Minichan

Topic: Grrrrrrrr A very 1st ever - Trading Blue for boob tube

Anonymous A started this discussion 10 years ago #50,560

Super lovely Ocean a Blue morning

EVERYONE gets out to watch Romney speech on Tablets-Phones.
Just as I am ready to roll back in. Time for work to B done.

Wazzzzzzzzzzzzzzz one historic speech that may help drive on the uneducated n wacko's.


Over n Out

PS: I do provide a quality bit of extra power with directed antenna Wi-Fi for Swami's beach use. Open with no password required.

Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later[^] [v] #656,077

@OP
Fake Syntax detected.

Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 39 seconds later, 1 minute after the original post[^] [v] #656,079

> Wazzzzzzzzzzzzzzz one historic speech that may help drive on the uneducated n wacko's.

I feel the same way about this post.

Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 4 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #656,082

@previous (C)
Why do you admit you're a wacko?

Anonymous C replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 6 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #656,083

@previous (D)
Loaded question

Reported for decadent statism.

Anonymous D replied with this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 10 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #656,086

@previous (C)
I feel your pain. Cannot be easy to end up as a puppet of the state.

Anonymous C replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 11 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #656,087

@previous (D)
False dichotomy. Your're decadent.

Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo replied with this 10 years ago, 50 seconds later, 11 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #656,088

@656,083 (C)
@previous (C)
Reported for unfunny /pol/ shtick.

Anonymous C replied with this 10 years ago, 22 minutes later, 33 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #656,091

@previous (Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo)
Reported for mansplaining and general microaggressions.

Metæ joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #656,104

Oh god they dragged out Mitt Romney to stump the Trump? Why not get Jeb! and Dubya while you're at it?

Romney totally dropped the ball on what had to have been the easiest Republican victory since Carter left office. Obama's a very low energy guy but somehow magic underwear Mitt was even lower energy-er.

Mormon Mitt's Bain Capital fucked over more people than ten Trump Universities and raided employee pension funds to enrich Mitt and his friends.

> herp derp muh Trump casino bankruptcies
22% of the companies Mitt invested it went bankrupt.

Metæ double-posted this 10 years ago, 10 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #656,105

@OP
Syntax, if you traded surfing for the opportunity to watch the guy who lost the 2012 election then I feel really bad for you.

Syntax (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 2 hours later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #656,144

@656,104 (Metæ)
@previous (Metæ)
My Ocean a Blue emptied super fast to watch Romney.
Ya gota admit all this stuff is very entertaining.

Metæ I thought you might like to compare Today vs same day in 2012 and the link if you use bookmarks will be useful as we proceed to Nov 8th

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2012/president/us/general_election_romney_vs_obama-1171.html

Drag to 3-3-2012 and notice Obama vs Romney - Obama +4.7 points

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2016/president/us/general_election_trump_vs_clinton-5491.html

Clinton is +5 on the Fox poll and +8 on the CNN poll

Its important to look at past accuracy of Polls and of course Nate Silver makes this easy. Lots of popular polls with dicey past results.
http://fivethirtyeight.com/interactives/pollster-ratings/

I keep pointing out using multiple sources that Trump is doing really well currently HOWEVER NOT as well as Romney at this point in time - One key reason of course - looking currently is that Romney locked in 50% Republican approval early on. Trump is currently at 37% which is the number based on: Adjusted for pollster quality, sample size and recency.
http://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/election-2016/national-primary-polls/republican/

Also General Election: Trump vs. Clinton Rasmussen Reports ("conservative-leaning polling group") Clinton 41, Trump 36 Clinton +5 bashed by Nate for bias leaning towards Republicans

Your guy Trump has gota find a way to break the 50% and catch up to Romney cause as you may remember Romney with even the more better numbers lost to Obama.

Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo replied with this 10 years ago, 12 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #656,145

@previous (Syntax)
Are multiple sources that Trump is doing really well currently HOWEVER NOT as well as Romney at this point in time re: 15 minute dryve from thee?

Metæ replied with this 10 years ago, 8 hours later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #656,215

@656,144 (Syntax)
> Romney locked in 50% Republican approval early on
Yes, but who was Mitt running against? Newt Gingrich, Ron Paul, and Rick Santorum. Everyone else dropped out by the end of February. Mitt was the establishment's man and so the GOP, Fox News, etc threw full support behind him.

The GOP dragging out Mittens to make his speech shows that they have no idea what the Trump phenomenon is about. Mitt Romney is the man Trump voters are voting against

It's like the Protestant Reformation. Martin Luther's supporters don't care what the pope has to say. The Vatican dragging out some old cardinal or bishop to make a speech won't sway Luther's supporters. They are done with Catholicism. It's not about "reforming" Catholicism they are done with it.

RWBY Rhubarb? !!iNo3FkiZx joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 8 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #656,216

@previous (Metæ)
What if they dragged out Jesus to speak against Trump? Would that stop him?

Metæ replied with this 10 years ago, 11 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #656,217

@previous (RWBY Rhubarb? !!iNo3FkiZx)
Doubtful, Jesus' "give everything to the poor" and "turn the other cheek" talking points aren't popular in Republican circles.

Syntax (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 11 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #656,340

@656,215 (Metæ)
In no way did I drag out Romney because of his rant yesterday morning against Trump.
Point was/is to show the point spread of a GOP vs Demo at this point in time - Apples vs Apples not Oranges. Its all about not who is in this race but who wins the Race.

For Trump to win he wood have to convert a lot of Demos to his side and do it without the necessary Black/Latino vote. In every current study Trump ends up with a ultra white looking group at his rallies - And if you want to see a pollster who is a well known Republican - Rassmunsen - His polls ALWAYS error on the side of making GOP look more better than it is - Poor rating on past polls - Look at his latest Poll showing Hillary who was behind Trump now in Front of Trump.

Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo replied with this 10 years ago, 3 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #656,417

@previous (Syntax)
> Demos
You spelled "Domestos" wrong.

Metæ replied with this 10 years ago, 37 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #656,434

@656,340 (Syntax)
Again, put your money where your mouth is and go vote for Trump on June 7. He's just a clown right? Why not set Hillary up against the easiest opponent? If you can't answer this you either don't believe in Hillary or you fear Trump.

Syntax (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 58 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #656,445

@previous (Metæ)
Ah in fact in the past I have done Exactly that And may this go round.

I however do not want anyone to think I wood help rig my own wallet - Nor am I about to lie to friends - For sure I am betting (its Illegal) Locally - So is poker.
:

Please familiarise yourself with the rules and markup syntax before posting.