Topic: Hey guise, I just saw Batman v Superman!!!
Anonymous A started this discussion 10 years ago #51,096
If I post spoilers here, will I get banned??Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 4 minutes later[^] [v] #662,972
I don't know.r04r joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #662,975
Ill-intended spoilers may get you banned. Keep it in a topic about batman vs superman and you will be fine, or use spoiler tags while mentioning you are spoiling batman vs superman.
RWBY Rhubarb? !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 10 years ago, 11 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #662,976
The critics generally seem to think that it wasn't very good:
http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/batman_v_superman_dawn_of_justice/
What did you think, OP?
http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/batman_v_superman_dawn_of_justice/
What did you think, OP?
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 34 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #662,978
@662,975 (r04r)
It's one of the best superhero movies I've seen so far. Won't say too much more, except I'm planning to see it again over the weekend and I can't wait for the next one in the series.
It's one of the best superhero movies I've seen so far. Won't say too much more, except I'm planning to see it again over the weekend and I can't wait for the next one in the series.
r04r replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #662,979
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 43 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #662,980
Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 10 years ago, 6 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #662,983
@662,979 (r04r)
Well, Affleck kicks ass as The Bat, despite all the backlash to his being cast in the role. He plays both Bruce Wayne and Batman completely straight and avoids all the cliches associated with the character(s). Not much more I can say without giving away the plot, but he more or less dominated the movie from his first appearance.
Well, Affleck kicks ass as The Bat, despite all the backlash to his being cast in the role. He plays both Bruce Wayne and Batman completely straight and avoids all the cliches associated with the character(s). Not much more I can say without giving away the plot, but he more or less dominated the movie from his first appearance.
RWBY Rhubarb? !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 10 years ago, 25 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #662,984
I understand that some comic book fans were unhappy with the portrayal of Lex Luthor. Since in the comics he's quite cool and cerebral, whereas in this he's more outgoing, energetic, and a bit silly. Though, of course, this is likely only a problem if you're attached to his comic portrayal.
He also has hair. Does he lose his hair, by the end? This is pretty crucial. His baldness is one of the cornerstones of his character.
@662,980 (A)
Do you feel it was a good setup for the wider DC Cinematic Universe? Since that was a main aim of this film.
He also has hair. Does he lose his hair, by the end? This is pretty crucial. His baldness is one of the cornerstones of his character.
@662,980 (A)
Do you feel it was a good setup for the wider DC Cinematic Universe? Since that was a main aim of this film.
Lt. Judy Hopps joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 6 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #662,986
@previous (RWBY Rhubarb? !!iNo3FkiZx)
i don't care about comics or superhero movies but I found it strange that they cast jesse eisenberg and wrote him that way and gave him hair
i too would like to know if he loses his hair in the film
i don't care about comics or superhero movies but I found it strange that they cast jesse eisenberg and wrote him that way and gave him hair
i too would like to know if he loses his hair in the film
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 33 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #662,989
@662,984 (RWBY Rhubarb? !!iNo3FkiZx)
> Do you feel it was a good setup for the wider DC Cinematic Universe?
Definitely. As a comics geek, I can see where the overall storyline is leading, but the interesting thing is that multiple possibilities are suggested throughout the film.
@previous (Lt. Judy Hopps)
@662,984 (RWBY Rhubarb? !!iNo3FkiZx)
> I found it strange that they cast jesse eisenberg and wrote him that way and gave him hair
> I understand that some comic book fans were unhappy with the portrayal of Lex Luthor. Since in the comics he's quite cool and cerebral, whereas in this he's more outgoing, energetic, and a bit silly.
Seriously, I think you should see the movie and judge for yourself. I'll say this much, however: Eisenberg turns in an impressive performance as Luthor, and his portrayal of the character makes a lot more sense as the story progresses.
> Do you feel it was a good setup for the wider DC Cinematic Universe?
Definitely. As a comics geek, I can see where the overall storyline is leading, but the interesting thing is that multiple possibilities are suggested throughout the film.
@previous (Lt. Judy Hopps)
@662,984 (RWBY Rhubarb? !!iNo3FkiZx)
> I found it strange that they cast jesse eisenberg and wrote him that way and gave him hair
> I understand that some comic book fans were unhappy with the portrayal of Lex Luthor. Since in the comics he's quite cool and cerebral, whereas in this he's more outgoing, energetic, and a bit silly.
