Topic: can we list all of the minichan trannies in one place please
Anonymous A started this discussion 10 years ago #51,967
Catherine
Brie
Sophie
Nexus
Who am i missing?
Brie
Sophie
Nexus
Who am i missing?
Pikachu joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 9 minutes later[^] [v] #674,935
Me.
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 31 seconds later, 9 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #674,936
There are so many more!
lost soul joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 4 minutes later, 14 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #674,941
Probably everyone but the tinychan posters
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 12 minutes later, 26 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #674,949
Anonymous B replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 28 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #674,950
lost soul replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 29 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #674,951
kook !!mCVqftDha joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #674,982
Owl
Wade
Wade
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 4 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #674,987
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #674,990
kook !!mCVqftDha replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #674,993
kook !!mCVqftDha double-posted this 10 years ago, 49 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #674,996
Also Joe DDM
lost soul replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #674,998
Anonymous G replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #675,002
Sheila LaBoof joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 26 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #675,034
are the Koreans shooting out tranny rays or what
kook !!mCVqftDha replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #675,036
Sheila LaBoof replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #675,039
statistically, we should be more likely to be full of diabetes, AIDS, and cancer patients
kook !!mCVqftDha replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #675,042
Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 20 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #675,053
Triptych.
Walter's girlfriend Ace.
Walter's girlfriend Ace.
(Edited 19 seconds later.)
kook !!mCVqftDha replied with this 10 years ago, 15 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #675,061
kook !!mCVqftDha double-posted this 10 years ago, 15 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #675,062
Vocalon
!MLHqI35Srs joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 26 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #675,075
@675,061 (kook !!mCVqftDha)
Walter's girlfriend Ace is a suspect case of autistic-variance/autogynephilliac-paraphillic-obsession, for real. He even claims not to honestly care about the implications of something as deep as dysphoria. His boyfriend, Walter, had admitted how frequently Kyle Lund has switched back and forth on the matter.
Walter's girlfriend Ace is a suspect case of autistic-variance/autogynephilliac-paraphillic-obsession, for real. He even claims not to honestly care about the implications of something as deep as dysphoria. His boyfriend, Walter, had admitted how frequently Kyle Lund has switched back and forth on the matter.
Anonymous K joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #675,078
@previous (!MLHqI35Srs)
Tell us more about walter's bae. Does she pass?
Has Walter ever seen her in person, or is the relationship conducted via closely cropped video calls on Skype?
Tell us more about walter's bae. Does she pass?
Has Walter ever seen her in person, or is the relationship conducted via closely cropped video calls on Skype?
!MLHqI35Srs replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #675,082
@previous (K)
Yes to the latter question; no, it's still very much a pre-hormonal boy, and will remain behaviourally so because his sexual characteristics go even more shallowly than "juvenile preconceptions of femininity". Having spoken to him in depth, he has no perception of femininity except in vague social gender-variance, with his sexuality consisting entirely of autoerotic dickgirl-fetishism, so I take even something as substantial as the Blanchardian claim I made back.
Yes to the latter question; no, it's still very much a pre-hormonal boy, and will remain behaviourally so because his sexual characteristics go even more shallowly than "juvenile preconceptions of femininity". Having spoken to him in depth, he has no perception of femininity except in vague social gender-variance, with his sexuality consisting entirely of autoerotic dickgirl-fetishism, so I take even something as substantial as the Blanchardian claim I made back.
Anonymous I replied with this 10 years ago, 13 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #675,087
@675,061 (kook !!mCVqftDha)
Triptych identifies as genderfluid, doesn't she? If so, that is under the transgender umbrella.
@675,078 (K)
I've seen her. Yes, she passes. She is a cutie too, but she is 16.
Triptych identifies as genderfluid, doesn't she? If so, that is under the transgender umbrella.
@675,078 (K)
I've seen her. Yes, she passes. She is a cutie too, but she is 16.
buttons joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #675,088
Anonymous K replied with this 10 years ago, 45 seconds later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #675,089
@675,087 (I)
So Walter is abusing the power dynamics of his age and gender to get it in and forget about the relentless rejection he received at the hands of people who knew him at that age? That's nice.
So Walter is abusing the power dynamics of his age and gender to get it in and forget about the relentless rejection he received at the hands of people who knew him at that age? That's nice.
Anonymous K double-posted this 10 years ago, 19 seconds later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #675,092
Anonymous I replied with this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #675,096
buttons replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #675,097
Anonymous K replied with this 10 years ago, 27 seconds later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #675,100
@675,096 (I)
I didn't accuse him of breaking laws, I just noted that his relationship was creepy and based on a weird and uncomfortable power dynamic.
Think about Walter at 16. Imagine what he would have done for a vaguely attractive transwoman who pretended he wasn't dumb as a rock.
I didn't accuse him of breaking laws, I just noted that his relationship was creepy and based on a weird and uncomfortable power dynamic.
Think about Walter at 16. Imagine what he would have done for a vaguely attractive transwoman who pretended he wasn't dumb as a rock.
Anonymous I replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #675,104
@previous (K)
He's not breaking any laws though. Also, Walter would have went after older transwomen at that age probably.
He's not breaking any laws though. Also, Walter would have went after older transwomen at that age probably.
Anonymous K replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #675,106
@previous (I)
1. You said that already. Neither of the two people you said it to based their judgment based on the age of consent. You're dumb.
2. Of course he would have. Do you understand what I'm trying to illustrate? You're dumb.
3. You're really really dumb.
1. You said that already. Neither of the two people you said it to based their judgment based on the age of consent. You're dumb.
