Minichan

Topic: Metæ... After posting this I am going to take another shower - I feel degraded doing this Topic

Anonymous A started this discussion 10 years ago #50,940

Limbaugh: Jeb Bush could mount a convention comeback

Conservative radio host Rush Limbaugh on Tuesday speculated that a Floridian will emerge as the Republican nominee at a contested convention in July.

Recent polls suggest John Kasich has a narrow advantage over Republican front-runner Donald Trump in Ohio, but the New York billionaire dominates Florida Sen. Marco Rubio in his state. Both states are holding winner-take-all primaries on Tuesday.

But Kasich doesn’t have a prayer of becoming the nominee, Limbaugh said, and it’s former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush — not Rubio — he says could win the nomination.

If neither Trump nor Ted Cruz win the necessary 1,237 delegates to win the Republican nomination outright, “I’m here to tell you Jeb Bush is gonna be the nominee,” Limbaugh warned, according to a transcript of his radio show. “That’s what they’re gonna do. That’s what they’ve always wanted.”

Limbaugh recalled Bush remarking in December 2014 that his strategy was to win the nomination despite losing primaries — something he planned to do by outspending his opponents. Limbaugh added that Bush, who left race in February, would escape the primary without having to talk about abortion, immigration or anything else that matters to Tea Party voters.

“He’s gonna win the nomination nevertheless,” Limbaugh said. “And it may well yet happen.”

If Bush doesn’t wind up with the nomination, Limbaugh said, it will be 2012 GOP nominee Mitt Romney who emerges. But in either scenario, Limbaugh stressed, it’s paramount for Kasich to win Ohio.

“Kasich wins Ohio, then the establishment thinks that they’ve got a pathway to deny Trump 1,237 or Cruz 1,237,” he said. “And that’s key.”



And of course Kasich pulled a slam dunk on Trump.

http://www.politico.com/blogs/2016-gop-primary-live-updates-and-results/2016/03/rush-limbaugh-bush-nominee-220805

Time to really shower and head out to a meeting at Qualcomm


ZoooOOOoooOOOOOOOOooooM-------------------------------------------------------------------->

Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 6 minutes later[^] [v] #661,169

Didn't and won't read but what the fuck is going on in your image

Metæ joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 42 minutes later, 49 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #661,177

> Jeb Bush
I doubt it. The Bush brand is just too toxic after 9/11, Iraq, Afghanistan, TBTF, TARP. I mean Jeb Bush couldn't even convince registered Republicans to vote for him.

Kasich is a fluke. Remember how excited everyone was when Little Marco won Minnesota?

I see Kasich or Mitt Romney at a brokered convention. Both will lose in a 50 state landslide to Hillary. Funny though how when Romney made his little speech against Trump all the people who were crowing about Trump's casino bankruptcies ignored that 22% of companies Bain Capital took ownership in failed plus raided pension funds and jobs shipped overseas.

I guess this is gonna keep you and Fake Anon and Becky up at night because Kasich is a much stronger candidate than Trump.

(Edited 36 seconds later.)

Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 11 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #661,179

@previous (Metæ)
Here to defend "your guy" again, I see?

Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 7 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #661,181

@OP

Is your imaginary meeting at qualcomm a 15 minute drive from that roach infested nursing home you currently reside in?

Metæ replied with this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #661,183

@661,179 (D)
> say Bush sucks
> say Kasich's Ohio victory is a one-off
> agree with Syntax that Trump is a weak candidate
Trump status: disavowed.

Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #661,186

@OP
Why are you sharing your showering schedule on a fora used by adolescent boys?

Anonymous E replied with this 10 years ago, 55 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #661,188

@previous (Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo)
So he can take Viagra and fap off to the thought of young boys.

Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 21 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #661,194

@661,177 (Metæ)
I sleep just fine at night actually. If anyone other than Trump runs, Trump will feel cheated and run third party, ruining any chance repubs might have had. He has said that numerous times. Also Kasich has a very narrow appeal. I doubt even half of repubs could have told you who he was before this election season, and beyond being the "moderate" when contrasted with Cruz or Trump, most people couldn't name a substantive policy position he has. And we know what happened to the previous two "moderate" establishment candidates. You can keep trying to make this Republican meltdown into a Democratic problem...but it isn't.

Metæ replied with this 10 years ago, 6 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #661,195

@previous (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
Trump would have a pretty legitimate grievance though if he came in with the most delegates and they gave it to Romney or Kasich. The problem is the delegate thing is like the electoral college. Do we want direct democracy or a (small r) republican system of indirect election? They should just scrap the delegate thing and let every voter be their own delegate and have one giant nationwide primary.

Syntax (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 1 hour later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #661,199

@661,183 (Metæ)
> > agree with Syntax that Trump is a weak candidate

I have kept this one in a tab and there are so many others that explain the troubles Trump has going forward re trying to find enough White Guys to win the election
http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2016/03/donald-trump-needs-7-of-10-white-guys-213699

Donald Trump Needs 7 of 10 White Guys “because I don't think there are enough morons to elect him."

And there are all those Polls that Cruz points to which are in fact saying without exception that Trump draws the least votes against Hillary in Nov - Rubio beats Hillary Cruz beats Hillary. Those Polls are driving the RNC bat shit crazy

Snapshot continues to show Clinton not only beats weak Trump it is also several points more better than Romney had at this point in time.

