Topic: OK, so I PM'd a certain poster to ask if I should be deleting references to his/her alleged dox
beckyderp !4aMoRa.T2Q started this discussion 10 years ago #50,094
> > > Hi, should I be deleting the references to "[DOX]"? I normally delete dox, I just don't know if that's an inside joke or what.
> > >
> > > Becky
> >
> > Ideally, that is, if you're not merely asking this because you're complicit and asking for confirmation under the veil of concern.
>
> No I'm not trying to dox you, I just didn't know if it was some weird tinychan joke or something. I'll go through and delete that stuff and warn people not to do it again.
Ahahahahaha, ahahaha, no. Thanks for confirming, once again, my theories on neurofemales. You're only giving me more fuel.
What?? How would this be offensive to someone? I am trying to help. :|> > >
> > > Becky
> >
> > Ideally, that is, if you're not merely asking this because you're complicit and asking for confirmation under the veil of concern.
>
> No I'm not trying to dox you, I just didn't know if it was some weird tinychan joke or something. I'll go through and delete that stuff and warn people not to do it again.
Ahahahahaha, ahahaha, no. Thanks for confirming, once again, my theories on neurofemales. You're only giving me more fuel.
!MLHqI35Srs joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 45 seconds later[^] [v] #650,343
Because it was insincere to begin with, as anyone with an IQ above the African continent's average could discern?
Yeah that sounds about right.
Yeah that sounds about right.
FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #650,344
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 4 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #650,347
Becky he-she-it is telling you it has no problem with dox.
Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 54 seconds later, 5 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #650,348
!MLHqI35Srs replied with this 10 years ago, 8 seconds later, 5 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #650,349
@650,344 (FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI)
Fake anon had made it abundantly clear that none of the mods like me. There's no motive to help, you have acted pretty clearly in the manner of a circlejerk before. I only expect circlejerking politics from establishments like this. There's no need to go playing games like this in order to let down my expectations.
Fake anon had made it abundantly clear that none of the mods like me. There's no motive to help, you have acted pretty clearly in the manner of a circlejerk before. I only expect circlejerking politics from establishments like this. There's no need to go playing games like this in order to let down my expectations.
DasSheeple joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 7 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #650,350
mad
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 34 seconds later, 7 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #650,351
@650,349 (!MLHqI35Srs)
> Fake anon had made it abundantly clear that none of the mods like me
WTF? You have written 150,000 words about why you hate yourself. How could anyone like you?
> Fake anon had made it abundantly clear that none of the mods like me
WTF? You have written 150,000 words about why you hate yourself. How could anyone like you?
Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 9 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #650,352
@OP
There is no point in trying to reason with someone whom's disorder renders him incapable of reason. Thanks.
There is no point in trying to reason with someone whom's disorder renders him incapable of reason. Thanks.
(Edited 9 seconds later.)
!MLHqI35Srs replied with this 10 years ago, 49 seconds later, 10 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #650,353
beckyderp !4aMoRa.T2Q (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 12 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #650,355
@650,343 (!MLHqI35Srs)
Honestly, that was not my intent. I am a little maniacal about dox and unauthorized pictures. I tried to ask in a way that wasn't asking you whether it was your name or not, just whether you wanted it deleted.
I never noticed the dox before because I typically ignore your threads.
So anyway, then I went through and deleted about 40-50 references to this alleged dox. And I saw that you, too, had posted the same damn name when referring to yourself. So, sup Matt and fuck you.
Honestly, that was not my intent. I am a little maniacal about dox and unauthorized pictures. I tried to ask in a way that wasn't asking you whether it was your name or not, just whether you wanted it deleted.
I never noticed the dox before because I typically ignore your threads.
So anyway, then I went through and deleted about 40-50 references to this alleged dox. And I saw that you, too, had posted the same damn name when referring to yourself. So, sup Matt and fuck you.
Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo replied with this 10 years ago, 14 seconds later, 12 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #650,356
@650,353 (!MLHqI35Srs)
I was referring, of course, to higher reason; that which pertains to moral, social, and intellectual aptitude.
I was referring, of course, to higher reason; that which pertains to moral, social, and intellectual aptitude.
r04r joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 50 seconds later, 13 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #650,357
Since Autphag has declared that we all hate him and didn't appreciate having his dox cleaned up, we might as well live up to the part. Here it is: Christopher Gillon. Have a nice day.
!MLHqI35Srs replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 15 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #650,360
Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo replied with this 10 years ago, 56 seconds later, 16 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #650,362
beckyderp !4aMoRa.T2Q (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 4 seconds later, 16 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #650,363
Anonymous G replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 17 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #650,367
@650,357 (r04r)
He has been using that monkier for several years. The only change is - he once said he lived in Ireland. He uses his full name on multiple blogs.
He has been using that monkier for several years. The only change is - he once said he lived in Ireland. He uses his full name on multiple blogs.
!MLHqI35Srs replied with this 10 years ago, 4 seconds later, 17 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #650,368
@650,363 (beckyderp !4aMoRa.T2Q)
Using a computer to express it is a passive act. If she was being plain aggressive she'd come up to Scotland and thwack me on my face or something idk.
The fact of the matter is that it'd require r04r to waddle her way to the nearest Netherlandian airline. That's not gonna happen ofc for a number of reasons lol.
Using a computer to express it is a passive act. If she was being plain aggressive she'd come up to Scotland and thwack me on my face or something idk.
The fact of the matter is that it'd require r04r to waddle her way to the nearest Netherlandian airline. That's not gonna happen ofc for a number of reasons lol.
Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo replied with this 10 years ago, 52 seconds later, 18 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #650,369
!MLHqI35Srs replied with this 10 years ago, 40 seconds later, 19 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #650,370
@previous (Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo)
No, I'm just using vocalon's attitude against the lot of you.
No, I'm just using vocalon's attitude against the lot of you.
Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo replied with this 10 years ago, 58 seconds later, 20 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #650,371
Metæ joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 13 seconds later, 20 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #650,372
Did CHRIS GILLON report the posts?
FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 21 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #650,374
@650,368 (!MLHqI35Srs)
And this is different from the method in which you lash out at everyone else in what way?
And this is different from the method in which you lash out at everyone else in what way?
!MLHqI35Srs replied with this 10 years ago, 0 seconds later, 21 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #650,375
@650,372 (Metæ)
Passive-aggressive highlighting now too!
No. I'm not petty like Matt, becky and r04r. I know a chan is just a chan.
Passive-aggressive highlighting now too!
No. I'm not petty like Matt, becky and r04r. I know a chan is just a chan.
Anonymous K joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 23 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #650,376
Holy fuck he's been at it for hours now. When is he going to reach sperg overload and pass out?
!MLHqI35Srs replied with this 10 years ago, 39 seconds later, 23 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #650,377
Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo replied with this 10 years ago, 45 seconds later, 24 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #650,379
Anonymous K replied with this 10 years ago, 2 seconds later, 24 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #650,380
beckyderp !4aMoRa.T2Q (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 20 seconds later, 24 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #650,381
!MLHqI35Srs replied with this 10 years ago, 4 seconds later, 24 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #650,382
!MLHqI35Srs double-posted this 10 years ago, 38 seconds later, 25 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #650,384
@650,381 (beckyderp !4aMoRa.T2Q)
"Inquired" being "acted with false alarm".
Get screwed. You're no psychodynamically mature than the little girls who used to tease me in primary school. The tactics haven't even evolved.
"Inquired" being "acted with false alarm".
Get screwed. You're no psychodynamically mature than the little girls who used to tease me in primary school. The tactics haven't even evolved.
Metæ replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 26 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #650,385
@650,375 (!MLHqI35Srs)
Negroid
@650,381 (beckyderp !4aMoRa.T2Q)
That was very sweet of you. I can't believe he took your kindness and turned it around into an attack.
Negroid
@650,381 (beckyderp !4aMoRa.T2Q)
That was very sweet of you. I can't believe he took your kindness and turned it around into an attack.
!MLHqI35Srs replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 28 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #650,386
@previous (Metæ)
I can't believe you'd defend an act as if it was anything more than a veiled attack.
This is why I befriend individuals like Ginger of /r9k/ well before faux-moralizing pontificators obsessed with the pretense of their good and kind-heartedness like you. My Skype contact list has been invaluable in providing insights into these duplicitous aspects of neurotypical psychopathy.
I can't believe you'd defend an act as if it was anything more than a veiled attack.
This is why I befriend individuals like Ginger of /r9k/ well before faux-moralizing pontificators obsessed with the pretense of their good and kind-heartedness like you. My Skype contact list has been invaluable in providing insights into these duplicitous aspects of neurotypical psychopathy.
Anonymous K replied with this 10 years ago, 30 seconds later, 29 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #650,387
kook !!mCVqftDha joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 31 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #650,388
!MLHqI35Srs replied with this 10 years ago, 42 seconds later, 31 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #650,389
@previous (kook !!mCVqftDha)
Ginger is cis, and a woman. But she is one of Aspergian characteristics. She's helping me write another pamphlet, 'Womanhood of Aspergian Characteristics', which delinates the difference between the moral Aspergian and the pruprient neurotypical femalewhore.
I won't speak for the rest of my list. Introman's on there, funnily enough.
Ginger is cis, and a woman. But she is one of Aspergian characteristics. She's helping me write another pamphlet, 'Womanhood of Aspergian Characteristics', which delinates the difference between the moral Aspergian and the pruprient neurotypical femalewhore.
I won't speak for the rest of my list. Introman's on there, funnily enough.
(Edited 54 seconds later.)
Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo replied with this 10 years ago, 4 minutes later, 36 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #650,391
@650,386 (!MLHqI35Srs)
Your Skype contact list is full of ineffectual shut-ins if you've been hanging out on /r9k/, Mr. Gillon.
Your Skype contact list is full of ineffectual shut-ins if you've been hanging out on /r9k/, Mr. Gillon.
FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI replied with this 10 years ago, 36 seconds later, 36 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #650,392
@650,384 (!MLHqI35Srs)
> Get screwed. You're no psychodynamically mature than
If you'd calm down, maybe you wouldn't be omitting words
> Get screwed. You're no psychodynamically mature than
If you'd calm down, maybe you wouldn't be omitting words
!MLHqI35Srs replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 37 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #650,393
@650,391 (Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo)
She is a sweetheart, currently studies at art school, is a traditional woman in every sense of the almost Confucian-esque connotations of the word, which I need more of in my movement. Despite her aberrosexualism, she did the moral thing and suppressed it, presently communing with a boyfriend. An example to us all, I think.
She is a sweetheart, currently studies at art school, is a traditional woman in every sense of the almost Confucian-esque connotations of the word, which I need more of in my movement. Despite her aberrosexualism, she did the moral thing and suppressed it, presently communing with a boyfriend. An example to us all, I think.
!MLHqI35Srs double-posted this 10 years ago, 28 seconds later, 38 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #650,394
RWBY Rhubarb? !!iNo3FkiZx joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 15 seconds later, 38 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #650,395
Gentlemen and gentlewomen! I have successfully doxed our dear Christopher!
Feast your eyes on this 100% true and accurate dox:
http://www.charollaissheep.com/flock-competition-results-south-of-scotland/
Could his loss to Hannah have been what triggered his hatred of women? We can only speculate.
Feast your eyes on this 100% true and accurate dox:
http://www.charollaissheep.com/flock-competition-results-south-of-scotland/
Could his loss to Hannah have been what triggered his hatred of women? We can only speculate.
Anonymous D replied with this 10 years ago, 15 seconds later, 38 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #650,396
@650,392 (FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI)
> If you'd calm down, maybe you wouldn't be omitting words
Good God man. Why would you ask the master of word salad, to use more words?