2. Of course he would have. Do you understand what I'm trying to illustrate? You're dumb.
3. You're really really dumb.
(Edited 37 seconds later.)
Anonymous M joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 6 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #675,109
Tryptch was 16 many years ago.
Anonymous K replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #675,110
Anonymous M replied with this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #675,113
Anonymous K replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #675,114
Anonymous M replied with this 10 years ago, 4 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #675,117
Anonymous K replied with this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #675,121
@previous (M)
Most women don't feel comfortable pursuing action against their abusers, the person in question was just a child with no or worse than no parental support. If you had any empathy at all you might understand.
Most women don't feel comfortable pursuing action against their abusers, the person in question was just a child with no or worse than no parental support. If you had any empathy at all you might understand.
kook !!mCVqftDha replied with this 10 years ago, 41 seconds later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #675,122
chili dog !!81dzJNNYL joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 52 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #675,135
@675,121 (K)
Oh bc he is surprisingly good at maintaining anonymity
I never had an address and I think the phone number was Google voice or sth
Anyway I did find his wife on Facebook but she just thought I was jealous /shrug
@675,087 (I)
Yes Thx
Oh bc he is surprisingly good at maintaining anonymity
I never had an address and I think the phone number was Google voice or sth
Anyway I did find his wife on Facebook but she just thought I was jealous /shrug
@675,087 (I)
Yes Thx
(Edited 10 seconds later.)
kook !!mCVqftDha replied with this 10 years ago, 27 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #675,146
So you can be trans now without gender dysphoria? Oh okay
chili dog !!81dzJNNYL replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #675,149
kook !!mCVqftDha replied with this 10 years ago, 29 seconds later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #675,150
chili dog !!81dzJNNYL replied with this 10 years ago, 5 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #675,159
@previous (kook !!mCVqftDha)
Im a fuzzy queer I don't need gender
Trainsgender? Wut is Trainsgender I m 2 fast 4 gender
Im a fuzzy queer I don't need gender
Trainsgender? Wut is Trainsgender I m 2 fast 4 gender
kook !!mCVqftDha replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #675,163
chili dog !!81dzJNNYL replied with this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #675,167
@previous (kook !!mCVqftDha)
I don't really identify as male or female
Those are weird classifications and I don't like the idea of classifying people by their designated or identified gender
I don't really identify as male or female
Those are weird classifications and I don't like the idea of classifying people by their designated or identified gender
RWBY Rhubarb? !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 10 years ago, 5 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #675,176
@previous (chili dog !!81dzJNNYL)
They're very real concepts, mapped right into human biology. It goes beyond just what genitals you have, too. Genes, hormones, brain structure, they can all have a certain influence on a person's gender identity, and how they behave in accordance with that identify.
That's not to say that gender fluidity or being non-binary is somehow false or not a real thing. I think they're entirely legit things. Just saying that the concepts of "male" and "female" genders are indeed very real, and quite a logical way to classify or analyse people.
They're very real concepts, mapped right into human biology. It goes beyond just what genitals you have, too. Genes, hormones, brain structure, they can all have a certain influence on a person's gender identity, and how they behave in accordance with that identify.
That's not to say that gender fluidity or being non-binary is somehow false or not a real thing. I think they're entirely legit things. Just saying that the concepts of "male" and "female" genders are indeed very real, and quite a logical way to classify or analyse people.
chili dog !!81dzJNNYL replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #675,182
@previous (RWBY Rhubarb? !!iNo3FkiZx)
Yeah of course they're real
I just
Don't like classifying people by it
It doesn't really seem salient
It doesn't seem different from classifying people by race which is also silly
I try to classify people by how much I like their personality for the most part
Yeah of course they're real
I just
Don't like classifying people by it
It doesn't really seem salient
It doesn't seem different from classifying people by race which is also silly
I try to classify people by how much I like their personality for the most part
(Edited 37 seconds later.)
RWBY Rhubarb? !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 10 years ago, 12 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #675,197
@previous (chili dog !!81dzJNNYL)
Oh, it is very different to classifying people by race. Race is just a skin pigment. Gender has all sorts of proven influences on behaviour. Increased systemised thinking in males, lower aggression in females, even, apparently, an innate knowledge of the body (as even transsexual children often know that their body does not match their gender identity).
Of course, I'm not saying that one should go around analysing and stereotyping individual people just according to gender. Up there, I'm only speaking generally. As you said, it's better to treat individuals as individuals rather than stereotyping them by race or gender or whatever. And I'm strongly in favour of equal opportunities, and allowing people to be what they want regardless of who they are.
What I'm getting at is, when looking at humans in general, you can analyse gender and draw valid conclusions from it.
Oh, it is very different to classifying people by race. Race is just a skin pigment. Gender has all sorts of proven influences on behaviour. Increased systemised thinking in males, lower aggression in females, even, apparently, an innate knowledge of the body (as even transsexual children often know that their body does not match their gender identity).
Of course, I'm not saying that one should go around analysing and stereotyping individual people just according to gender. Up there, I'm only speaking generally. As you said, it's better to treat individuals as individuals rather than stereotyping them by race or gender or whatever. And I'm strongly in favour of equal opportunities, and allowing people to be what they want regardless of who they are.
What I'm getting at is, when looking at humans in general, you can analyse gender and draw valid conclusions from it.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 2 seconds later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #675,198
RWBY Rhubarb? !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #675,200
chili dog !!81dzJNNYL replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #675,202
@675,197 (RWBY Rhubarb? !!iNo3FkiZx)
That's absolutely valid, but it's usually in a macroscopic sense though, looking at human behaviours in large groups and drawing statistics (ew, stats. Have you ever done them? They're awful.)
