Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later[^][v]#663,417
Catherine, if they do that then America and the rest of the world will be after them.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 4 minutes after the original post[^][v]#663,418
@previous (B)
But once 6 nuclear missiles fall there won't even be a world to come after them.
Anonymous B replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 7 minutes after the original post[^][v]#663,421
@previous (A)
They cannot nuke the entire world, Catherine. Especially not with their poor track record on missile technology.
You have been getting hyped up by sensationalist media. You need to calm down.
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 8 minutes later, 15 minutes after the original post[^][v]#663,425
@663,418 (A)
All those Nuke Submarines from USA and UK. All the missile silos in the Midwest.
They can turn North Korea into a place to dump all of the words Nuke power plant waste. Even room for lots of old tires.
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 5 minutes later, 21 minutes after the original post[^][v]#663,426
I think even Supreme Leader recognizes that most the of the world powers would be willing to turn Pyongyang into the world's biggest crater if they actually try to launch anything at anyone.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 23 minutes after the original post[^][v]#663,427
@663,421 (B)
Everybody's Catherine and that wasn't just the North Korea nukes.
It takes 6 nuclear missiles total to ruin everyone's day on Earth.
North Korea launches 1 missile. The United States might launch 5 missiles in retaliation. This is enough to wipe out all life on the planet.
FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 20 minutes later, 43 minutes after the original post[^][v]#663,430
@previous (A)
This is inaccurate. The missiles would need to be dispersed all around the world to do what you describe. The US isn't going to launch a nuke at Australia if NK sends one to the US.
Anonymous B replied with this 10 years ago, 49 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#663,445
@663,427 (A)
Why would America launch 5 nukes, Catherine? Just one aimed at Pyongyang would cripple North Korea.
squeegee joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 20 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#663,456
we've already literally exploded hundreds of nuclear weapons above the surface and some of them were the biggest bombs ever made. 6 nukes isn't enough to destroy the world. more like thousands. we have enough, there's still thousands of nukes deployed, but 6 would barely even cause an environmental issue regionally.
Lt. Judy Hopps joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#663,459
what squeegee said
@663,427 (A)
where are you getting this 6 nukes thing dummy
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 1 day later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#663,722
@previous (Lt. Judy Hopps)
My anthropology instructor.
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#663,735
@previous (A)
Lol this isn't a video game with an Armageddon counter that ends the match in a draw if 6 nukes are launched. If the US did respond with nukes, instead of just massive conventional retaliation, they would use smaller ones that wouldn't...you know...end all human life on the planet.