Topic: What's all this sentimental bullshit
Anonymous A started this discussion 10 years ago #50,757
...about Aldrin and Armstrong? They're just a pair of geriatric old faggots who deserve nothing but contempt. Celebrities, public figures and Alzheimer's patients have always been fair game on MC.
Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 9 minutes later[^] [v] #658,639
@OP
Cram it, faggot.
Cram it, faggot.
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 9 minutes later, 18 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #658,644
OP
Is an geriatric old faggot who deserve nothing but contempt.
Is an geriatric old faggot who deserve nothing but contempt.
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 17 minutes later, 36 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #658,654
How many times have you set foot on the moon approximately?
FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 53 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #658,698
You know who else has always been fair game?kook !!mCVqftDha joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #658,699
What in the fuck are you talking about?
FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI replied with this 10 years ago, 6 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #658,704
@previous (kook !!mCVqftDha)
He's mad that he made a shitpost and people are treating it with the contempt it deserves.
He's mad that he made a shitpost and people are treating it with the contempt it deserves.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #658,705
@658,654 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
Nobody has set foot on the moon. Armstrong & Aldren's refusal to confirm their involvement in the so-called lunar mission is evidence. Why such sympathy for a pair of cock-smoking old parasites who have lived off undeserved fame for nearly 50 years?
Nobody has set foot on the moon. Armstrong & Aldren's refusal to confirm their involvement in the so-called lunar mission is evidence. Why such sympathy for a pair of cock-smoking old parasites who have lived off undeserved fame for nearly 50 years?
Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 10 years ago, 5 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #658,706
@658,699 (kook !!mCVqftDha)
MC has been making vicious attacks on the elderly & the noteworthy for years (just look at the way they've treated Syntax, the Wachowsky Sisters and Caitlyn Jenner). Why are we suddenly leaping to the defense of a couple of conniving old queers who helped the government steal billions of tax payers' dollars for a non-existent space exploration program?
MC has been making vicious attacks on the elderly & the noteworthy for years (just look at the way they've treated Syntax, the Wachowsky Sisters and Caitlyn Jenner). Why are we suddenly leaping to the defense of a couple of conniving old queers who helped the government steal billions of tax payers' dollars for a non-existent space exploration program?
Syntax replied with this 10 years ago, 6 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #658,712
@previous (A)
I take pride on how I proved you made a shit post and got you to admit to it.
http://minichan.org/topic/50722
I'm curious: why didn't you subject me to petty insults when I posted this topic? Its premise is just as ridiculous as this one's.
> MC has been making vicious attacks
On OP Yes indeed
I take pride on how I proved you made a shit post and got you to admit to it.
http://minichan.org/topic/50722
I'm curious: why didn't you subject me to petty insults when I posted this topic? Its premise is just as ridiculous as this one's.
> MC has been making vicious attacks
On OP Yes indeed
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 10 years ago, 26 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #658,713
kook !!mCVqftDha replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #658,715
Green !BEERiVqJJw joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #658,718
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 17 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #658,733
@658,712 (Syntax)
Syntax, I've made innumerable shitposts; MC is full of them. This is common knowledge. As stated elsewhere, I'm just curious as to why there's been such a backlash to my ridiculing Armstrong & Aldren in particular.
Syntax, I've made innumerable shitposts; MC is full of them. This is common knowledge. As stated elsewhere, I'm just curious as to why there's been such a backlash to my ridiculing Armstrong & Aldren in particular.
Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #658,736
kook !!mCVqftDha replied with this 10 years ago, 5 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #658,741
Green !BEERiVqJJw replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #658,742
Syntax replied with this 10 years ago, 40 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #658,743
@658,733 (A)
> I'm just curious as to why there's been such a backlash to my ridiculing Armstrong & Aldren in particular.
Most here when you mention Armstrong think of Lance. Most here have never heard of Aldren.