And your average person doesn't usually analyse humans in a macroscopic sense. Drawing it to specific people sounds... Dangerous.
That's absolutely valid, but it's usually in a macroscopic sense though, looking at human behaviours in large groups and drawing statistics (ew, stats. Have you ever done them? They're awful.)
And your average person doesn't usually analyse humans in a macroscopic sense. Drawing it to specific people sounds... Dangerous.
(Edited 18 seconds later.)
Anonymous M replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #675,205
@675,198 (A)> But in a culinary sense, what is gender?
Males. Steak and potatoes
Females. Lamb chops as illustrated in picture.
RWBY Rhubarb? !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 10 years ago, 22 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #675,260
@675,202 (chili dog !!81dzJNNYL)
Of course I've done stats. You gotta know your way around them in a Psychology course. Many a time have I wrestled with the likes of Excel, and the dreaded SPSS.
Anyway, I see what you're saying. What if an individual is an exception to "the norm", right? Then a macroscopic analysis could be harmful or incorrect. As I said, I agree it's better to assess individuals as individuals, before you apply any of that stuff.
But that can probably come alongside useful data gleaned from wider analysis, too. E.g, I've seen a study suggesting that men might react better to trauma treatment done a certain way. But it would be better to try and "feel out" (if possible) an individual man before applying that macroscopic conclusion to him.
Ha, I revised this reply so many times, it really got me thinking. It's quite the ethical debate.
Of course I've done stats. You gotta know your way around them in a Psychology course. Many a time have I wrestled with the likes of Excel, and the dreaded SPSS.
Anyway, I see what you're saying. What if an individual is an exception to "the norm", right? Then a macroscopic analysis could be harmful or incorrect. As I said, I agree it's better to assess individuals as individuals, before you apply any of that stuff.
But that can probably come alongside useful data gleaned from wider analysis, too. E.g, I've seen a study suggesting that men might react better to trauma treatment done a certain way. But it would be better to try and "feel out" (if possible) an individual man before applying that macroscopic conclusion to him.
Ha, I revised this reply so many times, it really got me thinking. It's quite the ethical debate.
chili dog !!81dzJNNYL replied with this 10 years ago, 4 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #675,264
@previous (RWBY Rhubarb? !!iNo3FkiZx)
Stats make me a sad boy. I got 0% of the stats part of analytical chem
0.
That's a good point. In a clinical context it's valuable information, especially medically, where it would be absolutely foolish to ignore it.
It just. Socially I don't see any benefit of applying that filter.
Stats make me a sad boy. I got 0% of the stats part of analytical chem
0.
That's a good point. In a clinical context it's valuable information, especially medically, where it would be absolutely foolish to ignore it.
It just. Socially I don't see any benefit of applying that filter.
RWBY Rhubarb? !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 10 years ago, 15 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #675,277
@previous (chili dog !!81dzJNNYL)
When you say socially, are you talking about things like, say, one person interacting with somebody else? Or human social interaction in the wider sense?
I agree it's probably better not to apply it on an individual, constant level. But one could gain useful insight from doing it in the wider sense.
Just for example, there's a popular form of study that looks at what traits people are looking for in partners via lonely hearts ads. One could apply that knowledge to try and make oneself more attractive to others. You're basically using the macro knowledge to draw a conclusion about the majority, without necessarily assuming that it'll always be correct.
When you say socially, are you talking about things like, say, one person interacting with somebody else? Or human social interaction in the wider sense?
I agree it's probably better not to apply it on an individual, constant level. But one could gain useful insight from doing it in the wider sense.
Just for example, there's a popular form of study that looks at what traits people are looking for in partners via lonely hearts ads. One could apply that knowledge to try and make oneself more attractive to others. You're basically using the macro knowledge to draw a conclusion about the majority, without necessarily assuming that it'll always be correct.
WSD !m2cp3rR5zw joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 2 hours later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #675,438
ACE is not 16 you fucking retards.
WSD !m2cp3rR5zw double-posted this 10 years ago, 34 minutes later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #675,463
@675,089 (K)
You're just resentful that I have a cute non-op transgirl girlfriend and you fuck a crusty dildo in your mold infested apartment you fat fucking SJW whale.
You're just resentful that I have a cute non-op transgirl girlfriend and you fuck a crusty dildo in your mold infested apartment you fat fucking SJW whale.
(Edited 13 seconds later.)
Anonymous M replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #675,465
@previous (WSD !m2cp3rR5zw)
> non-op transgirl girlfriend
Hate to break this to you - He is a dude. You need glasses.
> non-op transgirl girlfriend
Hate to break this to you - He is a dude. You need glasses.
WSD !m2cp3rR5zw replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #675,469
Anonymous K replied with this 10 years ago, 27 minutes later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #675,517
@675,463 (WSD !m2cp3rR5zw)
...that's what you got out of that?
Glad to see half a decade hasn't made you any less angry, pitiful, or stupid.
...that's what you got out of that?
Glad to see half a decade hasn't made you any less angry, pitiful, or stupid.
WSD !m2cp3rR5zw replied with this 10 years ago, 9 minutes later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #675,540
@previous (K)
I don't need your judgemental bullshit about how ACE and I choose to live our lives and now ACE is somehow a victim here simply for being under 18. I can almost guarantee she is far smarter and more mature than I am so really who gives a shit? Go donate to UNICEF if you care so much about the welfare of children.
I don't need your judgemental bullshit about how ACE and I choose to live our lives and now ACE is somehow a victim here simply for being under 18. I can almost guarantee she is far smarter and more mature than I am so really who gives a shit? Go donate to UNICEF if you care so much about the welfare of children.
