Topic: What sort of wife would Sophie make?
Anonymous A started this discussion 10 years ago #51,790
A good one, a bad one? Whould she cook and clean or would she be a working girl? Do you think she would be more sub or more raging feminist?
!MLHqI35Srs joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later[^] [v] #671,828
Mediocre, would try to (x ditto; autism affects my capacity to do both, I'm not a great domestic and sensory disturbance irks me), and probably, in all truth, sub if the man was guaranteeably competent.
(Edited 19 seconds later.)
Catherine !TGirlYJKXM joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 5 minutes later, 9 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #671,832
I would cook and clean if I were a wife. Hopefully my husband (or wife) in this scenario makes a decent living that we could afford quality imgredients. Now I want to make chicken noodle soup again.
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 12 seconds later, 9 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #671,833
OP
> or would she be a working girl?
Sophie is a lazy Scot. He does not even have the energy to put on his kilt, I mean dress, daily.
> or would she be a working girl?
Sophie is a lazy Scot. He does not even have the energy to put on his kilt, I mean dress, daily.
squeegee joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 11 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #671,835
she'd spend all her time posting on the internet and having wierd roleplay sex. no cooking, no cleaning, no responsibilities and you'd have to listen to her rant constantly and complain about everything out of her control. you'd also have to play out bizzare sexual fantasies and perversions that she feels are a necessary to be intimate.
this is just based on her internet persona and apparent obsessions and stated sexual predilections.
this is just based on her internet persona and apparent obsessions and stated sexual predilections.
!MLHqI35Srs replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 12 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #671,836
@previous (squeegee)
Many couples like to engage in "wierd roleplay sex". What happens in the bedroom is none of your goddamn concern.
Many couples like to engage in "wierd roleplay sex". What happens in the bedroom is none of your goddamn concern.
squeegee replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 15 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #671,837
@previous (!MLHqI35Srs)
then why do you feel the need to go on and on about your sissy fantasies and how sub you are? dude... we only know anything because you've made it public information. if you want to say it's none of my concern the you shouldn't air your perverted laundry to everyone.
then why do you feel the need to go on and on about your sissy fantasies and how sub you are? dude... we only know anything because you've made it public information. if you want to say it's none of my concern the you shouldn't air your perverted laundry to everyone.
!MLHqI35Srs replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 18 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #671,839
@previous (squeegee)
You're kinkshaming whether stated publically or done privately. But by qualification of the difference between "stated" and "done", you are still passing a value judgement and thus forfeit on the right for those judgements to concern objectively the business of others.
You're kinkshaming whether stated publically or done privately. But by qualification of the difference between "stated" and "done", you are still passing a value judgement and thus forfeit on the right for those judgements to concern objectively the business of others.
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 11 minutes later, 29 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #671,847
@previous (!MLHqI35Srs)
> you are still passing a value judgement
You're two faced. You keep passing value judgements on Doctors.
> you are still passing a value judgement
You're two faced. You keep passing value judgements on Doctors.
squeegee replied with this 10 years ago, 4 minutes later, 34 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #671,853
@671,839 (!MLHqI35Srs)
shaming people is a perfectly acceptible form of social interaction that has worked for millenia to modify the actions of twits. it's only recently that shame has come under fire and it's always people who are ashamed people know about their shameful ways that get upset by it.
but that's the whole point of it you cum gurgling diaper wearing pervert.
shaming people is a perfectly acceptible form of social interaction that has worked for millenia to modify the actions of twits. it's only recently that shame has come under fire and it's always people who are ashamed people know about their shameful ways that get upset by it.
but that's the whole point of it you cum gurgling diaper wearing pervert.
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 37 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #671,858
@previous (squeegee)
> but that's the whole point of it you cum gurgling diaper wearing pervert.
Expect quality squeegee reply. Get more than expected.
> but that's the whole point of it you cum gurgling diaper wearing pervert.
Expect quality squeegee reply. Get more than expected.
Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 1 hour later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #671,922
A fucking ugly ass he-bitch.
He had a chance with Bert, but he blew it(literally).
He had a chance with Bert, but he blew it(literally).
Anonymous C replied with this 10 years ago, 1 hour later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #671,959
@671,853 (squeegee)
Reading your posts now are starting to feel like I'm reading a better structured Syntax post.
Reading your posts now are starting to feel like I'm reading a better structured Syntax post.
Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 6 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #671,961
@previous (C)
really? guess i should start primarily posting anon for a while then. see you on the other side, anon
really? guess i should start primarily posting anon for a while then. see you on the other side, anon
buttons joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 42 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #671,975
Anonymous C replied with this 10 years ago, 36 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #671,980
@previous (buttons)
It's like he become more arrogant and full of himself. At least when Syntax does it he always has the excuse of being a lovable elder, but when squeegee does it, it just feels prickish.
