Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later[^][v]#672,407
@OP
If he's sincere then he's deeply psychotic. I'd prefer to think of it all as an escapist fantasy to distract from the piles of filth building up around him.
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 9 minutes later, 13 minutes after the original post[^][v]#672,409
Yeah... It's a pretty scary revelation, once you realise it.
It seems that not even professional help is fixing him either. It's a sad state of affairs.
Anonymous C double-posted this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 15 minutes after the original post[^][v]#672,410
@672,407 (B)
I'm sorry, but he is sincere. Not a persona.
I know it seems far-fetched, but you have to remember that there are a lot of people on Earth. And some of them are just going to be that unbalanced.
!MLHqI35Srs joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 4 minutes later, 20 minutes after the original post[^][v]#672,412
!MLHqI35Srs replied with this 10 years ago, 53 seconds later, 22 minutes after the original post[^][v]#672,414
@previous (C)
Then you can cover your head inside an enlarged condom and lunge yourself inside my excretory tract.
Anonymous B replied with this 10 years ago, 18 minutes later, 40 minutes after the original post[^][v]#672,422
@672,412 (!MLHqI35Srs)
No you aren't. You're a misogynistic twat who has not a single healthy relationship with a woman.
And, on a practical level, you are horrifically unattractive with a male gender identity. If I have to apply female standards of attractiveness and self care god only knows how much worse it would be.
!MLHqI35Srs replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 42 minutes after the original post[^][v]#672,424
@previous (B)
WOW I'M CRITICAL OF WOMEN THAT MEANS I CAN'T BE ONE.
Lol, you fucking idiot, you seem to fail to realize how many women that would disqualify. Self-aware, well-regulated ones, y'know?
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 6 minutes later, 48 minutes after the original post[^][v]#672,428
Yep, he's just a melodramatic drag queen with a touch of delusional psychosis. There's plenty of people like him around.
P.S. I mean drag queen in the literal sense, and not as generalization for transgender people.
!MLHqI35Srs replied with this 10 years ago, 9 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#672,446
@672,435 (B) @672,436 (B) > Mystifying the concept of womanhood to suit your pseudo-enlightenment.
No, you're just feigning insight now. Typical neurotypical veneer of depth.
Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 6 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#672,448
@previous (!MLHqI35Srs)
Guessing that because you live in a town with a dismal population, there are few opportunities to make a living as a drag queen.
Anonymous B replied with this 10 years ago, 11 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#672,453
@672,446 (!MLHqI35Srs)
I'm not mystifying anything. You show a complete lack of understanding of the social obligations and norms of being a woman.
If you were to be allowed to transition you would still be a piggish and vaguely masculine child, not a woman.
!MLHqI35Srs replied with this 10 years ago, 5 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#672,455
@previous (B)
Obligations women themselves barely hold themselves to, thus showing hypocrisy; it's one of my main arguments agains the psychiatry department's upholding of the same double-standard where ciswomen can use their womanhood pretty much to deflect responsibility and renege on decorum.
These are crap assertions. I'd know them full well, had you bothered paying attention to my traditionalist writings. However, as usual, you're only interested in meretricious defenses of ciswomen from the attack against modernity's "liberation" of their responsibility.
(Edited 1 minute later.)
Anonymous B replied with this 10 years ago, 19 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^][v]#672,461
@previous (!MLHqI35Srs)
I got to, 'one of my main arguments' before I stopped reading.
I don't care about your pseudophilosophical musings buttercup. You thinking or believing something does not make it so.
!MLHqI35Srs replied with this 10 years ago, 6 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^][v]#672,470
@previous (B)
So let me get this straight. A true-tranny with a borderline retardation IQ is telling me about the obligations of gender identity despite not comprehending basic arguments to this effect, demonstrating it had merely falsely and inappropriately internalized the wrong characteristics?
Colour me in surprised!
Anonymous B replied with this 10 years ago, 50 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^][v]#672,471
Anonymous B replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^][v]#672,525
@previous (kook !!mCVqftDha)
As trans- people become more accepted and church folk get more suspicious more people are going to assume you are MTF. I forgot how explicitly you need things spelled out for you. My apologies.
buttons replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^][v]#672,527
@previous (B)
Isn't it weird how an intersex person can so passionately back the gender binary
!MLHqI35Srs replied with this 10 years ago, 42 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[^][v]#672,528
@672,525 (B) > you > accepted as anything other than a schizophrenogenic autogynephile fruit
In your dreams, sperg.
kook !!mCVqftDha replied with this 10 years ago, 48 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[^][v]#672,530
@672,525 (B)
They really won't though. I have almost no male characteristics besides hirsutism and an aggressive personality.
kook !!mCVqftDha double-posted this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 hours after the original post[^][v]#672,531
@672,527 (buttons)
Gender fluidity doesn't exist, many trannies have a fetish, and Sophie isn't less of a woman because you dislike her. Thanks
buttons replied with this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^][v]#672,534
Anonymous B replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^][v]#672,537
@672,527 (buttons)
It used to make me mildly upset, but now I just try to milk it for laughs.
Get it. Milk it.
Because she's completely incapable of bearing or nourishing children.
