Topic: Now why would a religious institution have to hide their forum on the deep web?
Anonymous A started this discussion 10 years ago #51,595
A little something dug up from the darknet.
https://hxnibog5m2ocjeef.onion.link/
https://hxnibog5m2ocjeef.onion.link/
FuckAlms !vUd1jCb4os joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 7 minutes later[^] [v] #668,873
More to the point, why would you be hunting around that part of the deep web?
Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 5 minutes later, 12 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #668,875
@OP
Not clicking that CP link.
Not clicking that CP link.
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 16 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #668,876
After you register to use it.
You can hire someone to "recruit your enemy" to a faster entry into heaven. Payment is only by bitcoin.
You can hire someone to "recruit your enemy" to a faster entry into heaven. Payment is only by bitcoin.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 12 minutes later, 29 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #668,878
FuckAlms !vUd1jCb4os replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 31 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #668,879
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 51 seconds later, 32 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #668,880
FuckAlms !vUd1jCb4os replied with this 10 years ago, 35 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #668,887
FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 1 hour later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #668,913
FuckAlms !vUd1jCb4os replied with this 10 years ago, 1 hour later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #668,927
@previous (FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI)
No, that was Martin from Wichita. Keep up nonce, this business of deciding whose fake name belongs to whom on internet message boards is serious.
No, that was Martin from Wichita. Keep up nonce, this business of deciding whose fake name belongs to whom on internet message boards is serious.
FuckAlms joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 9 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #668,928
Fuck
Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 6 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #668,929
FuckAlms !vUd1jCb4os replied with this 10 years ago, 20 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #668,931
@previous (H)
You back yourself onto 12 inch love pumps with such regularity your ass is becoming a wizard's sleeve.
You back yourself onto 12 inch love pumps with such regularity your ass is becoming a wizard's sleeve.
kook !!mCVqftDha joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 48 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #668,932
@668,927 (FuckAlms !vUd1jCb4os)
You have some sort of weird sexual obsession with fuckalms, but not in a charming way like me. That's sad
You have some sort of weird sexual obsession with fuckalms, but not in a charming way like me. That's sad
FuckAlms !vUd1jCb4os replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #668,935
Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 10 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #668,936
Anonymous H replied with this 10 years ago, 20 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #669,077
FuckAlms !vUd1jCb4os replied with this 10 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #669,117
@668,932 (kook !!mCVqftDha)
> You have some sort of weird sexual obsession with fuckalms, but not in a charming way like me. That's sad
The Fuckalms you're referring to is a teenager who is still in school. You on the other hand are a middle-aged fat old lonely humorless cunt with the personality of a dead librarian. In other words, that boy you say you have a "weird sexual obsession" for is practically a child, you sad old bitch. A child you know only online too, you creepy fucking weirdo.
Fucking hell, you pedophiles really have formed a little club haven't you?
> You have some sort of weird sexual obsession with fuckalms, but not in a charming way like me. That's sad
The Fuckalms you're referring to is a teenager who is still in school. You on the other hand are a middle-aged fat old lonely humorless cunt with the personality of a dead librarian. In other words, that boy you say you have a "weird sexual obsession" for is practically a child, you sad old bitch. A child you know only online too, you creepy fucking weirdo.
Fucking hell, you pedophiles really have formed a little club haven't you?
FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI replied with this 10 years ago, 12 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #669,121
FuckAlms !vUd1jCb4os replied with this 10 years ago, 6 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #669,123
@previous (FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI)
You seem uncomfortable, now that your fangirl has revealed herself to be some creepy old pedophile. Like attracts like so they say!
You seem uncomfortable, now that your fangirl has revealed herself to be some creepy old pedophile. Like attracts like so they say!
FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI replied with this 10 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #669,126
@previous (FuckAlms !vUd1jCb4os)
> now that your fangirl has revealed herself to be some creepy old pedophile.
How do you figure?
> now that your fangirl has revealed herself to be some creepy old pedophile.
How do you figure?
FuckAlms !vUd1jCb4os replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #669,127
FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI replied with this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #669,129
FuckAlms !vUd1jCb4os replied with this 10 years ago, 24 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #669,135
@previous (FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI)
"How does one figure?"
"Via the brain"
"Then your brain is disconnected from reality"
Ah nonceboy, you are quite literally the clueless moronic gift that never stops giving. And to think you're the guy who decided to delete Shakespeare and Nabokov parodies because you decided for everybody that they "weren't funny" (Doc's shitposting spam was "hilarious" though, right?)