I think wot got people inspired to go after you was the concept that anyone wood chase down ANYONE and demand they put hands on bible and swear ANYTHING
Here in Cardiff by the Sea the Mormons and 7th day Adventists and on occasion Church of Scientology will engage people on their way to the beach - Mormons n Adventists have bible in hands but wood NEVER EVER ask anyone to put hands on or hands up and swear
Besides you damn well No that on MC the very idea that some fool is going to run after you and demand you swear on a bible is ANTI Chans concept
> I'm just curious as to why there's been such a backlash to my ridiculing Armstrong & Aldren in particular.
Most here when you mention Armstrong think of Lance. Most here have never heard of Aldren.
I think wot got people inspired to go after you was the concept that anyone wood chase down ANYONE and demand they put hands on bible and swear ANYTHING
Here in Cardiff by the Sea the Mormons and 7th day Adventists and on occasion Church of Scientology will engage people on their way to the beach - Mormons n Adventists have bible in hands but wood NEVER EVER ask anyone to put hands on or hands up and swear
Besides you damn well No that on MC the very idea that some fool is going to run after you and demand you swear on a bible is ANTI Chans concept
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 28 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #658,770
@previous (Syntax)
> Besides you damn well No that on MC the very idea that some fool is going to run after you and demand you swear on a bible is ANTI Chans concept
There are numerous threads here attacking atheists and anti-theism in general. Using religious texts to troll the user base is nothing new on either MC or TC.
> Most here when you mention Armstrong think of Lance. Most here have never heard of Aldrin.
The replies to this thread indicate a clear understanding of who Buzz Aldrin is, so I'm assuming they know I'm talking about the first two men to set foot on the moon.
> I think wot got people inspired to go after you was the concept that anyone wood chase down ANYONE and demand they put hands on bible and swear ANYTHING
As previously stated, using religious texts to troll MC's user base is common practice. Extra kudos to Sibrel for approaching him with a bible in hand, given Aldrin's unproven claim that he held a holy communion on the moon. That is true trolling.
> Besides you damn well No that on MC the very idea that some fool is going to run after you and demand you swear on a bible is ANTI Chans concept
There are numerous threads here attacking atheists and anti-theism in general. Using religious texts to troll the user base is nothing new on either MC or TC.
> Most here when you mention Armstrong think of Lance. Most here have never heard of Aldrin.
The replies to this thread indicate a clear understanding of who Buzz Aldrin is, so I'm assuming they know I'm talking about the first two men to set foot on the moon.
> I think wot got people inspired to go after you was the concept that anyone wood chase down ANYONE and demand they put hands on bible and swear ANYTHING
As previously stated, using religious texts to troll MC's user base is common practice. Extra kudos to Sibrel for approaching him with a bible in hand, given Aldrin's unproven claim that he held a holy communion on the moon. That is true trolling.
Syntax replied with this 10 years ago, 5 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #658,773
@previous (A)
Indeed he was a troll. The only good thing he can say he did with the trolling was to do it in R/L
It is one step up from you doing it on a net site if you get my drift.
Indeed he was a troll. The only good thing he can say he did with the trolling was to do it in R/L
It is one step up from you doing it on a net site if you get my drift.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 15 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #658,778
@previous (Syntax)
You have no reason to complain, Syntax. I've made no attack on you, and I stated the reasons for my conversion to the Flat Earth Hypothesis two days ago.
You have no reason to complain, Syntax. I've made no attack on you, and I stated the reasons for my conversion to the Flat Earth Hypothesis two days ago.
Green !BEERiVqJJw replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #658,780
Syntax replied with this 10 years ago, 4 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #658,785
@658,778 (A)
> You have no reason to complain, Syntax. I've made no attack on you, and I stated the reasons for my conversion to the Flat Earth Hypothesis two days ago.
Yo where did you see me complaining? I had some fun some even stealth with uid change to add to the fun of of of -
Just Saying
> You have no reason to complain, Syntax. I've made no attack on you, and I stated the reasons for my conversion to the Flat Earth Hypothesis two days ago.