On the RNC Convention issue I figure if the CNN and FOX News crew have yet to figure out the state to state rules on books re delegates and a contested election - Each state has diff rules about switch of votes even on a 2nd ballot - So I will leave it up to all the lawyers going over the rules - Me? Just lots more lulz


@661,194 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
> Trump will feel cheated and run third party, ruining any chance repubs might have had

With his Ego and Money he sure could continue to make a mess out of the party - On the other hand he is a good (not great) business man and he has to look to the future of needed people in power to help his company - Well hummmmmm seems his outrage on Rag Heads is having some blowback - Dang I just do not no

Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo replied with this 10 years ago, 5 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #661,200

@previous (Syntax)
Are 7 of 10 Whyte Guys re: 15 minute dryve from thee?

Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 10 years ago, 16 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #661,204

@661,195 (Metæ)
That's always the balance in a democratic republic, this is merely one instantiation of it. I would bet that if you had to pitch the idea to establishment Republicans, you would be angrily shoved out of the room. They do not like the candidates that their voting population chooses, and if being a little more "undemocratic" means they never have to face this kind of existential crisis, it's not really a close call. I agree he would feel cheated if he had the most delegates, but not quite a majority, and the Repubs nominate someone like Romney who didn't even run this year, or someone like Jeb! who dropped out and should by any fair ruleset, be disqualified from getting the nod.


@661,199 (Syntax)
This campaign has already tanked his relationships with a lot of people. I think now this is more about pride and justice (from Trump's POV) than it is about $$$, if it ever was about $$$.

Syntax (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 11 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #661,206

@previous (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
The guy is a terrific marketer. He watches CNN and has a good memory for the stuff he wants to remember. Wish more noise was made about those tax returns. He can get his attorneys to hold out on the IRS until after the election. Wood be fun to really C all there is to C

Unless he really really fucks up I am sure he ends up more Wealthy even if he fails.

Sheldon Cooper replied with this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #661,208

@previous (Syntax)
Is this "terrific marketer" a 15 minute drive from that roach infested nursing home you currently reside in?

Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #661,211

@previous (Sheldon Cooper)
Is Syntax a 15 minute drive from your spot?

Metæ replied with this 10 years ago, 10 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #661,213

@661,206 (Syntax)
> tax returns
Apparently Trump gets audited every year so I doubt he's doing anything too criminal. What are people expecting to find? He's a rich guy with many business enterprises and he uses every conceivable tax shelter and deduction and pushes the boundaries of the IRS code to the ragged edge. Trump's supporters lean anti-IRS so if it came out he was cheating on his taxes (and all the rich guys do) I don't think it would bust anyone's bubble.

I think Trump is doing with his tax returns what Obama did with his birth certificate*: let it build up into a crescendo then rain on the haters' parade with an anticlimactic reveal of nothing.

*I never cared about birtherism and I personally think the natural-born citizen requirement is stupid. At the time I thought it was a bad political move for Obama to drag his feet with the long-form certificate but in retrospect it was the right move showing strength and not caving to ridiculous demands.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 7 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #661,215

@previous (Metæ)
> Apparently Trump gets audited every year so I doubt he's doing anything too criminal

Web is full of Billionairs that say they are not audited every year. Wot they are looking for in detail are deductions for charities - Deductions for legal services and losses on failed ventures

Noticed how Trump boasted about his Airline which went belly up yet Trump said he sold it at a profit - Yet web is loaded with the actually numbers of how poorly he did.

Also the many defaults where he borrowed money and defaulted on loans - And even sued a bank because they made load defaults public -

BUT Wot I want to see for lulz only is his real wealth - He says 10 Billion Forbes says about 3.3 -

More about Just how honest has he been with facts vs fiction - NOT that it will hurt his base of Morons - They are locked in as true believers - It will be super for TV ads on those undecided which apparently are many many -

Metæ replied with this 10 years ago, 4 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #661,216

@previous (A)
I'm sure Trump cheated on his taxes in the past but Trump plays to peoples fantasies. How many guys filling out 1040s wish they could buy a new jet ski and deduct it as a business expense? Trump voters hate the tax man so saying "Trump cheated the tax man!" gets you nowhere.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 10 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #661,218

@previous (Metæ)
As I said for me its only for lulz and after all he did say he wood release them.

Now I fully admit I have taken legal advantage of tax deductions for equipment - office furniture albeit the rules for a home office are limiting. One of the HUGE holes in the tax code allow a business to invest in art for the office - Can be zillion dollar paintings at auction - The loop hole remains - Close that branch of a business or even just close it and KEEP the Art as personal and sell and collect cold hard cash - Yes one pays a tax at sale but the cost of the item ends up as FREE.

Also a couple of times when running a business for others - When the business needed influx of cash on the cheep - I hired quality CPA/Attorneys and I mean Attorney with a CPA and made sure they once worked for IRS - In order to walk that line to the very edge - Just inside the law to get away with all I could get away with n maybe MORE - BUTTTTT I used 100% of that money on tax savings to re-invest in the business - hire more people buy more equipment - larger building and IRS ended up with far more money than I saved at the front end

So I fully expect Trump to use every trick in the book - AND to come out and say Yep laws should be changed - Not looking to hang him or jail him - BUT there may be some shit that OTHERS can connect the dots with and people have ended up in deep trouble when dots are connected - Not that Trump wood cheet but ya never no given it happens all the tyme
:

Please familiarise yourself with the rules and markup syntax before posting.