Anonymous K replied with this 10 years ago, 9 minutes later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #675,565
@previous (WSD !m2cp3rR5zw)
I don't know your partner, and I won't pretend to. She isn't a victim for being under the age of majority.
Your relationship is creepy for the same reason most any relation is creepy. There's a sizable power difference between a 16 year old girl and a 22 (?) year old man. I hope I don't have to spell out why that is for you.
I'm not making any attempt to break up your relationship. Take it down a notch or three.
I don't know your partner, and I won't pretend to. She isn't a victim for being under the age of majority.
Your relationship is creepy for the same reason most any relation is creepy. There's a sizable power difference between a 16 year old girl and a 22 (?) year old man. I hope I don't have to spell out why that is for you.
I'm not making any attempt to break up your relationship. Take it down a notch or three.
Anonymous P joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #675,570
WSD !m2cp3rR5zw replied with this 10 years ago, 8 minutes later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #675,584
@675,565 (K)
I am 21 and she is 17. I understand it's a bit weird but we connect so well on so many various things it's ridiculous and it was like our friendship became bestfriendship and then platonic lovers and now we're engaged. Like, we're compatible and shit man.
Sorry if I went a bit overboard, but I have to deal with some judgemental fucks who think I'm a literal rapist and a pedophile thug because of who I am dating.
I am 21 and she is 17. I understand it's a bit weird but we connect so well on so many various things it's ridiculous and it was like our friendship became bestfriendship and then platonic lovers and now we're engaged. Like, we're compatible and shit man.
Sorry if I went a bit overboard, but I have to deal with some judgemental fucks who think I'm a literal rapist and a pedophile thug because of who I am dating.
Anonymous M replied with this 10 years ago, 4 minutes later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #675,587
@previous (WSD !m2cp3rR5zw)
If you do the crime you have to expect to do the time.
Even if its legal where you live - You still have to expect judgemental people to rag on you.
If you do the crime you have to expect to do the time.
Even if its legal where you live - You still have to expect judgemental people to rag on you.
FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 1 hour later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #675,656
Nexus !jNexusRe/. joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 11 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #675,661
@675,463 (WSD !m2cp3rR5zw)
I am glad you can find people like us attractive. I am curious and have a couple of questions if you don't mind?
I am glad you can find people like us attractive. I am curious and have a couple of questions if you don't mind?
chili dog !!81dzJNNYL replied with this 10 years ago, 5 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #675,665
Anonymous B replied with this 10 years ago, 10 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #675,669
Nexus !jNexusRe/. replied with this 10 years ago, 27 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #675,675
@675,665 (chili dog !!81dzJNNYL)
No. I don't think I could date another pre-op trans woman. I am just not attracted to people with penises, period. There is nothing wrong with trans girls and there are plenty of T-Girls who like men and other T-Girls but I just cant do it. I have always been attracted to women, ever since I was a kid. All the people I have ever been with or slept with were women.
I would give a Trans Man a chance however. I think that might be an interesting dynamic...
No. I don't think I could date another pre-op trans woman. I am just not attracted to people with penises, period. There is nothing wrong with trans girls and there are plenty of T-Girls who like men and other T-Girls but I just cant do it. I have always been attracted to women, ever since I was a kid. All the people I have ever been with or slept with were women.
I would give a Trans Man a chance however. I think that might be an interesting dynamic...
Anonymous S joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 24 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #675,684
@previous (Nexus !jNexusRe/.)> No. I don't think I could date another pre-op trans woman. I am just not attracted to people with penises, period. There is nothing wrong with trans girls and there are plenty of T-Girls who like men and other T-Girls but I just cant do it. I have always been attracted to women, ever since I was a kid. All the people I have ever been with or slept with were women.
>
> I would give a Trans Man a chance however. I think that might be an interesting dynamic...
Honestly, normal women want nothing to do with you, tranny. Go fuck yourself with a magic wand and stop creeping on them. Your obsession with vag is gross, and I personally think you should be registered as a sex offender, if not outright murdered for being an abomination in God's eyes.
Go home, tranny. Stay gone.
Anonymous B replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #675,686
Nexus !jNexusRe/. replied with this 10 years ago, 6 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #675,690
@675,684 (S)
Your obsession with dick is gross. You hide behind a keyboard with an anonymous tag afraid of people judging you because you know your beliefs are wrong. You tell me that I am an abomination in god's eyes but he made me this way. I am home, This has been my home since this site first started.
Your obsession with dick is gross. You hide behind a keyboard with an anonymous tag afraid of people judging you because you know your beliefs are wrong. You tell me that I am an abomination in god's eyes but he made me this way. I am home, This has been my home since this site first started.
Anonymous S replied with this 10 years ago, 6 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #675,699
@previous (Nexus !jNexusRe/.)> Your obsession with dick is gross. You hide behind a keyboard with an anonymous tag afraid of people judging you because you know your beliefs are wrong. You tell me that I am an abomination in god's eyes but he made me this way. I am home, This has been my home since this site first started.
Think what you want, ya shitty professional victim, but there is a reason the vast majority of normal women want nothing to do with trannies like you, and that's because you are literally a fucking man, with a penis, demanding to be treated like a woman.
You grew up a man, you were socialized a man, and you are biologically a man. You will never, ever be a woman despite all your vainglorious posturing.
Wanna know why you detest penis? Because you're a man! You want vag to procreate with, but somewhere in that sick, dark mind you pathologized what a woman was, and now you try in vain to be a simulacra of one.
But you can't even do that right. Leave normal women alone, you rapist.