To be serious though, you know I keep to my word. I never ban evade even if I disagree with mod decisions, I 'respect' them in so far as I never go against them. I have never gone against a mod decision and I have never once broken my word. I am fair even if you don't want to accept it. And so I say again, if you simply answer the question I initially asked you last week then I will stop this 'Fuckalms' shtick, I'll stop bothering you completely, and we'll call an end to the matter. Just answer the question.
"How does one figure?"
"Via the brain"
"Then your brain is disconnected from reality"
Ah nonceboy, you are quite literally the clueless moronic gift that never stops giving. And to think you're the guy who decided to delete Shakespeare and Nabokov parodies because you decided for everybody that they "weren't funny" (Doc's shitposting spam was "hilarious" though, right?)
To be serious though, you know I keep to my word. I never ban evade even if I disagree with mod decisions, I 'respect' them in so far as I never go against them. I have never gone against a mod decision and I have never once broken my word. I am fair even if you don't want to accept it. And so I say again, if you simply answer the question I initially asked you last week then I will stop this 'Fuckalms' shtick, I'll stop bothering you completely, and we'll call an end to the matter. Just answer the question.
FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI replied with this 10 years ago, 5 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #669,139
Anonymous K joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 58 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #669,141
@669,135 (FuckAlms !vUd1jCb4os)
> stop this 'Fuckalms' shtick
You miss one of the best posters TC had. The Doctor. You always jizzed in your panties over him.
> stop this 'Fuckalms' shtick
You miss one of the best posters TC had. The Doctor. You always jizzed in your panties over him.
FuckAlms !vUd1jCb4os replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #669,145
@669,139 (FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI)
Still gonna evade the question huh? Very well, I offered to call an end to it but since you're clearly happy to let it carry on then I guess I'll oblige you. Don't worry though, we have different trip codes, nobody will casually mistake me for you. See you around nonce!
Still gonna evade the question huh? Very well, I offered to call an end to it but since you're clearly happy to let it carry on then I guess I'll oblige you. Don't worry though, we have different trip codes, nobody will casually mistake me for you. See you around nonce!
Betsy !FGiFa6Df0k double-posted this 10 years ago, 44 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #669,146
FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI replied with this 10 years ago, 2 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #669,175
@669,145 (FuckAlms !vUd1jCb4os)
You won't stop bothering me regardless, seeing as you showed up here as soon as tc wasn't available.
You won't stop bothering me regardless, seeing as you showed up here as soon as tc wasn't available.
kook !!mCVqftDha replied with this 10 years ago, 17 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #669,185
@669,117 (FuckAlms !vUd1jCb4os)
You literally post about her day after day. You even roleplay as a pedo. Stop trying to hide it and go with your heart. Maybe you two will develop a great friendship.
You literally post about her day after day. You even roleplay as a pedo. Stop trying to hide it and go with your heart. Maybe you two will develop a great friendship.
kook !!mCVqftDha double-posted this 10 years ago, 42 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #669,186
kook !!mCVqftDha triple-posted this 10 years ago, 40 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #669,187
FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI replied with this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #669,190
@669,186 (kook !!mCVqftDha)
I think he must have had a meltdown; he's flailing all over the place like fish on the deck.
I think he must have had a meltdown; he's flailing all over the place like fish on the deck.
kook !!mCVqftDha replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #669,191
@previous (FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI)
Well I'm dating him now. So his temperament should improve in the near future.
Well I'm dating him now. So his temperament should improve in the near future.
FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI replied with this 10 years ago, 13 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #669,317
@669,135 (FuckAlms !vUd1jCb4os)> delete Shakespeare and Nabokov parodies because you decided for everybody that they "weren't funny"
You wrote dialogues about pedophilia. Are you seriously saying that you think discussion of child abuse is humorous? For the sake of the world, please please eat lead.
FuckAlms !vUd1jCb4os replied with this 10 years ago, 3 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #669,403
@previous (FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI)
> You wrote dialogues about pedophilia. Are you seriously saying that you think discussion of child abuse is humorous? For the sake of the world, please please eat lead.
Post evidence in the form of a screenshot that I ever wrote "dialogues about pedophilia"
Also, even if a person did that, why would it then follow that those dialogues would be "humorous", you sick creep? How have you gone from "a discussion of pedophilia" to "humorous"?
