Topic: Did you ever wake up as trump after watching one of his speeches before sleep?
Denmark guy !jJEom8Ii3E started this discussion 10 years ago#50,884
I woke up with a unreal cigarette in my hand and I dropped it, I panicked while trying to find it because I thought I was moments away from burning the house down.
Then suddenly I was trump and everything i was about to do would be soooo great and all the meanies didn't even know what they were doing, they were so dumb... REALLY dumb. Okay?
Actually I didn't stalk anyone while I was trump but some strange guy kept stalking me and insisting I was a pedo. He kept asking me if I liked little girls and constantly begged me to talk about stalking girls.
Felt kinda sorry for him because I think he was just trying to be funny or something.
Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo replied with this 10 years ago, 13 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#660,213
@previous (Denmark guy !jJEom8Ii3E)
Reported for anti-Derek sentiment and sass. You've crossed the line here, boy.
(Edited 12 seconds later.)
squeegee replied with this 10 years ago, 5 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#660,217
@660,200 (Denmark guy !jJEom8Ii3E)
he can be as un-pc as he likes, but inciting a crowd to violence is where a line is drawn. it's actually a crime, and if he keeps it up he's going to get more people hurt and you're pulling the wool over your own eyes with every lame excuse you make for him.
Metæ joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 5 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#660,223
@660,196 (squeegee)
I had a dream I was Bernie Sanders and when I was challenged by opposition protesters I politely gave them the podium and stood discreetly off to the side staring at the floor.
kook !!mCVqftDha joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#660,226
Because the media keeps throwing him in my face. It doesn't matter where I get the news, trump is in it and of course most of the time it's about how i should dislike trump. Well those places i get the news, well those places i hate and isn't it a opertunity of a lifetime to have those certain people get slapped in the face via the Democratic way? Maybe once the man they hate will get elected, then maybe they will remember something about what the news is about, maybe they will stop being arrogant and no longer think it's their job to create the opinions of the public.
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 7 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^][v]#660,269
@previous (Denmark guy !jJEom8Ii3E)
Yes, only the news thinks he is a violence-advocating bigot...lol. That is literally the belief of like 90% of dems and a good chunk of independents. Wbich is one of the many many many reasons establishment repubs hate him. By all metrics he will lose to the candidate Repubs hate the most, despite the fact that most people view her as untrustworthy and there is a decent shot she gets indicted. Man you really need to step outside your online echo chamber for a little bit.
Denmark guy !jJEom8Ii3E (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 7 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^][v]#660,272
You mentioned the news and how they all say the same thing. Yet I need to step out of somekind of a chamber? His opponents have spent millions in advertising how bad he is, meetings of the powerful discuss how to prevent him to win. They even justify and convince others that violently disrupting his campaign can only be blamed on trump.
This does not sound like something anybody would do against someone who wouldn't even win in the first place.
Lt. Judy Hopps joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 5 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^][v]#660,273
> You mentioned the news and how they all say the same thing. Yet I need to step out of somekind of a chamber? His opponents have spent millions in advertising how bad he is, meetings of the powerful discuss how to prevent him to win. They even justify and convince others that violently disrupting his campaign can only be blamed on trump. > > This does not sound like something anybody would do against someone who wouldn't even win in the first place.
You keep saying that people 'violently disrupted' his rally - who? It was his supporters. It's always his supporters. And it's usually, literally, white supremacists
Trump says 'get them out of here', his cronies 'get them out', the news covers it, trump gets more supporters like you
How is any of this bad for trump?
Denmark guy !jJEom8Ii3E (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 5 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^][v]#660,277
Oh of course! Everyone voting for trump is a racist. Listen buddy you are right, maybe there was no violence in one of his rallies, or maybe there was and only protesters got harmed.
That wouldn't explain why the news say it was a violent clash. They never said it was only trump supporters doing the violence but they have echoed the idea that trump is to blame for it all.
Lt. Judy Hopps replied with this 10 years ago, 4 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^][v]#660,282
@previous (Denmark guy !jJEom8Ii3E)
Yeah, there were definitely no 'clashes' afaik
It sounds like you're trying to talk about this when you don't even know what happened. It sounds like you're complaining about the news you watch? Just watch different news
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 10 years ago, 14 seconds later, 4 hours after the original post[^][v]#660,283
@660,272 (Denmark guy !jJEom8Ii3E)
Lol, Trunp is the most generally unpopular candidate the repubs have ever had do this well. They are terrified that he will get the nomination because he has alienated most people who would normally support the repub candidate (fox news, congressional Republicans, right-leaning Super PACs) and polls uniformly awful across the US, particularly with independents. Independents would prefer to vote for Hillary, whom they view as untrustworthy, and probably some kind of criminal. So that's a non-starter. But if they don't run him, they risk fracturing, if not outright destroying, the current Republican party, in which case the Dems win the next couple presidential elections. There is literally no scenario where Trump and the GOP reach some kind of happy middle ground. THAT is why they are scared. He is presenting an impossible political dilemma for any rational Conservative American. If you want to ignore all that because breitbart.com or whatever says something else, you're free to do that...but you would be wrong.