Anonymous N joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 46 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[^][v]#672,538
@672,531 (kook !!mCVqftDha)
Nor is Sophie a woman. Autphag has dick and nuts.
kook !!mCVqftDha replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 hours after the original post[^][v]#672,541
@672,534 (buttons)
Nope. Unlike what you sjws think, popularity doesn't determine gender. Sophie has done more to transition than all of our resident trannies combined. Thanks
kook !!mCVqftDha double-posted this 10 years ago, 33 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[^][v]#672,542
@672,538 (N)
Sophie is as much of a woman as any other tranny.
kook !!mCVqftDha triple-posted this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^][v]#672,545
@672,537 (B)
No don't trigger my dysphoria! You're a monster! Lol idiot
(Edited 11 seconds later.)
buttons replied with this 10 years ago, 4 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[^][v]#672,546
@672,541 (kook !!mCVqftDha)
Oh I am not calling Sophie a male
Even tho she goes on and on about hypermasculinity and feeling oppressed by matriarchy and is totally insane its not like women aren't allowed to be psycho too
Lol 'you sjws'
kook !!mCVqftDha replied with this 10 years ago, 58 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[^][v]#672,547
buttons replied with this 10 years ago, 4 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^][v]#672,552
@previous (kook !!mCVqftDha)
Why don't you accept fluidity
If I told you I was agender or gender nonconforming what would you tell me? that I'm whatever my genitals are?
Like if I'm perfectly sane and my conceptions on gender and sex are reasonable would you sooner respect sophies identity than mine
(Edited 32 seconds later.)
kook !!mCVqftDha replied with this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^][v]#672,557
@previous (buttons)
Gender nonconforming I would recognize as a real thing. But yes, you would still be a bio male if you have a penis. Also if your gender changes from week to week, it's clearly not a biological issue.
buttons replied with this 10 years ago, 14 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^][v]#672,566
@previous (kook !!mCVqftDha)
Oh I understand now where you're coming from
Yeah no that's not me
I think the people who identify as Fluid and embrace masculinity and femininity Explicitly and in such a way that They simultaneously reject and embrace the binary and its like
What u trying to achieve
Also tho do u acknowledge biological sex as chromosomal? like yes If I have a Weiner or a Vagine I realize thats how people will categorize me but I also acknowledge that there is variance underneath Visible Sex and I'm not going to tell someone what they are when they don't even know prolly
i feel like these conversations should be less about discussing the validity of individuals identities and more about widening perceptions
but I see why thats not possible
buttons double-posted this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^][v]#672,568
@672,557 (kook !!mCVqftDha)
But yes fyi I am nonconforming my bottom line is I really don't give a shit I just want to see everyone else afforded the same comfortability I am able to ignore over here w.r.t my gender identity
kook !!mCVqftDha replied with this 10 years ago, 11 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^][v]#672,572
@672,566 (buttons)
I agree. But point blank people's genitals affect their lives more than their genitals imo
kook !!mCVqftDha double-posted this 10 years ago, 22 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[^][v]#672,573
@672,568 (buttons)
Everyone cannot be comfortable. That isn't possible
buttons replied with this 10 years ago, 10 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^][v]#672,581
> I agree. But point blank people's genitals affect their lives more than their genitals imo
Idk what you're trying to say but yes we live on a genital obsessed planet
@previous (kook !!mCVqftDha)
I think a lot more people could be comfortable sexually and in their own skins if change permits it
I know not everyone will ever be comfortable but That don't stop me from wanting it
buttons double-posted this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 4 hours after the original post[^][v]#672,582
@672,572 (kook !!mCVqftDha)
also the more we shift these discussions away from genitals the more open they become
Anonymous N replied with this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^][v]#672,584
@previous (buttons) > genitals the more open they become
A snug lubricated fit is best.
kook !!mCVqftDha replied with this 10 years ago, 16 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^][v]#672,589
@672,581 (buttons)
What exactly do you mean by people could be more comfortable of change permissions it? What type of changes?
kook !!mCVqftDha double-posted this 10 years ago, 32 seconds later, 4 hours after the original post[^][v]#672,590
@672,582 (buttons)
I disagree with this. It just brings more labels, which is the opposite of open.
buttons replied with this 10 years ago, 30 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^][v]#672,598
@previous (kook !!mCVqftDha)
Why would that bring more labels? I'm not talking about labels. Talking about doing away with 'labels' not making more stupid Niche identities
@672,589 (kook !!mCVqftDha)
shifting away from focus and expectations on bodies entirely
Anonymous O joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 5 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^][v]#672,599
kook !!mCVqftDha replied with this 10 years ago, 24 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^][v]#672,606
@672,598 (buttons)
If you're saying what I think you're saying, it would take away the idea of being transgendered entirely
buttons replied with this 10 years ago, 45 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^][v]#672,611
@previous (kook !!mCVqftDha)
No, just the overt 'femme' and 'masc' aspects and their mutual exclusivity
I'm against heavy enforcement and normalization of a binary but not for its total and immediate erasure
That'd be like jokers who insist on being 'color blind' wrt race
kook !!mCVqftDha replied with this 10 years ago, 43 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^][v]#672,615
@previous (buttons)
So then I can't agree with that. In a gender blind world, we would accept that males can be feminine, and females can be masculine.
Anonymous I replied with this 10 years ago, 1 hour later, 8 hours after the original post[^][v]#672,631
@previous (kook !!mCVqftDha)
in a gender blind world those concepts wouldn't exist
I don't think you understand where I'm coming from
kook !!mCVqftDha replied with this 10 years ago, 33 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^][v]#672,633
@previous (I)
Oh that's interesting. Nothing would seen as masculine or feminine? That's very refreshing
lost soul joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 9 hours later, 18 hours after the original post[^][v]#672,674