Seriously, I think you should see the movie and judge for yourself. I'll say this much, however: Eisenberg turns in an impressive performance as Luthor, and his portrayal of the character makes a lot more sense as the story progresses.
Anonymous C replied with this 10 years ago, 1 hour later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #662,996
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 10 hours later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #663,144
Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 5 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #663,146
The relationship between Catwoman and The Flash felt a bit forced.
Lt. Judy Hopps replied with this 10 years ago, 49 minutes later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #663,171
@663,144 (A)
We're asking for spoilers here just tell us whether or not he gets bald I am NEVER going to watch this film
We're asking for spoilers here just tell us whether or not he gets bald I am NEVER going to watch this film
RWBY Rhubarb? !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 10 years ago, 26 minutes later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #663,182
@662,996 (C)
@previous (Lt. Judy Hopps)
The anticipation became too much. I took to Google to try and find the answer. I shall place the results of my sleuthing under a spoiler tag:
Yes, it seems that he does loose his hair, at some point. I found pictures of the character as a bald.
@previous (Lt. Judy Hopps)
The anticipation became too much. I took to Google to try and find the answer. I shall place the results of my sleuthing under a spoiler tag:
Yes, it seems that he does loose his hair, at some point. I found pictures of the character as a bald.
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 59 minutes later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #663,186
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 5 hours later, 22 hours after the original post[^] [v] #663,236
Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 22 hours after the original post[^] [v] #663,237
squeegee joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 14 minutes later, 23 hours after the original post[^] [v] #663,243
that plot twist where +1 point if you respond saying this spoiler pissed you off was really unexpected.
lt. judy hopps joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 37 minutes later, 23 hours after the original post[^] [v] #663,269
@previous (squeegee)
ok i'm pretty sure I have six points if I say that I was pissed off because I half knew that would be a points related spoiler
@663,182 (RWBY Rhubarb? !!iNo3FkiZx)
hell yeah
ok i'm pretty sure I have six points if I say that I was pissed off because I half knew that would be a points related spoiler
@663,182 (RWBY Rhubarb? !!iNo3FkiZx)
hell yeah
squeegee replied with this 10 years ago, 6 days later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #664,250
it was pretty lackluster, imo. the first hour was slow, but building up to a big idealogical fight. then they decided to make it about their moms :/
basically all the movie did was get louder and brighter, and the fight with doomsday was short as fuck. and why wonder woman? seriously, the character was totally tacked on and superfluous. at the end batman and superman are like, "i thought she was with you." it's like they tried to make her a strong female character by having her elbow her way on screen. she was like a party crasher no one knew or cared about.
and did they really need to do ''4 dream sequences? really?
2/5
basically all the movie did was get louder and brighter, and the fight with doomsday was short as fuck. and why wonder woman? seriously, the character was totally tacked on and superfluous. at the end batman and superman are like, "i thought she was with you." it's like they tried to make her a strong female character by having her elbow her way on screen. she was like a party crasher no one knew or cared about.
and did they really need to do ''4 dream sequences? really?
2/5
RWBY Rhubarb? !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 10 years ago, 52 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #664,251
@previous (squeegee)
That person was in there because DC wants to set up a shared universe. Like Marvel.
That person especially strikes a demographic that Marvel hasn't as strongly committed to, yet, since they're getting their own movie. So they want to get them set up and known.
That person was in there because DC wants to set up a shared universe. Like Marvel.
That person especially strikes a demographic that Marvel hasn't as strongly committed to, yet, since they're getting their own movie. So they want to get them set up and known.
(Edited 17 seconds later.)
squeegee replied with this 10 years ago, 58 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #664,255
@previous (RWBY Rhubarb? !!iNo3FkiZx)
yeah. but it was so tacked on. i get what they are doing, but it is very ham-handed the way they are doing it. also, marvel is more light hearted and pokes fun at itself. dc takes it's movies so seriously and it ends up ruining the drama they try so hard to craft. can't take caped super heros so seriously.
marvel is doing it right, dc is trying hard to do it differently and they are doing it poorly. imho.
yeah. but it was so tacked on. i get what they are doing, but it is very ham-handed the way they are doing it. also, marvel is more light hearted and pokes fun at itself. dc takes it's movies so seriously and it ends up ruining the drama they try so hard to craft. can't take caped super heros so seriously.
marvel is doing it right, dc is trying hard to do it differently and they are doing it poorly. imho.