> If you'd calm down, maybe you wouldn't be omitting words
Good God man. Why would you ask the master of word salad, to use more words?
kook !!mCVqftDha replied with this 10 years ago, 5 minutes later, 44 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #650,399
FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 45 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #650,401
@650,396 (D)
Because I'm a masochistic subhuman degenerate who can't overcome my negroidally-ingrained "rules" about written English. I am compulsively required to correct people when I see a mistake. If only I were an enlightened Aspergian philosopher...
Because I'm a masochistic subhuman degenerate who can't overcome my negroidally-ingrained "rules" about written English. I am compulsively required to correct people when I see a mistake. If only I were an enlightened Aspergian philosopher...
!MLHqI35Srs replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 47 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #650,403
@650,399 (kook !!mCVqftDha)
Former lesbian, had uncontrollable lesbian urges in high school, found religion and converted those.
Former lesbian, had uncontrollable lesbian urges in high school, found religion and converted those.
Anonymous D replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 48 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #650,405
Perhaps you might drink some of this lol
Almost worked for autphag
(Edited 7 minutes later.)
Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 51 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #650,407
@650,393 (!MLHqI35Srs)
"She" would say that, Mr. Gillon. In reality, he's probably the same person whom tried to goad you into castrating yourself, using a different Skype ID.
"She" would say that, Mr. Gillon. In reality, he's probably the same person whom tried to goad you into castrating yourself, using a different Skype ID.
(Edited 15 seconds later.)
kook !!mCVqftDha replied with this 10 years ago, 26 seconds later, 51 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #650,408
!MLHqI35Srs replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 52 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #650,409
!MLHqI35Srs double-posted this 10 years ago, 18 seconds later, 53 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #650,410
!MLHqI35Srs triple-posted this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 54 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #650,412
@650,408 (kook !!mCVqftDha)
In a way. It shows she has principle. Her sexual conflict however, is no laughing matter. At the end of the day, child rearing urges took over and for her, this arrangement is more practical for that eventual purpose. Very nuclear-family minded.
In a way. It shows she has principle. Her sexual conflict however, is no laughing matter. At the end of the day, child rearing urges took over and for her, this arrangement is more practical for that eventual purpose. Very nuclear-family minded.
FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI replied with this 10 years ago, 18 seconds later, 54 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #650,413
@650,408 (kook !!mCVqftDha)
Yeah, I don't get it either. How are "facts" negroidal, but religion is a good an healthy thing. And how can someone condone suppressing sexual urges while at the same time claiming to be a liberated transsexual?
Yeah, I don't get it either. How are "facts" negroidal, but religion is a good an healthy thing. And how can someone condone suppressing sexual urges while at the same time claiming to be a liberated transsexual?
Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo replied with this 10 years ago, 51 seconds later, 55 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #650,415
!MLHqI35Srs replied with this 10 years ago, 28 seconds later, 56 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #650,416
@650,413 (FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI)
Because my transsexuality goes beyond a mere qualm of sexual orientation. The jury was out on whether God condoned it and an analysis of the Bible says: more likely than homosexuality.
Because my transsexuality goes beyond a mere qualm of sexual orientation. The jury was out on whether God condoned it and an analysis of the Bible says: more likely than homosexuality.
(Edited 34 seconds later.)
squeegee joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 59 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #650,419
@650,413 (FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI)
> And how can someone condone suppressing sexual urges while at the same time claiming to be a liberated transsexual?
because he's a self-interested autist without a drop of empathy for others and bases his entire belief system on double standards and hypocrisy because he is incapable of doing otherwise. to do otherwise would be to admit other people's agency and he isn't willing to do that because the 'tism. pretty textbook stuff, tbh.
> And how can someone condone suppressing sexual urges while at the same time claiming to be a liberated transsexual?
because he's a self-interested autist without a drop of empathy for others and bases his entire belief system on double standards and hypocrisy because he is incapable of doing otherwise. to do otherwise would be to admit other people's agency and he isn't willing to do that because the 'tism. pretty textbook stuff, tbh.
Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo replied with this 10 years ago, 32 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #650,420
kook !!mCVqftDha replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #650,424
!MLHqI35Srs replied with this 10 years ago, 15 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #650,425
@650,420 (Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo)According to the Masons, "yes". Note how I quoted the "yes"? Because their aspersions aren't real.
@650,419 (squeegee)
Erm, no, Cohen.
Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo replied with this 10 years ago, 52 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #650,426
@previous (!MLHqI35Srs)
Please stop spamming that useless MS Paint scribble as if it proves something, Mr. Gillon.
Please stop spamming that useless MS Paint scribble as if it proves something, Mr. Gillon.
(Edited 7 seconds later.)
!MLHqI35Srs replied with this 10 years ago, 48 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #650,429
Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #650,434
!MLHqI35Srs replied with this 10 years ago, 34 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #650,436
squeegee replied with this 10 years ago, 47 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #650,439
Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo replied with this 10 years ago, 3 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #650,440
!MLHqI35Srs replied with this 10 years ago, 19 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #650,441
!MLHqI35Srs double-posted this 10 years ago, 16 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #650,442
Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #650,444
@previous (!MLHqI35Srs)
There is no meaningful content in that post, Mr. Gillon. You are simply babbling.
There is no meaningful content in that post, Mr. Gillon. You are simply babbling.
squeegee replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #650,449
!MLHqI35Srs replied with this 10 years ago, 6 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #650,456
@650,424 (kook !!mCVqftDha)
I am, if I'm to be honest, enjoying how easy it is to vicariously live through her predicament.
If nothing else, I can live through her. I sometimes partake in imagining Ginger's penetration.
I am, if I'm to be honest, enjoying how easy it is to vicariously live through her predicament.
If nothing else, I can live through her. I sometimes partake in imagining Ginger's penetration.
Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo replied with this 10 years ago, 54 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #650,458
@previous (!MLHqI35Srs)
> I sometimes partake in imagining Ginger's penetration.
