Topic: Lunar Astronauts refused to swear that they had been to the moon.
Anonymous A started this discussion 10 years ago #50,722
NASA faked the moon landings, therefore, the Earth is flat. This is common knowledge.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o1S0oObHT0c
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o1S0oObHT0c
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 13 minutes later[^] [v] #658,195
literal retardation
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 5 minutes later, 19 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #658,197
Next OP will post that Aliens from outer space killed JFK.
http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/ciencia/ciencia_flyingobjects71.htm
http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/ciencia/ciencia_flyingobjects71.htm
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 38 seconds later, 19 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #658,198
Anonymous B replied with this 10 years ago, 48 seconds later, 20 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #658,199
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 21 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #658,200
@658,197 (C)
There is no outer space. The closest thing we have to aliens are the Reptilians, whom, we suspect, are involved in a large number of conspiracies and political assassinations.
There is no outer space. The closest thing we have to aliens are the Reptilians, whom, we suspect, are involved in a large number of conspiracies and political assassinations.
Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 10 years ago, 51 seconds later, 22 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #658,201
Anonymous B replied with this 10 years ago, 55 seconds later, 23 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #658,202
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 27 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #658,203
Anonymous B replied with this 10 years ago, 33 seconds later, 27 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #658,204
@previous (A)
So, at what age were you dropped on the head? Or were you just born with brain damage?
So, at what age were you dropped on the head? Or were you just born with brain damage?
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 5 minutes later, 33 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #658,207
@658,198 (A)
lol
A stalker, who drives a cab for a living owns a camera. He runs after each astronaut with a bible in hand and demands they swear on his bible. This is the kind of shit that killed princess diana.
Stalkers name is Bart Winfield Sibrel.
Sibrel, who works as a Nashville taxicab driver, was charged with vandalism when he jumped up and down on the hood of a car owned by a woman with whom he was having a parking dispute. Court documents show he was arrested after the driver refused to pull out of a parking space he wanted. The arresting officer wrote, "A few moments later the parking space in front of the victim opened up and Sibrel drove into it and parked." Sibrel "then walked up to the victim's car and jumped onto the hood, and then jumped up and down several times." The report says he caused about US$1,400 worth of damage, after which Sibrel pleaded guilty to vandalism and was placed on probation.
Sibrel got in Buzz Aldren's face with his stupid demands and ended up in court having to apologize to Buzz as ordered by a judge.
lol
A stalker, who drives a cab for a living owns a camera. He runs after each astronaut with a bible in hand and demands they swear on his bible. This is the kind of shit that killed princess diana.
Stalkers name is Bart Winfield Sibrel.
Sibrel, who works as a Nashville taxicab driver, was charged with vandalism when he jumped up and down on the hood of a car owned by a woman with whom he was having a parking dispute. Court documents show he was arrested after the driver refused to pull out of a parking space he wanted. The arresting officer wrote, "A few moments later the parking space in front of the victim opened up and Sibrel drove into it and parked." Sibrel "then walked up to the victim's car and jumped onto the hood, and then jumped up and down several times." The report says he caused about US$1,400 worth of damage, after which Sibrel pleaded guilty to vandalism and was placed on probation.
Sibrel got in Buzz Aldren's face with his stupid demands and ended up in court having to apologize to Buzz as ordered by a judge.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 15 minutes later, 48 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #658,214
@658,204 (B)
Never. I can swear to that. However, both Armstrong and Aldrin refused to take an oath regarding their alleged trip to the moon.
@previous (E)
Did Aldrin testify in court that he had been to the moon?
Never. I can swear to that. However, both Armstrong and Aldrin refused to take an oath regarding their alleged trip to the moon.
@previous (E)
Did Aldrin testify in court that he had been to the moon?
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 4 hours later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #658,257
@previous (A)
How would you feel if some asshole walked up to you and called you a liar to your face when you were minding your own business
How would you feel if some asshole walked up to you and called you a liar to your face when you were minding your own business
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 31 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #658,266
Brain damage.
HelterSkelter !ncKvmqq0Bs joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 1 hour later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #658,276
@OP
I'm convinced now.