Nexus !jNexusRe/. replied with this 10 years ago, 5 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #675,708
@previous (S)
> Calling me a rapist
You have some serious transphobia. So why don't gay men detest penis? You make gender binary and it is not.
> Calling me a rapist
You have some serious transphobia. So why don't gay men detest penis? You make gender binary and it is not.
Anonymous S replied with this 10 years ago, 4 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #675,715
@previous (Nexus !jNexusRe/.)> >Calling me a rapist
>
> You have some serious transphobia. So why don't gay men detest penis? You make gender binary and it is not.
Oh boy, now we're getting into special snowflake territory. Don't try to muddy the water by invoking "enby" scum. Transtrender trash like you will never know what being a woman is like. You will never have grown up learning how to protect yourself from a rapist. You will never have the power imbalance of being a woman in a man's world seared into your dimwitted brain.
Just stop, son. You're not a woman. Homosexuality is perfectly understandable. Stop trying to change the subject.
You
Are
A
Rapist
Anonymous B replied with this 10 years ago, 4 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #675,724
@675,699 (S)> Assuming
> Generalizing
> Being a closed minded bigot
Domestos will clear your transphobia, and closet homosexuality right up.
FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #675,726
Anonymous B replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #675,729
Nexus !jNexusRe/. replied with this 10 years ago, 19 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #675,746
@675,715 (S)
You can keep projecting your hatred and transphobia against me but I have never raped anyone. It's funny how you throw that word around and devalue the meaning of it for women and men who actually have been raped. You have no idea what that word really means. I will say it again. You are a coward who is afraid of using their name because you are afraid of being judged. I am not, let he without sin cast the first stone. It's kind of sad honestly. I see how you are using anger and hatred as a mask for how sad and lonely you are on the inside.
You can keep projecting your hatred and transphobia against me but I have never raped anyone. It's funny how you throw that word around and devalue the meaning of it for women and men who actually have been raped. You have no idea what that word really means. I will say it again. You are a coward who is afraid of using their name because you are afraid of being judged. I am not, let he without sin cast the first stone. It's kind of sad honestly. I see how you are using anger and hatred as a mask for how sad and lonely you are on the inside.
Romans 14:1-4 As for the one who is weak in faith, welcome him, but not to quarrel over opinions. One person believes he may eat anything, while the weak person eats only vegetables. Let not the one who eats despise the one who abstains, and let not the one who abstains pass judgment on the one who eats, for God has welcomed him. Who are you to pass judgment on the servant of another? It is before his own master that he stands or falls. And he will be upheld, for the Lord is able to make him stand.
Anonymous T joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #675,750
@previous (Nexus !jNexusRe/.)> You can keep projecting your hatred and transphobia against me but I have never raped anyone. It's funny how you throw that word around and devalue the meaning of it for women and men who actually have been raped. You have no idea what that word really means. I will say it again. You are a coward who is afraid of using their name because you are afraid of being judged. I am not, let he without sin cast the first stone. It's kind of sad honestly. I see how you are using anger and hatred as a mask for how sad and lonely you are on the inside.
>
>
Romans 14:1-4 As for the one who is weak in faith, welcome him, but not to quarrel over opinions. One person believes he may eat anything, while the weak person eats only vegetables. Let not the one who eats despise the one who abstains, and let not the one who abstains pass judgment on the one who eats, for God has welcomed him. Who are you to pass judgment on the servant of another? It is before his own master that he stands or falls. And he will be upheld, for the Lord is able to make him stand.
lolz k tripfag. you remain a rapist. you defile womanhood by assuming the role of pretender to it. you have no right to it, and you never will. give up.
FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI replied with this 10 years ago, 59 seconds later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #675,752
@675,746 (Nexus !jNexusRe/.)
While everything you just said is true, you should know that it's just an unimaginative troll.
While everything you just said is true, you should know that it's just an unimaginative troll.
Nexus !jNexusRe/. replied with this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #675,754
@675,750 (T)
There you go, calling me a rapist again. You continually devalue that word. It is not an insult, It is a crime. I love how you put womanhood on this pedestal like it is some special thing when instead it is just a way of life. I bet the ladies just love you. I think you need to have your autism checked out.
There you go, calling me a rapist again. You continually devalue that word. It is not an insult, It is a crime. I love how you put womanhood on this pedestal like it is some special thing when instead it is just a way of life. I bet the ladies just love you. I think you need to have your autism checked out.
Anonymous T replied with this 10 years ago, 11 seconds later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #675,755
@675,752 (FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI)
> While everything you just said is true, you should know that it's just an unimaginative troll.
shiiiiiiiiiiiiit motherfucker, you wig wearing faggots should be grateful I'm even trolling your 3rd rate shitboard.
> While everything you just said is true, you should know that it's just an unimaginative troll.
shiiiiiiiiiiiiit motherfucker, you wig wearing faggots should be grateful I'm even trolling your 3rd rate shitboard.
Nexus !jNexusRe/. replied with this 10 years ago, 41 seconds later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #675,756
@675,752 (FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI)
I know. It doesn't matter. I will defend this because it is the right thing to do. There is nothing wrong with being transgender.
I know. It doesn't matter. I will defend this because it is the right thing to do. There is nothing wrong with being transgender.
Anonymous T replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #675,758
@675,754 (Nexus !jNexusRe/.)
> There you go, calling me a rapist again. You continually devalue that word. It is not an insult, It is a crime. I love how you put womanhood on this pedestal like it is some special thing when instead it is just a way of life. I bet the ladies just love you. I think you need to have your autism checked out.
