?
Anonymous J replied with this 10 years ago, 5 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #679,305
@previous (Mordor)
Whatever you may think or affect to think of the present age, you cannot get out of it; you must suffer with its sufferings, and enjoy with its enjoyments; you must share in its lot, and, to be either useful or at ease, you must even partake its character.
Whatever you may think or affect to think of the present age, you cannot get out of it; you must suffer with its sufferings, and enjoy with its enjoyments; you must share in its lot, and, to be either useful or at ease, you must even partake its character.
Mordor replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #679,306
Oh I choose whatever I like .. I am merely raw on the search for merit
Nexi !jNexusRe/. replied with this 10 years ago, 32 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #679,307
@679,287 (Sophie !MLHqI35Srs)
I argue because I wish to defend myself. I am tired of the doubt thrust upon me by this board as whether transgender exists or not, or whether I am or not. I am quite frankly tired of hearing it. I respect you for at least standing by how you feel and not being swayed. I do the same. I guess that is one way we are similar, neither of us take shit when our status as transgender individuals is called into question. We both defend it with everything.
It is easier to be treated here, in some respects it also brings out a lot of people who obviously should not transition. I have met a couple of transwomen that are exactly what you think I am and it disgusts me. They manipulated the doctors and therapists out here to get their hormones. I know one "transman" who is not at all but her boyfriend wanted T and she went to my IC clinic to get it and the only reason they caught her was because of the bloodwork. It happens here, there are too many scams. There are a lot of problems with it but it prevents people from suffering needlessly when they are actually trans. Honestly it isn't right to transition just because you want to look better in drag or because you want to attract more men by looking like a girl or a trap and it happens here a lot. Although the NHS system is painfully slow it does weed out people like them. I didn't go that course until i was 100% sure I was transgender and I want you to really understand that. It was not a decision I made lightly at all, I truly struggled for years before I took my first hormones. Before I made my first appointment. I actually scheduled an appointment with the IC clinic last year but was so scared to go I never went and they brought it up the last time I was there in March. This isn't something that I exactly wanted so to speak, I was raised different, I was raised religiously. I just sort of ended up being this way and I have to play the cards I am dealt.
I won't ever go back and I don't think you will either. There is too much at stake for me to just give up. I don't want to go back to who I was before, that was just a shell of a man, death walking. This gave me a renewed vigor I haven't had since I felt my first love. In fact that the exact kind of joy I felt the first time I took my first dose; Happy, what that word truly means and I think you know how that feels too.
I argue because I wish to defend myself. I am tired of the doubt thrust upon me by this board as whether transgender exists or not, or whether I am or not. I am quite frankly tired of hearing it. I respect you for at least standing by how you feel and not being swayed. I do the same. I guess that is one way we are similar, neither of us take shit when our status as transgender individuals is called into question. We both defend it with everything.
It is easier to be treated here, in some respects it also brings out a lot of people who obviously should not transition. I have met a couple of transwomen that are exactly what you think I am and it disgusts me. They manipulated the doctors and therapists out here to get their hormones. I know one "transman" who is not at all but her boyfriend wanted T and she went to my IC clinic to get it and the only reason they caught her was because of the bloodwork. It happens here, there are too many scams. There are a lot of problems with it but it prevents people from suffering needlessly when they are actually trans. Honestly it isn't right to transition just because you want to look better in drag or because you want to attract more men by looking like a girl or a trap and it happens here a lot. Although the NHS system is painfully slow it does weed out people like them. I didn't go that course until i was 100% sure I was transgender and I want you to really understand that. It was not a decision I made lightly at all, I truly struggled for years before I took my first hormones. Before I made my first appointment. I actually scheduled an appointment with the IC clinic last year but was so scared to go I never went and they brought it up the last time I was there in March. This isn't something that I exactly wanted so to speak, I was raised different, I was raised religiously. I just sort of ended up being this way and I have to play the cards I am dealt.
I won't ever go back and I don't think you will either. There is too much at stake for me to just give up. I don't want to go back to who I was before, that was just a shell of a man, death walking. This gave me a renewed vigor I haven't had since I felt my first love. In fact that the exact kind of joy I felt the first time I took my first dose; Happy, what that word truly means and I think you know how that feels too.
Metæ joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 6 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #679,309
@previous (Nexi !jNexusRe/.)
It's impossible to argue with Sophie. It's like trying to win a game of poker with a checkmate. Sophie is playing by different rules altogether.