Oh wait, do you mean "humorous" like when Doctor would post those links to stories about adults trying to have sex with kids and he'd label them "hilarious"? Those threads you had no problem with because you were too busy banning everyone who objected to him turning a once-popular board into a playpen for pedophiles.
Keep digging, nonceboy.
> You wrote dialogues about pedophilia. Are you seriously saying that you think discussion of child abuse is humorous? For the sake of the world, please please eat lead.
Post evidence in the form of a screenshot that I ever wrote "dialogues about pedophilia"
Also, even if a person did that, why would it then follow that those dialogues would be "humorous", you sick creep? How have you gone from "a discussion of pedophilia" to "humorous"?
Oh wait, do you mean "humorous" like when Doctor would post those links to stories about adults trying to have sex with kids and he'd label them "hilarious"? Those threads you had no problem with because you were too busy banning everyone who objected to him turning a once-popular board into a playpen for pedophiles.
Keep digging, nonceboy.
kook !!mCVqftDha replied with this 10 years ago, 30 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #669,427
FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI replied with this 10 years ago, 12 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #669,448
@669,403 (FuckAlms !vUd1jCb4os)
You complained that I deleted your posts because I judged them to be unfunny. The only conclusion that can be drawn from the objection as you stated it, is that you disagree with my assessment that pedophilia is unfunny. You really are fucking retarded.
How very convenient for you that tc is down so that you can turn my call-out around to ask me to post screenshots of something I can't produce because you know that I'm actually not a pedo and would not have taken screenshots of something I expressly deleted for being pedo material. Sorry, but you've been asked countless times in the past to submit evidence to support any of your claims and have always used long diatribes and the Chewbacca defense to try and convince people that the evidence is already in plain sight, while declining to even providing hyperlinks. Your ploy has unraveled.
You complained that I deleted your posts because I judged them to be unfunny. The only conclusion that can be drawn from the objection as you stated it, is that you disagree with my assessment that pedophilia is unfunny. You really are fucking retarded.
How very convenient for you that tc is down so that you can turn my call-out around to ask me to post screenshots of something I can't produce because you know that I'm actually not a pedo and would not have taken screenshots of something I expressly deleted for being pedo material. Sorry, but you've been asked countless times in the past to submit evidence to support any of your claims and have always used long diatribes and the Chewbacca defense to try and convince people that the evidence is already in plain sight, while declining to even providing hyperlinks. Your ploy has unraveled.
FuckAlms !vUd1jCb4os replied with this 10 years ago, 1 hour later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #669,517
@previous (FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI)
> You complained that I deleted your posts because I judged them to be unfunny. The only conclusion that can be drawn from the objection as you stated it, is that you disagree with my assessment that pedophilia is unfunny. You really are fucking retarded.
Nope dumbass, I "complained" that you deleted parodies of Shakespeare and Nabokov. Do you know who they are, retard? You, typically, brought pedophilia into it, possibly a Freudian slip resulting from whatever it is you're jacking off to right now. You really are fucking retarded.
Still waiting for those screenshots, pedo...
> You complained that I deleted your posts because I judged them to be unfunny. The only conclusion that can be drawn from the objection as you stated it, is that you disagree with my assessment that pedophilia is unfunny. You really are fucking retarded.
Nope dumbass, I "complained" that you deleted parodies of Shakespeare and Nabokov. Do you know who they are, retard? You, typically, brought pedophilia into it, possibly a Freudian slip resulting from whatever it is you're jacking off to right now. You really are fucking retarded.
Still waiting for those screenshots, pedo...
FuckAlms !vUd1jCb4os double-posted this 10 years ago, 34 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #669,542
@669,448 (FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI)
Fuckalms, look what you've done here. Now you've gone and dragged your friend Kook into this. You tried to let her fight your battle and as a result she's being torn apart in public now. So here's the new situation - now we're gonna see how much of a friend you are to her. If you answer the initial question (about did you or did you not ban the guy who laughed at Louie, and if so, then why, while allowing him to shit up the board with his "niggers" posts) then not only will I stop attacking you, but you have my word that I will never again post a single thing to or about Kook, much less post that picture. I will completely leave her alone.