Been huffing Autphag fumes, have ye? That's quaint. And no! I don't mean to use it as an insult. What you are doing by presuming to claim womanhood is actual rape perpetuated upon the blood that normal women spilled to get where they are today. You suddenly think you can pop a few titty skittles and bam, that's it? Are you seriously that delusional? It'd be hilarious if it weren't so frightening. People like you are why North Carolina's bathroom law was even seriously considered. Please, by all means, drop off the face of the Earth, and stop making it hard for the rest of us real transgender people to be taken seriously, for fuck's sake.
> There you go, calling me a rapist again. You continually devalue that word. It is not an insult, It is a crime. I love how you put womanhood on this pedestal like it is some special thing when instead it is just a way of life. I bet the ladies just love you. I think you need to have your autism checked out.
Been huffing Autphag fumes, have ye? That's quaint. And no! I don't mean to use it as an insult. What you are doing by presuming to claim womanhood is actual rape perpetuated upon the blood that normal women spilled to get where they are today. You suddenly think you can pop a few titty skittles and bam, that's it? Are you seriously that delusional? It'd be hilarious if it weren't so frightening. People like you are why North Carolina's bathroom law was even seriously considered. Please, by all means, drop off the face of the Earth, and stop making it hard for the rest of us real transgender people to be taken seriously, for fuck's sake.
kook !!mCVqftDha replied with this 10 years ago, 14 seconds later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #675,759
Anonymous T replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #675,761
@675,756 (Nexus !jNexusRe/.)
> I know. It doesn't matter. I will defend this because it is the right thing to do. There is nothing wrong with being transgender.
LOL! You're actually conflating being transgender with being a disgusting vaghound rape-beast. I have no issue with real transgender people. It just so happens that special snowflakes like you are seizing hold of what transgender is, and are perverting it to meet the needs of your sick fetish. You are a sick, dirty, nasty slop slut.
> I know. It doesn't matter. I will defend this because it is the right thing to do. There is nothing wrong with being transgender.
LOL! You're actually conflating being transgender with being a disgusting vaghound rape-beast. I have no issue with real transgender people. It just so happens that special snowflakes like you are seizing hold of what transgender is, and are perverting it to meet the needs of your sick fetish. You are a sick, dirty, nasty slop slut.
Nexus !jNexusRe/. replied with this 10 years ago, 18 seconds later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #675,762
@675,759 (kook !!mCVqftDha)
Yes I am. Anon T called me an abomination in god's eyes. I thought I would return the favor.
I was raised very religious so I know the bible, I think there is wisdom in it, I just don't believe there is a man in the sky judging everything I do.
Yes I am. Anon T called me an abomination in god's eyes. I thought I would return the favor.
I was raised very religious so I know the bible, I think there is wisdom in it, I just don't believe there is a man in the sky judging everything I do.
kook !!mCVqftDha replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #675,765
Anonymous B replied with this 10 years ago, 6 seconds later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #675,766
@675,755 (T)> Admitting you have nothing better going on than "trolling a 3rd rate shit board"
Get a hobby, nonce.
kook !!mCVqftDha replied with this 10 years ago, 30 seconds later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #675,767
Anonymous T replied with this 10 years ago, 14 seconds later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #675,768
@675,762 (Nexus !jNexusRe/.)
> Yes I am. Anon T called me an abomination in god's eyes. I thought I would return the favor.
>
> I was raised very religious so I know the bible, I think there is wisdom in it, I just don't believe there is a man in the sky judging everything I do.
Hahaha! You are quoting a religious text, picking & choosing it's verses to suit your needs! Just like what you're trying to do with womanhood! You are a filthy, fucking rapist.
> Yes I am. Anon T called me an abomination in god's eyes. I thought I would return the favor.
>
> I was raised very religious so I know the bible, I think there is wisdom in it, I just don't believe there is a man in the sky judging everything I do.
Hahaha! You are quoting a religious text, picking & choosing it's verses to suit your needs! Just like what you're trying to do with womanhood! You are a filthy, fucking rapist.
WSD !m2cp3rR5zw replied with this 10 years ago, 4 hours later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #675,839
@675,587 (M)
Fair enough. I just think it's a bit silly for people to freak out about young people dating within a four year difference.
@675,656 (FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI)
I respond to old people memes with other old people memes.
@675,661 (Nexus !jNexusRe/.)
Feel free to ask me basically whatever.
@675,675 (Nexus !jNexusRe/.)
I'm kind of the opposite myself, but I guess I'd date a cutie transguy if he aint one of those really hairy ones. Hairy bodies are yucky yucky bad bad.
Fair enough. I just think it's a bit silly for people to freak out about young people dating within a four year difference.
@675,656 (FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI)
I respond to old people memes with other old people memes.
@675,661 (Nexus !jNexusRe/.)
Feel free to ask me basically whatever.
@675,675 (Nexus !jNexusRe/.)
I'm kind of the opposite myself, but I guess I'd date a cutie transguy if he aint one of those really hairy ones. Hairy bodies are yucky yucky bad bad.
Nexus !jNexusRe/. replied with this 10 years ago, 4 hours later, 23 hours after the original post[^] [v] #675,883
@previous (WSD !m2cp3rR5zw)
How did you meet? Why did you choose to date an MtF? Is she taking hormones?
How did you meet? Why did you choose to date an MtF? Is she taking hormones?
WSD !m2cp3rR5zw replied with this 10 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #675,913
@previous (Nexus !jNexusRe/.)
We met on an obscure IRC channel, ironically about a week after I gave up hope of finding love lol
It was a channel I used to common back in the day so I came to check up on how it was now that I'm college age. I found ACE there but it took a bit for our friendship to take hold real strong.