It's impossible to argue with Sophie. It's like trying to win a game of poker with a checkmate. Sophie is playing by different rules altogether.
Nexi !jNexusRe/. replied with this 10 years ago, 10 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #679,313
Nexi !jNexusRe/. double-posted this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #679,314
@679,309 (Metæ)
In all honesty though I just don't understand why we are both pointing out each others flaws with being trans when we obviously are both transgender when it is just getting the faggot anons who are transphobic hard-ons.
It is time for peace among transgenders on this board. No more infighting, it just makes us both look like idiots.
In all honesty though I just don't understand why we are both pointing out each others flaws with being trans when we obviously are both transgender when it is just getting the faggot anons who are transphobic hard-ons.
It is time for peace among transgenders on this board. No more infighting, it just makes us both look like idiots.
kook !!vzUOyOi/5 replied with this 10 years ago, 18 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #679,315
@previous (Nexi !jNexusRe/.)
You kind of started it with Sophie days ago, by calling her a fake tranny.
You kind of started it with Sophie days ago, by calling her a fake tranny.
hamfist !0Ynig1RSDc joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #679,316
caaaat fiiiiiiiiiiiiiight
buttons replied with this 10 years ago, 6 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #679,319
Syntax replied with this 10 years ago, 4 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #679,323
@679,315 (kook !!vzUOyOi/5)
> You kind of started it with Sophie days ago, by calling her a fake tranny.
Nexi can pull a Trump. Say anything he wants to say and then pretend it was never said
Nexi has not been around here in ages. He has no clue how often Autfag has made agreements to agree and then it blows up in a few hours and Autfag goes off and creates a blog and exposes everything including making up shit. Frankly I will get out the popcorn cause you and I have seen this so many times before. Where is WSD when I need him.
Or how much Cathy tried to help and become friends and ended up in shit over it. Trusting Autfag is well its like trusting Trump to have ethics
> You kind of started it with Sophie days ago, by calling her a fake tranny.
Nexi can pull a Trump. Say anything he wants to say and then pretend it was never said
Nexi has not been around here in ages. He has no clue how often Autfag has made agreements to agree and then it blows up in a few hours and Autfag goes off and creates a blog and exposes everything including making up shit. Frankly I will get out the popcorn cause you and I have seen this so many times before. Where is WSD when I need him.
Or how much Cathy tried to help and become friends and ended up in shit over it. Trusting Autfag is well its like trusting Trump to have ethics
Metæ replied with this 10 years ago, 6 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #679,328
@679,314 (Nexi !jNexusRe/.)
I could see a truce or a pact where Minichan's transgender posters agree not to question each others' trans authenticity, but there will still be arguments because Sophie is - gender aside- totally insane and impossible to reason with.
I could see a truce or a pact where Minichan's transgender posters agree not to question each others' trans authenticity, but there will still be arguments because Sophie is - gender aside- totally insane and impossible to reason with.
(Edited 1 minute later.)
Nexi !jNexusRe/. replied with this 10 years ago, 5 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #679,331
@679,315 (kook !!vzUOyOi/5)
I jumped on the "Lets everybody hate on sophie" bandwagon thread. Now that I kind of know her things have changed and I regret my earlier behavior. That isn't who I am, I get defensive easily. I should not have spoken like that. I want peace to return to these boards among the trans population. She has every right to be transgender just like I have every right to be and I am willing to let the past be the past. No animosity here.
@679,323 (Syntax)
I will wear my combover with style. I have not, I actually had shit to do in my life versus spending it here and I would do it all over the same way again. It took a long time for things in my life to stabilize. I came back when my life was back in order You have absolutely no idea what I have went through, but that is ok, you suck cocks anyways.
If Auphfag decides to do that then this time it won't be my fault. I tried to bury the hatchet and I did the right thing by doing so. Maybe auphfag cant be helped, maybe she can. I would like to personally know that/
I jumped on the "Lets everybody hate on sophie" bandwagon thread. Now that I kind of know her things have changed and I regret my earlier behavior. That isn't who I am, I get defensive easily. I should not have spoken like that. I want peace to return to these boards among the trans population. She has every right to be transgender just like I have every right to be and I am willing to let the past be the past. No animosity here.
@679,323 (Syntax)
I will wear my combover with style. I have not, I actually had shit to do in my life versus spending it here and I would do it all over the same way again. It took a long time for things in my life to stabilize. I came back when my life was back in order You have absolutely no idea what I have went through, but that is ok, you suck cocks anyways.
