Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 20 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#668,715
@668,703 (chili dog !!81dzJNNYL)
Ops pic related then
squeegee joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#668,716
i used to read a lot of AP and reuters stuff and listened to npr and tried to stay up on local news by reading the dallas newspaper online and international news by reading bbc whatever stuff online and even al jazerra. for years i did that.
turns out i'm much happier ignoring all news except word of mouth. trust me, you won't miss anything important and will still end up being inundated with overflowing bullshit.
just go outside and read a book. it's much less stressful, and there ain't shit you can do about shit anyways, so just ignore it
Anonymous C replied with this 10 years ago, 16 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#668,720
Sheila LaBoof joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 1 hour later, 4 hours after the original post[^][v]#668,757
@668,733 (kook !!mCVqftDha)
that's some kooky shit right there
@previous (J)
nah, they're just making a buck off people the way limbaugh and colter have done in the past, pundit types who wind people up all the time
(Edited 2 minutes later.)
Anonymous L joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 15 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^][v]#668,758
Al Jazeera mostly. Only because that's what's on TV though. I get other news from ars technica I guess.
kook !!mCVqftDha replied with this 10 years ago, 58 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^][v]#668,764
@668,757 (Sheila LaBoof)
the same as any other person on tv or the internet.
Sheila LaBoof replied with this 10 years ago, 17 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^][v]#668,767
@previous (kook !!mCVqftDha)
sure, but kind of sketchy and skeevy, some of those guys more than others
(Edited 17 seconds later.)
Kaedin Bane !wSj5be7y6w joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 17 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^][v]#668,772
I'm kind of like a jellyfish in that I just drift around the internet aimlessly and absorb any content I run into.
FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 7 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^][v]#668,775
@668,699 (FuckAlms !vUd1jCb4os)
You got that all wrong.
Lt. Piss Pig joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 16 seconds later, 6 hours after the original post[^][v]#668,776
mostly the guardian and random blogs and journals that I check on if I remember to
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 19 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^][v]#668,781
The Economist, BBC, CNN, NPR, C-SPAN, PBS, RealClearPolitics, Politico. Once in a while I'll skim Fox, MSNBC, the HuffPost and Breitbart/National Review to get more partisan coverage but I find usually their articles are shit and a waste of my energy.
(Edited 38 seconds later.)
kook !!mCVqftDha replied with this 10 years ago, 8 hours later, 14 hours after the original post[^][v]#668,809
@668,767 (Sheila LaBoof)
Everyone on TV is sketchy and skeevy. Also every politician.
(Edited 3 minutes later.)
chili dog !!81dzJNNYL replied with this 10 years ago, 48 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[^][v]#668,814
I like reading the big old feature articles from the new york times and the Atlantic
I want to start caring about Harper's
Sheila LaBoof replied with this 10 years ago, 4 hours later, 19 hours after the original post[^][v]#668,854
@668,809 (kook !!mCVqftDha)
ehhh some more than others
Anonymous Q joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 8 minutes later, 20 hours after the original post[^][v]#668,857
The Bible. Old and New Testament.
When in the mood for science fiction I skim the book of Mormon.