It's like he become more arrogant and full of himself. At least when Syntax does it he always has the excuse of being a lovable elder, but when squeegee does it, it just feels prickish.
Anonymous I replied with this 10 years ago, 44 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #672,002
@previous (C)
really? have i changed though? i've always been arrogant and prickish, remember when i was charlie sheen? i was a dick.
maybe i have changed, idk, i've been here near 5 years. am i becoming an asshole? haven't i always been one?
maybe i need to look at squeegee and make some changes. that sounds like a lot of work though. going anon would probably just be easier.
really? have i changed though? i've always been arrogant and prickish, remember when i was charlie sheen? i was a dick.
maybe i have changed, idk, i've been here near 5 years. am i becoming an asshole? haven't i always been one?
maybe i need to look at squeegee and make some changes. that sounds like a lot of work though. going anon would probably just be easier.
Anonymous C replied with this 10 years ago, 13 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #672,006
@previous (I)
I could just now be noticing it, but I do notice that squeegee comes off as an arrogant whiny fart during reviews or critiques of anything.
I could just now be noticing it, but I do notice that squeegee comes off as an arrogant whiny fart during reviews or critiques of anything.
squeegee replied with this 10 years ago, 24 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #672,018
kook !!mCVqftDha joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #672,021
Anonymous C replied with this 10 years ago, 19 seconds later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #672,022
@672,018 (squeegee)
And Wonder Woman, and Fury Road, and any other bullshit complaints of feminism where logic goes right out of the window much like whenever a feminist themselves try to argue.
And Wonder Woman, and Fury Road, and any other bullshit complaints of feminism where logic goes right out of the window much like whenever a feminist themselves try to argue.
squeegee replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #672,023
@previous (C)yeah, yeah, put more words in my mouth you whiny fuck, you know good and god damned well i wasn't making any misogynistic comments. you keep trying to paint me that way but it's not going to work because you're a fuck-face.
Anonymous D replied with this 10 years ago, 58 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #672,030
buttons replied with this 10 years ago, 16 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #672,044
@672,002 (I)
wow you were charlie sheen?? I hated that Schtick
I like squeegee as an apolitical 30-something good-natured family-oriented gamer guy who has a decent social life
But lately all I've been seeing is divisive, conservative, salty, braggart squeegee who doesn't even bother to use his poorly taxidermied cats appropriately
wow you were charlie sheen?? I hated that Schtick
I like squeegee as an apolitical 30-something good-natured family-oriented gamer guy who has a decent social life
But lately all I've been seeing is divisive, conservative, salty, braggart squeegee who doesn't even bother to use his poorly taxidermied cats appropriately
buttons double-posted this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #672,047
@672,023 (squeegee)
Oh yeah and your topics have been getting more weird in less of a funny way and more of a 'is this guy ok?' Way
Oh yeah and your topics have been getting more weird in less of a funny way and more of a 'is this guy ok?' Way
squeegee replied with this 10 years ago, 28 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #672,057
@previous (buttons)
yeah? like in what way? got an example? you're dealing in vague generalizations. what about my topics make you worry if i'm "ok" or not. just curious.
yeah? like in what way? got an example? you're dealing in vague generalizations. what about my topics make you worry if i'm "ok" or not. just curious.
buttons replied with this 10 years ago, 1 hour later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #672,065
@previous (squeegee)
like the time travel one and some other one
Idk I'm making generalizations because I don't keep a notebook on 'weird topics squeegee makes'
Usually the ones to which Becky replies 'how high are you right now'
Does that work
like the time travel one and some other one
Idk I'm making generalizations because I don't keep a notebook on 'weird topics squeegee makes'
Usually the ones to which Becky replies 'how high are you right now'
Does that work
squeegee replied with this 10 years ago, 1 hour later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #672,071
@previous (buttons)uh, so the ones that are obvious satire? dude, i didn't really believe i was traveling through time by smoking drugs. are you fucking okay, bud? you seem to be taking things a little too seriously around here. maybe you need to take a break and go outside for a bit. i'm not actually a taxidermied cat who's been to hell and got fucked up at satan's house. you do know what fiction means, right? squeegee is a persona, some of my beliefs and personality leak through but i very opportunistically and deliberately say things that are outlandish or unexpected because i think it's funny. i often times say things that are counter to my actual beliefs because it makes me chuckle. and you believe them or think they inform on me as a person? i didn't think i would need to spell this out to anyone, but i think i'm trolling you and didn't even realize it.
tell you what, let me ingest some quantum time fog and time trip a few hours into the future to read your reply, i can't wait to read it.
squeegee double-posted this 10 years ago, 4 minutes later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #672,072
oh good lord, your future reply is pretty cringe worthy. you totally miss the entire point. i'm not actually sometimes a transgender named squeegette. that's a character.edit: i know, i know, you're asking yourself, "why did he make an edit and not just go back in time and fix it at the source," well, fuck you, that's why.