If Auphfag decides to do that then this time it won't be my fault. I tried to bury the hatchet and I did the right thing by doing so. Maybe auphfag cant be helped, maybe she can. I would like to personally know that/
kook !!vzUOyOi/5 replied with this 10 years ago, 4 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #679,334
@previous (Nexi !jNexusRe/.)
If you're willing to jump on such a bandwagon, than you might be such a person. Just saying.
Either way, you should probably address her directly. It'll help make your time here more pleasant.
If you're willing to jump on such a bandwagon, than you might be such a person. Just saying.
Either way, you should probably address her directly. It'll help make your time here more pleasant.
Syntax replied with this 10 years ago, 7 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #679,335
@679,331 (Nexi !jNexusRe/.)> but that is ok, you suck cocks anyways.
Yep a typical fucked up Transvestite Drag Queen argument you have going there.
LoL
Guess you are trying as hard as you can to get prissy and role play a Transvestite - Good for you.
Metæ replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #679,340
@679,331 (Nexi !jNexusRe/.)
Sophie's reputation here is 1% due to her being transgendered, and 99% to her being hateful and batshit crazy.
Sophie's reputation here is 1% due to her being transgendered, and 99% to her being hateful and batshit crazy.
kook !!vzUOyOi/5 replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #679,342
Nexi !jNexusRe/. replied with this 10 years ago, 12 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #679,349
@679,334 (kook !!vzUOyOi/5)
I did.
@679,335 (Syntax)
> Ad Hominem
That is honestly the best you can do, call me names. Can't actually respond to the argument, it is beyond you to do so, instead you just resort to this. That is how much your argument has devolved. It makes no sense, you know it makes no sense, yet you keep trying because you have too many screws loose to notice.
@679,340 (Metæ)
I think 90% of the posters here are crazy. You are sane though.
I did.
@679,335 (Syntax)
> Ad Hominem
That is honestly the best you can do, call me names. Can't actually respond to the argument, it is beyond you to do so, instead you just resort to this. That is how much your argument has devolved. It makes no sense, you know it makes no sense, yet you keep trying because you have too many screws loose to notice.
@679,340 (Metæ)
I think 90% of the posters here are crazy. You are sane though.
Sophie !MLHqI35Srs (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #679,352
@679,340 (Metæ)
I.e. "waah I can't appreciate good philosophical discourse and have to emotionalize it, ruining it for everyone inolved".
@679,331 (Nexi !jNexusRe/.)
@679,307 (Nexi !jNexusRe/.)
I sorely misestimated you. Obviously, insofar as we have a similarity of experience, it seems there's the gulf of you having first-hand experience of open malignerers, but as far as I can see, it always seems to be those most loudly screaming in proclamation to the top of their lungs the truthfulness of their nature that end up taking these tricks less openly and far more clandestinely. For instance, you've admitted to knowledge of self-medding -- something you don't actually do, of course, but you do endorse it and don't appear to speak out against those who secretly do so for years simply to increase the putative femininity of their presentation as a means of circumventing gatekeeping procedure, for example. That's just one specific hypothetical situation that comes to mind.
A lot of debauchery exists in the community within the confines of its loudest proponents. You may even end up falling to unwittingly endorsing such corruption yourself. Vigilance is a virtue and you can only exercise it ever so far.
I.e. "waah I can't appreciate good philosophical discourse and have to emotionalize it, ruining it for everyone inolved".
@679,331 (Nexi !jNexusRe/.)
@679,307 (Nexi !jNexusRe/.)
I sorely misestimated you. Obviously, insofar as we have a similarity of experience, it seems there's the gulf of you having first-hand experience of open malignerers, but as far as I can see, it always seems to be those most loudly screaming in proclamation to the top of their lungs the truthfulness of their nature that end up taking these tricks less openly and far more clandestinely. For instance, you've admitted to knowledge of self-medding -- something you don't actually do, of course, but you do endorse it and don't appear to speak out against those who secretly do so for years simply to increase the putative femininity of their presentation as a means of circumventing gatekeeping procedure, for example. That's just one specific hypothetical situation that comes to mind.
A lot of debauchery exists in the community within the confines of its loudest proponents. You may even end up falling to unwittingly endorsing such corruption yourself. Vigilance is a virtue and you can only exercise it ever so far.
Nexi !jNexusRe/. replied with this 10 years ago, 6 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #679,356
@previous (Sophie !MLHqI35Srs)
I self medicate other medications, I know my shit about prescriptions and doses. I could be a pharmacist if I went to school and did it...I actually might. I don't have a problem with self medicating, I think it is dangerous and stupid of you don't know what you are doing but self medicating in itself is jumping through its own hoops.