I'm convinced now.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 8 hours later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #658,590
@658,257 (F)
I'd probably do the same thing that Aldrin did. That, however, is irrelevant. The fact remains that Aldrin neither confirmed nor denied he'd walked on the lunar surface. For some reason, many of these national heroes are unwilling to put their hand on a so-called holy book and say "Yes, I've been to the moon".
I'd probably do the same thing that Aldrin did. That, however, is irrelevant. The fact remains that Aldrin neither confirmed nor denied he'd walked on the lunar surface. For some reason, many of these national heroes are unwilling to put their hand on a so-called holy book and say "Yes, I've been to the moon".
Green !BEERiVqJJw joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #658,592
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 8 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #658,600
@658,266 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
You people are strangely protective of your national heroes. Odd how this post didn't attract the same level of hostility, despite being just as ludicrous.
You people are strangely protective of your national heroes. Odd how this post didn't attract the same level of hostility, despite being just as ludicrous.
Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #658,601
@658,590 (A)
Please post your video on youtube, with hand on the bible and swear to God almighty you're not a pedophile.
Otherwise its going to be proof OP is a pedophile.
Please post your video on youtube, with hand on the bible and swear to God almighty you're not a pedophile.
Otherwise its going to be proof OP is a pedophile.
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 10 years ago, 48 seconds later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #658,602
Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 6 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #658,607
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 11 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #658,611
@658,602 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
@previous (J)
Again, the quality of my posts is irrelevant to the issue at hand. We have it on record that a number of high ranking American Astronauts have refused to confirm or deny the Lunar expeditions.
@previous (J)
Again, the quality of my posts is irrelevant to the issue at hand. We have it on record that a number of high ranking American Astronauts have refused to confirm or deny the Lunar expeditions.
Green !BEERiVqJJw replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #658,612
Anonymous J replied with this 10 years ago, 6 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #658,619
@658,611 (A)
Did you even bother to read Anon E reply?
Taxi driver stalks the shit out of lunar dudes. Wacko's like Mark David Chapman lurk everywhere.
> Again, the quality of my posts is irrelevant to the issue at hand.
You must have attended the Svet school of shit-posting.
Did you even bother to read Anon E reply?
Taxi driver stalks the shit out of lunar dudes. Wacko's like Mark David Chapman lurk everywhere.
> Again, the quality of my posts is irrelevant to the issue at hand.
You must have attended the Svet school of shit-posting.
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 10 years ago, 8 seconds later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #658,620
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 18 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #658,628
@658,619 (J)
Yes, I read it, and as previously stated, it's completely irrelevant. Aldrin could just as easily have put his hand on the book and said "I've been to the moon" before he smacked Sibrel upside the head. The issue is not whether Sibrel is crazy asshole, it's whether Aldrin took an oath in public that he had walked on the moon. This video clearly shows that he refused:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wptn5RE2I-k
@previous (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
I'm curious: why didn't you subject me to petty insults when I posted this topic? Its premise is just as ridiculous as this one's.
Yes, I read it, and as previously stated, it's completely irrelevant. Aldrin could just as easily have put his hand on the book and said "I've been to the moon" before he smacked Sibrel upside the head. The issue is not whether Sibrel is crazy asshole, it's whether Aldrin took an oath in public that he had walked on the moon. This video clearly shows that he refused:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wptn5RE2I-k
@previous (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
I'm curious: why didn't you subject me to petty insults when I posted this topic? Its premise is just as ridiculous as this one's.
(Edited 3 minutes later.)
Metæ joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 8 minutes later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #658,630
Trump will put us back on the moon and make China pay for it!
Anonymous L joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #658,632
Anonymous M joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 44 minutes later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #658,640
@658,628 (A)
> I'm curious: why didn't you subject me to petty insults when I posted this topic? Its premise is just as ridiculous as this one's.
lol
Yep Svets school of shitposting.
> I'm curious: why didn't you subject me to petty insults when I posted this topic? Its premise is just as ridiculous as this one's.
lol
Yep Svets school of shitposting.