(Edited 14 seconds later.)
kook !!mCVqftDha replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 4 hours after the original post[^][v]#660,287
@660,273 (Lt. Judy Hopps)
There has been a lot of violence from the other side. Like the guy who rushed Trump on stage. It's okay to hate Trump, I hate all politicians, but it's not okay to ignore bad behavior from your own side.
(Edited 13 seconds later.)
Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^][v]#660,291
@previous (kook !!mCVqftDha)
That's not a lot of violence. That's one person rushing the stage.
Denmark guy !jJEom8Ii3E (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 15 seconds later, 4 hours after the original post[^][v]#660,293
Well we will see who wins and when HE DOES i will come back on minichan. If not? Then this is my shitty good bye.
But if he gets killed during the election, then none of this counts.
kook !!mCVqftDha replied with this 10 years ago, 38 seconds later, 4 hours after the original post[^][v]#660,295
@660,277 (Denmark guy !jJEom8Ii3E)
I just saw a town hall meeting with Bernie where he called on Trump to denounce the violence of his supporters. The moderator mentioned that Bernie should do the same thing because his supporters have also been violent recently, and Sanders just said that he couldn't control everyone. Lol
kook !!mCVqftDha double-posted this 10 years ago, 36 seconds later, 4 hours after the original post[^][v]#660,296
@660,291 (J)
There have also been multiple attacks on people with Trump bumperstickers, etc.
Lt. Judy Hopps replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 4 hours after the original post[^][v]#660,298
@660,287 (kook !!mCVqftDha)
That's one dude, and I don't know 'whose side' he's on. I haven't heard of any protestors being violent towards supporters in any way though. Seen a lot of supporters shoving and spitting on protestors however
Lt. Judy Hopps double-posted this 10 years ago, 44 seconds later, 4 hours after the original post[^][v]#660,299
@660,295 (kook !!mCVqftDha)
Sanders supporters are just as fucked
Lt. Judy Hopps triple-posted this 10 years ago, 56 seconds later, 4 hours after the original post[^][v]#660,300
> Well we will see who wins and when HE DOES i will come back on minichan. If not? Then this is my shitty good bye. > > But if he gets killed during the election, then none of this counts.
Hell yes
Anonymous J replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 4 hours after the original post[^][v]#660,302
@660,296 (kook !!mCVqftDha)
So random road rage incidents and one person rushing a stage equals a lot of violence? Lol kook.
Most of the rallies recently have featured video of attendees assaulting and verbally abusing black people. Trump has implicitly and explicitly encouraged this sort of violence half a dozen times. Trying to make the two sides seem equivalent is fucking stupid.
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 4 hours after the original post[^][v]#660,304
@660,298 (Lt. Judy Hopps)
He was a Sanders supporter. He was interviewed on CNN. There is also the rally shut down by protestors in Chicago like yesterday or the day before. I'm not really happy with the way any side of this is behaving, but I think overall Trump supporters are worse because he has encouraged a lot of the radical white supremacists to come out of the woodwork.
Lt. Judy Hopps replied with this 10 years ago, 7 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^][v]#660,309
> He was a Sanders supporter. He was interviewed on CNN.
Trump and sanders are two sides of the same coin not surprised > There is also the rally shut down by protestors in Chicago like yesterday or the day before.
That was more of a successful protest than a violent eruption. Good for them > I'm not really happy with the way any side of this is behaving, but I think overall Trump supporters are worse because he has encouraged a lot of the radical white supremacists to come out of the woodwork.
tru. and once they're out he encourages them to behave badly while calling opposition 'thugs'
and I think everybody knows what old white guys mean when they call someone a thug
kook !!mCVqftDha replied with this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^][v]#660,313
@660,302 (J)
Thugs have been disrupting rallies. Are you blind and deaf to the world?
kook !!mCVqftDha double-posted this 10 years ago, 35 seconds later, 4 hours after the original post[^][v]#660,314
Anonymous J replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 4 hours after the original post[^][v]#660,317
@660,313 (kook !!mCVqftDha)
Kook you are a willfully ignorant cunt. Your political opinions are cringeworthy.
kook !!mCVqftDha replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 4 hours after the original post[^][v]#660,320
@previous (J)
Don't use gendered insults against me you shitlord! That's oppression!
Lol fuck off
Lt. Judy Hopps replied with this 10 years ago, 50 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^][v]#660,382
@previous (kook !!mCVqftDha)
Ok honey babe sweetie
kook !!mCVqftDha replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 5 hours after the original post[^][v]#660,385
@previous (Lt. Judy Hopps)
Bernie Sanders clearly encourages cis white penis people to talk down to feminine goddess. A vote for Sanders is a vote for the patriarchy!
Metæ replied with this 10 years ago, 42 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^][v]#660,387
@660,295 (kook !!mCVqftDha) > his supporters have also been violent recently, and Sanders just said that he couldn't control everyone.