I self medicate other medications, I know my shit about prescriptions and doses. I could be a pharmacist if I went to school and did it...I actually might. I don't have a problem with self medicating, I think it is dangerous and stupid of you don't know what you are doing but self medicating in itself is jumping through its own hoops.
Metæ replied with this 10 years ago, 5 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #679,360
@679,349 (Nexi !jNexusRe/.)
Thank you. I've had a few existential crises though.
@679,342 (kook !!vzUOyOi/5)
I'm really surprised Sophie hasn't "accidentally" hit her head repeatedly on Haselgrove's copy of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. I want to meet this Doctor Haselgrove. I think she might literally be a saint.
Thank you. I've had a few existential crises though.
@679,342 (kook !!vzUOyOi/5)
I'm really surprised Sophie hasn't "accidentally" hit her head repeatedly on Haselgrove's copy of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. I want to meet this Doctor Haselgrove. I think she might literally be a saint.
Sophie !MLHqI35Srs (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 36 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #679,361
@679,356 (Nexi !jNexusRe/.)
It's not difficult, honestly. You're never going to run into a problem so long as you take nothing near its toxic lethal limit; for those adverse reactions that potentially may occur, your body warns you well in advance with something severe enough, though unlethal, to prime you in the direction of its cessation. That much is instinctual to anybody unfoolish. I've experimented a lot in this way and it hasn't really killed or harmed me yet.
It's not difficult, honestly. You're never going to run into a problem so long as you take nothing near its toxic lethal limit; for those adverse reactions that potentially may occur, your body warns you well in advance with something severe enough, though unlethal, to prime you in the direction of its cessation. That much is instinctual to anybody unfoolish. I've experimented a lot in this way and it hasn't really killed or harmed me yet.
Sophie !MLHqI35Srs (OP) double-posted this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #679,362
@679,360 (Metæ)
Eherm, it's International Classification of Diseases, 10th Edition in Europoor-land.
Eherm, it's International Classification of Diseases, 10th Edition in Europoor-land.
RWBY Rhubarb? !!iNo3FkiZx joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #679,363
well that was a threadMetæ replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #679,365
RWBY Rhubarb? !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 10 years ago, 58 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #679,367
kook !!vzUOyOi/5 replied with this 10 years ago, 37 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #679,370
Metæ replied with this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #679,371
@previous (kook !!vzUOyOi/5)
Sophie could cancel it out by overdosing on something that positively affects judgement. Like benzos and cheap wine.
Sophie could cancel it out by overdosing on something that positively affects judgement. Like benzos and cheap wine.
Sophie !MLHqI35Srs (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #679,372
@previous (Metæ)
My judgement is never fallible, it just ends in consequences that other people expedite outwith my locus of control.
My judgement is never fallible, it just ends in consequences that other people expedite outwith my locus of control.
kook !!vzUOyOi/5 replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #679,375
Sophie !MLHqI35Srs (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #679,377
@previous (kook !!vzUOyOi/5)
Sedation means other people can control me and force me to detransition. What are you thinking? ;_;
Sedation means other people can control me and force me to detransition. What are you thinking? ;_;
kook !!vzUOyOi/5 replied with this 10 years ago, 4 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #679,378
Anonymous O joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 2 hours later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #679,399
@679,133 (Mordor)
> Only real psychopaths knows that abilities of real psychopaths.
I'm glad your're back. Real talk.
> Only real psychopaths knows that abilities of real psychopaths.
I'm glad your're back. Real talk.
chili dog !!81dzJNNYL joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 1 hour later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #679,407
what a buttery thread
EXACTLY replied with this 10 years ago, 12 hours later, 22 hours after the original post[^] [v] #679,800
After a mortal is being forced to life-threatening hostility and vehemence for its intricate expedience of protecting itself meantime the agony and anguish that he is suffering is not being reasoned, plus as it is viewed upon as if it were a bare idiot human being, which has his eyes toppling out of its sockets when a dickhead begins to babble out of his ass on the streets … that person, who had the life’s history of a servant - in his deprivation - might just take the turn to corporeal hostility and out of its absolute rage as raw fear of manslaughter cracks the fucking molars out of the face of a that wanker who was shitmouthing.Anonymous XXX double-posted this 10 years ago, 30 minutes later, 23 hours after the original post[^] [v] #679,804
watch the psychotranny