Yo where did you see me complaining? I had some fun some even stealth with uid change to add to the fun of of of -
Just Saying
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 5 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #658,788
@previous (Syntax)
Maybe so, but a lot of people here seem to have taken offense at my describing two national heroes as a pair of conniving old twats. From my perspective as an MC regular, that virtually reeks of moralfaggotry - something we've tried to avoid since the board was established.
Maybe so, but a lot of people here seem to have taken offense at my describing two national heroes as a pair of conniving old twats. From my perspective as an MC regular, that virtually reeks of moralfaggotry - something we've tried to avoid since the board was established.
Syntax replied with this 10 years ago, 8 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #658,794
@previous (A)> Maybe so, but a lot of people here seem to have taken offense at my describing two national heroes as a pair of conniving old twats. From my perspective as an MC regular, that virtually reeks of moralfaggotry - something we've tried to avoid since the board was established.
As a MC regular you damn well No, you wood not last long if you attacked the Mods.
The conspiracy theories are easy to come by. Frankly not to many real hero's. I love to ski climb mountains surf n live life and I sure love science - BUTTTTTTTTTT I wood never ever imagine self strapped to top of Monster Rockets filled with Liquid Fuel and put my life in hands of many a low bidder. Its just fucking amazing so many lived to talk about it
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 20 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #658,812
@previous (Syntax)
The point I'm making, Syntax: wasn't Bart Sibrel doing exactly the same thing we do here on a daily basis - slinging shit at a soft target?
The point I'm making, Syntax: wasn't Bart Sibrel doing exactly the same thing we do here on a daily basis - slinging shit at a soft target?
squeegee joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 6 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #658,815
@previous (A)
so you can have an idiotic opinion but as soon as we call you an idiot and make fun of you we're in the wrong? that's kind of a double standard. if you get to troll then we get to troll you back, you idiot
so you can have an idiotic opinion but as soon as we call you an idiot and make fun of you we're in the wrong? that's kind of a double standard. if you get to troll then we get to troll you back, you idiot
Syntax replied with this 10 years ago, 19 seconds later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #658,816
@658,812 (A)
er no not at all
We can insult flame and even do a bit more or as in one of my most infamous cases call the law and get them on a case re net shit - Several where I contacted FBI with great results
Don't no about YOU but for sure I have never played Troll in R/L
er no not at all
We can insult flame and even do a bit more or as in one of my most infamous cases call the law and get them on a case re net shit - Several where I contacted FBI with great results
Don't no about YOU but for sure I have never played Troll in R/L
(Edited 40 seconds later.)
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 27 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #658,824
@658,815 (squeegee)
I have no objection to any of you trolling me - we've all been doing it for years. I'm just wondering why you're all so upset that I called two decrepit NASAfags a couple of raging queers when that is what MC is all about - butchering sacred cows and pissing on the flag for the lulz?
I have no objection to any of you trolling me - we've all been doing it for years. I'm just wondering why you're all so upset that I called two decrepit NASAfags a couple of raging queers when that is what MC is all about - butchering sacred cows and pissing on the flag for the lulz?
Green !BEERiVqJJw replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #658,825
squeegee replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #658,826
@658,824 (A)
atm your "sacred cow" is trolling and you seem to think the content of your message is being flamed rather than just you. how about we continue to flame this sacred cow of trolling that is somehow supposed to be off limits to being flamed? try trolling harder, there's nothing as beautiful as a tryhard troll unaware he's engulfed in flames.
atm your "sacred cow" is trolling and you seem to think the content of your message is being flamed rather than just you. how about we continue to flame this sacred cow of trolling that is somehow supposed to be off limits to being flamed? try trolling harder, there's nothing as beautiful as a tryhard troll unaware he's engulfed in flames.
Green !BEERiVqJJw replied with this 10 years ago, 52 seconds later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #658,827
squeegee replied with this 10 years ago, 32 seconds later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #658,828
we can perform a test if you like, anon A, you can say something else retarded and see if you get flamed over that or if we only flame for astronauts. go on, say something stupid, lets find out.
