Denmark guy !jJEom8Ii3E started this discussion 10 years ago#52,068
No such thing as a 20 dollar suicide, because you have to take account of the income lost by not being able to work (because you dead) which means that you are better off just living until you die, it's cheaper.
Just because you dead doesn't mean you have not made a bad financial decision. Which basically was a very expensive decision.
Adam Djensen replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 17 minutes after the original post[^][v]#677,322
@previous (Denmark guy !jJEom8Ii3E)
It doesn't cost you anything, you will just stop gaining money after you killed yourself at which point it does not matter because you, indeed, dead.
Anonymous B replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 18 minutes after the original post[^][v]#677,323
@677,321 (Denmark guy !jJEom8Ii3E)
Wouldn't that mean that being dead is infinitely expensive because of all the days you could have spent making money?
(Edited 22 seconds later.)
Denmark guy !jJEom8Ii3E (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 5 minutes later, 23 minutes after the original post[^][v]#677,324
Not infinitely, just the amount of days you could have lived extra.
Anonymous B replied with this 10 years ago, 5 minutes later, 32 minutes after the original post[^][v]#677,326
@previous (Denmark guy !jJEom8Ii3E)
What if you could live an infinitely extra amount of days? I talked to this guy, Ben Green, about living forever by jumping time loops. He started a religion called recursivism or racialism or something. I think it involved reptilians.
Denmark guy !jJEom8Ii3E (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 35 minutes after the original post[^][v]#677,327
So the price for no expenses is all your income forever plus not being able to appreciate the purchase in the first place? That's a shitty deal, gotta be insane to accept such a deal.
Anonymous D replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#677,340
@previous (Denmark guy !jJEom8Ii3E)
no expenses and no income means you have infinity wealth. sounds like a good deal to me.
!MLHqI35Srs joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#677,341
@previous (D)
You're assuming a divisory operand. Let's not pretend you're playing with mathematics and just admit you miss Denmark's point in an overestimation of your ability to troll him as usual.
Anonymous D replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#677,342
@previous (!MLHqI35Srs) > implying you can even wrap your head around basic math
!MLHqI35Srs replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#677,343
@previous (D)
I did, and called you out for your bullshit, didn't I?
Anonymous D replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#677,344
@previous (!MLHqI35Srs)
im not sure what you are trying to say, maybe write a wordsalad about it? im sure we all would appreciate your genius negro-insights
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 5 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#677,346
Technically, having a job that pays less than every dollar currently in the world is expensive, because you are earning so much less than the maximum possible amount.
Adam Djensen replied with this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#677,349
@677,336 (Denmark guy !jJEom8Ii3E)
im not dead now but i havent fucking killed myself. until i kill myself there will be no lack of income and once i do it doesnt matter because i am dead
Denmark guy !jJEom8Ii3E (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#677,351
Don't get all butt hurt over making a mistake, we all make them.
Anonymous D replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#677,353
@previous (Denmark guy !jJEom8Ii3E)
no mistake, autphag is just one of those pseudo-intellectual people who are simply impossible to take serious. still waiting for that wordsalad by the way. anyway, back to your initial premise which makes 0 fucking sense since we're apparently being pedantic, income lost is not the same as expenses so go away
Denmark guy !jJEom8Ii3E (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 7 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#677,356
Nothing what you do matters, if you kill yourself in the end?
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#677,357
@previous (Denmark guy !jJEom8Ii3E)
No it's not true you fucking arghhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh. MONEY YOU HAVE NOT EARNED IS NOT A COST. YOU DONT STARVE TO DEATH BECAUSE YOU HAVE ONLY EATEN .000001% OF THE FOOD IN THE WORLD. FUCK. Goddamn, I would not even consider reality concrete at this point.
Denmark guy !jJEom8Ii3E (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 21 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#677,358
When people have a chance to quit their high paying job and work in their low paying dream job.... Do you know what the first question usually is?
Can I afford it?
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 10 years ago, 5 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^][v]#677,360
@previous (Denmark guy !jJEom8Ii3E)
Yes. "Can I afford the reduction of income if my expenses are $X?". Not " Can I afford the expense of making money, but not as much as I used to?"
Denmark guy !jJEom8Ii3E (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 8 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^][v]#677,365
Your point about the difference in these two questions?
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 10 years ago, 4 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^][v]#677,366
@previous (Denmark guy !jJEom8Ii3E)
Um...one is the way people actually think about things and the other is your bizarre alternate universe conception of how people think about things.
Denmark guy !jJEom8Ii3E (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 5 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^][v]#677,370
You mean my universe where it would cost a reduction in income to quit your job for a lower paying dream job?
That's a universe that exists despite you claiming there is no cost to not earning money. The cost is the money you don't earn.
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 10 years ago, 17 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^][v]#677,383
@previous (Denmark guy !jJEom8Ii3E)
There is an opportunity cost for every economic decision but there are no EXPENSES in this one. You don't SPEND the difference in income by earning less money than you did before.
Earning less =/= spending more
(Edited 47 seconds later.)
beckyderp !Hi.HILLARY joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^][v]#677,385
This is another example of why I am pro-Denmark Guy now. Look at how mad he made Fake anon! Threads grate.
Denmark guy !jJEom8Ii3E (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 22 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^][v]#677,390
FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 1 hour later, 4 hours after the original post[^][v]#677,408
> implying money has actual value > implying a life has value
lol
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 10 years ago, 4 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^][v]#677,411
@677,390 (Denmark guy !jJEom8Ii3E)
You are abusing the word "cost". Fuck. Let's say you earn $3000/month. Your rent + utilities + food + transportation (your EXPENSES) total $1500, and so your disposable income is $1500. Let's say you decide to work at a job that now pays only $2000/month. Your EXPENSES are UNCHANGED. they are still $1500/month. What has changed is your INCOME has DROPPED meaning you have less disposable income. FUCK. You have $1000 less to spend but you aren't spending any more. Income. Down. Expenses. Same.
FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI replied with this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^][v]#677,414
@previous (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
Whereas with suicide, income AND expenses BOTH become $0
Denmark guy !jJEom8Ii3E (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 28 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^][v]#677,422
Yeah just give up fake anon, just tell yourself it's okay some how like anon i.
kook !!vzUOyOi/5 joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 5 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^][v]#677,431
Wrong thread
(Edited 1 minute later.)
Anonymous I replied with this 10 years ago, 17 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^][v]#677,440
@677,428 (Denmark guy !jJEom8Ii3E)
Yeah, congratulations. You convinced a person on an obscure BBS that you're too annoying to bother talking with. But I suppose that's an accomplishment to you. With reality being so elastic, anything can be.
Denmark guy !jJEom8Ii3E (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 24 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^][v]#677,454