Adam Djensen joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later[^][v]#665,641
somewhere slightly above hitler, but under angela merkel
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 4 minutes after the original post[^][v]#665,644
I think that if you posted more pictures of your cats online, then you could become a better person.
Johnny Cockrun joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 4 minutes later, 9 minutes after the original post[^][v]#665,645
Becky. Because of your profession, you are not expected to be a good person. This is not expected of attorneys. A good person, is probably not an asset, in your profession.
It takes a bad person to get off the likes of OJ.
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 4 minutes later, 13 minutes after the original post[^][v]#665,647
I like you a lot!
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 16 seconds later, 13 minutes after the original post[^][v]#665,648
I said yes, mainly cause I'm a dick.
kook !!mCVqftDha joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 17 minutes after the original post[^][v]#665,649
No I dont
squeegee joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#665,662
tbh i judge people by their looks. since i don't know what you look like i can't say if your behavior is excusable. i do tend to give people the benefit of the doubt and assume hot until proven otherwise. so i'm going to err on the side of bangable and say you're probably not a bad person.
Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 15 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#665,663
Anonymous N joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 19 hours later, 23 hours after the original post[^][v]#666,095
Not all the time.
Anonymous O joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 2 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#666,110
@665,662 (squeegee)
Squeegee you are not nearly cute enough to be that shallow.
squeegee replied with this 10 years ago, 10 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#666,111
@previous (O)
how do you mean? i'm merely pointing out that beautiful people can get away with more than ugly people. it's a double standard and my looks have nothing to do with how shallow i can be.
RWBY Rhubarb? !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 10 years ago, 21 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#666,115
@previous (squeegee)
Except if you're on trial for fraud. Then it's better to be ugly.
Antikhristos !M6R0eWkIpk joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#666,175
Nah, but really only you can answer that, you know your morals and values better than anyone else. IMO people are neither inherently bad or good. Otherwise normal "good" people can do terrible things given the right situational variables. Ever read 'The Lucifer Effect'? It's by the guy that did the infamous 'Standford Prison Experiment', check it out sometime if you feel like it.
lost soul joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 3 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#666,266
@665,662 (squeegee)
when assuming people are hot online you'll always be disappointed
squeegee joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 10 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#666,274
squeegee replied with this 10 years ago, 12 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#666,283
@previous (lost soul)
trust me, it works. like, just imagine everyone here with gorgeous bodies and TV show hair and everything suddenly is awesome.
like, becky used to always harass me by PM and since i always picture her as a hot tamale with killer gams i told her it's kinda like a domination thing which i'm not entirely opposed to.
and guess what. no more PMs about black cocks.
i guess i'll need to build up a mental image of ducky now that she's around.
I no replied with this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#666,285