Anonymous F replied with this 10 years ago, 5 minutes later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #658,642
@658,590 (A)
The fact he was not willing to swear an oath on the matter does not imply that he did not do it though
The fact he was not willing to swear an oath on the matter does not imply that he did not do it though
Anonymous N joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 16 seconds later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #658,643
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 10 years ago, 20 minutes later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #658,659
@658,628 (A)
Are you feeling alright m8? You seem to be confused by the fact that people treat different shitposts differently. Do you need me to write out the word "differences" in crayon or something?
Are you feeling alright m8? You seem to be confused by the fact that people treat different shitposts differently. Do you need me to write out the word "differences" in crayon or something?
FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 21 minutes later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #658,682
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 27 minutes later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #658,696
@658,619 (J)
@658,640 (M)
@previous (FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI)
The "taxi driver" is actually an investigative journalist and film-maker. Again, this is beyond dispute.
@658,659 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
> people treat different shitposts differently
You mean they're defending two geriatric old faggots who are deserving of nothing but contempt.
@658,640 (M)
@previous (FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI)
The "taxi driver" is actually an investigative journalist and film-maker. Again, this is beyond dispute.
@658,659 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
> people treat different shitposts differently
You mean they're defending two geriatric old faggots who are deserving of nothing but contempt.
(Edited 4 minutes later.)
FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI replied with this 10 years ago, 8 minutes later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #658,700
@previous (A)
The quality of your thread is shit. This is beyond dispute. Now please go make like a lemming and become a pancake.
The quality of your thread is shit. This is beyond dispute. Now please go make like a lemming and become a pancake.
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 10 years ago, 9 seconds later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #658,701
Anonymous J replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #658,703
@658,628 (A)
> premise is just as ridiculous as this one's.
@658,696 (A)
> The "taxi driver" is actually an investigative journalist and film-maker. Again, this is beyond dispute.
How about a new topic where you claim Mark David Chapman is a hero. Go on you know you want to do this.
> premise is just as ridiculous as this one's.
@658,696 (A)
> The "taxi driver" is actually an investigative journalist and film-maker. Again, this is beyond dispute.
How about a new topic where you claim Mark David Chapman is a hero. Go on you know you want to do this.
Metæ replied with this 10 years ago, 15 minutes later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #658,710
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 28 seconds later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #658,711
@658,701 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
I've made no claims whatsoever regarding my accomplishments. However, these lying old queer-fags have been scamming the public for well over forty years with their grandiose fantasies without providing a shred of evidence.
I've made no claims whatsoever regarding my accomplishments. However, these lying old queer-fags have been scamming the public for well over forty years with their grandiose fantasies without providing a shred of evidence.
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #658,714
@previous (A)
Please provide the forum with a list of your notable accomplishments.
@658,710 (Metæ)
I have a BA in Philosophy hanging up on my wall, thanks
Please provide the forum with a list of your notable accomplishments.
@658,710 (Metæ)
I have a BA in Philosophy hanging up on my wall, thanks
Syntax replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #658,716
@658,711 (A)
You already said
> despite this topic ludicrous.
Just wtf are you trying to prove other than Alzheimer's
You already said
> despite this topic ludicrous.
Just wtf are you trying to prove other than Alzheimer's
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #658,717
@658,703 (J)
> How about a new topic where you claim Mark David Chapman is a hero.
That would be asinine. Chapman was a fat, smirking creep who stalked and murdered a celebrity. Bart Sibrel is an investigative journalist who got smacked upside the head for asking inconvenient questions. There's no comparison.
> How about a new topic where you claim Mark David Chapman is a hero.
That would be asinine. Chapman was a fat, smirking creep who stalked and murdered a celebrity. Bart Sibrel is an investigative journalist who got smacked upside the head for asking inconvenient questions. There's no comparison.
Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #658,719
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #658,720
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 52 seconds later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #658,721
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 10 years ago, 46 seconds later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #658,722
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 5 minutes later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #658,723
@658,716 (Syntax)
I'm just curious as to why there's been such a backlash to my deriding two aging public figures, given MC's treatment of the elderly. Look at the way they've treated you, Syntax - your claims are well within the realms of possibility, and yet they've consistently mocked, ridiculed and harassed you from the moment you started posting here, calling you a delusional fantasist and worse. Why are they demanding more respect for Armstrong & Aldren than they've ever offered anyone else?
I'm just curious as to why there's been such a backlash to my deriding two aging public figures, given MC's treatment of the elderly. Look at the way they've treated you, Syntax - your claims are well within the realms of possibility, and yet they've consistently mocked, ridiculed and harassed you from the moment you started posting here, calling you a delusional fantasist and worse. Why are they demanding more respect for Armstrong & Aldren than they've ever offered anyone else?
(Edited 2 minutes later.)
Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #658,724
Green !BEERiVqJJw replied with this 10 years ago, 14 seconds later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #658,725
Syntax replied with this 10 years ago, 24 seconds later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #658,727
@658,717 (A)
http://www.crank.net/new.html
As listed by www.crank.net A site dedicatad to listing "cranks, crankpots, kooks and loons on the net"
http://www.thekeyboard.org.uk/Bart%20Sibrel.htm
Bart Winfield Sibrel was arrested shortly after a a train operator saw him on on his knees in the nearly empty first car, thrusting his pelvis against a seat next to the cab.
Sibrel, who boarded the train at the 16th Street Station, exited at Civic Center but returned to his paramour just before the doors closed, according to the public defender’s office. The operator testified that she then saw him gyrating on his stomach, his feet in the aisle, before he flipped over and began masturbating.
Sibrel never acknowledged the operator while in the throes of passion, but noticed her once he exited at the Station, the public defender’s office said. The operator testified that while Sibrel apologized to her, his genitals were peeking out from beneath his shirt.
http://www.crank.net/new.html
As listed by www.crank.net A site dedicatad to listing "cranks, crankpots, kooks and loons on the net"
http://www.thekeyboard.org.uk/Bart%20Sibrel.htm
Bart Winfield Sibrel was arrested shortly after a a train operator saw him on on his knees in the nearly empty first car, thrusting his pelvis against a seat next to the cab.
Sibrel, who boarded the train at the 16th Street Station, exited at Civic Center but returned to his paramour just before the doors closed, according to the public defender’s office. The operator testified that she then saw him gyrating on his stomach, his feet in the aisle, before he flipped over and began masturbating.
Sibrel never acknowledged the operator while in the throes of passion, but noticed her once he exited at the Station, the public defender’s office said. The operator testified that while Sibrel apologized to her, his genitals were peeking out from beneath his shirt.
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #658,728
Green !BEERiVqJJw replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #658,729
Syntax replied with this 10 years ago, 6 minutes later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #658,738
@previous (Green !BEERiVqJJw)
Wot? I doubt he has a functional one. Probably sold it to survive in China.
Hey I read that you have tried to sober up. Once you have done such you will stop posting such silly stuff
Wot? I doubt he has a functional one. Probably sold it to survive in China.
Hey I read that you have tried to sober up. Once you have done such you will stop posting such silly stuff
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #658,740
@658,727 (Syntax)
Syntax, what does this have to do with former Apollo astronauts refusing to take an oath that they walked on the lunar surface?
Syntax, what does this have to do with former Apollo astronauts refusing to take an oath that they walked on the lunar surface?
Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 4 minutes later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #658,744
Green !BEERiVqJJw replied with this 10 years ago, 50 seconds later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #658,745
Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo replied with this 10 years ago, 7 seconds later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #658,746
@658,738 (Syntax)
Approximately how much time per day do you spend thinking about Indy's penis? 23? 24, perhaps?
Approximately how much time per day do you spend thinking about Indy's penis? 23? 24, perhaps?
Syntax replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #658,747
@658,740 (A)
Copypasta from your other topic
Syntax (you) replied with this 1 minute ago, 40 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #658,743
> I'm just curious as to why there's been such a backlash to my ridiculing Armstrong & Aldren in particular.