Is he aware of this?
> I sometimes partake in imagining Ginger's penetration.
Is he aware of this?
beckyderp !4aMoRa.T2Q (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 51 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #650,459
!MLHqI35Srs replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #650,462
Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #650,464
@previous (!MLHqI35Srs)
Have you discussed with him, Mr Gillon, your desire to penetrate his female alter-ego's vagina?
Have you discussed with him, Mr Gillon, your desire to penetrate his female alter-ego's vagina?
kook !!mCVqftDha replied with this 10 years ago, 46 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #650,466
@650,459 (beckyderp !4aMoRa.T2Q)
thats why I will never breed. I dont believe in passing on defects.
thats why I will never breed. I dont believe in passing on defects.
kook !!mCVqftDha double-posted this 10 years ago, 40 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #650,467
!MLHqI35Srs replied with this 10 years ago, 17 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #650,470
@650,464 (Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo)
You retard. I mean his "female alter-ego's" being penetrated.
I want to be penetrated, not to penetrate, because I'm not a faux-tranny like you, Catherine.
You retard. I mean his "female alter-ego's" being penetrated.
I want to be penetrated, not to penetrate, because I'm not a faux-tranny like you, Catherine.
Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo replied with this 10 years ago, 45 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #650,473
squeegee replied with this 10 years ago, 8 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #650,486
@650,470 (!MLHqI35Srs)
why are you attacking catherine now? just lash out at everyone today why don't you.
you're also the fakest tranny imaginable. your personality is so not feminie it's hilarious. you're not a woman, numb nuts, you don't have the capability to act like one at all based on your sperg-tirades. women don't act like you, dude. you come across as a foul-mouthed pervert who can't tolerate anyone but himself, and you come across as a guy. i could never confuse you for a woman, because you aren't interested in anything women are interested in. all you ever talk about are your deranged delusions and psychotic paranoia and you obsess about exactly the wrong things to be a real tranny. real trannies try very, very hard to be women by emulating them down to the last affectation. all you ever do is slander women and it's fucking weird for you to do that and claim to be one at the same time.
you've got serious mental problems, young man. you need some fucking help, quit resisting and get your fucking life in order dude.
why are you attacking catherine now? just lash out at everyone today why don't you.
you're also the fakest tranny imaginable. your personality is so not feminie it's hilarious. you're not a woman, numb nuts, you don't have the capability to act like one at all based on your sperg-tirades. women don't act like you, dude. you come across as a foul-mouthed pervert who can't tolerate anyone but himself, and you come across as a guy. i could never confuse you for a woman, because you aren't interested in anything women are interested in. all you ever talk about are your deranged delusions and psychotic paranoia and you obsess about exactly the wrong things to be a real tranny. real trannies try very, very hard to be women by emulating them down to the last affectation. all you ever do is slander women and it's fucking weird for you to do that and claim to be one at the same time.
you've got serious mental problems, young man. you need some fucking help, quit resisting and get your fucking life in order dude.
!MLHqI35Srs replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #650,492
@previous (squeegee)
What a dumbfuck. He thinks that "emulating" a woman is criterially requisite of gender dysphoria. No, numbnuts. You have to be a woman. As in, the conviction has to run down to your core. And, Aspergian women tend not to act like women anyway, so doubly, there's no behavioural prerequisite.
What a dumbfuck. He thinks that "emulating" a woman is criterially requisite of gender dysphoria. No, numbnuts. You have to be a woman. As in, the conviction has to run down to your core. And, Aspergian women tend not to act like women anyway, so doubly, there's no behavioural prerequisite.
Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #650,496
!MLHqI35Srs replied with this 10 years ago, 46 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #650,497
@previous (Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo)
Because you say so? Lol.
Get fucked, you stupid misogynist autogynephile-canvasser.
Because you say so? Lol.
Get fucked, you stupid misogynist autogynephile-canvasser.
Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo replied with this 10 years ago, 55 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #650,499
@previous (!MLHqI35Srs)
> Get fucked, you stupid misogynist autogynephile-canvasser.
Coming from you, Mr. Gillon, this is particularly amusing.
> Get fucked, you stupid misogynist autogynephile-canvasser.
Coming from you, Mr. Gillon, this is particularly amusing.
squeegee replied with this 10 years ago, 7 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #650,502
@650,492 (!MLHqI35Srs)
no, no, no, brother... i've known quite a few women in my time. i've been around the block way more than once and have known women from all walks of life.
you, sir, are not a women. i say this with the conviction of a man who has actually known more women than just my mother. women do behave differently. and you do not act like any woman i've ever known. even the transexual women i've known (which is far more than i ever thought in my early life that i would know) act more like biological women than biological men, but you act so biologically male that there is no question what you are. you are nothing but a dim-witted oaf of a man who is so narcissistic that you feel entitled to anything you think you want. but i'll tell you something, you sheltered little shut-in, you don't want to be a transexual. you don't have the wherewithal to do what it takes to live that lifestyle. you can't even see the world from another person's point of view, how are you ever going to conform to a standard that would be called "woman." that's why your shrinks won't give you hormones and tits. you lack the ability to even empathize, how are you going to integrate as another sex? every one of your obsessive little screeds against "the matriarchy" or women in general prove that you can't even see the world from their point of view, let alone fucking be one. you're not a woman, you're an insult to transexual women is what you are.
no, no, no, brother... i've known quite a few women in my time. i've been around the block way more than once and have known women from all walks of life.
you, sir, are not a women. i say this with the conviction of a man who has actually known more women than just my mother. women do behave differently. and you do not act like any woman i've ever known. even the transexual women i've known (which is far more than i ever thought in my early life that i would know) act more like biological women than biological men, but you act so biologically male that there is no question what you are. you are nothing but a dim-witted oaf of a man who is so narcissistic that you feel entitled to anything you think you want. but i'll tell you something, you sheltered little shut-in, you don't want to be a transexual. you don't have the wherewithal to do what it takes to live that lifestyle. you can't even see the world from another person's point of view, how are you ever going to conform to a standard that would be called "woman." that's why your shrinks won't give you hormones and tits. you lack the ability to even empathize, how are you going to integrate as another sex? every one of your obsessive little screeds against "the matriarchy" or women in general prove that you can't even see the world from their point of view, let alone fucking be one. you're not a woman, you're an insult to transexual women is what you are.
Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #650,506
Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #650,507
@650,486 (squeegee)
Beyond not 'acting like a woman' he has the most warped ideas of womanhood and is a rampant misogynist
He's the only person who identifies as a woman who I 100% don't believe because every facet of his identity is based on his delusional bigoted world view
Beyond not 'acting like a woman' he has the most warped ideas of womanhood and is a rampant misogynist
He's the only person who identifies as a woman who I 100% don't believe because every facet of his identity is based on his delusional bigoted world view
!MLHqI35Srs replied with this 10 years ago, 32 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #650,509
@650,502 (squeegee)
You are just an Aspergiopath and do not understand Aspergian womanhood. You have an inability to empathize with Aspergians as predicated on your socially-mandated redefinition of the term "empathy" which, per the philosophical problem I've spent every fiber in my body explicating, you've conveniently redefined so as to excuse your reneging on the capacity to do so when the neurotypical's confrontation with an Aspergian is involved, so how can you expect to know what's reasonably female by the standards of an Aspergian? You can't, you don't know Aspergian women, you've never spent near the time speaking with them that I have, and you merely made meretricious value judgements that are patently untrue - for example the claim that the only woman I know is my mother - in order to justify your low-functioning neurotypical chivalry-slave beta-male tirade. Go join the serial murdering omegas like introman in your fucking Return of Kings troll-article tirade, I will make sure to mention this fact to my psychiatrist if the whore brings it up.
You are just an Aspergiopath and do not understand Aspergian womanhood. You have an inability to empathize with Aspergians as predicated on your socially-mandated redefinition of the term "empathy" which, per the philosophical problem I've spent every fiber in my body explicating, you've conveniently redefined so as to excuse your reneging on the capacity to do so when the neurotypical's confrontation with an Aspergian is involved, so how can you expect to know what's reasonably female by the standards of an Aspergian? You can't, you don't know Aspergian women, you've never spent near the time speaking with them that I have, and you merely made meretricious value judgements that are patently untrue - for example the claim that the only woman I know is my mother - in order to justify your low-functioning neurotypical chivalry-slave beta-male tirade. Go join the serial murdering omegas like introman in your fucking Return of Kings troll-article tirade, I will make sure to mention this fact to my psychiatrist if the whore brings it up.
(Edited 35 seconds later.)
Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #650,510
!MLHqI35Srs replied with this 10 years ago, 43 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #650,511
@previous (Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo)
I'm sure she can guess. I've about as little respect for her, even less that they believe someone like introman given his history.
I'm sure she can guess. I've about as little respect for her, even less that they believe someone like introman given his history.
Anonymous P joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 55 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #650,513
Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo replied with this 10 years ago, 12 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #650,514
!MLHqI35Srs replied with this 10 years ago, 38 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #650,515
@650,513 (P)
No. But you can teach yourself reading comprehension.
@previous (Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo)
it's*
No. But you can teach yourself reading comprehension.
@previous (Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo)
it's*
Anonymous Q joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 55 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #650,516
So much drama and madness caused.
thanks @OP ilu
thanks @OP ilu
RWBY Rhubarb? !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 10 years ago, 21 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #650,517
@650,509 (!MLHqI35Srs)
> I will make sure to mention this fact to my psychiatrist if the whore brings it up.
Do you think your psychiatrist can help you with your squeegee problem?
> I will make sure to mention this fact to my psychiatrist if the whore brings it up.
Do you think your psychiatrist can help you with your squeegee problem?
FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI replied with this 10 years ago, 10 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #650,518
@650,509 (!MLHqI35Srs)
If it's not too much trouble, could you go outside and tell me what color the sky is in your world?
If it's not too much trouble, could you go outside and tell me what color the sky is in your world?
!MLHqI35Srs replied with this 10 years ago, 42 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #650,520
@650,517 (RWBY Rhubarb? !!iNo3FkiZx)
No, but if introman's telling the truth, I can at least ask them to tell me whether a strange American troll had contacted their department one Saturday night $X weeks ago where $X is the number of weeks since it happened.
No, but if introman's telling the truth, I can at least ask them to tell me whether a strange American troll had contacted their department one Saturday night $X weeks ago where $X is the number of weeks since it happened.
Anonymous P replied with this 10 years ago, 55 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #650,523
@650,515 (!MLHqI35Srs)
Why does your particular sort of idiot cling to the idea that other people's reading comprehension is the limiting factor to you communicating?
You can't even explain your thoughts without this weird self referential faux academic psychobabble.
Why does your particular sort of idiot cling to the idea that other people's reading comprehension is the limiting factor to you communicating?
You can't even explain your thoughts without this weird self referential faux academic psychobabble.
!MLHqI35Srs replied with this 10 years ago, 47 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #650,526
@previous (P)
It's the limiting factor to you being able to understanding the thoughts of someone whose ideas far exceed yours in complexity, evidently. It makes the claim of my idiocy heftily laughable and ironic.
It's the limiting factor to you being able to understanding the thoughts of someone whose ideas far exceed yours in complexity, evidently. It makes the claim of my idiocy heftily laughable and ironic.
(Edited 21 seconds later.)
Anonymous P replied with this 10 years ago, 4 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #650,530
@previous (!MLHqI35Srs)
That was a sincere question. Please give a more thoughtful answer.
Preferably one that doesn't make you look delusional.
That was a sincere question. Please give a more thoughtful answer.
Preferably one that doesn't make you look delusional.
Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #650,533
@650,526 (!MLHqI35Srs)
> It's the limiting factor to you being able to understanding the thoughts of someone whose ideas far exceed
No, it's this shit
> It's the limiting factor to you being able to understanding the thoughts of someone whose ideas far exceed
No, it's this shit
Anonymous Q replied with this 10 years ago, 20 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #650,534
!MLHqI35Srs replied with this 10 years ago, 12 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #650,535
@650,530 (P)
I gave you a sincere answer. If you have to ask that question then obviously it must point to your errant understanding. If you understood it fully, there would be no question about what I've said. Spastic.
I gave you a sincere answer. If you have to ask that question then obviously it must point to your errant understanding. If you understood it fully, there would be no question about what I've said. Spastic.
kook !!mCVqftDha replied with this 10 years ago, 28 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #650,536
Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo replied with this 10 years ago, 12 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #650,537
@650,533 (Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo)
'Able to understanding'
You can't form a simple sentence without fucking it up big time and then you say 'you can't read it because I'm smart'
It's baffling
'Able to understanding'
You can't form a simple sentence without fucking it up big time and then you say 'you can't read it because I'm smart'
It's baffling
!MLHqI35Srs replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #650,540
@previous (Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo)
Typographical error, spastic.
Of course if this was spoken, I wouldn't have an issue not regulating my co-ordination. I don't have to co-ordinate my mouth in the same way I do my hands.
God, what's with neurotypicals and a lack of elementary logic?
Typographical error, spastic.
Of course if this was spoken, I wouldn't have an issue not regulating my co-ordination. I don't have to co-ordinate my mouth in the same way I do my hands.
God, what's with neurotypicals and a lack of elementary logic?
Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #650,542
@previous (!MLHqI35Srs)
> I don't have to co-ordinate my mouth in the same way I do my hands.
Does this mean you can't talk whilst flapping your hands?
> I don't have to co-ordinate my mouth in the same way I do my hands.
Does this mean you can't talk whilst flapping your hands?
Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #650,546
@650,540 (!MLHqI35Srs)
No, it's nearly every one of your posts. it's beyond typos when your shit makes no sense consistently
Don't talk about logic ya nut
Like 1 in 10 people here are actually even neurotypical
No, it's nearly every one of your posts. it's beyond typos when your shit makes no sense consistently
Don't talk about logic ya nut
Like 1 in 10 people here are actually even neurotypical
!MLHqI35Srs replied with this 10 years ago, 10 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #650,547
@650,542 (Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo)
What does gross/fine co-ordination have to do with multitasking?
Like I said, none of you know ANYTHING about autism.
What does gross/fine co-ordination have to do with multitasking?
Like I said, none of you know ANYTHING about autism.
Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo replied with this 10 years ago, 39 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #650,549
Anonymous P replied with this 10 years ago, 42 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #650,550
@650,535 (!MLHqI35Srs)
You and I have enough trouble communicating without you mangling the meanings of simple words.
You and I have enough trouble communicating without you mangling the meanings of simple words.
squeegee replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #650,551
@650,509 (!MLHqI35Srs)
that's some pretty tasty and unreadably meaningless salad you made there. got some drivel dressing to go with that?
that's some pretty tasty and unreadably meaningless salad you made there. got some drivel dressing to go with that?
!MLHqI35Srs replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #650,552
@previous (squeegee)
I.e. you've distorted it beyond the realms of comprehension with your overbearingly contemptuous disdain like a fucking douche. Got it.
I.e. you've distorted it beyond the realms of comprehension with your overbearingly contemptuous disdain like a fucking douche. Got it.
Anonymous R joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 33 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #650,554
Why do you care about his dox when he posts public videos on youtube like this?
http://sendvid.com/yshdvzrv
Check out the nasty interior of the house. How can one womyn be so unhygienic?
http://sendvid.com/yshdvzrv
Check out the nasty interior of the house. How can one womyn be so unhygienic?
beckyderp !4aMoRa.T2Q (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 49 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #650,556
Anonymous R replied with this 10 years ago, 46 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #650,557
No. It's a Sophie rant video about an Indian bus driver destroying his sperg bus pass and how it's the jews fault for it all.
(Edited 37 seconds later.)
!MLHqI35Srs replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #650,559
squeegee replied with this 10 years ago, 37 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #650,560
@650,552 (!MLHqI35Srs)
no, you literally are making up words that i can't even google the definitions of. how am i supposed to know what you're talking about when your words are literally without definition and the context is all over the place. the fuck are you even going on about. the last couple of sentences don't even apply me, what the fuck are you talking about you scatterbrained train wreck?
no, you literally are making up words that i can't even google the definitions of. how am i supposed to know what you're talking about when your words are literally without definition and the context is all over the place. the fuck are you even going on about. the last couple of sentences don't even apply me, what the fuck are you talking about you scatterbrained train wreck?
Anonymous R replied with this 10 years ago, 57 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #650,561
@650,559 (!MLHqI35Srs)
It's too funny not to mate. You think your Psych's haven't seen your youtube channel? You're the best self-incriminating indicter in the history of mentally ill people.
It's too funny not to mate. You think your Psych's haven't seen your youtube channel? You're the best self-incriminating indicter in the history of mentally ill people.
RWBY Rhubarb? !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #650,562
@650,556 (beckyderp !4aMoRa.T2Q)
It's a virus that tells the NZ troll where you live.
Your dream is coming true.
It's a virus that tells the NZ troll where you live.
Your dream is coming true.
Anonymous Q replied with this 10 years ago, 58 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #650,564
squeegee replied with this 10 years ago, 25 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #650,565
@650,559 (!MLHqI35Srs)
clean your house. it takes you like 7 minutes to climb over all that trash. at least forge a trail so you can get around easier
clean your house. it takes you like 7 minutes to climb over all that trash. at least forge a trail so you can get around easier
!MLHqI35Srs replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #650,567
Anonymous R replied with this 10 years ago, 23 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #650,577
Says the man who pretends to be a woman on the internet and before that pretended to be a 50 year old Irish Mechanic. Do the fine people of this chan even know why you pretended to be a middle-aged Irish mechanic? It has a whole lot to do with me and 789chan. We should let that era be forgotten, boy. Their opinion of you might even lower further.
Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #650,578
@previous (R)
I remember that time. I remember it even better, now that you have reminded me of it. Thanks.
I remember that time. I remember it even better, now that you have reminded me of it. Thanks.
!MLHqI35Srs replied with this 10 years ago, 12 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #650,579
@650,577 (R)
That was David's idea, more than my own; then we decided to make a propaganda apparatus out of it, which worked in converting some of your plebiscite to Autphagism.
That was David's idea, more than my own; then we decided to make a propaganda apparatus out of it, which worked in converting some of your plebiscite to Autphagism.
Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #650,580
@previous (!MLHqI35Srs)
When did "David" decide that it would be a good idea to bluespike you into castrating yourself, Mr. Gillon?
When did "David" decide that it would be a good idea to bluespike you into castrating yourself, Mr. Gillon?
!MLHqI35Srs replied with this 10 years ago, 37 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #650,581
Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #650,582
@previous (!MLHqI35Srs)Oh, the castration thing was "Alexander Gillaspie's" idea, wasn't it, Mr. Gillon?
Triptych !!/xkPL9myM joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #650,583
@650,567 (!MLHqI35Srs)
holy shit your house is disgusting
i thought i was messy
you are almost at green levels
besides that, this entire thread is moot bc despite how becky feels about a particular poster she takes dox seriously
holy shit your house is disgusting
i thought i was messy
you are almost at green levels
besides that, this entire thread is moot bc despite how becky feels about a particular poster she takes dox seriously
Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo replied with this 10 years ago, 34 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #650,584
Triptych !!/xkPL9myM replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #650,585
@previous (Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo)
abrasive but lovable
like a medium dog made out of sandpaper
abrasive but lovable
like a medium dog made out of sandpaper
(Edited 2 minutes later.)
Anonymous R replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #650,586
One of the real reasons that "autphag" the mechanic came to be was because back in 2011. 789chan use to clown his former mentor and John Wayne Gacy look-alike "David Chac". We also use to roast on his other buddy who even Sobriquet won't defend anymore(Jim Profit). Well, there was an Old School lulcow named "Bob McBob" aka Robert Ethier. This gentleman was an 80 IQ fat jolly fellow who use to scream in to the mic about wrestling and his dream wedding. A certain homebody named "tator" wearing a trench coat tried to troll Bob McBob. That didn't end up so well and everybody on 789chan laughed at this individual's 10 year ween tactics. A few months later a Folderal writing fool named with autism in his title tried to spam 789chan. The userbase laughed at his tactics so much that we dubbed him "autphag". This individual would go in to IRC and try to probe me all the time. Little Homie wanted to be like us, but couldn't rock with us.
Kid, you wanted to be Jordan, but you ended up as Rodman. ;)
Kid, you wanted to be Jordan, but you ended up as Rodman. ;)
!MLHqI35Srs replied with this 10 years ago, 15 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #650,588
@previous (R)
Autphag was my own neologism.
David Chac wasn't known to the chans until 2014 and successfully hid behind the scenes. The most you discerned was an early profile of his named Jack Davis.
What's more, I virtually never went into IRC until near the end of 789chan's life.
Nice pathological lying, just like a true neurofemale, introman. Are you an FtM perchance? You always came across as one.
Autphag was my own neologism.
David Chac wasn't known to the chans until 2014 and successfully hid behind the scenes. The most you discerned was an early profile of his named Jack Davis.
What's more, I virtually never went into IRC until near the end of 789chan's life.
Nice pathological lying, just like a true neurofemale, introman. Are you an FtM perchance? You always came across as one.
(Edited 2 minutes later.)
Anonymous R replied with this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #650,589
@previous (!MLHqI35Srs)
@previous (!MLHqI35Srs)
> Autphag was my own neologism.
Never said it was my idea, and attribute the persona on your end.
> What's more, I virtually never went into IRC until near the end of 789chan's life.
Again, you were laughed off of 789chan in late 2011 and came back in the summer of 2012 as an autism spammer.
> Nice pathological lying, just like a true neurofemale, introman. Are you an FtM perchance? You always came across as one.
How was I pathologically lying about this? Why are you throwing shit like neurofemale around?
Just because somebody doesn't like your shennanigans doesn't make them part of a group you distrust. Accusing your enemies of being opposing trannies/jews/admins is some funny shit.
@previous (!MLHqI35Srs)
> Autphag was my own neologism.
Never said it was my idea, and attribute the persona on your end.
> What's more, I virtually never went into IRC until near the end of 789chan's life.
Again, you were laughed off of 789chan in late 2011 and came back in the summer of 2012 as an autism spammer.
> Nice pathological lying, just like a true neurofemale, introman. Are you an FtM perchance? You always came across as one.
How was I pathologically lying about this? Why are you throwing shit like neurofemale around?
Just because somebody doesn't like your shennanigans doesn't make them part of a group you distrust. Accusing your enemies of being opposing trannies/jews/admins is some funny shit.
!MLHqI35Srs replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #650,590
@previous (R)
I'm not even your enemy though, that's the thing. You had a violent moodswing some time in the last 6 months and decided I was yours, though. I don't know why that is, nor do I wish to entertain your arch nemesis arc. You've warped the past in your mind to something special though, and for that matter, a completely different version of events to that which you originally pertained to some years ago when we last spoke on Skype.
I still think you're a joke for trying to troll the NHS as part of your crusade, though.
I'm not even your enemy though, that's the thing. You had a violent moodswing some time in the last 6 months and decided I was yours, though. I don't know why that is, nor do I wish to entertain your arch nemesis arc. You've warped the past in your mind to something special though, and for that matter, a completely different version of events to that which you originally pertained to some years ago when we last spoke on Skype.
I still think you're a joke for trying to troll the NHS as part of your crusade, though.
