Anonymous A started this discussion 10 years ago#50,457
Many people when attempting to define gender to two biological categories of 'male' and 'female' often run into a disagreement as to rather or not they are defined by the 23rd set of chromosomes, i.e. XX and XY, or by the genitalia of the person, i.e. penis and vagina. Which is the most accurate way of categorizing people's sex.
I would say that due to rare circumstances of XY males being born with female genitalia and XX females being born with male genitalia that this is a very poor definition of sex. Chromosomes are more permanent so therefore should be the deciding factor of one's sex. The genitalia argument is for piss poor rednecks who do not understand how biology or science works.
RWBY Rhubarb ? !USyrBjAMxU joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 4 minutes later[^][v]#654,546
Chromosomes but also most people don't know their own chromosomes
WSD !m2cp3rR5zw joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 8 minutes later, 13 minutes after the original post[^][v]#654,547
I'd say gender is hormonal and presentation, and sex is genetic.
Adam Jensen joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 42 seconds later, 14 minutes after the original post[^][v]#654,548
Memes
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#654,558
A TL:DR response about the complexities of sex and gender.
kook !!mCVqftDha joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 1 hour later, 2 hours after the original post[^][v]#654,568
Have you had your chromosomes tested?
Sheila LaBoof joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 7 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^][v]#654,574
There's a specific chunk of the Y chromosome that is important. If that chunk is out, then the Y doesn't mean there's the appearence of anything male. Or, if somehow that chunk is with XX, you get male. Then there's androgen insensitivity syndrome. Let's just say that nature fucks up in a myriad of ways, like sometimes you get 12 fingers.
Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 4 hours later, 7 hours after the original post[^][v]#654,602
Sheila LaBoof replied with this 10 years ago, 7 hours later, 15 hours after the original post[^][v]#654,654
@previous (Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo)
don't be like that
you know very well that anyone could go to a dictionary and see multiple usages, and this peculiar non-sexual version of gender is only the most recent invention.
Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 4 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[^][v]#654,657
Male = XY Chromosomes
Female = XX Chromosomes
Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo replied with this 10 years ago, 21 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[^][v]#654,661
Sheila LaBoof replied with this 10 years ago, 27 minutes later, 16 hours after the original post[^][v]#654,667
@previous (Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo)
you are weird
is that supposed to be Sourthern US vernacular? over my head, dude
(Edited 1 minute later.)
Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 16 hours after the original post[^][v]#654,669
@previous (Sheila LaBoof)
The term "vernacular", when used correctly, refers, in fact, to any language which is not Latin. Please narrow it down. Thanks.
Sheila LaBoof replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 16 hours after the original post[^][v]#654,671
@previous (Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo)
oh I think I understand, you are some kind of parody identity of some guy I don't know so I didn't get it
Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo replied with this 10 years ago, 4 minutes later, 16 hours after the original post[^][v]#654,676