Why did I choose an MTF? Well actually she was still repressed then but we kind of fell in love by how well we related and all our life coincidences. We became best friends first and then lovers because we're gay as fuck but I don't mind the MTF bit since she is femboy as fuck anyway so she won't go through nasty hondom like how I would lol we were gay first then she came out as trans and by sheer coincidence i am now dating a transgirl.
No hormones yet but will go the IC route ASAP.
We met on an obscure IRC channel, ironically about a week after I gave up hope of finding love lol
It was a channel I used to common back in the day so I came to check up on how it was now that I'm college age. I found ACE there but it took a bit for our friendship to take hold real strong.
Why did I choose an MTF? Well actually she was still repressed then but we kind of fell in love by how well we related and all our life coincidences. We became best friends first and then lovers because we're gay as fuck but I don't mind the MTF bit since she is femboy as fuck anyway so she won't go through nasty hondom like how I would lol we were gay first then she came out as trans and by sheer coincidence i am now dating a transgirl.
No hormones yet but will go the IC route ASAP.
(Edited 27 seconds later.)
Nexus !jNexusRe/. replied with this 10 years ago, 8 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #676,118
@previous (WSD !m2cp3rR5zw)
I recommend the IC route, however she should see a gender therapist for a few months just to be sure this is what she wants. Wanting to transition and actually doing so are two different things.
I recommend the IC route, however she should see a gender therapist for a few months just to be sure this is what she wants. Wanting to transition and actually doing so are two different things.
!MLHqI35Srs replied with this 10 years ago, 8 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #676,266
@previous (Nexus !jNexusRe/.)
Yeah, no, and see, this is why Kyle will always be an NHS-reject (my new term for American IC trannies: they're analogous in my mind, the IC is just a consequence of a catch-all net for unlikelies) and nothing more in my eyes. A therapist would see he's an overcompensating, autistic, sub-human rote-automaton who needs clomipramine and risperidone more than he needs estrogen.
Yeah, no, and see, this is why Kyle will always be an NHS-reject (my new term for American IC trannies: they're analogous in my mind, the IC is just a consequence of a catch-all net for unlikelies) and nothing more in my eyes. A therapist would see he's an overcompensating, autistic, sub-human rote-automaton who needs clomipramine and risperidone more than he needs estrogen.
(Edited 44 seconds later.)
Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #676,267
!MLHqI35Srs replied with this 10 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #676,271
@previous (Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo)
None that you're qualified to assess (in case autism and a subjunctivity deficit fail you, read that as: "not that you'requalified to assess them"), Matt Miller the fail tranny.
None that you're qualified to assess (in case autism and a subjunctivity deficit fail you, read that as: "not that you'requalified to assess them"), Matt Miller the fail tranny.
(Edited 34 seconds later.)
Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #676,272
!MLHqI35Srs replied with this 10 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #676,273
Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo replied with this 10 years ago, 23 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #676,280
!MLHqI35Srs replied with this 10 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #676,287
@previous (Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo)
I didn't know Haselgrove had emerged from her office onto this forum just to gaslight me.
You learn something new every day!
I didn't know Haselgrove had emerged from her office onto this forum just to gaslight me.
You learn something new every day!
Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #676,288
@previous (!MLHqI35Srs)
Is this "Haselgrove" fantasy your equivalent of Mary Lee Walsh? I think it is, Mr. Gillon.
Is this "Haselgrove" fantasy your equivalent of Mary Lee Walsh? I think it is, Mr. Gillon.
!MLHqI35Srs replied with this 10 years ago, 5 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #676,293
Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #676,295
@676,288 (Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo)
We agreed that when Haselgrove was mentioned it would be ignored. Thanks
We agreed that when Haselgrove was mentioned it would be ignored. Thanks
Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo replied with this 10 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #676,298
@676,293 (!MLHqI35Srs)
One wonders what else you might have in common with Mr. Chandler, Mr. Gillon.
@previous (Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo)
I have changed the terms of our agreement.
One wonders what else you might have in common with Mr. Chandler, Mr. Gillon.
@previous (Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo)
I have changed the terms of our agreement.
RWBY Rhubarb? !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 10 years ago, 6 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #676,301
WSD !m2cp3rR5zw replied with this 10 years ago, 14 hours later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #676,997
@676,266 (!MLHqI35Srs)
LOL the one you hate would "manipulate the psychiatrist" (read: not chant and ramble about Jews and Women spying on you through matriarchial monocles to keep you a man slave) and get through the system relatively quickly even in Britain.
LOL the one you hate would "manipulate the psychiatrist" (read: not chant and ramble about Jews and Women spying on you through matriarchial monocles to keep you a man slave) and get through the system relatively quickly even in Britain.
WSD !m2cp3rR5zw double-posted this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #676,999
@676,118 (Nexus !jNexusRe/.)
Well by transition I think ACE will go the route of femboy/tomboy mode IE hormonal/cosmetic transition without the social part of being a 1950s stereotype of a woman.
Well by transition I think ACE will go the route of femboy/tomboy mode IE hormonal/cosmetic transition without the social part of being a 1950s stereotype of a woman.
Nexi !jNexusRe/. replied with this 10 years ago, 14 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #677,002
WSD !m2cp3rR5zw replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #677,004
@previous (Nexi !jNexusRe/.)
I think hormones are a good test of whether you're trans or not. If they make you feel more comfortable then they work for you.
I think hormones are a good test of whether you're trans or not. If they make you feel more comfortable then they work for you.
Nexi !jNexusRe/. replied with this 10 years ago, 4 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #677,009
kook !!vzUOyOi/5 replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #677,010
Nexi !jNexusRe/. replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #677,014
@previous (kook !!vzUOyOi/5)
Threatening to kill your therapists isn't a sign of good mental health.