Green !BEERiVqJJw replied with this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #658,830
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 4 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #658,839
squeegee replied with this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #658,843
@previous (A)yeah, but you'll have to try pretty hard to get your rocks off over that idiocy, it's yesterday's troll. these days you get a lot more traction as a trump supporter. get with the times, but for some reason i'm thinking you're just going to tryhard the flat earth troll as badly as you've tryharded the moon landings troll.
Green !BEERiVqJJw replied with this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #658,845
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 6 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #658,849
@658,843 (squeegee)
36 replies here and 80 over there. Seems I'm getting a lot more mileage shitting on national heroes than I would with Trump.
36 replies here and 80 over there. Seems I'm getting a lot more mileage shitting on national heroes than I would with Trump.
squeegee replied with this 10 years ago, 4 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #658,852
@previous (A)all i see are people laughing at you and you defending yourself. is that what the kids are calling trolling these days? alright, well, have fun then. enjoy playing troll martyr, you're putting a lot of effort into it i'll give you that.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 11 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #658,855
@previous (squeegee)
The two Trump topics on the front page have a total of 15 replies. By contrast, my FlatEarth/NASAFag posts have actually started a trend (see this, this and this) and spilled over into unrelated threads. I guess laughing at my stupidity generates more interest than laughing at Trump's.
BTW: you're all butthurt because I called Armstrong & Aldrin a pair of homos. Fucking moralfags.
The two Trump topics on the front page have a total of 15 replies. By contrast, my FlatEarth/NASAFag posts have actually started a trend (see this, this and this) and spilled over into unrelated threads. I guess laughing at my stupidity generates more interest than laughing at Trump's.
BTW: you're all butthurt because I called Armstrong & Aldrin a pair of homos. Fucking moralfags.
(Edited 6 minutes later.)
squeegee replied with this 10 years ago, 24 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #658,864
@previous (A)
look at all those links i'm not going to click. i like this guy, when you tell him to try hard he really tries hard.
> I guess laughing at my stupidity generates more interest than laughing at Trump's.
yeah, the last debate was pretty fucking boring. you on the other hand just keep delivering defensive madpost after defensive madpost. go on, prove to me some more how much you're trolling us. maybe we'll get tired of flaming you and go to bed and you can get the last word in and preserve your netcred
look at all those links i'm not going to click. i like this guy, when you tell him to try hard he really tries hard.
> I guess laughing at my stupidity generates more interest than laughing at Trump's.
yeah, the last debate was pretty fucking boring. you on the other hand just keep delivering defensive madpost after defensive madpost. go on, prove to me some more how much you're trolling us. maybe we'll get tired of flaming you and go to bed and you can get the last word in and preserve your netcred
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 38 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #658,871
@previous (squeegee)
Why're you so mad, Squeeg? You clearly don't give a fuck about these two old cocksmokers. Are you feeling upstaged?
Why're you so mad, Squeeg? You clearly don't give a fuck about these two old cocksmokers. Are you feeling upstaged?
Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 7 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #658,872
squeegee replied with this 10 years ago, 8 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #658,873
@previous (I)it's not a competition, but i am going to bed though. he's right, i don't care, op can obsess over it all he likes though
i think when it's all said and done, we're all winners here. except for OP who's still trying his little heart out
(Edited 1 minute later.)
Anonymous I replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #658,874
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 8 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #658,875
@658,873 (squeegee)
No problem. You'll be back tomorrow.
BTW: check out the Niggers Are Always Wrong thread.
No problem. You'll be back tomorrow.
BTW: check out the Niggers Are Always Wrong thread.
FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI replied with this 10 years ago, 6 hours later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #658,968
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 9 hours later, 22 hours after the original post[^] [v] #659,142
@previous (FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI)
Well, part nigger, anyway.
However, I notice that nobody here has even tried to answer the question posed in the headline. I mean, why would anybody on this board leap to the defense of two cum-guzzling oldfags who've been defrauding the public for decades?
Well, part nigger, anyway.
However, I notice that nobody here has even tried to answer the question posed in the headline. I mean, why would anybody on this board leap to the defense of two cum-guzzling oldfags who've been defrauding the public for decades?