> This past Sunday, my gorgeous wife – a white evangelical, like me — gave birth to our beautiful African-American triplet daughters whom we adopted as embryos. These sweet girls will hopefully soon be coming home to meet their 3-year-old African-American brother and 2-year-old biracial sister, both of whom we adopted as infants.
Once he realized how insane she is he will leave. Probably an impotent cuckold. Should have just let some black dude fuck his wife, literally no difference.
Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 44 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^][v]#676,384
Niglets should be put on a ship back to Africa.
!MLHqI35Srs joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 2 hours later, 10 hours after the original post[^][v]#676,448
I will say this. The European in-utero hormonal environment would've benefitted these kids substantially. There's something equitable in IQ-increase as a result of the decreased testosterone by the same level seen in mullato-mullato pairings (from ~75 to ~92). Possibly higher if enriched environmental contributions hold, such that they will in this middle-class family.
beckyderp !Hi.HILLARY replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 10 hours after the original post[^][v]#676,451
@previous (!MLHqI35Srs)
Do you just make all of this up or what?
Anonymous L joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 10 hours after the original post[^][v]#676,453
!MLHqI35Srs replied with this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 10 hours after the original post[^][v]#676,457
@676,451 (beckyderp !Hi.HILLARY)
There's tonnes of studies on this from the psychometricians. The Minesotta mixed-race IQ adoption studies are more of an allegory of innate biological difference when interpreted properly, than they are of cultural contributions.
buttons replied with this 10 years ago, 3 hours later, 13 hours after the original post[^][v]#676,639
!MLHqI35Srs replied with this 10 years ago, 6 seconds later, 14 hours after the original post[^][v]#676,673
@676,669 (Adam Djensen)
No. They're based on the fact that the construct validity of IQ tests is greater than say, that of calling certain sexual behaviours of autistic people 'inappropriate' simply by manner of their deviancy, in the same way we hypocritically, but without much better reason, give a special plea in case-point to neurotypical deviance.
(Edited 24 seconds later.)
buttons replied with this 10 years ago, 52 seconds later, 14 hours after the original post[^][v]#676,674
Adam Djensen replied with this 10 years ago, 35 seconds later, 14 hours after the original post[^][v]#676,678
@676,673 (!MLHqI35Srs)
what are you talking about now??
!MLHqI35Srs replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 14 hours after the original post[^][v]#676,679
@previous (Adam Djensen)
Freudo-Marxist influence in psychoanalytical babble is like "socialism for the rich". It only favours neurotypical deviancy. Meanwhile, there's a situation analogous to "capitalist social Darwinism for the poor", in how insensitively autistic sexuality is stringently treated, akin to Hobbensian legalism as opposed to Freudian liberation.
buttons replied with this 10 years ago, 47 seconds later, 14 hours after the original post[^][v]#676,681