Minichan

Topic: What is your favorite media outlet?

Anonymous A started this discussion 10 years ago #51,582

What's your "Go to" online media outlet?

FuckAlms !vUd1jCb4os joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 21 minutes later[^] [v] #668,699

Radio mostly. Magazines 2nd and the rest a distant 3rd.

Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 4 minutes later, 25 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #668,701

@previous (FuckAlms !vUd1jCb4os)
You're an archaic weirdo.

I like Reuters for most of my online news consumption.

chili dog !!81dzJNNYL joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 27 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #668,703

Facebook mostly

Adam Djensen joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 29 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #668,704

minichan.org

beckyderp !Hi.HILLARY joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 10 minutes later, 40 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #668,705

@previous (Adam Djensen)

> minichan.org

Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 20 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #668,715

@668,703 (chili dog !!81dzJNNYL)
Ops pic related then

squeegee joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #668,716

i used to read a lot of AP and reuters stuff and listened to npr and tried to stay up on local news by reading the dallas newspaper online and international news by reading bbc whatever stuff online and even al jazerra. for years i did that.

turns out i'm much happier ignoring all news except word of mouth. trust me, you won't miss anything important and will still end up being inundated with overflowing bullshit.

just go outside and read a book. it's much less stressful, and there ain't shit you can do about shit anyways, so just ignore it

Anonymous C replied with this 10 years ago, 16 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #668,720

@previous (squeegee)
Quality squeegee post

chili dog !!81dzJNNYL replied with this 10 years ago, 28 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #668,722

@668,715 (G)
what it's all posted by people I know or relate to

kook !!mCVqftDha joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 25 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #668,733

Rebel Media, Lowder with Crowder, Mr Madness Tommy Sotomayor, Milo, David Pakman.

Anonymous C replied with this 10 years ago, 38 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #668,745

@previous (kook !!mCVqftDha)
Just reading that made me sad.

kook !!mCVqftDha replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #668,747

@previous (C)
I'm sorry my honey. What would have been preferable? Stephen Colbert? The Young Turks?

Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 29 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #668,752

@668,745 (C)
Why?

Are they idiots?

Sheila LaBoof joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 1 hour later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #668,757

@668,733 (kook !!mCVqftDha)
that's some kooky shit right there

@previous (J)
nah, they're just making a buck off people the way limbaugh and colter have done in the past, pundit types who wind people up all the time

(Edited 2 minutes later.)

Anonymous L joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 15 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #668,758

Al Jazeera mostly. Only because that's what's on TV though. I get other news from ars technica I guess.

kook !!mCVqftDha replied with this 10 years ago, 58 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #668,764

@668,757 (Sheila LaBoof)
the same as any other person on tv or the internet.

Sheila LaBoof replied with this 10 years ago, 17 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #668,767

@previous (kook !!mCVqftDha)
sure, but kind of sketchy and skeevy, some of those guys more than others

(Edited 17 seconds later.)

Kaedin Bane !wSj5be7y6w joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 17 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #668,772

I'm kind of like a jellyfish in that I just drift around the internet aimlessly and absorb any content I run into.

FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 7 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #668,775

@668,699 (FuckAlms !vUd1jCb4os)
You got that all wrong.

Lt. Piss Pig joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 16 seconds later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #668,776

mostly the guardian and random blogs and journals that I check on if I remember to

Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 19 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #668,781

The Economist, BBC, CNN, NPR, C-SPAN, PBS, RealClearPolitics, Politico. Once in a while I'll skim Fox, MSNBC, the HuffPost and Breitbart/National Review to get more partisan coverage but I find usually their articles are shit and a waste of my energy.

(Edited 38 seconds later.)

kook !!mCVqftDha replied with this 10 years ago, 8 hours later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #668,809

@668,767 (Sheila LaBoof)
Everyone on TV is sketchy and skeevy. Also every politician.

(Edited 3 minutes later.)

chili dog !!81dzJNNYL replied with this 10 years ago, 48 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #668,814

I like reading the big old feature articles from the new york times and the Atlantic
I want to start caring about Harper's

Sheila LaBoof replied with this 10 years ago, 4 hours later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #668,854

@668,809 (kook !!mCVqftDha)
ehhh some more than others

Anonymous Q joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 8 minutes later, 20 hours after the original post[^] [v] #668,857

The Bible. Old and New Testament.
When in the mood for science fiction I skim the book of Mormon.
:

Please familiarise yourself with the rules and markup syntax before posting.