Most here when you mention Armstrong think of Lance. Most here have never heard of Aldren.
I think wot got people inspired to go after you was the concept that anyone wood chase down ANYONE and demand they put hands on bible and swear ANYTHING
Here in Cardiff by the Sea the Mormons and 7th day Adventists and on occasion Church of Scientology will engage people on their way to the beach - Mormons n Adventists have bible in hands but wood NEVER EVER ask anyone to put hands on or hands up and swear
Besides you damn well No that on MC the very idea that some fool is going to run after you and demand you swear on a bible is ANTI Chans concept
Copypasta from your other topic
Syntax (you) replied with this 1 minute ago, 40 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #658,743
> I'm just curious as to why there's been such a backlash to my ridiculing Armstrong & Aldren in particular.
Most here when you mention Armstrong think of Lance. Most here have never heard of Aldren.
I think wot got people inspired to go after you was the concept that anyone wood chase down ANYONE and demand they put hands on bible and swear ANYTHING
Here in Cardiff by the Sea the Mormons and 7th day Adventists and on occasion Church of Scientology will engage people on their way to the beach - Mormons n Adventists have bible in hands but wood NEVER EVER ask anyone to put hands on or hands up and swear
Besides you damn well No that on MC the very idea that some fool is going to run after you and demand you swear on a bible is ANTI Chans concept
Green !BEERiVqJJw replied with this 10 years ago, 29 seconds later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #658,748
Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo replied with this 10 years ago, 5 minutes later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #658,753
@658,747 (Syntax)
Yes, but approximately how much time per day do you spend thinking about Indy's penis? 23? 24, perhaps?
Yes, but approximately how much time per day do you spend thinking about Indy's penis? 23? 24, perhaps?
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 4 minutes later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #658,755
@658,747 (Syntax)
Yes, I read that, but what does Sibrel's sexual proclivities have to do with the topic under discussion (ie lunar astronauts refusing to swear that they've been to the moon?).
@658,744 (Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo)
Has he ever sworn it on a holy book, or taken a legally binding oath that he's walked on the face of the moon? That's why I asked earlier if he testified in court that he'd visited the moon.
Yes, I read that, but what does Sibrel's sexual proclivities have to do with the topic under discussion (ie lunar astronauts refusing to swear that they've been to the moon?).
@658,744 (Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo)
Has he ever sworn it on a holy book, or taken a legally binding oath that he's walked on the face of the moon? That's why I asked earlier if he testified in court that he'd visited the moon.
Green !BEERiVqJJw replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #658,758
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #658,762
Sheila LaBoof joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 7 minutes later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #658,764
squeegee joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #658,765
@658,755 (A)
video evidence and russian telemetry isn't enough, huh? not to mention apollo 13 proves human intervention. they manually sighted and adjusted their trajectory, no remote commamds were sent to the ships offline flight computer. again, russians tell us this too. tbh if they can travel millions of km and orbit the moon then the last 10km to the surface is not the hardest part. it was the most dangerous becuase they had 1 abort attempt.
so why would the russians be complicit in the "lie" if it would have benefited them greatly to "prove" it was being faked by their idealogical enemy?
answer: it really happened and the evidence for it having had happened is overwhelming.
video evidence and russian telemetry isn't enough, huh? not to mention apollo 13 proves human intervention. they manually sighted and adjusted their trajectory, no remote commamds were sent to the ships offline flight computer. again, russians tell us this too. tbh if they can travel millions of km and orbit the moon then the last 10km to the surface is not the hardest part. it was the most dangerous becuase they had 1 abort attempt.
so why would the russians be complicit in the "lie" if it would have benefited them greatly to "prove" it was being faked by their idealogical enemy?
answer: it really happened and the evidence for it having had happened is overwhelming.
Syntax replied with this 10 years ago, 19 seconds later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #658,766
@658,755 (A)
> but what does Sibrel's sexual proclivities have to do with the topic under discussion
Of course you're expected to continue the ruse. But just to humor you and keep you off the street from commuting sin.
Quality NASA types wood do or due all they could to avoid perverts.
