Minichan

Topic: My skull-pan's still growing!

!MLHqI35Srs started this discussion 10 years ago #51,792

It went up to 62cm in the past year from 60.5.

I'm a definite K-select. That's for certain. Neurological maturation is supposed to end for me this year but it's still continuing.

Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 47 seconds later[^] [v] #671,846

@OP
I think your forehead just got fatter.

!MLHqI35Srs (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #671,848

@previous (B)
The layer of subcutaneous fat surrounding the skull wouldn't grow 1.5 cm without significant mass growth elsewhere, we're talking rapidly escalating the scales of obesity again. I'd gained, at most, 20 pounds, diffused over nearly 5'9'' of body. It's definitely my skull accomodating more space for my evidently-growing brain. It's rare for even males to have skull expansion and neurolysis which lasts for this long, but evidently, my partially aristocratic blood's doing it.

Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 4 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #671,851

@previous (!MLHqI35Srs)

> The layer of subcutaneous fat surrounding the skull wouldn't grow 1.5 cm without significant mass growth elsewhere, we're talking rapidly escalating the scales of obesity again. I'd gained, at most, 20 pounds, diffused over nearly 5'9'' of body. It's definitely my skull accomodating more space for my evidently-growing brain. It's rare for even males to have skull expansion and neurolysis which lasts for this long, but evidently, my partially aristocratic blood's doing it.

Lol manlet

!MLHqI35Srs (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 5 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #671,852

@previous (C)
Average is 5'10. Lowest 2nd percentile is about 5'5. I'm doing fine, cheers.

Adam Djensen joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 8 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #671,860

you probably just held the measuring tape wrong one of the times!

!MLHqI35Srs (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 35 seconds later, 9 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #671,861

@previous (Adam Djensen)
It covers the same circumferential regions each time.

(Edited 19 seconds later.)

Adam Djensen replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 10 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #671,864

@previous (!MLHqI35Srs)
how do you know, did you take pictures?

!MLHqI35Srs (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 18 seconds later, 10 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #671,865

@previous (Adam Djensen)
I looked in a mirror, dumbass.

buttons joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 53 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #671,888

@previous (!MLHqI35Srs)
just kill yourself and stop worrying about this nonsense

RWBY Rhubarb? !!iNo3FkiZx joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 30 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #671,889

> Autphag is now advocating phrenology
This has to be trolling.

!MLHqI35Srs (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 15 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #671,890

@671,888 (buttons)
My brain pan's bigger than yours lol.

buttons replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #671,892

@previous (!MLHqI35Srs)
That's fine you can have whatever brain pan u want just keep your crazy to yourself psycho

Adam Djensen replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #671,893

@671,865 (!MLHqI35Srs)
yeah, i'm pretty sure your measurement were inaccurate then\

also @671,889 (RWBY Rhubarb? !!iNo3FkiZx)

Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #671,896

@previous (Adam Djensen)
There is no way he can measure anything accurately. He proved that with his misuse of Benadryl.

buttons replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #671,898

@previous (G)
Lmao

Anonymous G replied with this 10 years ago, 8 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #671,903

@previous (buttons)
You need to make up your mind. In another thread you tell me to shut up.
Here you appreciated my accurate reply.

buttons replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #671,907

@previous (G)
I can do both I don't hold grudges
I figure since I hate everybody on this site I have to be amicable like most of the time

Anonymous G replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #671,911

@previous (buttons)
Quality reply.

squeegee joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 1 hour later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #671,944

fat head. got it.

Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 49 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #671,963

It could be adult onset macrocephaly. See your doctor.

!MLHqI35Srs (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 24 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #671,965

@previous (I)
Skull circumference is highly, positively correlated to IQ. Why would I want that corrected?

buttons replied with this 10 years ago, 9 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #671,971

@previous (!MLHqI35Srs)
citation needed

Anonymous H replied with this 10 years ago, 1 hour later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #671,993

@671,965 (!MLHqI35Srs)
There's no corrective procedures for macrocephaly, but it does have a correlation to autism and can lead to death by a hematoma. That is something that can be corrected, but they can not fix your bizarrely large head. A circumference of 60cm or more may indicate macrocephaly. See your doctor.

Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 10 hours later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #672,115

@671,965 (!MLHqI35Srs)

> Skull circumference is highly, positively correlated to IQ. Why would I want that corrected?

thats wrong

Metæ joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 9 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #672,117

Have you considered trepanation? It will relieve brain pressure and promote blood flow.

Anonymous L joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 33 minutes later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #672,122

Meritocratically emerging as a meaningful individual. Although perhaps only 2 years ago might I have never entertained listening to a Negroid (this is not a racial epithet, you’re thinking of a Fabian death apparatus, in the initial, whom I’ve been most negligent, effacing, and outright impertinent in my old writings a lot, it was to see themselves an impoverishment of word-anything in their significance as self-independently standing constituents. In other words: the movement’s graft cannot any longer lean on popular power as its sole dependency, compelling itself a fiction of a proposal. Despite heavily enfoisted Aspergian intransigence and lassitude from the 'systemi' (same origin; the meaning obvious) and become 100 different new people, with all NHS-provided sexual phenotypological transformation, identifying-feature concealment transformation, and race phenotypological transformation surgeries. Just follow your "conditions". So we have given you with the international community? It's humiliating and indignifying to show your tacit support for internationalist corruption of the scientific pantheon, we are most certainly not recruiting.

buttons replied with this 10 years ago, 7 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #672,154

@previous (L)
you never closed the first set of parentheses there so I didn't read this reply

Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 10 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #672,158

@671,965 (!MLHqI35Srs)
Based on what evidence, Mr. Gillon? Cite your sources.

Anonymous N joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 14 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #672,169

You can thank the conversion of progesterone to testosterone for that. Males tend to have larger heads than females after all.

Anonymous N double-posted this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #672,170

@671,965 (!MLHqI35Srs)
Indeed and that is why the Irish are known for their superior intelligence. They have the largest skulls in all of Europe.

Anonymous G replied with this 10 years ago, 19 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #672,186

@previous (N)
Cite your source.

Anonymous N replied with this 10 years ago, 11 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #672,188

@previous (G)
http://www.theapricity.com/snpa/chapter-X2.htm

Anonymous O joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 25 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #672,193

@previous (N)
Bullshit.

Using Control F for Find IQ and Intelligence does not appear in that citation. Issues like how many Irish freckle and nose's detail are discussed.

http://www.theamericanconservative.com/articles/race-iq-and-wealth/

https://hbdchick.wordpress.com/2012/08/06/the-case-of-the-missing-irish-iq-data/

I am not going to use my citations to prove anything.

> Indeed and that is why the Irish are known for their superior intelligence. They have the largest skulls in all of Europe.

Fail

Anonymous J replied with this 10 years ago, 11 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #672,376

this nigga retarded
:

Please familiarise yourself with the rules and markup syntax before posting.