(Edited 1 minute later.)
buttons joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 36 minutes later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #672,074
@672,071 (squeegee)
this is exactly the kind of behavior i'm talking about.
I know when you're making jokes. I in no way take any of your stupid shit seriously, don't get off thinking I do, it's just that your stupid shit has been getting stupider at an alarming rate
you get way defensive and angry lately too
I just get the vibe that you've been generally more unhappy lately and, to me, some random guy on the internet, less likable
that's my two cents
but you could go off the deep end over this and accuse me of conflating fantasy with reality all angry-like again
tbh I think your squeegette and owl posts are funny
this is exactly the kind of behavior i'm talking about.
I know when you're making jokes. I in no way take any of your stupid shit seriously, don't get off thinking I do, it's just that your stupid shit has been getting stupider at an alarming rate
you get way defensive and angry lately too
I just get the vibe that you've been generally more unhappy lately and, to me, some random guy on the internet, less likable
that's my two cents
but you could go off the deep end over this and accuse me of conflating fantasy with reality all angry-like again
tbh I think your squeegette and owl posts are funny
A. Jones !M6R0eWkIpk joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 25 minutes later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #672,080
@671,828 (!MLHqI35Srs)
@671,832 (Catherine !TGirlYJKXM)
Mediocre at best, but you both could be better, a good place to start is becoming independent adults. Try that instead of hoping some schmuck is going to sweep you off your feet and keep you housed, fed, comfortable, etc. You'll both be happier in the end for it.
Alternatively, I'll find a couple reasonably well to do autistic neckbeards to marry you provided there's a hefty dowry in it for me.
@671,832 (Catherine !TGirlYJKXM)
Mediocre at best, but you both could be better, a good place to start is becoming independent adults. Try that instead of hoping some schmuck is going to sweep you off your feet and keep you housed, fed, comfortable, etc. You'll both be happier in the end for it.
Alternatively, I'll find a couple reasonably well to do autistic neckbeards to marry you provided there's a hefty dowry in it for me.
squeegee replied with this 10 years ago, 30 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #672,084
@672,074 (buttons)squeegette and the owl are arguably two of the most mean spirited posts that i've made. squeegette especially, she's nothing more than a collection of the worst possible stereotypes about transexuals. me making silly posts about time travel makes me more unlikable than open bigotry and derision?
alright then.
and keep trying to gauge my emotional state, you're doing a fantastic job
(Edited 25 seconds later.)
nuttons replied with this 10 years ago, 5 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #672,085
@previous (squeegee)
oh yeah I like the mean spiritedness of the owl posts
but I never actually read the texts in the squeegette posts I just meant I liked the pics
I just like your pics
and when you are mean to Denmark guy
oh yeah I like the mean spiritedness of the owl posts
but I never actually read the texts in the squeegette posts I just meant I liked the pics
I just like your pics
and when you are mean to Denmark guy
nuttons double-posted this 10 years ago, 34 seconds later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #672,086
buttons joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #672,088
squeegee you suck everything sucks
goddamn i'm just disdainful of everything
goddamn i'm just disdainful of everything
squeegee replied with this 10 years ago, 16 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #672,089
buttons replied with this 10 years ago, 3 hours later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #672,110
Metæ joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 31 minutes later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #672,118
Insufferable with all her word salad about HAselgrove and negroids.
(Edited 12 seconds later.)
Anonymous P joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 13 minutes later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #672,120
To death with the sperg, and forever shall we endeavour to achieve, whether by dint of defect against, and, contrarily, may serve enhancingly strengthening the morality. For, in an Aspergian conception of socio-dynamic wiles, unfettered by Hobbensian chains of felicitarian obsessive-compulsions with ‘heirarchical placement’ ala neurofeminine pathology, one’s principally integral values internalize themselves freely thereof thus. Practice of these moralities, speaking for itself. Those who espouse to integration may well indeed preponderate the enlightened among ourselves in number, but it is a Science some time), understandably, for it's basically to throw mud in the process of ‘research’ from the earliest days, it is the work of brutalization you carry out in your every “professionally”, “clinically justified” action every day.