You asked BDD about them swearing in court? One wood have to bring a court case and ask them. Now I used to as a kiddlet bounce Signals off the moon - Not with a huge degree of success because I kept upgrading my amateur system and had no clue that each upgrade and they be many - were exactly the opposite of wot I should have done. I bring this up because a number of Hams built gear to listen in to the conversations of Astronauts on the moon surface to the lander. Its all documented including where reporters for local papers were present
And anyone is free to look at my Globalstar Satellites and monitor the telemetry which is not at all encrypted - Its real real easy to do. Any old cell phone can be modified real easy to pick up the telemetry -
> but what does Sibrel's sexual proclivities have to do with the topic under discussion
Of course you're expected to continue the ruse. But just to humor you and keep you off the street from commuting sin.
Quality NASA types wood do or due all they could to avoid perverts.
You asked BDD about them swearing in court? One wood have to bring a court case and ask them. Now I used to as a kiddlet bounce Signals off the moon - Not with a huge degree of success because I kept upgrading my amateur system and had no clue that each upgrade and they be many - were exactly the opposite of wot I should have done. I bring this up because a number of Hams built gear to listen in to the conversations of Astronauts on the moon surface to the lander. Its all documented including where reporters for local papers were present
And anyone is free to look at my Globalstar Satellites and monitor the telemetry which is not at all encrypted - Its real real easy to do. Any old cell phone can be modified real easy to pick up the telemetry -
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 19 minutes later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #658,775
@previous (Syntax)
> Quality NASA types wood do or due all they could to avoid perverts.
Well, anyone would do well to avoid contact with sexual perverts, but I have no reason at this point to believe Aldrin knew anything about Sibrel's sexual history. He more likely knew him as a conspiracy theorist and wished to avoid a confrontation.
BTW: CrankDotNet is about as reliable a source of information as ED. While Sibrel's arrest for vandalism is well documented, there's no reason to believe he was detained on indecency charges or was caught engaging in bestiality as a few attack sites maintain.
> Quality NASA types wood do or due all they could to avoid perverts.
Well, anyone would do well to avoid contact with sexual perverts, but I have no reason at this point to believe Aldrin knew anything about Sibrel's sexual history. He more likely knew him as a conspiracy theorist and wished to avoid a confrontation.
BTW: CrankDotNet is about as reliable a source of information as ED. While Sibrel's arrest for vandalism is well documented, there's no reason to believe he was detained on indecency charges or was caught engaging in bestiality as a few attack sites maintain.
Green !BEERiVqJJw replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #658,776
Syntax replied with this 10 years ago, 13 minutes later, 20 hours after the original post[^] [v] #658,786
@658,775 (A)
> engaging in bestiality
Really. I did not look in depth about the depravity and sure happy I did not run in2 reading about him as such
> engaging in bestiality
Really. I did not look in depth about the depravity and sure happy I did not run in2 reading about him as such
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 8 minutes later, 20 hours after the original post[^] [v] #658,793
@previous (Syntax)
Oh, everyone hates the guy for giving Aldrin grief. Moralfags have been circulating these rumors since the moment Buzz clocked him in the jaw. It's quite amazing how low these good, upstanding flag-wavers will sink when their precious sensibilities are offended.
Oh, everyone hates the guy for giving Aldrin grief. Moralfags have been circulating these rumors since the moment Buzz clocked him in the jaw. It's quite amazing how low these good, upstanding flag-wavers will sink when their precious sensibilities are offended.
(Edited 1 minute later.)
Syntax replied with this 10 years ago, 4 minutes later, 20 hours after the original post[^] [v] #658,799
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 9 minutes later, 20 hours after the original post[^] [v] #658,804
@previous (Syntax)
I'm not. But spreading lies about some horse's ass is not the best way to honor Buzz Aldrin's achievements.
I'm not. But spreading lies about some horse's ass is not the best way to honor Buzz Aldrin's achievements.
FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI replied with this 10 years ago, 21 minutes later, 20 hours after the original post[^] [v] #658,820
@previous (A)
So you accept that Buzz Aldrin is a great man who did great things deserving of honor. Thanks, that'll be all.