All you need to do is answer the question. And don't kid yourself that this isn't affecting her, it is. She's putting a brave 'face' (I guess that's what she has) on it but just trust me here, she wishes this wasn't happening. So, it's in your hands. If you're really her friend, then only you can make this stop. If you don't...well then, any post which makes her feel bad will be on your conscience from now on.
Fuckalms, look what you've done here. Now you've gone and dragged your friend Kook into this. You tried to let her fight your battle and as a result she's being torn apart in public now. So here's the new situation - now we're gonna see how much of a friend you are to her. If you answer the initial question (about did you or did you not ban the guy who laughed at Louie, and if so, then why, while allowing him to shit up the board with his "niggers" posts) then not only will I stop attacking you, but you have my word that I will never again post a single thing to or about Kook, much less post that picture. I will completely leave her alone.
All you need to do is answer the question. And don't kid yourself that this isn't affecting her, it is. She's putting a brave 'face' (I guess that's what she has) on it but just trust me here, she wishes this wasn't happening. So, it's in your hands. If you're really her friend, then only you can make this stop. If you don't...well then, any post which makes her feel bad will be on your conscience from now on.
(Edited 49 seconds later.)
kook !!mCVqftDha replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #669,543
@previous (FuckAlms !vUd1jCb4os)
Donny you dont need fuckalms anymore. When you continue to flirt with her it just hurts us both, and completely undermines what we've created together. I am for you, and you are for me. Its that simple, so why? Why do this?
Donny you dont need fuckalms anymore. When you continue to flirt with her it just hurts us both, and completely undermines what we've created together. I am for you, and you are for me. Its that simple, so why? Why do this?
FuckAlms !vUd1jCb4os replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #669,544
Time is a ticking object on the wall, Fuckalms......kook !!mCVqftDha replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #669,547
@previous (FuckAlms !vUd1jCb4os)
Time will never stop what you've created. There is no hope for change.
Time will never stop what you've created. There is no hope for change.
FuckAlms !vUd1jCb4os replied with this 10 years ago, 21 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #669,564
Yo Fuckalms dude, check it out - <-----this, er, I'm gonna say "woman" right here has a "weird sexual obsession" (her words) for you. Do us a favor buddy, if and when you ever fuck her, film it and post it here. We've never seen a guy fuck a girl whose chins needed their own bra.
Time is a circular ticking contraption, Fuckalms...
kook !!mCVqftDha replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #669,565
@previous (FuckAlms !vUd1jCb4os)
No I have a sexual obsession with you Donny. Not even fuckalms can stop this now. I will pursue you until I've worn myself down into s nutrient rich powder. It's destiny calling
No I have a sexual obsession with you Donny. Not even fuckalms can stop this now. I will pursue you until I've worn myself down into s nutrient rich powder. It's destiny calling
FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #669,568
@669,517 (FuckAlms !vUd1jCb4os)
The only Freudian slip was when you embedded your bizarre fantasies about me and The Doctor into a Shakespeare passage and posted it on the internet.
The only Freudian slip was when you embedded your bizarre fantasies about me and The Doctor into a Shakespeare passage and posted it on the internet.
FuckAlms !vUd1jCb4os replied with this 10 years ago, 4 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #669,571
@previous (FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI)
> The only Freudian slip was when you embedded your bizarre fantasies about me and The Doctor into a Shakespeare passage and posted it on the internet.
Ah, suddenly you recognize that Lear parody as being from Shakespeare? Bullshitting little retard, quit covering up the fact that you banned anyone who laughed at the pedophiles who used your board while allowing those same pedophiles to shit it up and drive everyone else away.
You're still not answering the question by the way. Some friend you are to Kook! Believe me buddy, she's pretending she doesn't care (because at this point what else can she do, she'll look even more stupid if she asks you to end this for her), but she really doesn't like that picture being posted. And you're too proud to help your old friend and stop it for her.
> The only Freudian slip was when you embedded your bizarre fantasies about me and The Doctor into a Shakespeare passage and posted it on the internet.
Ah, suddenly you recognize that Lear parody as being from Shakespeare? Bullshitting little retard, quit covering up the fact that you banned anyone who laughed at the pedophiles who used your board while allowing those same pedophiles to shit it up and drive everyone else away.
You're still not answering the question by the way. Some friend you are to Kook! Believe me buddy, she's pretending she doesn't care (because at this point what else can she do, she'll look even more stupid if she asks you to end this for her), but she really doesn't like that picture being posted. And you're too proud to help your old friend and stop it for her.
