Topic: Only one race, the Ashkenazi Jew, could be so deft as to be singlehandedly credited for...
!MLHqI35Srs started this discussion 10 years ago #49,948
Preventing one's transitioning; caluminating one on the medical record with such expert crassness and aspersively devaluative moralization, bereft of scientific substantiation; spreading equally calumnious reputational errors of the mismeasure of character; aspersing to reclusive obscurity the general reputation of one's personal integrity; stripping one of aristocratic rank attained by the righteous ascendancy ancestrally of the brood's pedigree-blooded birthright; bulldozing the integrity of ancestral honour attained thereby the aforesaid whilst galvanizing the honour of an inferior bloodline and miscegenating them with members of one's own tribal nativity; enticing tantilizingly the tenaciously withheld lust for sexually aberrantly persuaded transgression with homogenously sexed members and even in Levtically prohibited passages constituing Sodomious perversion, etc.
Metæ joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 5 minutes later[^] [v] #648,683
I thought Jews were behind transgenderism???
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 6 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #648,684
Delusional babbling as usual.
!MLHqI35Srs (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 7 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #648,686
@648,683 (Metæ)
But they get to select who transitions; if it's politically kosher, you may proceed; if it is unpropituous, i.e. a neurohypermale convinced in the femininity of their own kind's women's characteristics, that is incorrect, it is seen in the Cohenitic lore, seeing as that would acknowledge a "womanhood with Aspergian characreristics" proscribed in the paradigmitic whorishness conventionally regarded to be pantheonically sacrosanct.
But they get to select who transitions; if it's politically kosher, you may proceed; if it is unpropituous, i.e. a neurohypermale convinced in the femininity of their own kind's women's characteristics, that is incorrect, it is seen in the Cohenitic lore, seeing as that would acknowledge a "womanhood with Aspergian characreristics" proscribed in the paradigmitic whorishness conventionally regarded to be pantheonically sacrosanct.
Metæ replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 10 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #648,687
squeegee joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 41 minutes later, 52 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #648,698
calling you a fake tranny again, huh? those darn psychiatric establishment jews.
Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 53 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #648,699
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 9 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #648,702
RWBY Rhubarb? !!iNo3FkiZx joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 19 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #648,707
Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 2 hours later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #648,743
caluminating