Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later[^][v]#662,670
It's the default format for lots of musical applications with good reason. But for playback? Eh. Anything that's accessible and high fidelity is ideal you obscurist elitist cunt.
Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 5 minutes later, 7 minutes after the original post[^][v]#662,672
@previous (B) > elitist
Laughed out loud in real life. A professional quality Roland MIDI sound module from the mid 90s will give you a much deeper and richer soundstage than any shitty sounding modern format, and you can get them secondhand for a couple of hundred bucks or less these days.
(Edited 2 minutes later.)
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 24 minutes later, 32 minutes after the original post[^][v]#662,677
@previous (Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo)
Are you a Markov generator fed by Headfi?
Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 8 minutes later, 40 minutes after the original post[^][v]#662,679
@previous (C)
I don't condone the use of plebphones, and I certainly don't use them myself.
Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 16 minutes later, 57 minutes after the original post[^][v]#662,680
I masturbate using icy-hot, while listening to n*Sync through off-brand ear buds.
DasSheeple joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 22 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#662,686
I can't disagree, specially since it sounds on every player different. Love the surprise factor! LOVE IT!!!!
FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 2 hours later, 3 hours after the original post[^][v]#662,709
MIDI is not really practical as a playback format unless your have a karaoke bar or only like instrumental music.
Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 1 hour later, 5 hours after the original post[^][v]#662,733
@662,686 (DasSheeple)
This is true. However, I must confess that I almost always use my Roland JV-1080 these days. It's just so warm, deep and luscious sounding, with an almost earthy, vintage feel in the midrange, and the soundstage lets you pick out the position of each instrument with almost holographic precision, even if you're in a relatively mediocre listening environment. I've heard a lot of people singing the praises of the newer XV series modules, and I must confess that the first time I heard one, I was very impressed by the light, breezy air in its top end. However, I found that there was, on deeper listening, a somewhat staid, artificial, almost robotic feel to the midrange, whilst the bass, although vigorous, lacked a certain depth and precision that I found in the 1080, and the soundstage was, to say the least, rather flat along the Z axis. After A/B listening tests in my music room, it became clear to me that the 1080 is going to be my default sound module for a long time to come. Vive la Roland!
Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo (OP) double-posted this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^][v]#662,734
@662,709 (FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI)
Why do you hate music so much?
Anonymous B replied with this 10 years ago, 26 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^][v]#662,735
> This is true. However, I must confess that I almost always use my Roland JV-1080 these days. It's just so warm, deep and luscious sounding, with an almost earthy, vintage feel in the midrange, and the soundstage lets you pick out the position of each instrument with almost holographic precision, even if you're in a relatively mediocre listening environment. I've heard a lot of people singing the praises of the newer XV series modules, and I must confess that the first time I heard one, I was very impressed by the light, breezy air in its top end. However, I found that there was, on deeper listening, a somewhat staid, artificial, almost robotic feel to the midrange, whilst the bass, although vigorous, lacked a certain depth and precision that I found in the 1080, and the soundstage was, to say the least, rather flat along the Z axis. After A/B listening tests in my music room, it became clear to me that the 1080 is going to be my default sound module for a long time to come. Vive la Roland!
Excuse my quoting that shitshow of a paragraph in full, but weren't you the one bragging about not being elitist before you unironically spit out gems like, 'so warm, deep and luscious sounding [inside of me], with an almost earthy, vintage feel in the midrange...'?
Audiophilia is a pretentious affliction exclusive to creepy white men with whispy facial hair and a tendency to remark on young girls' physical development.
Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 12 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^][v]#662,741
@previous (B)
As I said before, the means to enjoy MIDI music in the highest possible fidelity are well within reach of the common man these days. As for the rest of your ignorant, misinformed tirade, I shall simply choose to ignore it. Thanks.
(Edited 2 minutes later.)
Anonymous B replied with this 10 years ago, 9 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^][v]#662,744
@previous (Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo)
Your elitism is clearly based on (perceived) obscurity. This was clear from my initial comments. Better luck being right next time. THanks.
Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 7 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^][v]#662,745
@previous (B)
The Roland JV-1080 is far from obscure. In fact, it was virtually the industry standard rackmount MIDI synth in recording studios for about ten years.
Beauford Giddry !V8uI1sP7dw replied with this 10 years ago, 17 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^][v]#662,746