So you accept that Buzz Aldrin is a great man who did great things deserving of honor. Thanks, that'll be all.
Syntax replied with this 10 years ago, 6 minutes later, 20 hours after the original post[^] [v] #658,821
@previous (FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI)
Gotta scoot
Ya might look up his bio
More on him some other tyme
ZoooOOOoooOOOOOOOOooooM-------------------------------------------------------------------->
Gotta scoot
Ya might look up his bio
More on him some other tyme
ZoooOOOoooOOOOOOOOooooM-------------------------------------------------------------------->
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 23 minutes later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #658,831
@658,820 (FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI)
Sure I do. But isn't that all the more reason to piss all over the old faggot's legacy? This is a troll board infested with douchebags and shitposters. It's our duty to corrupt the innocent, mock the bereaved and lay shit on everyone & everything worthy of respect & admiration.
Sure I do. But isn't that all the more reason to piss all over the old faggot's legacy? This is a troll board infested with douchebags and shitposters. It's our duty to corrupt the innocent, mock the bereaved and lay shit on everyone & everything worthy of respect & admiration.
(Edited 1 minute later.)
Green !BEERiVqJJw replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #658,832
squeegee joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 47 seconds later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #658,833
@658,831 (A)
> It's our duty to corrupt the innocent, mock the bereaved and lay shit on everyone & everything worthy of respect & admiration.
you're being mocked for taking this shit so seriously. go put on your guy fawks mask and cum in your own mouth you faggit
> It's our duty to corrupt the innocent, mock the bereaved and lay shit on everyone & everything worthy of respect & admiration.
you're being mocked for taking this shit so seriously. go put on your guy fawks mask and cum in your own mouth you faggit
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 14 seconds later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #658,834
Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #658,835
squeegee replied with this 10 years ago, 30 seconds later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #658,836
@658,834 (A)
you're the edgiest edgelord we've seen in weeks, so one is going to think we're going soft with people like you around you edgy anon troll you. hey, i got an idea, let's ddos a rival chan, that'll show them how edgy we are.
you're the edgiest edgelord we've seen in weeks, so one is going to think we're going soft with people like you around you edgy anon troll you. hey, i got an idea, let's ddos a rival chan, that'll show them how edgy we are.
Green !BEERiVqJJw replied with this 10 years ago, 21 seconds later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #658,838
Anonymous T joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 23 minutes later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #658,853
Sheila LaBoof replied with this 10 years ago, 34 seconds later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #658,854
they also siad they never roade in a fagboat
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 7 minutes later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #658,857
Anonymous T replied with this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #658,859
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 17 minutes later, 22 hours after the original post[^] [v] #658,862
Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 10 years ago, 2 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #658,892
@658,765 (squeegee)
Makes no difference. The Apollo astronauts refused to take a public oath that they had been to the moon. This makes them thieves, lairs and cowards. And the Earth is clearly flat. That is all.
Makes no difference. The Apollo astronauts refused to take a public oath that they had been to the moon. This makes them thieves, lairs and cowards. And the Earth is clearly flat. That is all.
Green !BEERiVqJJw replied with this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #658,897
I will take a giant fucking shit on the moon. I don't give a fuck.
Adam Jensen joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #658,912
Green !BEERiVqJJw replied with this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #658,913
Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo replied with this 10 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #658,943
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 27 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #658,949
Green !BEERiVqJJw replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #658,950
FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI replied with this 10 years ago, 2 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #658,972
@658,834 (A)
who gives a shit?
@658,831 (A)
> It's our duty to corrupt the innocent, mock the bereaved and lay shit on everyone & everything worthy of respect & admiration.
Since the board contains pornography and coarse language, and you haven't been banned, I'm going to assume you're at least 18. In which case, the only explanation for your complete lack of awareness as to other people's motivations for ridiculing something, is severe autism.
who gives a shit?
@658,831 (A)
> It's our duty to corrupt the innocent, mock the bereaved and lay shit on everyone & everything worthy of respect & admiration.