Threatening to kill your therapists isn't a sign of good mental health.
kook !!vzUOyOi/5 replied with this 10 years ago, 44 seconds later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #677,016
WSD !m2cp3rR5zw replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #677,018
@677,009 (Nexi !jNexusRe/.)
That's what I thought. It's something that makes you feel less ragey and more at ease and shit and comfortable.
@677,014 (Nexi !jNexusRe/.)
ACE hasn't done that though.
That's what I thought. It's something that makes you feel less ragey and more at ease and shit and comfortable.
@677,014 (Nexi !jNexusRe/.)
ACE hasn't done that though.
Nexi !jNexusRe/. replied with this 10 years ago, 10 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #677,028
kook !!vzUOyOi/5 replied with this 10 years ago, 46 seconds later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #677,030
Nexi !jNexusRe/. replied with this 10 years ago, 20 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #677,069
kook !!vzUOyOi/5 replied with this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #677,076
@676,999 (WSD !m2cp3rR5zw)
@676,999 (WSD !m2cp3rR5zw)
> Well by transition I think ACE will go the route of femboy/tomboy mode IE hormonal/cosmetic transition without the social part of being a 1950s stereotype of a woman.
It's here
@676,999 (WSD !m2cp3rR5zw)
> Well by transition I think ACE will go the route of femboy/tomboy mode IE hormonal/cosmetic transition without the social part of being a 1950s stereotype of a woman.
It's here
Nexi !jNexusRe/. replied with this 10 years ago, 5 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #677,082
@previous (kook !!vzUOyOi/5)
I stand by what I said then. She should go to a gender therapist first. I didn't say she was fake, I didn't say she wasn't trans, I am saying be sure taking hormones is what you want to do. Having a therapist to talk while doing this is the sane thing to do.
I stand by what I said then. She should go to a gender therapist first. I didn't say she was fake, I didn't say she wasn't trans, I am saying be sure taking hormones is what you want to do. Having a therapist to talk while doing this is the sane thing to do.
kook !!vzUOyOi/5 replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #677,085
Nexi !jNexusRe/. replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #677,087
@previous (kook !!vzUOyOi/5)
There you go again, putting words in my mouth and telling other people what to think.
There you go again, putting words in my mouth and telling other people what to think.
kook !!vzUOyOi/5 replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #677,090
Nexi !jNexusRe/. replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #677,095
@previous (kook !!vzUOyOi/5)
No I meant a stereotypical 1950's women. I like how you twist words and try to turn people against eachother. You are good at that.
No I meant a stereotypical 1950's women. I like how you twist words and try to turn people against eachother. You are good at that.
kook !!vzUOyOi/5 replied with this 10 years ago, 58 seconds later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #677,098
Anonymous V replied with this 10 years ago, 2 months later, 2 months after the original post[^] [v] #699,481
Did vocalon make it on to the tranny list?
vriskalon !0D.SXWIdy6 joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 38 minutes later, 2 months after the original post[^] [v] #699,482
Anonymous X joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 1 hour later, 2 months after the original post[^] [v] #699,496
this thread is terrible
Anonymous Z-1 joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 47 minutes later, 2 months after the original post[^] [v] #699,501
vriskalon !0D.SXWIdy6 replied with this 10 years ago, 8 minutes later, 2 months after the original post[^] [v] #699,502
Anonymous X replied with this 10 years ago, 13 minutes later, 2 months after the original post[^] [v] #699,505
@previous (vriskalon !0D.SXWIdy6)you still have to remember all the good times we had
GHOUL and scatchan will always be there
vriskalon !0D.SXWIdy6 replied with this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 2 months after the original post[^] [v] #699,506
@previous (X)
glad 2 know someones out there storing screencaps from me being 14
did you get $.jpg too bc that was a good one
glad 2 know someones out there storing screencaps from me being 14
did you get $.jpg too bc that was a good one
Anonymous X replied with this 10 years ago, 11 minutes later, 2 months after the original post[^] [v] #699,510
vriskalon !0D.SXWIdy6 replied with this 10 years ago, 22 minutes later, 2 months after the original post[^] [v] #699,515
Anonymous Z-2 joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 3 hours later, 2 months after the original post[^] [v] #699,563
Syntax
Dr. Whom !7MHPahvoGY replied with this 10 years ago, 51 minutes later, 2 months after the original post[^] [v] #699,590
Sophie !MLHqI35Srs joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 45 minutes later, 2 months after the original post[^] [v] #699,597
Dr. Whom !7MHPahvoGY replied with this 10 years ago, 9 minutes later, 2 months after the original post[^] [v] #699,598
Sophie !MLHqI35Srs replied with this 10 years ago, 14 minutes later, 2 months after the original post[^] [v] #699,604
@previous (Dr. Whom !7MHPahvoGY)
Dr. Whom !7MHPahvoGY replied with this 10 years ago, 16 minutes later, 2 months after the original post[^] [v] #699,607
Sophie !MLHqI35Srs replied with this 10 years ago, 4 minutes later, 2 months after the original post[^] [v] #699,612
@previous (Dr. Whom !7MHPahvoGY)
Dr. Whom !7MHPahvoGY replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 months after the original post[^] [v] #699,616
brie !Yog9oDD6VU joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 2 months after the original post[^] [v] #699,618
Well, this devolved at an accelerated pace.
Anonymous Z-1 replied with this 10 years ago, 16 minutes later, 2 months after the original post[^] [v] #699,621
@699,515 (vriskalon !0D.SXWIdy6)
You are way worse now. I liked you back then but now you're a right fag
You are way worse now. I liked you back then but now you're a right fag