(Edited 43 seconds later.)
Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo replied with this 10 years ago, 20 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #650,591
beckyderp !4aMoRa.T2Q (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #650,592
@650,590 (!MLHqI35Srs)
Why did you start disliking me? I pretty much ignored you and have never Big Daddy Derek'd you. Honestly, I was really confused by your response to my PM. I barely know you.
Why did you start disliking me? I pretty much ignored you and have never Big Daddy Derek'd you. Honestly, I was really confused by your response to my PM. I barely know you.
(Edited 13 seconds later.)
!MLHqI35Srs replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #650,593
@previous (beckyderp !4aMoRa.T2Q)
Your site's - and this was the case as soon as I got here, though I'm informed by Fuchs this wasn't always the case - turned into a version of Bible Study 2.0 where the Bible is substituted with Al Salinsky's Rules for Radicals. That's why I don't trust anyone here. Nothing entirely personal.
Your site's - and this was the case as soon as I got here, though I'm informed by Fuchs this wasn't always the case - turned into a version of Bible Study 2.0 where the Bible is substituted with Al Salinsky's Rules for Radicals. That's why I don't trust anyone here. Nothing entirely personal.
Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo replied with this 10 years ago, 14 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #650,594
beckyderp !4aMoRa.T2Q (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #650,597
kook !!mCVqftDha replied with this 10 years ago, 10 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #650,601
!MLHqI35Srs replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #650,602
@previous (kook !!mCVqftDha)
What? That has nothing to do with it.
You're a den of leftists and it indicts badly on your conscientousness (some less than others; kook's relatively tolerable).
What? That has nothing to do with it.
You're a den of leftists and it indicts badly on your conscientousness (some less than others; kook's relatively tolerable).
Anonymous Q replied with this 10 years ago, 10 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #650,604
kook !!mCVqftDha replied with this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #650,605
@650,602 (!MLHqI35Srs)
Thank you for tolerating me. Who made tbhis topic, do you think?
http://minichan.org/topic/50096
Thank you for tolerating me. Who made tbhis topic, do you think?
http://minichan.org/topic/50096
Anonymous Q replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #650,606
Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo replied with this 10 years ago, 4 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #650,609
@650,602 (!MLHqI35Srs)
How is a bunch of nerds shitting on feminism and writing slurs all day a den of leftists
How is a bunch of nerds shitting on feminism and writing slurs all day a den of leftists
kook !!mCVqftDha replied with this 10 years ago, 13 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #650,612
Metæ replied with this 10 years ago, 14 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #650,617
@650,605 (kook !!mCVqftDha)
> Al Salinsky's Rules for Radicals
It's Saul Alinsky you retard. For all your prating about "Judæonegroid matriarchy" you'd think you'd be able to get their names right. Sheesh.
> Al Salinsky's Rules for Radicals
It's Saul Alinsky you retard. For all your prating about "Judæonegroid matriarchy" you'd think you'd be able to get their names right. Sheesh.
(Edited 18 seconds later.)
!MLHqI35Srs replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #650,618
@previous (Metæ)
I was high while reading his work though, and this was way back during Occupy days. As for retardation and "penny ideas for million dollars terminology", you must be the worst, and most pretentious offender of this convention, you fucking pontificating freak.
I was high while reading his work though, and this was way back during Occupy days. As for retardation and "penny ideas for million dollars terminology", you must be the worst, and most pretentious offender of this convention, you fucking pontificating freak.
(Edited 43 seconds later.)
r04r replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #650,619
!MLHqI35Srs replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #650,620
r04r replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #650,621
@previous (!MLHqI35Srs)
You still haven't explained why you think I'm obese. Is it just your go-to lashing out thing, or what?
You still haven't explained why you think I'm obese. Is it just your go-to lashing out thing, or what?
!MLHqI35Srs replied with this 10 years ago, 27 seconds later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #650,622
r04r replied with this 10 years ago, 28 seconds later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #650,623
@previous (!MLHqI35Srs)
Yeah, you said it was Walter. We then agreed that it is nonsense, which it is.
Yeah, you said it was Walter. We then agreed that it is nonsense, which it is.
r04r double-posted this 10 years ago, 56 seconds later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #650,624
!MLHqI35Srs replied with this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #650,625
@previous (r04r)
But I literally do believe in this mental image. It just seems so stereotypically Hollandish. That's the problem.
But I literally do believe in this mental image. It just seems so stereotypically Hollandish. That's the problem.
r04r replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #650,626
@previous (!MLHqI35Srs)
Holland is just two provinces, you know? The word you're looking for is Dutch. Anyway, if you're going to make shit up, at least do try to make it entertaining. "You're fat!" is just boring and makes it seem like you're 12 years old.
Holland is just two provinces, you know? The word you're looking for is Dutch. Anyway, if you're going to make shit up, at least do try to make it entertaining. "You're fat!" is just boring and makes it seem like you're 12 years old.
!MLHqI35Srs replied with this 10 years ago, 4 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #650,630
@previous (r04r)
We use the terms interchangably in British English and it's my language. Also, Walter made it up, not I; however, I've deliberately taken it as fact on face value.
We use the terms interchangably in British English and it's my language. Also, Walter made it up, not I; however, I've deliberately taken it as fact on face value.
r04r replied with this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #650,634
@previous (!MLHqI35Srs)
For someone who spergs out about being correct about language, you sure are happy to use an incorrect term. Please consult your thesaurus, which I'm sure you have handy.
For someone who spergs out about being correct about language, you sure are happy to use an incorrect term. Please consult your thesaurus, which I'm sure you have handy.
(Edited 22 seconds later.)
!MLHqI35Srs replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #650,636
@previous (r04r)
Yes, because the Netherlands is an irrelevant non-entity in our public consciousness.
Your country is so self-important, you know?
Yes, because the Netherlands is an irrelevant non-entity in our public consciousness.
Your country is so self-important, you know?
(Edited 29 seconds later.)