Minichan

Topic: "CE, and "BCE" are bullshit.

Anonymous A started this discussion 15 years ago #5,031

They just rename "BC" and "AD". It has nothing to do with the "common era", it still revolves around Jesus.

Change it, I'm all for a secular system that is based on something more important, but this is just a failed attempt at secularism.

Atheist here, BTW.

Greenologist !pFNWNYROxA joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later[^] [v] #88,901

wut

Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 19 seconds later, 2 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #88,902

@previous (Greenologist !pFNWNYROxA)
This.

Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 24 minutes later, 26 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #88,920

ICARE

WALLOFTEXT !!fxnDb+Ve4 joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 9 minutes later, 36 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #88,927

You might not like the reason why they started counting the years, but that is why they started counting them. It's good enough that they changed the naming convention. No one is going to be in favor of changing what year it is entirely just because you want to distance yourself from Jesus as much as possible. That's not so much atheism as it is bigotry. We don't have to be religious or follow religion to accept that it's part of our history. It's not a part of our history we need to be proud of, but we shouldn't change the history books in the name of secularism.

Atheist here, BTW.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 3 minutes later, 39 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #88,932

@previous (WALLOFTEXT !!fxnDb+Ve4)

WTF? I don't care if they stick to BC, and AD. Changing it would be nice, but either way is fine. BC and AD have been standardized, and everyone knows it, it makes sense to stick with it.

But this is just a half assed attempt to change it. It has nothing to do with the common era.

Either:
A. Keep BC and AD
B. Change to a better system.

But CE and BCE are just stupid half-assed attempts at changing it.

(Edited 1 minute later.)

WALLOFTEXT !!fxnDb+Ve4 replied with this 15 years ago, 22 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #88,943

@previous (A)
OK, fine, let's just stick with AD and BC then.

protip !!pMmAiEwOm joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 1 hour later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #88,980

Oh, okay.

brie !OudrPWaUDQ joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 1 hour later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #89,014

ITT: OP just found out about BCE/CE and is pissed!

Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 9 hours later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #89,392

what is common about the common era? nothing

psychopath !PAHVpsycho joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 57 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #89,422

BCE: before Christ's era
CE: Christ's era

Anonymous H replied with this 15 years ago, 9 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #89,430

@previous (psychopath !PAHVpsycho)
lol why not? That definition actually makes sense.

Syntax joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 1 hour later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #89,475

No matter because that Christ thing according to bill boards around here say its all ending on May 21, 2011 ok that is the start date for end and new bill board says its all over by Oct.
:

Please familiarise yourself with the rules and markup syntax before posting.