FuckAlms !vUd1jCb4os double-posted this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #669,572
@669,568 (FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI)
Actually, you know what? You've just fucked yourself there, because the Shakespeare parody was the Act 1 scene where Lear's 3 daughters declare their love for the king ("I love you dearer than eyesight..." etc). That one wasn't even about you, and it sure as shit contained nothing at all about Doc's pedophilia. So you really are just pulling kiddie sex out of your ass here you dirty fucking nonce.
Actually, you know what? You've just fucked yourself there, because the Shakespeare parody was the Act 1 scene where Lear's 3 daughters declare their love for the king ("I love you dearer than eyesight..." etc). That one wasn't even about you, and it sure as shit contained nothing at all about Doc's pedophilia. So you really are just pulling kiddie sex out of your ass here you dirty fucking nonce.
Anonymous L joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #669,575
kook !!mCVqftDha replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #669,580
@669,571 (FuckAlms !vUd1jCb4os)
I never want this to end. Even MM left before things got REALLY good.
I never want this to end. Even MM left before things got REALLY good.
FuckAlms !vUd1jCb4os replied with this 10 years ago, 6 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #669,586
@669,575 (L)
> Do you have proof in the form of screenshots?
How very convenient for you that tc is down so that you can turn my call-out around to ask me to post screenshots of something I can't produce.
> Do you have proof in the form of screenshots?
How very convenient for you that tc is down so that you can turn my call-out around to ask me to post screenshots of something I can't produce.
FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #669,587
@669,571 (FuckAlms !vUd1jCb4os)
In @669,517 (FuckAlms !vUd1jCb4os) you said
I'm telling you what you told me.
In @669,517 (FuckAlms !vUd1jCb4os) you said
Nope dumbass, I "complained" that you deleted parodies of Shakespeare and Nabokov
I'm telling you what you told me.
FuckAlms !vUd1jCb4os replied with this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #669,588
@previous (FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI)
I need to say it more slowly for you, huh? Ok then, I'll try. Follow along here Fuckalms, maybe say the words out loud if it helps you. You ready? Here we go...
Fuckalms - where...in...that...parody...of...Lear...was...there...anything...about...you...and...the...Doctor..?
Because...you...wrote...that...I..."embedded your fantasies about me and the Doctor into a Shakespeare parody".
No...I...didn't...you...dumb....fucking...retard.
I need to say it more slowly for you, huh? Ok then, I'll try. Follow along here Fuckalms, maybe say the words out loud if it helps you. You ready? Here we go...
Fuckalms - where...in...that...parody...of...Lear...was...there...anything...about...you...and...the...Doctor..?
Because...you...wrote...that...I..."embedded your fantasies about me and the Doctor into a Shakespeare parody".
No...I...didn't...you...dumb....fucking...retard.
kook !!mCVqftDha replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #669,590
Someone tell me how I can purchase tinychan!
(Edited 13 seconds later.)
kook !!mCVqftDha double-posted this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #669,591
FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI replied with this 10 years ago, 4 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #669,593
@669,588 (FuckAlms !vUd1jCb4os)
It doesn't matter because you can't prove that you didn't and I can't prove that you did. But even if you could prove it, you wouldn't because your whole shtick is dependent on goalpost moving, logical entrapment, and never actually proving anything, so that the game continues forever, allowing you to feed your obsession.
It doesn't matter because you can't prove that you didn't and I can't prove that you did. But even if you could prove it, you wouldn't because your whole shtick is dependent on goalpost moving, logical entrapment, and never actually proving anything, so that the game continues forever, allowing you to feed your obsession.
Anonymous L replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #669,594
Anonymous B replied with this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #669,595
@669,593 (FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI)
No, you little prick. My "shitck" is based on not allowing you to just run away from what you did and hope that it will be forgotten. I'm here to tell you that it won't.
You turned Tinychan into a safe and very secure playpen for a select few pedophiles and shitposters. And you banned people who objected to it happening, such as the guy who laughed at Louie. Of course you yourself are not a pedophile, that's fucking obvious, that much IS just bullshit I throw at you (and why I'm 'out of character' now in writing this). But you DID give total protection to a tiny group of racists and pedophiles and you banned anyone else from the board. This a FACT, but as you say, the board is gone now so neither of us can present screen shots and the like.
And now you're hoping this fact will go away. It won't, not until you explain your actions in banning that guy who mocked Louie.