Since the board contains pornography and coarse language, and you haven't been banned, I'm going to assume you're at least 18. In which case, the only explanation for your complete lack of awareness as to other people's motivations for ridiculing something, is severe autism.
Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo replied with this 10 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #659,001
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 7 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #659,132
@658,972 (FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI)
See also this topic. Clearly, my influence is spreading swiftly throughout the board.
See also this topic. Clearly, my influence is spreading swiftly throughout the board.
FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI replied with this 10 years ago, 7 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #659,238
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 46 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #659,247
@previous (FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI)
"What's all this sentimental bullshit about (about Aldrin and Armstrong)"
https://minichan.org/topic/50757
"What's all this sentimental bullshit about (about Aldrin and Armstrong)"
https://minichan.org/topic/50757
(Edited 35 seconds later.)
Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 17 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #659,249
Anonymous W joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 9 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #659,253
Anonymous X joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 16 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #659,255
OP has been flagged on r04rs madposters list before. He's the same madposting anon that couldn't figure out why all of his madtopics were being deleted. He thought it was because there was a word filter instead of a regular old butthurt weirdo madfilter. It's the same guy that madspams his own madpolls and then claims them as defining evidence of whatever he's currently madabout.He's reasonably hard to get rid of, because of the proxies, VPNs, and UID dropping to avoid all the bans and shadowbans...
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 14 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #659,256
Anonymous C replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #659,257
@previous (A)
Just came in from one fantastic evening and let me take you down - as if it matters
Hold on for my shit topic
Just came in from one fantastic evening and let me take you down - as if it matters
Hold on for my shit topic
Sheila LaBoof replied with this 10 years ago, 14 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #659,258
@659,247 (A)
what the fuck, why didn't the thread title contain the bracketed text? There is plenty of room to hold it. I never bothered to click the title because it didn't sound like about anything. Finish your titles you fuckers
what the fuck, why didn't the thread title contain the bracketed text? There is plenty of room to hold it. I never bothered to click the title because it didn't sound like about anything. Finish your titles you fuckers
(Edited 34 seconds later.)
Anonymous X replied with this 10 years ago, 20 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #659,260
@659,256 (A)Yep. Same madposter, same inferiority complex about the reply count. Are you struggling with your lack of a poll to spam in this thread though? You won't be able to gleefully madspam your madpoll madresults in other threads now!
Anonymous M replied with this 10 years ago, 9 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #659,263
@previous (X)
250,000,000 Spermatozoa are released in one typical ejaculation.
OP thinks its a big deal to get 100 replies.
250,000,000 Spermatozoa are released in one typical ejaculation.
OP thinks its a big deal to get 100 replies.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 20 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #659,265
@previous (M)
@659,260 (X)
@659,258 (Sheila LaBoof)
> OP thinks its a big deal to get 100 replies.
105 now. All because two lying old fucks refused to swear on a Bible.
@659,260 (X)
@659,258 (Sheila LaBoof)
> OP thinks its a big deal to get 100 replies.
105 now. All because two lying old fucks refused to swear on a Bible.
Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo replied with this 10 years ago, 6 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #659,266
@659,256 (A)
@previous (A)
How long has it been since you went outside? Or spoke to a person in real life?
@previous (A)
How long has it been since you went outside? Or spoke to a person in real life?
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 3 hours later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #659,274
@previous (Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo)
I hold a full time job and deal with groups of people on a daily basis. However, that is irrelevant to the issue posed in the original post, ie the refusal of Apollo astronauts to take a public oath that they had been to the moon.
I hold a full time job and deal with groups of people on a daily basis. However, that is irrelevant to the issue posed in the original post, ie the refusal of Apollo astronauts to take a public oath that they had been to the moon.
Big Dadddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo replied with this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #659,275
@previous (A)
No, you are a failure who sits at home getting erect over reply count, as it is one of the few remaining things that gives your life meaning. Thanks.
No, you are a failure who sits at home getting erect over reply count, as it is one of the few remaining things that gives your life meaning. Thanks.