That sounds like something Trump would say
@660,269 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU) > By all metrics he will lose to the candidate Repubs hate the most, despite the fact that most people view her as untrustworthy and there is a decent shot she gets indicted. Man you really need to step outside your online echo chamber for a little bit.
I don't believe this for a second and here's why: if Trump really was the worst candidate and would lose in a landslide to Hillary then Democrats would be doing everything possible to help him win. Sanders supporters would be protesting Rubio rallies (or Kasich rallies). Clinton and Sanders would be trashing Rubio and Kasich but to my knowledge they haven't said a word about either. It's just Trump Trump Trump. If he's just a clown then go vote for him (if you live in an open primary state). I mean, would you rather have Hillary face a failed reality TV clown or a serious candidate like Kasich/Rubio?
Lt. Judy Hopps replied with this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^][v]#660,390
@660,385 (kook !!mCVqftDha)
discourse with you is like hell
The amount of sarcasm and passive aggression and sjw name calling in your posts along with the relative lack of substance drives me nuts
kook !!mCVqftDha replied with this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^][v]#660,394
@previous (Lt. Judy Hopps)
It's funny though. I sound just like a vapid, Bernie loving cuck.
Lt. Judy Hopps replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 5 hours after the original post[^][v]#660,398
@previous (kook !!mCVqftDha)
But you do it when you're not satirizing liberals
You are literally the conservative equivalent of the tumblr teens you poke fun at
kook !!mCVqftDha replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^][v]#660,401
@previous (Lt. Judy Hopps)
I'm not conservative and I have at least six different tumblr for my Steven Universe inspired alters. Thanks
Lt. Judy Hopps replied with this 10 years ago, 45 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^][v]#660,403
@previous (kook !!mCVqftDha)
Don't you dare drag Steven into this he's an Angel
kook !!mCVqftDha replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^][v]#660,406
@previous (Lt. Judy Hopps)
Did you know that Garnet is a trans, aceromantic, demikin?
#yourfavoritesaretrans
Lt. Judy Hopps replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 5 hours after the original post[^][v]#660,410
@previous (kook !!mCVqftDha)
No Garnet is two space rocks
Thanks
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 10 years ago, 11 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^][v]#660,415
> Trump and sanders are two sides of the same coin not surprised
In that they are both anti-establishment candidates? Sure. Policy-wise they are pretty different (at least as much as they can be considering Trump doesn't really have a platform besides build a wall and ban Muslims) > That was more of a successful protest than a violent eruption. Good for them
Yeah this isn't ok in my book. Disagree all you want with trump. Run attack ads. Call him a race-baiting bigot, etc., but shutting down a rally is NOT ok. Speech, no matter how odious, is the most precious gift that we have. It is NOT ok that people stop other people from talking simply because they disagree or find it "offensive" or "hateful" etc. Shit like this is why I don't lean as far left as I used to. > tru. and once they're out he encourages them to behave badly while calling opposition 'thugs' > and I think everybody knows what old white guys mean when they call someone a thug
I mean...sometimes yeah it's oblique racism, but sometimes it isn't. Generalizing about "old white people" isn't particularly nice or useful IMO. They run the entire spectrum just like every other age and racial group. Are they more likely to be racist? Maybe, but I hate hate hate this undercurrent of speech policing in the left. "Let me tell you what you really mean when you say that, and let me tell you what you should say instead." That is one of the things that leads to the rise of people like Trump btw. One of the main appeals of Trump is he is so far removed from ordinary people that there are no consequences to him saying whatever he wants. Some of that is people who want to call people "nigger" in public again, sure, but to boil everything down to "Trump supporters are all closeted racists" is such a gross oversimplification, I don't think it adds any value to any political discussion.
@660,387 (Metæ)
The reason they are attacking him is the same reason dems were attacking Romney in 2012 and not Newt Gingrich or fucking Ron Paul or Mike Huckabee. He is currently clearly in the lead. If Cruz starts making a viable push, expect them to start talking about him more. By the way if you think that Trump is going to win the nod, and that he solidly beats Clinton, the same question can be asked about Hillary. No one on the repub side takes Sanders seriously. All attack ads are aimed at Clinton. So following your line of reasoning it follows that Repubs are targeting her because they think she will beat their candidate, which seems more and more likely to be Trump.
Also I live in a closed primary state so even if I wanted to, I couldn't vote for trump since I'm a registered dem.
(Edited 1 minute later.)
kook !!mCVqftDha replied with this 10 years ago, 39 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^][v]#660,416
@660,410 (Lt. Judy Hopps)
Garnet is two spirited. Thanks
RWBY Rhubarb? !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 10 years ago, 9 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^][v]#660,422
@660,293 (Denmark guy !jJEom8Ii3E)
lol you've threatened to quit like six times, now.
It only sticks for, at best, a few days.
Metæ replied with this 10 years ago, 16 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^][v]#660,432
@previous (RWBY Rhubarb? !!iNo3FkiZx)
"It's easy to quit smoking, I've done it a thousand times"
-Mark Twain
RWBY Rhubarb? !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 10 years ago, 28 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^][v]#660,446