No, you little prick. My "shitck" is based on not allowing you to just run away from what you did and hope that it will be forgotten. I'm here to tell you that it won't.
You turned Tinychan into a safe and very secure playpen for a select few pedophiles and shitposters. And you banned people who objected to it happening, such as the guy who laughed at Louie. Of course you yourself are not a pedophile, that's fucking obvious, that much IS just bullshit I throw at you (and why I'm 'out of character' now in writing this). But you DID give total protection to a tiny group of racists and pedophiles and you banned anyone else from the board. This a FACT, but as you say, the board is gone now so neither of us can present screen shots and the like.
And now you're hoping this fact will go away. It won't, not until you explain your actions in banning that guy who mocked Louie.
Anonymous B double-posted this 10 years ago, 53 seconds later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #669,596
@669,594 (L)
> So you don't have any proof, then?
LOL, I was quoting directly from Fuckalms' own post in this thread you dumbass :)
> So you don't have any proof, then?
LOL, I was quoting directly from Fuckalms' own post in this thread you dumbass :)
kook !!mCVqftDha replied with this 10 years ago, 9 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #669,598
FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI replied with this 10 years ago, 4 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #669,600
@669,595 (B)
I'm not running away from anything. All of your accusations are based in some bizarro universe you've concocted inside your head. You need to get help.
I'm not running away from anything. All of your accusations are based in some bizarro universe you've concocted inside your head. You need to get help.
Anonymous B replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #669,601
@previous (FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI)
My "accusations" are concocted? Ok then, a simple yes or no answer - are you saying that you DIDN'T ban the guy who laughed at the picture of Louie's bedroom? Yes or no Fuckalms, did you ban him, or am I "concocting" it?
My "accusations" are concocted? Ok then, a simple yes or no answer - are you saying that you DIDN'T ban the guy who laughed at the picture of Louie's bedroom? Yes or no Fuckalms, did you ban him, or am I "concocting" it?
kook !!mCVqftDha replied with this 10 years ago, 37 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #669,609
Anonymous B replied with this 10 years ago, 40 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #669,615
@previous (kook !!mCVqftDha)
> What was the reason given for the ban?
One word: "Rude". That was all. "Rude". For asking Louie if he was really justified in posting pictures of lynched black men and starved Jews in the Holocaust and thinking they were just about the greatest things in the world.
Whereas "Niggers must die", "Niggers are subhuman", "Fuck niggers", and endless pictures of black people hanging from trees and their burnt corpses were just fine and dandy with Fuckalms. No problem at all with those being posted by that uber-Mensch Louie.
But Fuckalms is avoiding answering this and is hiding behind the claim that all of this is "concocted", even though literally everyone here saw what he had allowed Tinychan to become towards the end. Oh yeah, sometimes he will say "I was doing my job as mod, it's not my job to hide things you personally don't like". Oh really? Then how the fuck do you explain banning everyone who questioned why you were allowing so much "niggers" and "Jews" content? If it's "not my job to hide things"?
> What was the reason given for the ban?
One word: "Rude". That was all. "Rude". For asking Louie if he was really justified in posting pictures of lynched black men and starved Jews in the Holocaust and thinking they were just about the greatest things in the world.
Whereas "Niggers must die", "Niggers are subhuman", "Fuck niggers", and endless pictures of black people hanging from trees and their burnt corpses were just fine and dandy with Fuckalms. No problem at all with those being posted by that uber-Mensch Louie.
But Fuckalms is avoiding answering this and is hiding behind the claim that all of this is "concocted", even though literally everyone here saw what he had allowed Tinychan to become towards the end. Oh yeah, sometimes he will say "I was doing my job as mod, it's not my job to hide things you personally don't like". Oh really? Then how the fuck do you explain banning everyone who questioned why you were allowing so much "niggers" and "Jews" content? If it's "not my job to hide things"?
(Edited 3 minutes later.)
The Doctor's Ghost replied with this 10 years ago, 1 hour later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #669,631
@previous (B)ooooooooooOOOOOOOOOOOoooooooooooooooOOOOOOOOOOOOooooooooooooooOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOoooooooooooooo
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #669,632
Who exactly is this fake FuckAlms?
His whiny tone sounds a lot like bobbyTGmadaboutdocnoncecomixsox.
His whiny tone sounds a lot like bobbyTGmadaboutdocnoncecomixsox.